Stay informed about this journal!
Stay informed about this journal!
The aim of this study is to contribute to a deeper understanding of the gendered condi- tions under which diplomats network. We still have limited knowledge of how female diplomats network when serving abroad in strongly male-dominated contexts. To what extent do they experience token tendencies (visibility, assimilation and contrast) and how are these tendencies perceived to affect their access to important contacts? Based on 28 interviews with diplomats and civil servants from the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA), this study compares how female and male diplomats are expected and perceived to network. The results indicate that the greater visibility of female diplomats makes them assimilate to a stereotypical gender role that closely resembles that of diplomatic wives. Women thus legitimise their presence in theMFA and make it less intrusive. Still, they experience contrast in silent resistance and con- stant reminders of their presence in a gender-inappropriate profession.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aggestam,Karin andAnnTowns. ‘The Gender Turn in Diplomacy: A New Research Agenda’.International Feminist Journal of Politics21 (1) (2019),9-28.
Al-Nadaf,Gufran. ‘Till Damaskus! Singel i hardship’. InDiplomat idag: Röster om en ny verklighet, eds.Jenny LennungMalmqvistandHelenaGustavsson Wahlund (Stockholm:Atlantis,2014),157-166.
Bashevkin,Sylvia.Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Politics in Superpower America (Oxford:Oxford University Press,2018).
Bergqvist,Christina. ‘The Welfare State and Gender Equality’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics, ed.JonPierre (Oxford:Oxford University Press,2016),55-68.
Berridge,Geoff R.Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (New York:Palgrave,2002).
Biltekin,Nevra. ‘The Diplomatic Partnership: Gender, Materiality and Performance in the Case of Sweden c. 1960s-1980s’.Genesis11 (1-2) (2012),253-265.
Biltekin,Nevra.Servants of Diplomacy: The Making of Swedish Diplomats, 1905-1995 (Stockholm:Department of History, Stockholm University,2016).
Brass,Daniel J.,JosephGalaskiewicz,Henrich R.Greve andWenpinTsai ‘Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective’.Academy of Management Journal47 (6) (2004),795-817.
Business Sweden. ‘About Business Sweden’.13May2019.https://www.business-sweden.se/en/about-us/About-Business-Sweden/.
Chehab, Sara J. ‘On the Retention and Promotion of Women Ambassadors: Perspectives from the Arab World’. Paper presented at the Gender and Diplomacy Workshop, Gothenburg, June 2019.
Cornut,Jérémie. ‘To Be a Diplomat Abroad: Diplomatic Practice at Embassies’.Cooperation and Conflict50 (3) (2015),385-301.
Database on Ambassador Postings, Sex and International Status. GenDip,2020.https://gendip.gu.se/data.
Erlandsson, Susanna. ‘The Crucial Roles of Women in Diplomacy before the Female Diplomat: Understanding the Gendered Nature of Diplomatic Practice in the Mid-Twentieth Century’. Paper presented at the panel Gender and the Changing Dynamics of Diplomacy, European Conference on Politics and Gender, Amsterdam, July 2019.
Hornscheidt,Lann. ‘Sweden—The World’s Most Feminist Society: An Analysis of Current Swedish Media Debates and Person Appellation Forms as a Tool within CDA’.Journal of Language and Politics7 (3) (2008),391-412.
Ibarra,Herminia. ‘Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework’.The Academy of Management Review18 (1) (1993),56-87.
Jäderström,Elin.Hennes excellens Agda Rössel: Från banvaktstugan till FN-skrapan (Stockholm:Bokförlaget Atlantis AB,2018).
Kanter,Rosabeth Moss.Men and Women of the Corporation (Reprint,New York:Basic Books,[1977] 1993).
Kegen,Nadine V. ‘Science Networks in Cutting-Edge Research Institutions: Gender Homophily and Embeddedness in Formal and Informal Networks’.Prodedia— Social and Behavioral Sciences79 (2013),62-81.
Kerr,Pauline andGeoffreyWiseman. ‘Introduction’. InDiplomacy in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices, eds.PaulineKerr andGeoffreyWiseman (Oxford:Oxford University Press,2013),1-12.
Kvale,Steinar.Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (Lund:Studentlitteratur AB,1997).
Legue-Feilleux,Jean-Robert.The Dynamics of Diplomacy (London:Lynne Rienner,2009).
Lequesne,Christian,GabrielCastillo,MindaHolm,Waldi JumblattAbdullah,HalvardLeira,KamnaTiwary andReubenWong. ‘Ethnic Diversity in the Recruitment of Diplomats: WhyMFAs Take the Issue Seriously’.The Hague Journal of Diplomacy15 (1-2) (2020), this issue.
Mace, Harry. ‘Masculinities and Diplomatic Culture in Late Twentieth-Century Britain’. Paper presented at the Gender and Diplomacy Workshop, Gothenburg, June 2019.
McCarthy,Helen.Women of the World: The Rise of the Female Diplomat (London:Bloomsbury,2014).
McCarthy,Helen. ‘Gendering Diplomatic History: Women in the British Diplomatic Service, circa 1919-1972’. InWomen, Diplomacy and International Politics since 1500, eds.GlendaSluga andCarolynJames (London:Routledge,2016),167-181.
McGlen,Nancy E. andMeredith ReidSarkees.Women in Foreign Policy: The Insiders (New York:Routledge,1993).
Metzl,Jamie F. ‘Network Diplomacy’.Georgetown Journal of International Affairs22 (2001),77-87.
Morin,Ann Miller. ‘Do Women Make Better Ambassadors?’Foreign Service Journal71 (12) (1994),26-30.
Morin,Ann Miller.Her Excellency (New York:Twayne,1995).
Murrey,Stuartet al. ‘The Present and Future of Diplomacy and Diplomatic Studies’.International Studies Review13 (2011),709-728.
Neumann,Iver. ‘The Body of the Diplomat’.European Journal of International Relations14 (4) (2008),671-695.
Neumann,Iver.Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry (Oxford:Oxford Scholarship Online,2013).
Neumann,Iver. ‘Diplomatic Representation in the Public Sphere’.The Hague Journal of Diplomacy14 (4) (2019),447-466.
Niklasson,Birgitta andFeliciaRobertson. ‘The SwedishMFA—Ready to Live up to Expectations?’ InGendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation, eds.KarinAggestam andAnnTowns (Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,2018),65-86.
Rossetti,Sonia. ‘Changes for Diplomacy under the Lens of Feminist Neo-Institutional Theory: The Case of Australia’.The Hague Journal for Diplomacy10 (3) (2015),285–305.
Rumelili, Bahar and Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm. ‘Gender and Governance in Turkish Diplomacy: A Feminist Institutionalist Approach’. Paper presented at the Gender and Diplomacy Workshop, Gothenburg, June 2019.
Shaw,John.The Ambassador: Inside the Life of a Working Diplomat (Sterling, VA:Capital Books,2006).
Standfield,Catriona. ‘Gendering the Practice Turn in Diplomacy’.European Journal of International Relations (forthcoming).
Stephenson, Elise. ‘Queer Women, Diplomacy and Security: A Case Study of Australian Leaders’. Paper presented at the Gender and Diplomacy Workshop, Gothenburg, June 2019.
Swedish Government. ‘The Swedish Foreign Politics Declaration 2015’.5April2019.https://www.regeringen.se/informationsmaterial/2015/02/utrikesdeklarationen-2015/.
Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs. ‘Handbook: The Swedish Feminist Foreign Policy’ (Stockholm:Ministry for Foreign Affairs,2018).
Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs. ‘Sweden Abroad’.24May2019.https://www.swedenabroad.se/sv/.
Thurén,Torsten.Källkritik (Stockholm:Liber,2013).
Towns, Ann. ‘Body Work of Ambassadors: Visual Expressions of Gender and Sexuality in Diplomacy’. Paper presented at the panel Gender and the Changing Dynamics of Diplomacy, European Conference on Politics and Gender, Amsterdam, July 2019.
Towns,Ann andBirgittaNiklasson. ‘Gender, International Status, and Ambassador Appointments’.Foreign Policy Analysis13 (3) (2016),1-20.
UNDP (UN Development Programme). ‘Human Development Indices and Indicators. 2018 Statistical Update’ (New York:UNDP,2018).
Velasco,Maria. ‘Vardagspussel i Jerusalem’. InDiplomat idag: Röster om en ny verklighet, eds.Jenny LennungMalmqvist andHelena GustavssonWahlund (Stockholm:Atlantis,2014),49-60.
Wood,Molly M. ‘“Commanding Beauty” and “Gentle Charm”: American Women and Gender in the Early Twentieth-Century Foreign Service’.Diplomatic History31 (3) (2007),505-330.
World Economic Forum. ‘Insight Report: The Global Gender Gap Report 2017’ (Geneva:World Economic Forum,2017).
Yoder,Janice D. ‘Rethinking Tokenism: Looking beyond Numbers’.Gender and Society5 (2) (1991),178-192.
Yoder,Janice D. ‘2001 Division 35 Presidential Address: Context Matters: Understanding Tokenism Processes and Their Impact on Women’s Work’.Psychology of Women Quarterly26 (2002),1-8.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2099 | 571 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 2046 | 97 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 2401 | 177 | 5 |
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
The aim of this study is to contribute to a deeper understanding of the gendered condi- tions under which diplomats network. We still have limited knowledge of how female diplomats network when serving abroad in strongly male-dominated contexts. To what extent do they experience token tendencies (visibility, assimilation and contrast) and how are these tendencies perceived to affect their access to important contacts? Based on 28 interviews with diplomats and civil servants from the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA), this study compares how female and male diplomats are expected and perceived to network. The results indicate that the greater visibility of female diplomats makes them assimilate to a stereotypical gender role that closely resembles that of diplomatic wives. Women thus legitimise their presence in theMFA and make it less intrusive. Still, they experience contrast in silent resistance and con- stant reminders of their presence in a gender-inappropriate profession.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2099 | 571 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 2046 | 97 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 2401 | 177 | 5 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2025