Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

BMC Biology
BMC Biology logo

The evolution of novel fungal genes from non-retroviral RNA viruses

BMC Biologyvolume 7, Article number: 88 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Endogenous derivatives of non-retroviral RNA viruses are thought to be absent or rare in eukaryotic genomes because integration of RNA viruses in host genomes is impossible without reverse transcription. However, such derivatives have been proposed for animals, plants and fungi, often based on surrogate bioinformatic evidence. At present, there is little known of the evolution and function of integrated non-retroviral RNA virus genes. Here, we provide direct evidence of integration by sequencing across host-virus gene boundaries and carry out phylogenetic analyses of fungal hosts and totivirids (dsRNA viruses of fungi and protozoans). Further, we examine functionality by tests of neutral evolution, comparison of residues that are necessary for viral capsid functioning and assays for transcripts, dsRNA and viral particles.

Results

Sequencing evidence from gene boundaries was consistent with integration. We detected previously unknown integratedTotivirus-like sequences in three fungi (Candida parapsilosis,Penicillium marneffei andUromyces appendiculatus). The phylogenetic evidence strongly indicated that the direction of transfer was fromTotivirus to fungus. However, there was evidence of transfer ofTotivirus-like sequences among fungi. Tests of selection indicated that integrated genes are maintained by purifying selection. Transcripts were apparent for some gene copies, but, in most cases, the endogenous sequences lacked the residues necessary for normal viral functioning.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal that horizontal gene transfer can result in novel gene formation in eukaryotes despite miniaturized genomic targets and a need for co-option of reverse transcriptase.

Background

In eukaryotes, novel genes can be formed by alternative splicing, exon shuffling, horizontal gene transfer and inserted retroelements [1,2]. Indeed, many eukaryotic genomes are bloated with the raw materials (introns and retroelements) for these processes [35]. In most budding yeasts, however, the source of novel gene formation is obscure as there is a dearth of spliceosomal introns (< 5% of genes and < 0.5% of the genome) and retroelement products (< 3% of genome size) [68]. Although duplication of existing genes is common in budding yeasts,de novo gene formation and the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) appear stifled by the architecture of miniaturized genomes [7,9]. It is surprising, then, that NCBI Genbank annotations (EU380679 from this study, CAR65487, ABN68085, and ABN68086) and the BLAST-based study of Frank and Wolfe [10] reveal significant matches of yeast genes to the non-retroviral dsRNA virusesSaccharomyces cerevisiae L-A (L1) virus (Totiviridae).Debaryomyces hansenii has two capsid (Cp)-like genes, whilePichia stipitis has at least four Cp-like genes; each fungus has a single RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)-like gene [10]. Endogeny is common for viruses that either encode their own reverse transcriptase (retroviruses and pararetroviruses) or are already DNA-based [1113] but fragments of integrated non-retroviral viral RNA have rarely been proposed [1416]. As the integration of non-retroviral RNA viruses into DNA-based eukaryotic genomes requires the co-option of reverse transcriptase [17], Holmes [12] called this type of transfer 'one of the most remarkable observations in viral evolution of recent years'.

Little is known of the biology of non-retroviral integrated RNA viruses (NIRVs). We are unaware, for example, of evolutionary or functional comparisons among NIRVs. Even the initial bioinformatic evidence of NIRVs is often weak as genome assemblies can be contaminated or incorrectly annotated and surrogate (non-phylogenetic) analyses are susceptible to false positives [1820]. The proposed transfer of bacterial genes into the human genome, for example, disappeared with a detailed phylogenetic analysis [21]. The initial claims of NIRVs in grape (Vitus) genomes also failed the direct tests of integration [22]. Direct evidence of NIRVs is provided by the successful polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification or sequencing across host and integrated virus gene boundaries [14]. Where HGT is strongly supported, BLAST-based analyses of genes with open reading frames cannot adequately discern the direction of the transfer (from host to virus or from virus to host). The dsRNA elements that code for killer toxins in some fungi appear to have a cellular origin based on structural similarities to cellular genes and, in some cases, the preservation of vestigial polyA sequences at internal positions of the viral plus strands [23]. However, another BLAST-based study concluded that significant sequence matches with cellular genes and the presence of cellular pseudogenes indicated the transfer from killer dsRNA element to cellular genome [10]. The resolution of the question of directionality and the determination of HGT requires phylogenetic evidence with strong support and adequate sampling of interacting organisms [18].

Nor can functional maintenance of suspected HGT genes be inferred solely from a putative open reading frame - recent pseudogenes can produce a similar pattern [24]. Evolutionary analysis of selection and analysis of transcription products can provide stronger evidence of functional maintenance. Though negative evidence, a lack of viral products (dsRNA or viral particles), might hint at a novel function in a NIRV. Further evidence can be provided by the comparative analysis of functional landmarks. For example, the capsid gene of theTotivirus (L1-LA) functions to remove m7GMP caps from fungal host mRNAs [25,26]. Site directed mutational experiments have revealed eight residues that are essential for this decapping function [25,26]. Alteration of these residues in an integrated viral Cp gene would provide evidence for novel function. In the present study we carry out phylogenetic, evolutionary and functional analyses to test the hypothesis of NIRVs, the direction of HGT and the hypothesis that HGT of non-retroviral RNA viruses results in novel functioning genes in the fungal-Totiviridae system.

Totivirids are simple dsRNA viruses defined by the presence of the RdRp and the single capsid polypeptide (Cp) on a single dsRNA [27]. The isometric virions are about 40 nm in diameter. Inheritance of these intracellular RNA viruses is normally vertical (no cellular genomic copies of the dsRNA genomes are present)[28] but horizontal transfer can occur across fungal hyphae [27]. Confirmed intracellular totivirid infections are known only from fungi and pathogenic protozoans (Leishmania,Giardia andTrichonomas). The totivirids in smut and yeast have been assigned to the genusTotivirus, whereas totivirids infecting filamentous fungi have been assigned to the genusVictorivirus [29]. Here, we provide independent direct evidence thatTotivirus-like genomes are integrated into the cellular genomes of yeast that lackTotivirus infections and phylogenetic evidence that genes ofTotivirus-like viruses have been transferred to the genomes of four yeast species. Moreover, the endogenousTotivirus-like genes appear to be functionally maintained with non-viral functions and may have been further transferred between deeper yeast lineages.

Results and discussion

BLAST analysis using the RdRp and Cp protein sequences of theS. cerevisiae virus La (L-Bc) as a query, detectedTotivirus-like genes in five fungal species. We found RdRp-like sequences inP. stipitis,Penicillium marneffei,D. hansenii andUromyces appendiculatus, and Cp-like sequences inP. stipitis,P. marneffei,D. hansenii, andCandida parapsilosis. TheU. appendiculatus match is from an Expressed Sequence Tags (EST) database. TheD. hansenii virus-like genome has two overlapping reading frames, as in the exogenous viral architecture of theS. cerevisiae L1 virus (ScVL1 or ScVL-A; Figure1; [10]. The overlap is 138 bases and the RdRp-like gene can be translated as a minus one (-1) programmed ribosomal frameshift with the slippery site, GGGUUUA [30,31], as in ScVL1. TheP. stipitis virus-like genes encode a Cp-RdRp fusion protein, and has a similar architecture to that found in theUstilago maydis P1H1 virus UmV [32]. TheP. marneffei genome also appears to contain aTotivirus-like genome (Figure2). Here the overlap between the CP-like gene and the RdRp-like gene is 141 bases, but the slippery site that would allow a minus one translation has been altered by a point mutation (GGAUUUA), suggesting a non-viral function. No nonviral-like sequence is available from existing contigs ofP. marneffei, so further sequencing would be needed in order to confirm the fungal flanking regions. ForC. parapsilosis, it is clear that only a Cp-like sequence is present on the large contig where we detected aTotivirus-like gene (Figure2).

Figure 1
figure 1

A comparison of the simple genome ofTotivirus, a dsRNA virus, with the fungal genome maps containing proposed endogenousTotivirus-like genes and open reading frames. Red arrows indicate capsid polypeptide-like genes and the blue arrows represent RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-like genes. These coloured arrows represent open reading frames). Gray lines represent an RNA based genome and black lines represent fungal chromosomal DNA. Gene copies that retain an exogenous viral genomic architecture are shown as solid coloured arrows with the coding strand indicated by the direction of the arrow. Sequences from the present study that reveal fungal-Totivirus-like genes boundaries are shown above the maps. Asterisks represent further gene boundary regions amplified successfully by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; see Figure 6A). Numbers below the gene annotations indicate the chromosomal positions of gene boundaries. Full sequences of the PCR products from these regions have the Genbank Accession numbers: GQ291318-GQ291321.

Figure 2
figure 2

A comparison of the fungal genome maps ofPenicilliumandCandidaproposed to contain endogenousTotivirus-like genes. Red arrows indicate capsid polypeptide-like genes and the blue arrows represent RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-like genes. These coloured arrows represent open reading frames. Black lines represent fungal chromosomal DNA. Gene copies that retain an exogenous viral genomic architecture are shown as solid coloured arrows with the coding strand indicated by the direction of the arrow. Numbers below the gene annotations indicate the contig positions of gene boundaries.

We tested for the presence of DNA copies of dsRNATotivirus-like genes by PCR amplification of fungal DNA extractions with specific primers (Figure1). The first assay, targeting the RdRp-Cp boundary, revealed an expected PCR product size from bothP. stipitis (488 bp) andD. hansenii (1172 bp), whileS. cerevisiae, which possesses only viral dsRNA targets, lacked a detectable PCR product. This result suggests that DNA-based genes matching the viral sequences are present inD. hansenii andP. stipitis cells. We then tested for fungal integration of these genes by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing across the proposed fungal-viral genome boundaries. We sequenced the RdRp-fungus and upstream Cp-fungus boundaries for each fungal species (Figure1). The experimental sequences have 100% matches with the proposed yeast genome assemblies containing both the expected yeast and the viral-like sequences. A direct test of the integration in the remaining three fungi where we detectedTotivirus-like sequences is pending.

The fungal RdRp-like sequences form a close, and strongly supported, derived group within the viral RdRp gene tree (Figure3). Thus, the data satisfy the phylogenetic criterion of horizontal transfer - a strongly supported phylogenetic incongruence between interacting organisms [18]. As many fungal genomes are now known, the close association of the viral-like RdRp gene in hemiascomycetous yeast (P. stipitis andD. hansenii) with the RdRp gene of exogenousTotivirus of other hemiascomycetes, such asS. cerevisiae (Figures3-4), is unlikely to be a sampling artifact or a differential gene loss ofTotivirus-like genes in fungi. Instead, the placement of virus-like fungal sequences at the tips of the totivirid tree indicates that the endogenous forms in hemiascomycetes evolved fromTotivirus and not from fungal genomes. TheTotivirus-like genes ofP. marneffei, a Euascomycote (Additional File1), are also nested within the hemiascomycete clade and are most closely related toD. hansenii. The presence of closely relatedTotivirus RdRp-like sequences in fungi from two divergent clades suggests the occurrence of multiple integration events or horizontal transfers among yeasts. The position of the fungal sequences within the hemiascomycete virus clade suggests that integration occurred first in hemiascomycetes and was transferred toP. marneffei. Further evidence of homology of NIRVs might be provided by similarity of chromosomal regions flanking the insertion site. However, even the most closely related fungi in our study have undergone extensive chromosomal rearrangements. Jeffrieset al. [8] found no orthologous chromosomal segments between the center of CHR 7 inP. stipitis and chromosome B ofD. hansenii, the locations of the NIRVs. The fungal gene tree (Additional File1) reveals that the fungal species with endogenousTotivirus-like genes, saveP. marneffei, belong to the Clavispora clade [33], which hasCandida lusitaniae as the representative species. The Clavispora clade, which has sometimes been called theCandida clade [9] and is characterized by a shift in genetic code, is estimated to be at least 100 million years old [33].

Figure 3
figure 3

Maximum likelihood phylograms of totivirid-like RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes based on an alignment of amino acid sequences. Bayesian posterior probability and nonparametric bootstrap values >85% are figured above branches. Fungal genomic sequences are highlighted by a blue box. The asterisk represents a putative fungal expressed sequence tag sequence.

Figure 4
figure 4

Maximum likelihood phylogram of totivirid-like capsid polypeptide (Cp)-like genes based on an alignment of amino acid sequences. Bayesian posterior probability and nonparametric bootstrap values > 85% are figured above branches. Fungal genomic sequences are highlighted with a red box. Within-species copies are numbered as in Figure 1.

The Cp gene tree also revealed a close relationship of the endogenous viruses to theTotivirus of Hemiascomycotes (Figure4). BLAST matches are apparently limited to the genusTotivirus because the Cp gene has evolved more rapidly than the RdRp gene (Figures3-4). The two copies of Cp-like genes withinD. hansenii have a sister relationship (amino-acidp-distance = 0.060) and represent either recent paralogous duplication or concerted evolution. However, the four copies of Cp-like genes inP. stipitis are much more divergent with the average aminop-distance between Cp1 and the other Cp copies inPichia at 0.755. The tandem positioning of two to four divergent Cp gene copies and the monophyly of the fungal viral-like genes is consistent with the hypothesis of endogenous tandem duplication after integration by aTotivirus-like dsRNA viral lineage. Interestingly, the ancestral viral genomic architecture appears intact inP. stipitis (similar to UmV, see above)D. hansenii (similar to ScVL1) andP. marneffei which further supports the viral genome transfer hypothesis and permits the diagnosis of the ancestral integrated gene in the Cp-like gene family (Figures1-2). Alternative scenarios, whereTotivirus genomes are repeatedly and faithfully duplicatedin toto or are independently integrated at the identical regions in these fungal genomes, are unlikely.

Under the scenario of endogeny we expect patterns of DNA substitutions to differ between exogenous viral and integrated fungal gene copies. A disparity index revealed that fungal sequences do differ from viral sequences in patterns of DNA substitution more than is expected from evolutionary distance or from chance alone (Additional File2). Apart from the Cp1 sequence inP. stipitis, there were no significant differences among disparity indices within the fungal sequences or within the viral sequences. Thus, our sequencing of gene boundaries and the substitution patterns are consistent with integrated fungal copies of dsRNATotivirus-like genes.

Despite pronounced sequence divergence, each of theTotivirus-like fungal genes had an uninterrupted open reading frame (Figures1-2). By searching the translated EST database forPichia with the RdRp amino acid sequence (tBLASTn), we found that the RdRp mRNA product appears as a normal, polyadenylated RNAPII transcript in EST libraries (FE843929.1 and FE843928.1). Similarly, we found matching RNAPII transcripts of at least two of the Cp genes, Cp2 (FE851263.1 and FE851264.1) and Cp4 (FE849285.1 and FE849284.1) inP. stipitis. In order to test whether the endogenous genes are evolving as functional genes, we calculated pairwise and phylogenetic tests of neutral evolution (Table1; Figure5). Each of the comparisons for endogenous fungal genes revealed a significant departure from neutrality in the direction of purifying selection, consistent with purifying selection to maintain gene function (Table1; Figure5).

Table 1 A codon based test for neutral evolution in the capsid protein-like genes ofTotivirus and nonretroviral integrated RNA viruses from fungi.
Figure 5
figure 5

Binary rooted tree of capsid protein-like nucleotide sequences with Ka/Ks ratios plotted on branches. The tree is constrained with the assumption of tandem array monophyly. The relationships of gene family members are shown forPichia stipitis (in red) and forDebaryomyces hansenii (in blue). Genes associated with the ancestral architecture are highlighted with a black oval.

As we found evidence for viral genome architecture in our PCRs (Figures1 and6A), we examined if the endogenous genes functioned as in dsRNA viruses. We failed to detect dsRNA products (Figure6B) or viral particles (empty or full) inP. stipitis and inD. hansenii (Figure6C). This contrasts with the positive detection of dsRNA and viral particles in theTotivirus containing cells ofS. cerevisiae. A reverse transcriptase PCR (RTPCR) experiment revealed no detectable transcripts of the complete endogenousTotivirus genomes inD. hansenii or inP. stipitis (targets include the Cp-RdRp boundary, Figure6D). Notably, RTPCR with oligonucleotide primers targeting only the RdRp region did contain transcripts (Figure6E). RNA from theTotivirus-containingS. crevisiae does give an RTPCR product from the Cp-RdRp region. These results indicate that endogenous gene transcription proceeds differently than inTotivirus, as the integrated RdRp sequences inD. hansenii and inP. stipitis initiate within the Cp sequence, creating a subgenomic mRNA. Further, six to seven of eight biochemically-conserved residues that are important to the decapping function forTotivirus Cp genes [25,26] are altered in three of the endogenous Cp-like genes ofP. stipitis (Figure7).

Figure 6
figure 6

A comparison ofTotivirusand endogenousTotivirus-like fungal gene products.Pichia stipitis (lane 1),Saccharomyces cerevisiae with exogenousTotivirus infection (lane 2) andDebaryomyces hansenii (lane 3) (A) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of total DNA (1.4% agarose gel). (B) Assay for dsRNA (1.4% agarose gel with EtBr staining). (C) Assay for viral particles (photograph of CsCl density gradients). (D) Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR of total RNA (1.4% agarose gel). (E) PCR of total RNA extractions treated with DNAse. Here, RT-PCR of Cp is attempted from primers that flank the Cp-RdRp boundary. Reverse transcriptase is marked as either present (+RT) or absent (-RT).

Figure 7
figure 7

A matrix showing conservation patterns in capsid protein-like genes at residues inSaccharomyces cerevisiaevirus L1 (L-A) capsid protein that are structurally important for the decapping function. Shading represents the seven amino acid categories assigned by size and charge in the GDE (Genetic Data Environment) format. Dashes are indels. Yellow-shaded names indicate fungal capsid-protein-like genes that lack conservation of functional residues for decapping (see Figure 1).

Taken together, the functional and comparative evidence suggests that the endogenous viral proteins have been co-opted for cellular functions. The abandonment of viral expression is also indicated by the absence of recognizable RNA pseudoknot structure, following the slippery site in theTotivirus-like genomes ofPichia and P. marneffei, and by the absence of recognizable proteinase cleavage sites or proteinase active site motifs in the Cp-RdRp overlap region ofD. hansenii. Co-option of integrated DNA viruses and retroviruses by multicellular eukaryotes is well known but rare [34]. An integration mechanism that co-opts endogenous RNA integration machinery is plausible as yeast genomes contain retroelements [9,35]. However, the signature of retroelements is not obvious in the flanking regions of the present integrations, perhaps as a result of evolutionary divergence.

The evolutionary distribution and stabilization of NIRVs is poorly understood. Opportunities for NIRV formation should be greater in host taxa that have evolved a longstanding (presumably hypovirulent) non-retroviral virus infection, as in the fungi-Totivirus or the dipteran-flavivirus associations. However, theClavispora clade, which we identify as the source of the yeast NIRVs, appears to lack such infections withTotivirus. Given the widespread taxonomic distribution ofTotivirus-like infections in fungi and their absence inClavispora [29], it is tempting to invoke the shift in genetic code as a contributor to the loss of infectionbyTotivirus. Holmes [12] proposed that shifts in genetic codes are evolutionary responses by the host to RNA-based viral infections. NIRVs could have initially played a beneficial role to the host by imparting resistance to exogenous viruses. Indeed, there is experimental evidence in the yeast-Totivirus system that overproduction of the capsid protein [36] or production of fragments of the capsid protein[37] will interfere with packaging of the virus and result in its loss. Such interference is also well-documented with plant viruses [38]. The apparent genomic prevalence of capsid-like NIRVs compared to RdRp-like NIRVs (Figures1 and2) is consistent with this interference hypothesis. In either case, the NIRVs that we find in theClavispora clade today could represent the vestiges of a co-evolutionary victory by the host.

Conclusions

We conclude that novel eukaryotic gene families have originated from non-retroviral RNA viruses. NIRVs and their transitional stages are archived in eukaryotic genomes and appear more important to yeast evolution than previously thought.

Methods

Cell cultures

We obtained lyophilized powders ofP. stipitis strain CBS6054 [8] from T Jeffries,Debaryomyces hansenii strain CBS767 [6] from Jean-Luc Souciet andSaccharomyces cerevisiae strain S7 from C McLaughlin [39], which has theS. cerevisiae virus L1 (LA) and the minor virus La (LB-C) but no satellite virus. Cells were streaked on YPD agar (yeast extract 1%, peptone 2%, and dextrose 2%) and single colonies were transferred to 150 ml of YPD broth.

Nucleic acid and viral particle extractions

RNA was extracted from cells with the Masterpure Yeast RNA extraction kit (Epicentre, WI, USA). DNA was extracted using a standard SDS/phenol/chloroform protocol. Viral dsRNA was isolated by CF11 chromatography from crude RNA preparations [40]. Empty viral particles of density 1.33 g/cc were isolated as described [41], except that polyethylene glycol precipitation was replaced by high-speed pelleting of viral particles (100,000 ×g for 1.5 h).

PCR, RTPCR and DNA sequencing

Fifty microlitre PCR reactions contained 5 μL of extracted DNA template, 10× PCR buffer [50 mM KCl, 1.5 mg MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 0.01% (w/v) gelatin], 2 mM of each dNTP, 1 μM of each primer and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase. Primers are listed in Additional File3. The PCR temperature profiles were: 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s; 55°C for 30 s; 72°C for 2 min; and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. RT-PCR detection of viral transcripts and PCR of genomic DNA copies (Epicentre high fidelity RT-PCR kit) were performed as described by the manufacturer. Gels were 1.4% agarose in Tris-acetate-EDTA (40 mM Tris-acetate and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) stained with ethidium bromide (1 mg/l). DNA was sequenced by Sanger methods at the University of Washington High Throughput Genomics Facility. Sequencher 4.8 was used to assemble and edit electrophoregrams. New sequences from this study have the following Genbank accession numbers: EU380679 and GQ291318-GQ291321.

Bioinformatics

We obtained the initial sequences of RdRp (Additional File4) and capsid (Additional File5) genes from totivirids by BLASTp of the nr peptide sequence database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, USA) with the protein sequences ofS. cerevisiae virus La (L-BC) and a cut-off of E<0.01. Additional genomic copies ofTotivirus-like genes were identified by significant tBLASTx hits (E<0.05) of relevant NCBI BLAST databases using the sequences ofS. cerevisiae virus La (L-BC). For the capsid proteins the entire sequences were used and, for RdRp, the contiguous conserved region [27] was used. Sequences were aligned using Prank: probabilistic alignment kit with the Pranskter graphical interface (Goldman Group, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom) [42]. We carried out maximum likelihood analyses with RAxML using the RTREV substitution matrix, estimated AA frequencies, a gamma parameter for among-site rate variation, and an invariable sites parameter [43]. For bootstrapping, RAxML estimated the number of pseudoreplicates. For Bayesian analysis, we used Mr Bayes [44] with an amino acid substitution model prior of RTREV with a setting of rates = INVGAMMA. After 1 million Markov chain Monte Carlo generations and confirming convergence (average standard deviation of split frequencies < 0.01 and a plot of log likelihood scores with generation), we culled a burn-in set of 10,000 trees and calculated the posterior probabilities. Trees were midpoint rooted.

For the phylogeny of yeasts, we used the five genes (Additional File6) with the greatest number of strong reliability values from the list of the best 10 performing genes for recovering fungal phylogeny (as determined by a genome-scale analysis [45] for topological correctness). For fungi, orthologous nuclear genes with strong support values for a given node (bootstrap > 90 and posterior probabilities > 0.95) rarely disagree [46,47]. We chose species from FUNYBASE [48] that had all of the genes of interest, and added genomic sequences from an additional species ofSchizosaccharomyces, and from three genomes where we detected totivirid-like sequences (Additional File1; a fourth genome with totivirid sequences,D. hansenii was already part of FUNYBASE). Concatenated sequences were aligned in MAFFT [49] and then exposed to culling from GBlocks [50]. We carried out maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses as for the totivirid alignments above.

A test of the homogeneity of substitution patterns between viral and fungal sequences for the Cp-like genes was carried out in MEGA4 [51]. We used the Disparity Index test [52] withP-values estimated from 1000 Monte Carlo based replicates (Additional File2). The most divergent sequence (S. cerevisiae virus La (L-BC)) and the shortest sequence (C. parapsilosis) were culled for this analysis because we wanted to retain informative alignment positions when gapped sites are completely deleted. After positions with gaps and missing data were eliminated a dataset of 1446 positions was retained.

Tests of neutral evolution for the Cp-like gene copies in fungi were carried out in MEGA4. The test statistic is (dN -dS) wheredS anddN are the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site, respectively. The variance of the difference was computed using the bootstrap method (500 replicates). Analyses were conducted using the Kumar method in MEGA4 [51]. Ka/Ks ratios were calculated by the Ka/Ks calculatorhttp://services.cbu.uib.no/tools/kaks and plotted on a tree using the methods of [53]. GC content was estimated from the alignment. The ratio of nonsynonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) nucleotide substitution rates is an indicator of selective pressures on genes. A ratio of less than one indicates selective pressure to conserve protein sequence. Note that values are averaged over sites.

Abbreviations

Cp:

capsid polypeptide

EST:

expressed sequence tag

HGT:

horizontal gene transfer

NIRV:

non-retroviral integrated RNA virus

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

RdRp:

RNA dependant RNA polymerase

RTPCR:

reverse transcriptase PCR.

References

  1. Long M, Betran E, Thornton K, Wang W: The origin of new genes: glimpses from the young and old. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4 (11): 865-875. 10.1038/nrg1204.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doolittle WF: You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet. 1998, 14 (8): 307-311. 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01494-2.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roy SW, Gilbert W: The evolution of spliceosomal introns: patterns, puzzles and progress. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (3): 211-221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyers BC, Tingey SV, Morgante M: Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (10): 1660-1676. 10.1101/gr.188201.

    Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazazian HH: Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science. 2004, 303 (5664): 1626-1632. 10.1126/science.1089670.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, De Montigny J, Marck C, Neuvéglise C, Talla E, Goffard N, Frangeul L, Aigle M, Anthouard V, Babour A, Barbe V, Barnay S, Blanchin S, Beckerich JM, Beyne E, Bleykasten C, Boisramé A, Boyer J, Cattolico L, Confanioleri F, De Daruvar A, Despons L, Fabre E, Fairhead C, Ferry-Dumazet H, et al: Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature. 2004, 430 (6995): 35-44. 10.1038/nature02579.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dujon B: Yeasts illustrate the molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic genome evolution. Trends Genetics. 2006, 22 (7): 375-387. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.05.007.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffries TW, Grigoriev IV, Grimwood J, Laplaza JM, Aerts A, Salamov A, Schmutz J, Lindquist E, Dehal P, Shapiro H, Jin YS, Passoth V, Richardson PM: Genome sequence of the lignocellulose-bioconverting and xylose-fermenting yeastPichia stipitis. Nature Biotechnol. 2007, 25 (3): 319-326. 10.1038/nbt1290.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MA, Sakthikumar S, Munro CA, Rheinbay E, Grabherr M, Forche A, Reedy JL, et al: Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature. 2009, 459 (7247): 657-662. 10.1038/nature08064.

    Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank AC, Wolfe KH: Evolutionary capture of viral and plasmid DNA by yeast nuclear chromosomes. Eukaryot Cell. 2009, 8 (10): 1521-1531. 10.1128/EC.00110-09.

    Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flegel TW: Hypothesis for heritable, anti-viral immunity in crustaceans and insects. Biol Direct. 2009, 4: 32-10.1186/1745-6150-4-32.

    Article PubMed Central PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmes EC: The Evolution and Emergence of RNA Viruses. 2009, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Staginnus C, Iskra-Caruana ML, Lockhart B, Hohn T, Richert-Poggeler KR: Suggestions for a nomenclature of endogenous pararetroviral sequences in plants. Arch Virol. 2009, 154 (7): 1189-1193. 10.1007/s00705-009-0412-y.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crochu S, Cook S, Attoui H, Charrel RN, De Chesse R, Belhouchet M, Lemasson JJ, de Micco P, de Lamballerie X: Sequences of flavivirus-related RNA viruses persist in DNA form integrated in the genome ofAedes spp. mosquitoes. J Gen Virol. 2004, 85 (Pt 7): 1971-1980. 10.1099/vir.0.79850-0.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maori E, Tanne E, Sela I: Reciprocal sequence exchange between non-retro viruses and hosts leading to the appearance of new host phenotypes. Virology. 2007, 362 (2): 342-349. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.038.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanne E, Sela I: Occurrence of a DNA sequence of a non-retro RNA virus in a host plant genome and its expression: evidence for recombination between viral and host RNAs. Virology. 2005, 332 (2): 614-622. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.11.007.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geuking MB, Weber J, Dewannieux M, Gorelik E, Heidmann T, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM, Hangartner L: Recombination of retrotransposon and exogenous RNA virus results in nonretroviral cDNA integration. Science. 2009, 323 (5912): 393-396. 10.1126/science.1167375.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keeling PJ, Palmer JD: Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2008, 9 (8): 605-618. 10.1038/nrg2386.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragan MA, Harlow TJ, Beiko RG: Do different surrogate methods detect lateral genetic transfer events of different relative ages?. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14 (1): 4-8. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.11.004.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ragan MA: On surrogate methods for detecting lateral gene transfer. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 201 (2): 187-191. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10755.x.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanhope MJ, Lupas A, Italia MJ, Koretke KK, Volker C, Brown JR: Phylogenetic analyses do not support horizontal gene transfers from bacteria to vertebrates. Nature. 2001, 411 (6840): 940-944. 10.1038/35082058.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bertsch C, Beuve M, Dolja VV, Wirth M, Pelsy F, Herrbach E, Lemaire O: Retention of the virus-derived sequences in the nuclear genome of grapevine as a potential pathway to virus resistance. Biol Direct. 2009, 4: 21-10.1186/1745-6150-4-21.

    Article PubMed Central PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruenn J: The Ustilago maydis viruses. Encyclopedia of Virology. Edited by: Mahy BWJ, van Regenmortel MHV. 2008, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5: 214-219. full_text. 3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Nikoh N, Nakabachi A: Aphids acquired symbiotic genes via lateral gene transfer. BMC Biol. 2009, 7: 12-10.1186/1741-7007-7-12.

    Article PubMed Central PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naitow H, Tang J, Canady M, Wickner RB, Johnson JE: L-A virus at 3.4 A resolution reveals particle architecture and mRNA decapping mechanism. Nat Struct Biol. 2002, 9 (10): 725-728. 10.1038/nsb844.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang J, Naitow H, Gardner NA, Kolesar A, Tang L, Wickner RB, Johnson JE: The structural basis of recognition and removal of cellular mRNA 7-methyl G 'caps' by a viral capsid protein: a unique viral response to host defense. J Mol Recognit. 2005, 18 (2): 158-168. 10.1002/jmr.724.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghabrial SA: Origin, adaptation and evolutionary pathways of fungal viruses. Virus Genes. 1998, 16 (1): 119-131. 10.1023/A:1007966229595.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hastie ND, Brennan V, Bruenn J: No homology between double-stranded RNA and nuclear DNA of yeast. J Virol. 1978, 28: 1002-1005.

    PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghabrial S: Totiviruses. Encyclopedia of Virology. Edited by: BWJ Mahy, van Regenmortel MHV. 2008, Academic Press, 5: 163-174. full_text. 3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Diamond ME, Dowhanick JJ, Nemeroff ME, Pietras DF, Tu C-L, Bruenn JA: Overlapping genes in a yeast dsRNA virus. J Virol. 1989, 63: 3983-3990.

    PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tzeng T-H, Tu C-L, Bruenn JA: Ribosomal frameshifting requires a pseudoknot in the yeast double-stranded RNA virus. J Virol. 1992, 66 (2): 999-1006.

    PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang J, Wu J, Bruenn JA, Park C: The H1 double-stranded RNA genome of Ustilago maydis virus-H1 encodes a polyprotein that contains structural motifs for capsid polypeptide, papain-like protease, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Virus Res. 2001, 76 (2): 183-189. 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00250-7.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor JW: Evolution of human-pathogenic fungi: phylogenies and species. Molecular Principles of Fungal Pathogenesis. Edited by: Heitman J, Filler SG, Edwards JE Jr, Mitchell AP. 2006, Washington D.C.: ASM press, 113-132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Jern P, Coffin JM: Effects of retroviruses on host genome function. Annu Rev Genet. 2008, 42: 709-732. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091501.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lesage P, Todeschini AL: Happy together: the life and times of Ty retrotransposons and their hosts. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005, 110 (1-4): 70-90. 10.1159/000084940.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Valle RP, Wickner RB: Elimination of L-A double-stranded RNA virus ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae by expression ofgag andgag-pol from L-A cDNA clone. J Virol. 1993, 67 (5): 2764-2771.

    PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yao W, Bruenn JA: Interference with replication of two double-stranded RNA viruses by production of N-terminal fragments of capsid polypeptides. Virology. 1995, 214: 215-221. 10.1006/viro.1995.9938.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reimann-Philipp U: Mechanisms of resistance: expression of coat protein. Methods Mol Biol. 1998, 81: 521-532.

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Holm CA, Oliver SG, Newman AM, Holland LE, McLaughlin CS, Wagner EK, Warner RC: The molecular weight of yeast P1 double-stranded RNA. J Biol Chem. 1978, 253: 8332-8336.

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Franklin RM: Purification and properties of the replicative intermediate of the RNA bacteriophage R17. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1966, 55: 1504-1511. 10.1073/pnas.55.6.1504.

    Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Naitow H, Canady MA, Lin T, Wickner RB, Johnson JE: Purification, crystallization, and preliminary X-ray analysis of L-A: a dsRNA yeast virus. J Struct Biol. 2001, 135 (1): 1-7. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4371.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Loytynoja A, Goldman N: Phylogeny-aware gap placement prevents errors in sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. Science. 2008, 320 (5883): 1632-1635. 10.1126/science.1158395.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J: A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008, 57 (5): 758-771. 10.1080/10635150802429642.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19 (12): 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aguileta G, Marthey S, Chiapello H, Lebrun MH, Rodolphe F, Fournier E, Gendrault-Jacquemard A, Giraud T: Assessing the performance of single-copy genes for recovering robust phylogenies. Syst Biol. 2008, 57 (4): 613-627. 10.1080/10635150802306527.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taylor DJ, Piel WH: An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21 (8): 1534-1537. 10.1093/molbev/msh156.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rasmussen MD, Kellis M: Accurate gene-tree reconstruction by learning gene- and species-specific substitution rates across multiple complete genomes. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (12): 1932-1942. 10.1101/gr.7105007.

    Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Marthey S, Aguileta G, Rodolphe F, Gendrault A, Giraud T, Fournier E, Lopez-Villavicencio M, Gautier A, Lebrun MH, Chiapello H: FUNYBASE: a FUNgal phYlogenomic dataBASE. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2008, 9: 456-10.1186/1471-2105-9-456.

    Article PubMed Central PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H: Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 537: 39-64. full_text.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Talavera G, Castresana J: Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007, 56 (4): 564-577. 10.1080/10635150701472164.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar S, Gadagkar SR: Disparity index: a simple statistic to measure and test the homogeneity of substitution patterns between molecular sequences. Genetics. 2001, 158 (3): 1321-1327.

    PubMed Central CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liberles DA: Evaluation of methods for determination of a reconstructed history of gene sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18 (11): 2040-2047.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the University at Buffalo for support, Thomas W Jeffries forP. stipitis strain CBS 6054, Jean-Luc Souciet forD. hansenii strain CBS767, and C McLaughlin forS. cerevisiae strain S7. Mahbuba Meem and Isabelle Kim aided in nucleic acid extractions and in PCR protocols.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA

    Derek J Taylor & Jeremy Bruenn

Authors
  1. Derek J Taylor

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Bruenn

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toDerek J Taylor.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

DJT and JB conceived the study and co-wrote the paper. JB carried out dsRNA and viral particle isolations, designed primers and identified residues essential for capsid functioning. DJT carried out DNA sequence assembly, PCR, phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses.

Electronic supplementary material

12915_2009_296_MOESM1_ESM.PDF

Additional file 1: Midpoint rooted maximum likelihood phylogram of yeast-like fungi based on a concatenation of the five single copy protein-coding genes identified as the most phylogenetically reliable in fungal genomes.(PDF 268 KB)

12915_2009_296_MOESM2_ESM.DOC

Additional file 2: Test of the homogeneity of substitution patterns between fungal and viral copies of capsid-like protein nucleotide sequences.(DOC 42 KB)

12915_2009_296_MOESM3_ESM.DOC

Additional file 3: Primers used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase-PCR ofTotivirus-like regions of yeast genomes and exogenousTotivirus.(DOC 42 KB)

12915_2009_296_MOESM4_ESM.DOC

Additional file 4: Viral and fungal sequences and accession numbers used for phylogenetic analysis of the RdRp-like regions of totivirids andTotivirus-like sequences in fungi.(DOC 50 KB)

12915_2009_296_MOESM5_ESM.DOC

Additional file 5: Viral and fungal accession numbers used for phylogenetic analysis of the Cp-like regions of totivirids andTotivirus-like sequences in fungi.(DOC 34 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Download PDF

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp