Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent
62 PagesPosted: 30 May 2000
Curtis Bradley
University of Chicago - Law School
Jack Landman Goldsmith
Harvard Law School
Date Written: May 2000
Abstract
The U.S. treaty-makers have consistently attached conditions to their consent to modern human rights treaties, in the form of reservations, understandings, and declarations ("RUDs"). Through these RUDs, the treatymakers have sought to limit their consent to international obligations that the United States is constitutionally and politically able to comply with, and to ensure that these obligations are implemented in a manner consistent with principles of separation of powers and federalism. The conventional wisdom among scholars is that the RUDs are invalid under international law and U.S. domestic law, and are harmful to the international human rights movement. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom about RUDs. It argues that the RUDs serve as a useful bridge between isolationists who want to preserve the United States' sovereign prerogatives, and internationalists who want the United States to increase its involvement in international institutions -- a political divide that has had a debilitating effect on U.S. participation in international human rights regimes since World War II. In addition, RUDs help reconcile fundamental changes in international law with the requirements of the U.S. constitutional system. The RUDs achieve these ends in ways that are valid under both international and domestic law.
Suggested Citation:Suggested Citation
Curtis Bradley (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School (email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Related eJournals
Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS5,643PAPERS1,883This Journal is curated by:Stuart Minor Benjamin at Duke University School of Law ,Margaret H. Lemos at Duke University School of LawUniversity of Chicago Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
University of Chicago Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS4,176PAPERS910This Journal is curated by:Richard H. McAdams at University of Chicago - Law School ,Aziz Z. Huq at University of Chicago - Law School ,Alison L. LaCroix at University of Chicago - Law SchoolUniversity of Virginia Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
University of Virginia Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS3,459PAPERS1,472This Journal is curated by:Ashley S. Deeks at University of Virginia School of LawU.S. Constitutional Law: Separation of Powers & Federalism eJournal
U.S. Constitutional Law: Separation of Powers & Federalism eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS1,952PAPERS7,442This Journal is curated by:Kevin Tobia at Georgetown University Law Center ,Joseph Blocher at Duke University School of LawPublic International Law: Human Rights eJournal
Public International Law: Human Rights eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS1,295PAPERS15,049This Journal is curated by:Alan Sykes at Stanford Law SchoolHuman Rights eJournal
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS7PAPERS29,621FeedbackFeedback to SSRN
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp
