Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

Technology, Computing, and Simulation: Research Report

Intraoperative Wake-Up Test and Postoperative Emergence in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Comparison of Intravenous and Inhaled Anesthetic Techniques Using Short-Acting Anesthetics

Grottke, Oliver MD, MSc*; Dietrich, Peter Johannes MD*; Wiegels, Stefanie MD*; Wappler, Frank MD

Editor(s): Warner, David S.

Author Information

*Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and †Department of Anesthesiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany

Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, San Diego, CA, 2001.

Accepted for publication May 13, 2004.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Frank Wappler, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Cologne-Merheim, Ostemerheimer Strassse 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany. Address e-mail to[email protected].

Anesthesia & Analgesia99(5):p 1521-1527, November 2004. |DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000134684.25322.26

Surgical procedures on the vertebral column may result in spinal cord damage, leading to neurological deficits that demand immediate therapeutical intervention. We designed this study to determine which anesthetic regimen allows a rapid wake-up test during and after surgery to detect neurological deficits. Fifty-four patients were randomly allocated to the following groups: group PR (propofol/remifentanil): target-controlled infusion with propofol (plasma concentration, 2–4 μg/mL) and remifentanil 0.2–0.5 μg · kg−1 · min−1; group PS (propofol/sufentanil): propofol (2–4 μg/mL) and repetitive boluses of 0.1–0.2 μg/kg of sufentanil adjusted to patients requirements; and group DR (desflurane/remifentanil): desflurane/air 3.0–4.0 vol% combined with remifentanil 0.2–0.5 μg · kg−1 · min−1. Group PS required significantly longer times for the onset of breathing (8.9 ± 1.6 min), elevation of the head (17.0 ± 3.8 min), and motion of the feet (17.0 ± 7.4 min) than group PR (6.9 ± 2.6 min, 9.3 ± 2.2 min, and 9.4 ± 2.4 min, respectively) or group DR (5.4 ± 0.8 min, 6.1 ± 1.0 min, and 6.2 ± 1.0 min, respectively). The anesthetic regimen with desflurane and remifentanil allowed faster awakening during and after surgery that permitted immediate neurological examination after spinal surgery compared with propofol/remifentanil.

© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp