Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


We use cookies to provide you with an optimal website experience. This includes cookies that are necessary for the operation of the site as well as cookies that are only used for anonymous statistical purposes, for comfort settings or to display personalized content. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to allow. Please note that based on your settings, you may not be able to use all of the site's functions.
  • Login

  • register

    areas of interest
    Clear allSelect all

    Selecting your areas of interest helps us to better understand our audience.

Does employee ownership improve performance?

Employee ownership generally increases firm performance and worker outcomes

Rutgers University, USA, and IZA, Germany

Elevator pitch

Employee ownership has attracted growing attention for its potential to improve economic outcomes for companies, workers, and the economy in general, and help reduce inequality. Over 100 studies across many countries indicate that employee ownership is generally linked to better productivity, pay, job stability, and firm survival—though the effects are dispersed and causation is difficult to firmly establish. Free-riding often appears to be overcome by worker co-monitoring and reciprocity. Financial risk is an important concern but is generally minimized by higher pay and job stability among employee owners.

Layoffs and employee ownership

Key findings

Pros

Employee ownership is linked to better company performance on average.

Employee ownership companies have more stability, higher survival rates, and fewer layoffs in recessions, potentially leading to lower unemployment in the overall economy.

Employer stock tends to come on top of, rather than substitute for, regular employee compensation, and thereby adds to pay and wealth in general.

The broader sharing of economic rewards may help reduce economic inequality.

Cons

Employee ownership is subject to the free-rider problem, since the rewards from individual effort are shared with other workers and the direct incentive to work hard may be weak, which can lead more able workers to leave.

The effectiveness of employee ownership may depend on a complicated combination of supportive policies, such as employee involvement, job security, and training.

Workers can be exposed to excessive financial risk, especially when employee ownership is a large share of a worker’s wealth, and when it substitutes for other pay and benefits.

Author's main message

It has been argued that workers need to have greater ownership stakes in the technologies that increasingly substitute for their labor. But how does employee ownership affect economic performance? Despite skepticism by some academics and policymakers, employee ownership can overcome free-rider problems by raising work standards, and reduce financial risks by raising pay and job stability. In the overall economy, employee ownership has the potential to both decrease inequality, through enhanced incomes, and improve macroeconomic stability by reducing layoffs and unemployment when recessions occur. These benefits can justify supportive public policies for employee ownership.

Further reading

Key references

Additional References

Full reference list
Open full reference list
Version(s)
Current Version:2
Version 2 updates the "Graphical abstract," adds a new section answering why more companies do not have employee ownership schemes, and adds new "Key references" [5], [9], [10].
Version:1
date
December 2016
Article number:311

Full citation

Full citation

Data source(s)

Data type(s)

Method(s)

Countries


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp