Planning on a prior intention
Sidebar
Main
Abstract
Intention plays a central role in coordinating action. It does so, it is commonly thought, by allowing one to plan further actions for the future on the basis of the belief that it will be executed. Doxasticists about intention (Harman, Velleman) conclude from this that accounting for this role of intention requires accepting the thesis that intention involves belief. Conativists about intention (Bratman, Brunero, Mele) reject that conclusion. I argue that Doxasticists are right in calling attention to the existence of a cognitive aspect to intention-based coordination, but that such an aspect is better understood in terms of the attitude of reliance than of belief. I also argue that an appeal to reliance affords Conativists with useful resources for explaining that aspect of intention-based coordination in a way that is compatible with their rejection of the thesis that intention involves belief.
Details

This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- William Ratoff,Radical Cognitivism about Practical Reason,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 26 No 1 (2023): Volume XXVI, Issue 1
- Alida Liberman,Reconsidering Resolutions,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 10 No 2 (2016): Volume X, Issue 2
- Linda Barclay,Paternalism, Supported Decision-Making and Expressive Respect,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 27 No 1 (2024): Volume XXVII, Issue 1
- Benjamin Lennertz,Uncertainty and Intention,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 25 No 3 (2023): Volume XXV, Issue 3
- Jan Willem Wieland,Kantian Free Riding,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 29 No 1 (2024): Volume XXIX, Issue 1
- Massimo Renzo,Helping the Rebels,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 13 No 3 (2018): Volume XIII, Issue 3
- Anna Brinkerhoff,The Moral Virtue of Social Consciousness,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 29 No 1 (2024): Volume XXIX, Issue 1
- Graham Hubbs,Answerability Without Answers,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 7 No 3 (2013): Volume VII, Issue 3
- Keyao Yang,Responsibility and the Social Dimension of Addiction,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 30 No 5 (2025): Volume XXX, Issue 5
- Kathryn Lindeman,Constitutivism without Normative Thresholds,Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: Vol 12 No 3 (2017): Volume XII, Issue 3
You may alsostart an advanced similarity search for this article.





