- English
- Français
Article contents
The Historian and the Indian: Racial Bias in American History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
- Jack D. Forbes*
- Affiliation:San Fernando Valley State College, Northridge, California
Extract
The student of history who is concerned with the historical past of the American Indian and who is also a reader of general American historical works is faced with a provocative problem which apparently does not seriously bother other members of the historical profession. That is, he is aware of the question of defining what is meant by the concepts of “United States history “and “American history.” Most historically minded people would solve the problem very simply: American history is the story of America’s past (meaning by “American “the United States of America only) or, Unįted States history is the story of the development of the United States as a nation and as a region.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1963
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
1Boorstin,Daniel J., cited inHagan,W.T.,American Indians (Chicago,1961), p.viiGoogle Scholar.
2Craven,Avery andJohnson,Walter,The United States, Experiment in Democracy (New York,1952), pp.xi, xvii, 17.Google Scholar
3Hicks,John D.,A Short History of American Democracy (Boston,1949), p.1.Google Scholar
4Hicks,John D.,The Federal Union (Boston,1948), p.2.Google Scholar
5Hofstadter,Richard,Miller,William, andAaron,Daniel,The United States: The History of a Republic (Englewood Cliffs,1957), pp.v–vi, 1, 20–22.Google Scholar
6Current,Richard N.,Williams,T. Harry, andFreidel,Frank,American History: A Survey (New York,1961), pp.3, 343.Google Scholar
7Bailey,Thomas A.,The American Pageant (Boston,1956), pp.3, 47, 50, 65–7, 571.Google Scholar
8 InArizona and the West, v.I, no.3,1959Google Scholar.
9 It should be noted that the Indian element in the United States is increasing rapidly in proportion to the balance of the population. Aside from the constant influx of Puerto Ricans and Cubans of White-Negro-Indian ancestry and the continued entrance of Indian Mexicans, is the fact that the Indian-Mexican segment of the population is increasing about seven times as fast as the White and almost three times as fast as the Negro, due to a very high birth rate.
10Adams,James Truslow,Provincial Society (New York,1927), pp.101–107Google Scholar.
11 Of course, these figures are only indicative and would be altered if the descendants of a case of intermarriage intermarried themselves.
12Herskovitz,Melville J.,The American Negro (New York,1928), p.33.Google Scholar
13Hallowell,A. Irving,The Backwash of the Frontier: The Impact of the Indian on American Culture (Washington,1959), pp.448, 470Google Scholar.

