The fall of Constantinople on the night of 13 April 1204 to the Venetians and the soldiers of the fourth crusade is taken as the crucial turning point of the history of the later Byzantine Empire. For many the final period of Byzantine history is nothing but the pathetic survival of a state built on the memories of its former greatness. This is in many ways far too gloomy a picture. Constantinople was to be recovered by the Byzantines in 1261; and we should not forget that the last centuries of Byzantium saw a flowering of Byzantine art and scholarship. This achievement naturally directs our attention to the period of exile, when the foundations of this ‘Last Byzantine Renaissance’, as it has been called, were laid. In exile the Byzantine Empire was re-established and the Byzantine heritage preserved, at a time when both appeared to be in danger of being recreated in a Latin image, for a Latin emperor and a Latin patriarch had been established in Constantinople in place of the Byzantine emperor and the Byzantine patriarch. The fall of Constantinople, indeed, produced a feeling of fatalism and despondency among the Byzantines. There was a tendency to accept the Latin conquest. The peasantry of Thrace even took pleasure in the discomfiture of the Byzantine aristocrats and intellectuals of Constantinople. Some Byzantine magnates attempted to organize resistance to the Latin conquest, but even this, at least in the aftermath of the fall of Constantinople, was probably done in the hope of securing a favourable bargaining position with the Latins. One of the great Byzantine magnates of Thrace, the Caesar Theodore Vranas, entered the ranks of the Latin aristocracy. Even Michael Angelos, the founder of what we have come to know as the Despotate of Epiros, was willing to submit for a short while to the authority of the Latin emperor.

1.Choniates,Nicetas,Historia (CSHB), p.785Google Scholar, ll. 7-17. 49

2.Longnon,J.,L’Empire latin de Constantinople et la principauté de Morée (Paris,1949), pp.64,134Google Scholar.

3.Nicol,D. M,The Despotate of Epiros (Oxford,1957), pp.28–9Google Scholar.

4.Ostrogorsky,G.,History of the Byzantine State, translated by Joan Hussey (2nd edition,Oxford,1968), p.428Google Scholar and n. 2.

5.Darrouzès,J., ‘Les discours d’Euthyme Tornikès (1200-1205)’,REB,XXVI (1968),82–3Google Scholar.

6.Browning,R.,Greece—Ancient and Medieval (London,1966), p.16Google Scholar; and in JHS, XCII (1971), 214-15.

7.Runciman,S.,The Last Byzantine Renaissance (Cambridge,1970), pp.15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8.Vacalopoulos,A. E.,The Origins of the Greek Nation: the Byzantine Period (1204-1461) (New Brunswick,N.J.,1970)Google Scholar.

9.Mango,C., inJHS,LXXXVIII (1968),256–8Google Scholar.

10.Mango,C., ‘Byzantinism and Romantic Hellenism’,Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes,XXVIII (1965),30–4Google Scholar.

11.Irmscher,J., ‘Nikâa als “Zentrum des griechischen Patriotismus” ‘,Revue des Etudes Sud-Est Européennes, VIII (1970), 33–47; J. Irmscher, ‘Nikaa als “ Mittelpunkt des griechischen Patriotismus” ‘,Byzantinische Forschungen,IV (1972),114–37Google Scholar.

12. Irmscher, ibid., 137.

13.Dieten,J. A. Van,Nicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae (Corpus Fontium HistoriaeByzantinae) (Berlin/New York,1972), p.205Google Scholar, 11. 26-30.

14. Ibid., pp. 127-8, 146-7, p. 175, 11. 24-35;, ed. Sp. Lampros (Athens, 1879-80), I, pp. 354-5; II, pp. 257-61, 276-7, 336-7.

15.Oikonomidès,N., ‘Cinq actes inédits du patriarche Michel Autôreianos’,REB,XXV (1967), 118, 11.37–46Google Scholar.

16.Dräseke,J., ‘Theodoras Laskaris’,BZ,III (1894),512–13Google Scholar.

17. SeeDucellier,A., ‘Mentalité historique et réalités politiques: l’Islam et les Musulmans vus par les Byzantins du XlIIème siècle’,Byzantinische Forschungen,IV (1972),31–63Google Scholar.

18. SeeBeck,H.-G., ‘Sénat und Volk von Konstantinopel’,Sitzungsberichte der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil.-hist. Klasse,1966, esp. pp.71–5Google Scholar.

19.Grumel,V., ‘L’authenticité de la lettre de Jean Vatatzès, empereur de Nicée, au pape Grégoire IX’,Echos d’Orient,XXIX (1930),452–4Google Scholar.

20.Nicol,D. M.,The Despotate of Epiros, p.92Google Scholar.

21.Blemmydae Nicephori, Curriculum Vitae et Carmina, ed.Heisenberg,A. (Leipzig,1896), pp.41–2Google Scholar.

22.Lappa-Zizicas,E., ‘Un Traité inédit de Théodore II Lascaris’,Actes du Vie Congrès international d’Etudes Byzantines,I (Paris,1950), pp.119–46Google Scholar.

23.Svoronos,N., ‘Le serment de fidélité à l’empereur byzantin et sa signification constitutionelle’, ibid., pp.195–6Google Scholar.

24.Pachymeris, Georgii, de Michaele et Andronico Palaeologis libri tredecim (CSHB),I, pp.42–6Google Scholar, esp. p. 45, 1. 16-p. 46, 1. 6.

25. Ibid., esp. p. 44, ll. 2-4, p. 44, l. 18-p. 45, l. 3.

26. Ibid., p. 50, ll. 2-5, ll. 12-14.

27. Ibid., p. 52, ll. 10-12.

28. SeeObolensky,D.,The Byzantine Commonwealth. Eastern Europe, 500-1453 (London,1971), pp.308–13Google Scholar;Obolensky,D., ‘Nationalism in Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages’,Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, ser. v,XXII (1972),1–16Google Scholar.

29. Pachymeres II, pp. 400-2;Heisenberg,A., ‘Kaiser Johannes Batatzes der Barmherzige’,BZ,XIV (1905),193–235Google Scholar.

30.Obolensky,,The Byzantine Commonwealth, pp.240—3Google Scholar.

31.Angold,M.J., ‘The Problem of the Unity of the Byzantine World after 1804: the Empire of Nicaea and Cyprus’,II (Levkosia,1972), pp.1–6Google Scholar.

32.Stiernon,L., ‘Les origines du despotat d’Epire (suite)’,Actes du Xlle Congrès d’Etudes Byzantines. Ochride 1961,II (Belgrade,1964), pp.197–202Google Scholar.

33.Nicol,D. M., ‘Ecclesiastical Relations between the Despotate of Epiros and the Kingdom of Nicaea in the years 1215 to 1230’,B,XXII (1952),207–28Google Scholar;Loenertz,R.-J., ‘Lettre de Geroges Bardanès, métropolite de Corcyre, au patriarche oecuménique Germain II, 1226-1227 c.’EEBS,XXXIII (1964),87–118Google Scholar.

34.Hoeck,J. M. andLoenertz,R.-J.,Nikolaos-Nektarios von Otranto, Abt von Casóle: Beitrãge zur Geschichte der ost-westlichen Beziehungen unter Innozenz III. und Friederich II (Studia Patristica et Byzantina, II) (Ettal,1965), pp.158–9Google Scholar.

35.Blemmydes,, p.36, 11. 16-19, p. 62, 11. 11-21.Cf. Blemmydae, Nicephori, Epistulae, Appendix III ofTheodori Ducae Lascaris Epistolae, ed.Festa,N. (Florence,1898), pp.320–4Google Scholar.

36. Blemmydes, pp. 41-5, 88-9. Cf. Acropolites, I, pp. 106-7.

37. Blemmydes, pp. 45-7.

38. Ibid., pp. 47-8, p. 89, ll. 9-13.

39.Miklosich,F. andMillier,J.,Acta et diplomata graeca medii aevi sacra et profana (Vienna., 1860-90),IV, p.203Google Scholar, ll. 19-22.

40. Acropolites, I, p. 108, 11. 2-4.

41. Ibid., pp. 76-7.

42. E.g.Dmitrievskij,A.,(Kiev,1895), I, pt 1, p.790Google Scholar, 11. 25–6:.

43. Acropolites, I, p. 167, ll. 20-3; Pachymeres, I, p. 137, ll. 10-15.

44. Acropolites, I, p. 166, ll. 5-7.

45. Theodore Laskaris, p. 165, ll. 23-4, p. 176, ll. 52-3.

46. SeeHunger,H., ‘Von Wissenschaft und Kunst der frühen Palaiologenzeit’,JOBG,VIII (1959),128Google Scholar.

47.Nicole,J., ‘Bref inédit de Germain II, patriarche de Constantinople (Année 1230), avec une recension nouvelle du chrysobulle de l’empereur Jean DucasVatacès’, REG,VII (1894),77Google Scholar, l. 12.

48. SeeBrowning,R.,inJHS,XCII (1971),214Google Scholar;Beck,H.-G., ‘Reichsidee und nationale Politile im spatbyzantinischen Staat’,BZ,LUI (1960),92Google Scholar. An example from the period of exile shows how ‘Hellene’ was used to emphasize the differences between Byzantine and Latin. Nikephoros Blemmydes (p. 4, 1. 17) refers to north-western Asia Minor which was still under Latin rule when he visited it, as not yet being under ‘the sceptre of the Hellenes’.

49. Theodore Laskaris, pp. 8-10.

50. Ibid., pp. 174-5.

51. Miklosich and Mullier, op. cit., IV, pp. 235-6.

52. Theodore Lascaris, p. 281, 11. 73-4.

53. Nicetas Choniates, pp. 796-7, p. 814, 11. 16-19.

54.Dõlger,F.,Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des ostr’ômischen Reiches,III (Munich-Berlin,1932), no.1817Google Scholar.

55. Gregoras, I, pp. 43-4.

56. Theodore Lascaris, pp. 58-9.

57.Lameere,W.,La tradition manuscrite de la correspondance de Grégoire de Chypre, patriarche de Constantinople (1283-138c) (Brussels/Rome,1937), p.181Google Scholar, 11. 15-23.

58. SeeToynbee,A.,Constantine Porphyrogenitus and his World (Oxford,1973), pp.73–4Google Scholar.

59. SeeAngold,M.J.,A Byzantine Government in Exile. Government and Society under the Laskarids of Nicaea (1204-1261) (Oxford,1974)Google Scholar.

60. Pachymeres, I, pp. 153-7.

61. SeeMango,C., ‘Antique Statuary and the Byzantine Beholder’,DOP,XXII (1963),69Google Scholar.

62. SeeMasai,F.,Pléthon et le platonisme de Mistra (Paris,1956), pp.66–101Google Scholar, esp. pp. 87-8;Barker,E.,Social and Political Thought in Byixmtium (Oxford,1957), pp.196–219Google Scholar.

63. See H.-G. Beck inBZ, LIII (1960), 86-94.