Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-13T17:20:19.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vavilovian Mimicry: Nikolai Vavilov and His Little-Known Impact on Weed Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017

J. Scott McElroy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
*
Corresponding author's E-mail:mcelroy@auburn.edu
Save PDF (0.16 mb)View PDF[Opens in a new window]
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov was an early 20th century Russian plant scientist who was killed by Joseph Stalin in 1943 for his adherence to basic genetic principles. Vavilov is well known within plant breeding and plant evolutionary biology circles, yet the science of Vavilov is just as important to the field of weed science. Specifically, Vavilov proposed that certain weeds adapted to weed control practices to survive in prehistorical agrarian societies. Most would refer to this adaption as crop mimicry, but the term “Vavilovian mimicry” is more apt. Vavilovian mimicry requires three factors: a model—the crop or desirable plant; a mimic—the weed; and an operator—the discriminating agent, possibly human, animal, or machine. In a modern context, it is proposed that weed adaptation to herbicide applications be included as a form of Vavilovian mimicry, with the acknowledgement that the operator is the herbicide. In this context, Vavilovian mimicry is the adaption of the weed mimic to be perceived by the operator as visually, physically, or biochemically indistinguishable from the crop model. This review will cover the history and legacy of Vavilov in a condensed version in the hope that weed scientists will hold this individual in high regard in our future endeavors and begin to acknowledge Vavilov as one of the first scientists to propose that weeds can mimic the attributes of crops.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

References

Literature Cited

Barrett,SCH (1983)Crop mimicry in weeds.Econ Bot.37:255282Google Scholar
Barrett,SCH,Wilson,BF (1981)Colonizing ability in theEchinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyard grass). I. Variation in life history.Can. J. Bot.59:18441860Google Scholar
Culpepper,AS,Grey,TL,Vencill,WK,Kichler,JM,Webster,TM,Brown,SM,York,AC,Davis,JW,Hanna,WW (2006)Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranth palmeri) confirmed in Georgia.Weed Sci.54:620626Google Scholar
Crow,CF (1993)N.I. Vavilov, martyr to genetic truth.Genetics.134:14Google Scholar
Danquah,EY,Johnson,DE,Riches,C,Arnold,GM,Karp,A (2002)Genetic diversity inEchinochloa spp. collected from different geographic origins and within rice fields in Cote d'Ivoire.Weed Res.42:394405Google Scholar
De Wet,JMJ,Harlan,JR (1975)Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat.Econ Bot.29:99107Google Scholar
Dmitriev,VS (1951)The primary source of origin ofBromus secalinus and measures for its liquidation.Agrobiologija.6:615Google Scholar
Dmitriev,VS (1952)Concerning the primary source of origin ofBromus secalinus and measures for it liquidation.Agrobiologija.1:3943Google Scholar
Dwivedi,AD,Gopal,K (2010)Biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles usingChenopodium album leaf extract.Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects.369:2733Google Scholar
Ellstrand,NC,Heredia,SM,Leak-Garcia,JA,Heraty,JH,Burger,JC,Yao,L,Nohzadeh-Malakshah,S,Ridley,CE (2010)Crops gone wild: evolution of weeds and invasives from domesticated ancestors.Evol Appl.3:494504Google Scholar
Endler,JA (1981)An overview of the relationship between mimicry and crypsis.Biol J Linn Soc.16:2531Google Scholar
Gould,F (1991)The evolutionary potential of crop pests.Am Sci.79:496507Google Scholar
Harlan,JR (1965)The possible role of weed races in the evolution of cultivated plants.Euphytica.14:173176Google Scholar
Harlan,JR (1982)Relationships between weeds and crops. Pages9196 inHolzner,W andNumata,N, eds.Biology and Ecology of Weeds.The HagueW JunkGoogle Scholar
Harland,SC (1954)Nicolai Ivanovitch Vavilov, 1885–1942.Obit. Notices Fellows R Soc.9:259264Google Scholar
Hawkes,JG (1990)N.I. Vavilov—the man and his work.Biol J Linn Soc.39:36Google Scholar
Johnston,SK,Murray,DS,Williams,JC (1979)Germination and emergence of balloonvine (Cardiospermum halicacabum).Weed Sci.27:7376Google Scholar
La Mantia,JM,Huff,DR (2011)Instability of the greens-type phenotypePoa annua L.Crop Sci.51:17841792Google Scholar
Lizarazo,K,Fernandez-Martin,B,Becerril,JM,Garcia-Plazaola,JI (2010)Ageing and irradiance enhance vitamin E content in green edible tissues from crop plants.J Sci Food Agric.90:19941999Google Scholar
Lysenko,TD (1950)Some new ideas in the science of biological species.Proc Lenin Acad Sci USSR.12:313Google Scholar
McCoy,ED,Heck,KLJr. (1976)Biogeography of corals, seagrasses, and mangroves: an alternative to the center of origin concept.Syst Biol.25:201210Google Scholar
McElroy,JS,Walker,RH,van Santen,E (2002)Patterns of variation inPoa annua populations as revealed by canonical discriminant analysis of life history traits.Crop Sci.42:513517Google Scholar
Medvedev,ZA (1970)The rise and fall of T.D. Lysenko.Columbia University Press:New York, NY.284 pGoogle Scholar
Murphy,DJ (2007)People, plants, and genes: The story of crops and humanity.Oxford University Press:New York, NY.432 pGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy,JK,Griffith,GM,Scott,RC,Smith,KL,Oliver,LR (2008)Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas.Weed Technol.22:108–113Google Scholar
Pasteur,G (1982)A classificatory review of mimicry systems.Ann Rev Ecol Syst.13:169199Google Scholar
Pringle,P (2008)The Murder of Nikolai Vavilov.New YorkSimon and Schuster.370 pGoogle Scholar
Radosevich,SR,Holt,J,Ghersa,C (1997)Weed Ecology: Implications for Management.2nd ednNew YorkJ. Wiley.589 pGoogle Scholar
Roll-Hansen,N (2005)The Lysenko effect: undermining the autonomy of science.Endeavour.29:143147Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen,N (2008)Wishful science: the persistence of T.D. Lysenko's agrobiology in the politics of science.Osiris.23:166188Google Scholar
Rowlands,DG (1959)A case of mimicry in plants—Vicia sativa L. in lentil crops.Genetica.30:435446Google Scholar
Sakamoto,S (1982)The Middle East as a cradle for crops and weeds. Pages97109inHolzner,W andNumata,N, eds.Biology and Ecology of Weeds.The Hague, The NetherlandsDr W. Junk PublishersGoogle Scholar
Schlichting,CD,Levin,DA (1986)Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character.Biol J Linn Soc.29:3747Google Scholar
Sencer,HA,Hawkes,JG (1980)On the origin of cultivated rye.Biol J Linn Soc.13:299313Google Scholar
Shaw,WC (1964)Weed science: revolution in agricultural technology.Weed Sci.12:153162Google Scholar
Simmonds,NW (1995)Food crops: 500 years of travels. Pages3145inDuncan,RR, ed.International Germplasm Transfer: Past and Present.Madison, WICrop Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Skroch,WA,Sheets,TJ,Monaco,TJ (1975)Weed populations and herbicide residues in apple orchards after five years.Weed Sci.23:5357Google Scholar
Smith,GF,Figueiredo,E (2010)Purslane (Portulaca oleracea, Portulacaceae) in southern Africa: more useful than most succulents.Cactus Succulent J.82:116121Google Scholar
Soyfer,VN (1989)New light on the Lysenko era.Nature.339:415420Google Scholar
Stutz,HC (1972)On the origin of cultivated rye.Am J Bot.59:5970Google Scholar
Vane-Wright,RI (1980)On the definition of mimicry.Biol J Linn Soc.13:16Google Scholar
VanGessel,MJ (2001)Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware.Weed Sci.49:703705Google Scholar
Vavilov,NI (1922)The law of homologous series in variation.J Genet.12:4789Google Scholar
Vavilov,NI (1992)Origin and Geography of Cultivated Plants.Cambridge, UKPress Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.498 pGoogle Scholar
Weiss,E,Kislev,ME,Hartmann,A (2006)Autonomous cultivation before domestication.Science.312:16081610Google Scholar
Wiens,D (1978)Mimicry in plants.Evol Biol.11:365403Google Scholar
Williamson,GB (1982)Plant mimicry: evolutionary constraints.Biol J Linn Soc.18:4958Google Scholar
Wolfe,AJ (2012)The Cold War context of the Golden Jubilee, or, why we think of Mendel as the father of Genetics.J Hist Biol.45:389414Google Scholar
Young,S,Meyer,G (2012)Precision and automation weed control technology.Crops Soils Mag.45(6):49Google Scholar
Zijlstra,C,Lund,I,Justesen,AF,Nicolaisen,M,Jensen,PK,Bianciotto,V,Posta,K,Balestrini,R,Przetakiewicz,A,Czembor,E,van de Zande,J (2011)Combining novel monitoring tools and precision application technologies for integrated high-tech crop protection in the future (a discussion document).Pest Manag Sci.67:616625Google Scholar
Zimdahl,RL (2007)Principles of Weed Science.San Diego, CAAcademic.666 pGoogle Scholar
You have Access Open access