Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

Anesthetic Pharmacology: Research Report

A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Borkett, Keith M. BSc*; Riff, Dennis S. MD; Schwartz, Howard I. MD; Winkle, Peter J. MD; Pambianco, Daniel J. MD§; Lees, James P. BSc*; Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, Karin MD

Author Information

From the*PAION UK Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom;Advanced Clinical Research Institute, Anaheim, California;Miami Research Institute, Miami, Florida;§Charlottesville Medical Research, Charlottesville, Virginia; andPAION Deutschland GmbH, Aachen, Germany.

Accepted for publication September 26, 2014.

Published ahead of print December 11, 2014

Funding: This study was funded by PAION UK Ltd.

Conflict of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Address correspondence to Keith M. Borkett, BSc, PAION UK Ltd., Compass House, Vision Park, Histon, Cambridge CB24 9ZR, UK. Address e-mail to[email protected].

Anesthesia & Analgesia120(4):p 771-780, April 2015. |DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548

BACKGROUND: 

This exploratory study was the first study of remimazolam in patients to assess the safety and efficacy of different single doses for procedural sedation.

METHODS: 

Patients scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of remimazolam or midazolam (25 per group) in a double-blind manner. After a single dose of study drug to achieve sedation, patients underwent gastroscopy. We assessed the success of the procedure, sedation levels, recovery from sedation, and safety.

RESULTS: 

A single dose of remimazolam resulted in a successful procedure in 32%, 56%, and 64% of patients in the low (0.10), middle (0.15), and high (0.20 mg/kg) dose groups compared with 44% of patients in the midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) dose group. The onset of sedation was 1.5 to 2.5 minutes in the remimazolam dose groups compared with 5 minutes for midazolam. Because this was a single administration study, sedation could be maintained for as long as necessary to complete the procedure, using rescue midazolam or propofol. Recovery from sedation was rapid for all treatment groups but was influenced by the choice of rescue medication. There were no obvious differences in the safety profiles of remimazolam and midazolam.

CONCLUSIONS: 

This exploratory dose-finding study showed that a single administration of remimazolam (0.10–0.20 mg/kg) was capable of inducing rapid sedation with a quick recovery profile in patients undergoing a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The safety profile was favorable and appeared to be similar to that of midazolam, warranting further development of this short-acting compound.

© 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp