Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

HomeReproductive phenology of the subtropical seagrasses Thalassia testudinum (turtle grass) and Halodule wrightii (shoal grass) in the northwest Gulf of Mexico
Article
Licensed
UnlicensedRequires Authentication

Reproductive phenology of the subtropical seagrassesThalassia testudinum (turtle grass) andHalodule wrightii (shoal grass) in the northwest Gulf of Mexico

  • Kelly M. Darnell

    Kelly M. Darnell is a research scientist at The Water Institute of the Gulf in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her research focuses on the functional role of submerged, floating and emergent coastal plants as habitat and food for nearshore animals, submerged plant reproductive ecology, and ecological consequences of complexity across scales.

    EMAIL logo     andKenneth H. Dunton

    Kenneth H. Dunton is a professor at The University of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute in Port Aransas, Texas. His research focuses on the productivity of coastal ecosystems at mid- and high latitudes, trophic ecology and the ecological response and resilience of benthic communities to environmental change.

Published/Copyright:November 12, 2016
Published by
De Gruyter

Abstract

Seagrass cover is declining worldwide, and successful management, conservation and restoration require a complete understanding of individual species’ life histories. The historically undervalued importance of sexual reproduction in seagrass population dynamics has prompted investigations of reproductive phenology and output. Here, we present the results of a multi-year study examining the reproductive phenology and output of two dominant seagrass species in the northwest Gulf of Mexico,Thalassia testudinum (turtle grass) andHalodule wrightii (shoal grass). We assessed flowering, fruit and seed production, seed reserve density and plant biomass in several locations along the central Texas coast. Results indicate that reproductive timing and output are heterogeneous over both small and large spatial scales and across years. The percentage of flowering and fruit-bearingT. testudinum shoots ranged from 0% to 15% and 0% to 10%, respectively, and fruit densities ranged from 0 to 180 fruits m−2. Average biomass allocated to reproductive structures for floweringT. testudinum shoots ranged from ~27% to 42%. High-densityH. wrightii seed reserves (3950 seeds m−2) were localized and exhibited substantial variation among sites, but average site-specific seed densities were lower (0–611 seeds m−2). The results of this study can inform restoration efforts and emphasize the need for understanding factors that influence reproductive timing and output for these species.

About the authors

Kelly M. Darnell

Kelly M. Darnell is a research scientist at The Water Institute of the Gulf in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her research focuses on the functional role of submerged, floating and emergent coastal plants as habitat and food for nearshore animals, submerged plant reproductive ecology, and ecological consequences of complexity across scales.

Kenneth H. Dunton

Kenneth H. Dunton is a professor at The University of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute in Port Aransas, Texas. His research focuses on the productivity of coastal ecosystems at mid- and high latitudes, trophic ecology and the ecological response and resilience of benthic communities to environmental change.

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Jackson, V. Congdon, S. Wilson, N. McTigue and P. Bucolo for assistance in the field and laboratory. We also thank the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve for logistic support. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments that greatly improved this manuscript. This study was funded by the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Grant number NA11NOS4200082), an E.J. Lund Marine Science Research Fellowship and a Scholar Award from P.E.O. International.

References

Bazzaz, F.A., D.A. Ackerly and E.G. Reekie. 2000. Reproductive allocation in plants.In: (M. Fenner, ed.)Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. 2nd edition.10.1079/9780851994321.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bjork, M., F. Short, E. Mcleod and S. Beer. 2008.Managing Seagrasses for Resilience to Climate Change. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. pp. 56.Search in Google Scholar

Campey, M.L., G.A. Kendrick and D.I. Walker. 2002. Interannual and small-scale spatial variability in sexual reproduction of the seagrassesPosidonia coriacea andHeterozostera tasmanica, southwestern Australia.Aquat. Bot.74: 287–297.10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00127-4Search in Google Scholar

Darnell, K.M. and K.H. Dunton. 2015. Consumption of turtle grass seeds and seedlings by crabs in the western Gulf of Mexico.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 520: 153–163.10.3354/meps11057Search in Google Scholar

Darnell, K.M., D.M. Booth, E.W. Koch and K.H. Dunton. 2015. The interactive effects of water flow and reproductive strategies on seed and seedling dispersal along the substrate in two sub-tropical seagrass species.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 471: 30–40.10.1016/j.jembe.2015.05.006Search in Google Scholar

den Hartog, C. 1970.The Seagrasses of the World. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 275.Search in Google Scholar

Dunton, K.H. 1990. Production ecology ofRuppia maritima L. s.l. andHalodule wrightii Aschers. in two subtropical estuaries.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.143: 147–164.10.1016/0022-0981(90)90067-MSearch in Google Scholar

Dunton, K.H., W. Pulich and T. Mutchler. 2010. A seagrass monitoring program for Texas coastal waters: multiscale integration of landscape features with plant and water quality integrators. Coastal Bend Bays and Estuaries Program, Final Report, pp. 39.Search in Google Scholar

Durako, M.J. and M.D. Moffler. 1985. Observations on the reproductive ecology ofThalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae). III. Spatial and temporal variations in reproductive patterns within a seagrass bed.Aquat. Bot.22: 265–276.10.1016/0304-3770(85)90004-XSearch in Google Scholar

Durako, M.J. and M.D. Moffler. 1987. Nutritional studies of the submerged marine angiospermThalassia testudinum, growth responses of axenic seedlings to nitrogen enrichment.Am. J. Bot.74: 234–240.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb08601.xSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, A., K. Madden and S. Morehead. 2012.The Ecology and Sociology of the Mission-Aransas Estuary: An Estuarine and Watershed Profile. Univeristy of Texas Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, Texas. pp. 183.Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, J.R. and R.J. Orth. 1996. Effects of predation onZostera marina L. seed abundance.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.198: 11–26.10.1016/0022-0981(95)00176-XSearch in Google Scholar

Fonseca, M.S., W.J. Kenworthy and G.W. Thayer. 1998. Guildelines for the conservation and restoration of seagrasses in the United States and adjacent waters. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 12, NOAA. Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Spring, MD.Search in Google Scholar

Gallegos, M.E., M. Merino, N. Marba and C.M. Duarte. 1992. Flowering ofThalassia testudinum Banks ex Konig in the Mexican Caribbean: age-dependence and interannual variability.Aquat. Bot.43: 249–255.10.1016/0304-3770(92)90070-YSearch in Google Scholar

Green, E.P. and F.T. Short. 2003.World Atlas of Seagrasses. UNEP-WCMC, University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holbrook, S.J., D.C. Reed, K. Hansen and C.A. Blanchette. 2000. Spatial and temporal patterns of predation on seeds of the surfgrassPhyllospadix torreyi.Mar. Biol. 136: 739–747.10.1007/s002270050733Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, A.R., K. Jun Bando, L.F. Rodriguez and S.L. Williams. 2004. Relative effects of grazers and nutrients on seagrasses: a meta-analysis approach.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.282: 87–99.10.3354/meps282087Search in Google Scholar

Kaldy, J.E. and K.H. Dunton. 1999. Ontogenetic photosynthetic changes, dispersal and survival ofThalassia testudinum (turtle grass) seedlings in a sub-tropical lagoon.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.249: 193–212.10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00058-1Search in Google Scholar

Kaldy, J. and K.H. Dunton. 2000. Above- and below-ground production, biomass and reproductive ecology ofThalassia testudinum (turtle grass) in a subtropical coastal lagoon.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.193: 271–283.10.3354/meps193271Search in Google Scholar

Kopecky, A.L. and K.H. Dunton. 2006. Variability in drift macroalgal abundance in relation to biotic and abiotic factors in two seagrass dominated estuaries in the western Gulf of Mexico.Estuar. Coast29: 617–629.10.1007/BF02784286Search in Google Scholar

Kowalski, J.L. and H.R. DeYoe. 2016. Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrassHalodule wrightii (shoal grass).Bot. Mar. 59: 193–199.10.1515/bot-2015-0099Search in Google Scholar

Lee, K.-S. and K.H. Dunton. 1996. Production and carbon reserve dynamics of the seagrassThalassia testudinum in Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, USA.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.143: 201–210.10.3354/meps143201Search in Google Scholar

Marion, S.R. and R.J. Orth. 2010. Innovative techniques for large-scale seagrass restoration usingZostera marina (eelgrass) seeds.Restor. Ecol. 18: 514–526.10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00692.xSearch in Google Scholar

McGovern, T.M. and K. Blankenhorn. 2007. Observation of fruit production by the seagrassHalodule wrightii in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico.Aquat. Bot.87: 247–250.10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.05.004Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. 1976. Experimental studies on flowering and reproduction in seagrasses.Aquat. Bot.2: 87–92.10.1016/0304-3770(76)90011-5Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. 1981. Seed reserves and seed germination for two seagrasses,Halodule wrightii andSyringodium filiforme, from the western Atlantic.Aquat. Bot.11: 279–296.10.1016/0304-3770(81)90066-8Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. 1983. Seed germination inHalodule wrightii andSyringodium filiforme from Texas and the U.S. Virgin Islands.Aquat. Bot.15: 217–220.10.1016/0304-3770(83)90033-5Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. 1985. The seed reserve forHalodule wrightii, Syringodium filiforme andRuppia maritima in Laguna Madre.Contrib. Mar. Sci. i28: 141–150.Search in Google Scholar

McMillan, C. 1991. The longevity of seagrass seeds.Aquat. Bot.40: 195–198.10.1016/0304-3770(91)90097-OSearch in Google Scholar

Moffler, M.D., M.J. Durako and W.F. Grey. 1981. Observations on the reproductive ecology ofThalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae).Aquat. Bot.10: 183–187.10.1016/0304-3770(81)90020-6Search in Google Scholar

Mooney, H.A., W.E. Winner and E.J. Pell, eds. 1991.Response of Plants to Multiple Stressors. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Nakaoka, M. 2002. Predation on seeds of seagrassesZostera marina andZostera caulescens by a tanaid crustaceanZeuxo sp.Aquat. Bot.72: 99–106.10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00213-3Search in Google Scholar

Onuf, C.P., R.C. Phillips, C.A. Moncreiff, A. Raz-Guzman and J.A. Herrera-Silveira. 2003. The seagrasses of the Gulf of Mexico.In: (E.P. Green and F.T. Short, eds.)World Atlas of Seagrasss.Search in Google Scholar

Orpurt, P.A. and L.L. Boral. 1964. The flowers, fruits and seeds ofThalassia testudinum Koenig.Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf. Carib.14: 296–302.Search in Google Scholar

Orth, R.J., K.L. Heck Jr. and D.J. Tunbridge. 2002. Predation on seeds of the seagrassPosidonia australis in Western Australia.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.244: 81–88.10.3354/meps244081Search in Google Scholar

Orth, R.J., G.A. Kendrick and S.A. Marion. 2006a. Predation onPosidonia australis seeds in seagrass habitats of Rottnest Island, Western Australia: patterns and predators.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.313: 105–114.10.3354/meps313105Search in Google Scholar

Orth, R.J., M.C. Harwell and G.J. Inglis. 2006b. Ecology of seagrass seeds and seagrass dispersal processes.In: (A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth and C.M. Duarte, eds.)Seagrasses: Biology Ecology and Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, R.C., C. McMillan and K.W. Bridges. 1981. Phenology and reproductive physiology ofThalassia testudinum from the western tropical Atlantic.Aquat. Bot.11: 263–277.10.1016/0304-3770(81)90065-6Search in Google Scholar

Pulich, Jr., W.M. 1985. Seasonal growth dynamics ofRuppia maritima L. s.l. andHalodule wrightii Aschers. in southern Texas and evaluation of sediment fertility status.Aquat. Bot.23: 53–66.10.1016/0304-3770(85)90020-8Search in Google Scholar

Pulich, Jr., W.M. 1999.Seagrass Conservation Plan for Texas. Austin, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Resource Protection Division. pp. 79.Search in Google Scholar

Pulich, Jr, W.M. and C. Onuf. 2007.Statewide Summary for Texas. Seagrass Status and Trends in the Northern Gulf of Mexico 1940–2002, pp. 16.Search in Google Scholar

Rollon, R.N., N.M. Cayabyab and M.D. Fortes. 2001. Vegetative dynamics and sexual reproduction of monospecificThalassia hemprichii meadows in the Kayalaan Island Group.Aquat. Bot.71: 239–246.10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00178-4Search in Google Scholar

Spalding, M., M. Taylor, C. Ravilious, F. Short and E. Green. 2003. The distribution and status of seagrasses.In: (E.P. Green and F.T. Short, eds.)World Atlas of Seagrasss.Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, A.G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.12: 253–279.10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, J.K., B.I. van Tussenbroek, K. Jimenez-Duran, G.J. Marquez-Guzman and J. Ouborg. 2009. High levels of gene flow and low population genetic structure related to high dispersal potential of a tropical marine angiosperm.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 390: 67–77.10.3354/meps08190Search in Google Scholar

van Tussenbroek, B.I. 1994. Aspects of the reproductive ecology ofThalassia testudinum in Puerto Morelos Reef Lagoon, Mexico.Bot. Mar.37: 413–419.10.1515/botm.1994.37.5.413Search in Google Scholar

van Tussenbroek, B.I. and M. Muhlia-Montero. 2013. Can floral consumption by fish shape traits of seagrass flowers?Evol. Ecol.27: 269–284.10.1007/s10682-012-9600-4Search in Google Scholar

van Tussenbroek, B.I., M.G.B Santos, J.G.R Wong, J.K. van Dijk and M. Waycott. 2010a.A Guide to the Tropical Seagrasses of the Western Atlantic, 1st ed. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Search in Google Scholar

van Tussenbroek, B.I., M. Muhlia-Montero, R. Wong, M. Guadalupe Barba Santos and J. Marquez Guzman. 2010b. Pollen limitation in a dioecious seagrass: evidence from a field experiment.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.419: 283–288.10.3354/meps08870Search in Google Scholar

Waycott, M., C.M. Duarte, T.J.B. Carruthers, R.J. Orth, W.C. Dennison, S. Olyarnik, A. Calladine, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck Jr., A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, F.T. Short and S.L. Williams. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrass across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.106: 12377–12381.10.1073/pnas.0905620106Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zieman, J.C. 1982.The Ecology of the Seagrasses of South Florida: A Community Profile. 82/25 US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Received:2016-7-26
Accepted:2016-10-7
Published Online:2016-11-12
Published in Print:2016-12-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Review
  4. Third addendum to the synoptic review of red algal genera
  5. Research articles
  6. Transfer ofPapenfussia japonica (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) from Korea to the genusAugophyllum
  7. The genusRamicrusta (Peyssonneliales, Rhodophyta) in the Caribbean Sea, includingRamicrusta bonairensis sp. nov.and Ramicrusta monensis sp. nov.
  8. Sorus formation on the holdfast haptera of the kelpEcklonia radicosa (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales)
  9. Codium fragile in Norway: subspecies identity and morphology
  10. Fate of two invasive or potentially invasive alien seaweeds in a central Mediterranean transitional water system: failure and success
  11. Isolation and identification of the marine diatomEntomoneis sp. MMOGRB 0374S (Bacillariophyta): a strain with high arachidonic acid composition
  12. Reproductive phenology of the subtropical seagrassesThalassia testudinum (turtle grass) andHalodule wrightii (shoal grass) in the northwest Gulf of Mexico
  13. Short communication
  14. Macroscopic sexual dimorphism inFucus radicans (Phaeophyceae) with implications for its reproductive ecology
  15. Annual reviewer acknowledgement
  16. Reviewer acknowledgementBotanica Marina volume 59 (2016)
Search journal

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Review
  4. Third addendum to the synoptic review of red algal genera
  5. Research articles
  6. Transfer ofPapenfussia japonica (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta) from Korea to the genusAugophyllum
  7. The genusRamicrusta (Peyssonneliales, Rhodophyta) in the Caribbean Sea, includingRamicrusta bonairensis sp. nov.and Ramicrusta monensis sp. nov.
  8. Sorus formation on the holdfast haptera of the kelpEcklonia radicosa (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales)
  9. Codium fragile in Norway: subspecies identity and morphology
  10. Fate of two invasive or potentially invasive alien seaweeds in a central Mediterranean transitional water system: failure and success
  11. Isolation and identification of the marine diatomEntomoneis sp. MMOGRB 0374S (Bacillariophyta): a strain with high arachidonic acid composition
  12. Reproductive phenology of the subtropical seagrassesThalassia testudinum (turtle grass) andHalodule wrightii (shoal grass) in the northwest Gulf of Mexico
  13. Short communication
  14. Macroscopic sexual dimorphism inFucus radicans (Phaeophyceae) with implications for its reproductive ecology
  15. Annual reviewer acknowledgement
  16. Reviewer acknowledgementBotanica Marina volume 59 (2016)
Stay updated on our offers and services
Subscribe to our newsletter
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 28.4.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bot-2016-0080/html
Scroll to top button
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp