Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Comparison of Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Dipyrone in the Treatment of Renal Colic

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used for pain relief in patients with renal colic. Dexketoprofen trometamol is an NSAID that has demonstrated good analgesic efficacy and a good safety profile after oral administration in different models of acute and chronic pain.

Objective: To assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of single intramuscular doses of dexketoprofen trometamol (25 and 50mg) compared with dipyrone (2g) in moderate to severe pain due to renal colic.

Study design: Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.

Patients: Patients of both sexes aged 18–70 years with a diagnosis of renal colic were eligible for randomisation if they presented with at least moderate pain as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring ≥40mm on a scale of 100mm immediately before study drug administration.

Methods: Assessment of analgesic efficacy was done using standard pain intensity and pain relief scales. Total scores from baseline to 6 hours after study drug administration were calculated for the sum of pain intensity differences relative to baseline (SPID), sum of analogue pain intensity differences relative to baseline (SAPID) and total pain relief scores (TOTPAR) as primary efficacy endpoints. Secondary efficacy and safety variables were also analysed.

Results: A total of 333 patients (dexketoprofen 25mg, n = 112; dexketoprofen 50mg, n = 113; dipyrone 2g, n = 108) were included in the study. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups with regard to SPID (p = 0.797), SAPID (p = 0.852) and TOTPAR (p = 0.716). The time-effect course for pain intensity differences and pain relief showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values for both doses of dexketoprofen trometamol compared with dipyrone during the first hour after treatment administration. More than 90% of the patients in all three groups achieved pain relief of at least 50% as compared with baseline. Similarly, over 70% of the patients in all three groups considered the received treatment as excellent or good in the overall assessment of efficacy at the end of the study. No dose-effect relationship was observed in this pain model between both doses of dexketoprofen trometamol. All three treatments were well tolerated, showing mostly mild to moderate adverse events.

Conclusion: Dexketoprofen trometamol is a good analgesic for the treatment of moderate to severe pain due to renal colic, with a good safety profile and an efficacy comparable to that of dipyrone. The significantly greater effect of dexketoprofen trometamol early after administration suggests a faster onset of action, which can be of paramount importance in this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1 Use of tradenames is for product identification only and does not imply endorsement;

References

  1. Wasserstein AG. Nephrolithiasis: acute management and prevention. Dis Mon 1998; 44: 196–213

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saklayen MG. Medical management of nephrolithiasis. Med Clin North Am 1997; 81: 785–99

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Laecke E, Oosterlinck W. Physiopathology of renal colic and the therapeutic consequences. Acta Urol Belg 1994; 62: 15–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larkin GL, Peacock WF, Pearl SM, et al. Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17: 6–19

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon J, Roumeguere T, Vaessen C, et al. Conservative management of ureteric stones. Acta Urol Belg 1997; 65: 7–9

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordell WH, Wright SW, Wolfson AE, et al. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac, meperidine and both (balanced analgesia) for renal colic. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28: 151–8

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Labrecque M, Dostaler LP, Rouselle R, et al. Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of acute renal colic: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1381–7

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mauleón D, Artigas R, Garcia ML, et al. Preclinical and clinical development of dexketoprofen. Drugs 1996; 52 Suppl. 5: 34–46

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suesa N, Fernández MF, Gutiérrez M, et al. Stereoselective cyclooxygenase inhibition in cellular models by the enantiomers of ketoprofen. Chirality 1993; 5: 589–95

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayball P, Nation RL, Bochner F. Enantioselective pharmaco-dynamics of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketoprofen: in vitro inhibition of human platelet cyclooxygenase activity. Chirality 1992; 4: 484–7

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carabaza A, Cabré F, Rotllan E, et al. Stereoselective inhibition of inducible cyclooxygenase by chiral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 36: 505–12

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cabré F, Fernández MF, Calvo L, et al. Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects of S-(+)-ketoprofen in vivo. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 3S–10S

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calvo L, Fernandez MF, Ferrer X, et al. Analgesic activity of ketoprofen enantiomers in the abdominal pain induced by intraperitoneal injections of etacrinic acid in the rat. Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1994; 16 Suppl. 1: 83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bagán JV, López-Arranz JS, Valencia E, et al. Clinical comparison of dexketoprofen trometamol and dipyrone in postoperative dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 46S–54S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beltrán J, Martín-Mola E, Figueroa M, et al. Comparison of dexketoprofen trometamol and ketoprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 74S–80S

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ezcurdia M, Cortejoso FJ, Lanzón R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of dexketoprofen and ketoprofen in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 65S–73S

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gay C, Planas E, Donado M, et al. Analgesic efficacy of low doses of dexketoprofen in the dental pain model. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 11: 320–30

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McGurk M, Robinson P, Rajayogeswaran V, et al. Clinical comparison of dexketoprofen trometamol, ketoprofen and placebo in postoperative dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 46S–54S

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marenco JL, Pérez M, Navarro FJ, et al. A multicentre, randomised, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of dexketoprofen trometamol versus diclofenac in the symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Invest 2000; 19: 247–56

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tramèr MR, Williams JE, Carroll D, et al. Comparing analgesic efficacy of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs given by different routes in acute and chronic pain: a qualitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 71–9

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa J, Zapata A Marlasca MJ, et al. Tolerability of single intravenous dose of dexketoprofen trometamol in healthy volunteers. VII World Conference on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (IUPHAR). 4th Congress of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT). Florence 15–20 July. Br J Clin Pharmacol; CPT 2000: 218

  22. Collaborative Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology. Comparative study of the efficacy of dipyrone, diclofenac sodium and pethidine in acute renal colic. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 40: 543–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muriel C, Ortiz P, Cooperative Study Group. Efficacy of two different intramuscular doses of dipyrone in acute renal colic. Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1993; 15: 465–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Muriel-Villoria C, Zungri-Telo E, Diaz-Curiel M, et al. Comparison of the onset and duration of the analgesic effect of dipyrone, 1 or 2g by the intramuscular or intravenous route, in acute renal colic. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 48: 103–7

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Magrini M, Pavesi G, Liverta C, et al. Intravenous ketoprofen in renal colic: a placebo-controlled pilot study. Clin Ther 1984; 6: 483–7

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergus GR. Pain relief for renal colic. J Fam Pract 1996; 43: 438–40

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zwergel U, Feigner J, Rombach H, et al. Current conservative treatment of renal colic: value of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors. Schmerz 1998; 12: 112–7

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. British Medical Association, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary, 37th ed. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: ketoprofen, 1999 Mar: 441

  29. Barbanoj MJ, Gich I, Artigas R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of dex-ketoprofen trometamol in healthy volunteers after single and repeated oral doses. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38: 33S–40S

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warrington S, Boyce M, Johnston A, et al. Two-way crossover bioequivalence study of single intramuscular doses of dex-ketoprofen (LM-1158.TRIS) and an established formulation of racemate ketoprofen in healthy volunteers. Report code LM-1158.IM Phase A (0-kef/Beq). Data on file, Laboratorios Menarini, SA

  31. Barbanoj MJ, Antonijoan RM, Gich I. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dexketoprofen. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40: 245–62

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin Carrasco C, Rodriguez Vázquez M, Palacios Garcia R. Estudio doble ciego de la eficacia analgésica en el cólico nefrítico de la asociación de dipirona y espasmolítico con el ketorolaco trometamol. Arch Esp Urol 1993; 46: 763–8

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brogden R. Pyrazolone derivatives. Drugs 1986; 32 Suppl. 4: 60–70

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levy M, Zylber-Katz E, Rosenkranz B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dipyrone and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995; 28: 216–34

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hetherington JW, Philip NH. Diclofenac sodium versus pethidine in acute renal colic. BMJ 1986; 292: 237–8

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Oosterlinck W, Philip NH, Charig C, et al. A double-blind single dose comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine in treatment of renal colic. J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: 336–41

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Menarini Research. The authors thank Marta Pulido, MD, for editing the manuscript and for editorial assistance.

Participating investigators of the Dexketoprofen Renal Colic Study Group are: J. Sánchez-Carpena, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia; M. Mariné Blanco, Hospital de El Escorial, Madrid; C. Sánchez Juan, Hospital de Sagunto, Valencia; J. Rico Salvadó, Hospital de la Creu Roja, Barcelona; S. Tomás Vecina, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona; J.C. Gordillo Ballesteros, Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona; F. Roqueta Egea, Centre Hospitalari Unitat Coronària de Manresa, Manresa, Barcelona; J. Sesma Sánchez, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona; J.A. Serrano Martínez, Hospital Morales Messeguer, Murcia; C. Galbán Rodríguez, Hospital Gil Casares, Santiago de Compostela, and A. Martín Joven, Policlínico de Vigo, S.A., Pontevedra, Spain. P. Jerntrop, Akutkliniken Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Malmo, and G. Persson, Akutenheten Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden. M. Leivonen, Peijas Hospital, Vantaa; J. Kallio, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere; M. Multanen, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, and E. Wuokko, Maria Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain

    Juan Sánchez-Carpena

  2. Emergency Department, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

    Javier Sesma-Sánchez

  3. Emergency Department, Hospital de Sagunto, Valencia, Spain

    Carlos Sánchez-Juan

  4. Emergency Department, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

    Santiago Tomás-Vecina

  5. Emergency Department, Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

    Dolors García-Alonso

  6. Emergency Department, Hospital de la Creu Roja L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Rico-Salvadó

  7. Menarini Research, Florence, Italy

    Mónica Forns, Marta Mas, Isabel Paredes &  Remei Artigas

  8. Barcelona, Spain

    Mónica Forns, Marta Mas, Isabel Paredes &  Remei Artigas

  9. Laboratorios Menarini, SA, Clinical Research, C/ Alfons XII 587, E-08918, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

    Remei Artigas

Authors
  1. Juan Sánchez-Carpena

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier Sesma-Sánchez

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Sánchez-Juan

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Santiago Tomás-Vecina

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dolors García-Alonso

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jordi Rico-Salvadó

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mónica Forns

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marta Mas

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Isabel Paredes

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Remei Artigas

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Dexketoprofen Renal Colic Study Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remei Artigas.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Carpena, J., Sesma-Sánchez, J., Sánchez-Juan, C.et al. Comparison of Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Dipyrone in the Treatment of Renal Colic.Clin. Drug Investig.23, 139–152 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200323030-00001

Download citation

Keywords

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp