Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

1932
Annual Reviews logo
Skip to content

Review Article

Free

Center-Right Political Parties in Advanced Democracies

Abstract

This review proposes a comparative research agenda on center-right parties in advanced democracies, bringing together research in American and comparative politics. Political scientists have recently closely examined the decline of the center-left and the rise of the radical right but have paid less attention to the weakening of center-right parties. Yet cohesive center-right parties have facilitated political stability and compromises, while their disintegration has empowered radical challengers. After presenting an overview of right-wing politics in Western democracies and weighing different definitions of the electoral right, we discuss two factors that shape variations in center-right cohesion: organizational robustness of center-right partisan institutions and the (un)bundling of conservative mass attitudes on different policy dimensions. Last, we argue that a full account of the rise of the radical right cannot focus solely on the strategies of the center-left but must incorporate also the choices, opportunities, and constraints of center-right parties.

    Loading

    Article metrics loading...

    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    2019-05-11
    2026-02-15

    Metrics

    Download as PowerPoint
    Loading full text...

    Full text loading...

    /deliver/fulltext/polisci/22/1/annurev-polisci-090717-092750.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

    Literature Cited

    1. AberbachJD,PeeleG2011.Crisis of Conservatism? The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    2. ArmingeonK,WengerV,WiedemeierF,IslerC,KnöpfelL et al.2017. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2015.http://www.cpds-data.org/
    3. ArzheimerK2015. The AfD: Finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany?.West Eur. Politics38:3535–56
      [Google Scholar]
    4. ArzheimerK,CarterE2006. Political opportunity structure and right-wing extremist party success.Eur. J. Political Res.45:3419–33
      [Google Scholar]
    5. BaleT2008. Turning round the telescope: centre-right parties and immigration and integration policy in Europe.J. Eur. Public Policy15:3315–30
      [Google Scholar]
    6. BaleT2018. Who leads and who follows? The symbiotic relationship between UKIP and the Conservatives—and populism and Euroscepticism.Politics38:3263–77
      [Google Scholar]
    7. BaleT,KrouwelA2013. Down but not out: a comparison of Germany's CDU/CSU with Christian Democratic parties in Austria, Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands.German Politics22:1–216–45
      [Google Scholar]
    8. BartelsL2013.Party systems and political change in Europe Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Aug. 29–Sept1 Chicago:
      [Google Scholar]
    9. BeerSH1965.Modern British Politics: Parties and Pressure Groups New York: Norton
      [Google Scholar]
    10. BleeKM,CreasapKA2010. Conservative and right-wing movements.Annu. Rev. Sociol.36:1269–86
      [Google Scholar]
    11. BobC2012.The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    12. BobbioN1996.Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    13. BorgSG,CastlesFG1981. The influence of the political right on public income maintenance expenditure and equality.Political Stud29:4604–21
      [Google Scholar]
    14. BornschierS,KriesiH2012. The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics.Class Politics and the Radical Right J Rydgren10–29 London: Routledge
      [Google Scholar]
    15. BurginA2012.The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets Since the Depression Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    16. CochraneC2013. The asymmetrical structure of left/right disagreement.Party Politics19:1104–21
      [Google Scholar]
    17. CowleyP,GarryJ1998. The British Conservative Party and Europe: the choosing of John Major.Br. J. Political Sci.28:3473–99
      [Google Scholar]
    18. CroninJE,RossG,ShochJ2011.What's Left of the Left Furham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    19. DahlströmC,SundellA2012. A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success.Electoral Stud31:2353–63
      [Google Scholar]
    20. DionneEJ2016.Why the Right Went Wrong: Conservatism—from Goldwater to the Tea Party and Beyond New York: Simon and Schuster
      [Google Scholar]
    21. Economist.2017. Donald Trump is remodelling the right.Economist Feb. 24.https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/02/24/donald-trump-is-remodelling-the-right
      [Google Scholar]
    22. EleyG2002.Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    23. ElisC,StimsonJ2012.Ideology in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    24. EvansG,TilleyJ2011. How parties shape class politics: explaining the decline of the class basis of party support.Br. J. Political Sci.42:1137–61
      [Google Scholar]
    25. [Google Scholar]
    26. GeddesA2008. Il rombo dei cannoni? Immigration and the centre-right in Italy.J. Eur. Public Policy15:3349–66
      [Google Scholar]
    27. GibsonEL1996.Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    28. GidronN,HallPA2017. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right.Br. J. Sociol.68:157–84
      [Google Scholar]
    29. GingrichJ2011.Making Markets in the Welfare State New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    30. GingrichJ,HäusermannS2015. The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state.J. Eur. Soc. Policy25:150–75
      [Google Scholar]
    31. GlennBJ,TelesSM.2009a. Conclusion: conservatism and American political development. See Glenn & Teles 2009b324–47
    32. GlennBJ,TelesSM2009b.Conservatism and American Political Development New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    33. GrossmannM,HopkinsDA2016.Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    34. GrossmannM,HopkinsDA2018.Placing media in conservative culture Paper presented at UT Austin New Agendas Conference, April Austin, TX:
      [Google Scholar]
    35. HackerJS,PiersonP2005.Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    36. HackerJS,PiersonP2010.Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class New York: Simon and Schuster
      [Google Scholar]
    37. HareC,PooleKT2014. The polarization of contemporary American politics.Polity46:3411–29
      [Google Scholar]
    38. Hertel-FernandezA2014. Who passes business's “model bills”? Policy capacity and corporate influence in US state politics.Perspect. Politics12:3582–602
      [Google Scholar]
    39. HirschmanAO1991.The Rhetoric of Reaction Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    40. HopkinsDJ,NoelH2017.Is John McCain more conservative than Rand Paul? Using activists' pairwise comparisons to measure ideology Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Apr6–9 Chicago:
      [Google Scholar]
    41. HuberE,StephensJD2001.Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    42. HuntingtonSP1957. Conservatism as an ideology.Am. Political Sci. Rev.51:2454–73
      [Google Scholar]
    43. IgnaziP1992. The silent counter-revolution: hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe.Eur. J. Political Res.22:13–34
      [Google Scholar]
    44. IgnaziP,WellhoferES2013. Religion, rurality and voting: secularisation, landownership and Italian electoral behaviour, 1953–2008.West Eur. Politics36:5919–45
      [Google Scholar]
    45. Invernizzi-AccettiC2018.What is Christian Democracy? New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    46. IversenT,SoskiceD2015. Democratic limits to redistribution: inclusionary versus exclusionary coalitions in the knowledge economy.World Politics67:2185–225
      [Google Scholar]
    47. IversenT,StephensJD2008. Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation.Comp. Political Stud.41:4–5600–37
      [Google Scholar]
    48. JensenC2014.The Right and the Welfare State Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    49. JostJT2009. Elective affinities: on the psychological bases of left-right differences.Psychol. Inq.20:2–3129–41
      [Google Scholar]
    50. JostJT2017. Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology.Political Psychol38:2167–208
      [Google Scholar]
    51. JostJT,GlaserJ,KruglanskiAW,SullowayFJ2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.Psychol. Bull.129:3339–75
      [Google Scholar]
    52. KabaserviceG2012.Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    53. KaiserW2007.Christian Democracy and the Origins of the European Union Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    54. KalyvasSN1996.The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    55. KalyvasSN,van KersbergenK2010. Christian democracy.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.13:1183–209
      [Google Scholar]
    56. KelemanRD2017. Europe's other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe's democratic union.Gov. Opposition52:2211–38
      [Google Scholar]
    57. KitscheltH1994.The Transformation of European Social Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    58. KitscheltH2018. Party systems and radical right-wing parties.The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right J Rydgren166–99 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    59. KitscheltH,McGannAJ1995.The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    60. KitscheltH,RehmP2014. Occupations as a site of political preference formation.Comp. Political Stud.47:121670–706
      [Google Scholar]
    61. KorpiW2006. Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: protagonists, consenters, and antagonists.World Politics58:2167–206
      [Google Scholar]
    62. KriesiH,EdgarG,LachatR,DolezalM,BornschierS,FreyT2008.West European Politics in the Age of Globalization New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    63. LelkesY,SnidermanPM2016. The ideological asymmetry of the American party system.Br. J. Political Sci.46:4825–44
      [Google Scholar]
    64. LevitskyS,ZiblattD2018.How Democracies Die New York: Crown
      [Google Scholar]
    65. LipsetSM1961.Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    66. LipsetSM,RaabE1970.The Politics of Unreason: Right Wing Extremism in America,1790–1970 New York: Harper & Row
      [Google Scholar]
    67. LipsetSM,RokkanS1967. Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: an introduction.Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives SM Lipset, S Rokkan1–64 New York: Free Press
      [Google Scholar]
    68. LowndesJE2008.From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    69. LunaJP,KaltwasserCR2014.The Resilience of the Latin American Right Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    70. LuptonRN,MyersWM,ThorntonJR2017. Party animals: asymmetric ideological constraint among Democratic and Republican Party activists.Political Res. Q.70:4889–904
      [Google Scholar]
    71. MalkaA,LelkesY,SotoCJ2017. Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test.Br. J. Political Sci. May 30.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/are-cultural-and-economic-conservatism-positively-correlated-a-largescale-crossnational-test/83AFEDEA5E004CF23631C5388E7C9F67
      [Google Scholar]
    72. MaresI2003.The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    73. MasonL2018. Ideologues without issues: the polarizing consequences of ideological identities.Public Opinion Q82:1280–30
      [Google Scholar]
    74. McCartyN,PooleKT,RosenthalH2006.Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
      [Google Scholar]
    75. MedvetzT2006. The strength of weekly ties: relations of material and symbolic exchange in the conservative movement.Politics Soc34:3343–68
      [Google Scholar]
    76. MeguidBM2005. Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success.Am. Political Sci. Rev.99:2347–59
      [Google Scholar]
    77. MichelsR1930. Conservatism.Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences ER Seligman230–32 New York: Macmillan
      [Google Scholar]
    78. MizruchiMS2013.The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    79. MuddeC2007.Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    80. MüllerJW2006. Comprehending conservatism: a new framework for analysis.J. Political Ideologies11:3359–65
      [Google Scholar]
    81. MüllerJW2011.Contesting Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    82. MüllerJW2014. The end of Christian Democracy. What the movement's decline means for Europe.Foreign Aff July 15.https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/western-europe/2014-07-15/end-christian-democracy
      [Google Scholar]
    83. MüllerJW2016.What is Populism Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    84. MullerJZ1997.Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    85. NashGH1996.The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945 Wilmington, DE: Intercoll. Stud. Inst.
      [Google Scholar]
    86. NoelA,TherienJP2008.Left and Right in Global Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    87. Pardos-PradoS2015. How can mainstream parties prevent niche party success? Center-Right parties and the immigration issue.J. Politics77:2352–67
      [Google Scholar]
    88. PaxtonRO2004.The Anatomy of Fascism New York: Vintage
      [Google Scholar]
    89. Phillips-FeinK2011. Conservatism: a state of the field.J. Am. Hist.98:3723–43
      [Google Scholar]
    90. PiersonP1995.Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    91. RémondR1969.The Right Wing in France from 1815 to De Gaulle Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    92. RicciD2009. Political science and conservative ideas: the American case.J. Political Ideologies14:2155–71
      [Google Scholar]
    93. RikerW1986.The Art of Political Manipulation New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    94. RobinC2011.The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    95. RokkanS1970.Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
      [Google Scholar]
    96. RovnyJ2013. Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition.Eur. Political Sci. Rev.5:11–26
      [Google Scholar]
    97. SandelMJ2018. Populism, liberalism, and democracy.Philos. Soc. Criticism. In press
      [Google Scholar]
    98. ShepsleK2003. Losers in politics (and how they sometimes become winners): William Riker's heresthetic.Perspect. Politics1:2307–15
      [Google Scholar]
    99. SkocpolT,Hertel-FernandezA2016. The Koch network and Republican Party extremism.Perspect. Politics14:3681–99
      [Google Scholar]
    100. SkocpolT,WilliamsonV2012.The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    101. SkowronekS2009. Afterword: an attenuated reconstruction: the conservative turn in American political development.Conservatism and American Political Development BJ Glenn, SM Teles348–64 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    102. StreeckW2017. Trump and the Trumpists.Inference: Int. Rev. Sci.3:1https://inference-review.com/article/trump-and-the-trumpists
      [Google Scholar]
    103. SwensonPA1991. Bringing capital back in, or social democracy reconsidered: employer power, cross-class alliances, and centralization of industrial relations in Denmark and Sweden.World Politics43:04513–44
      [Google Scholar]
    104. TavitsM,PotterJD2015. The effect of inequality and social identity on party strategies.Am. J. Political Sci59:3744–58
      [Google Scholar]
    105. TelesSM2008.The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    106. TurnerE2013. The CDU and party organisational change.German Politics22:1–2114–33
      [Google Scholar]
    107. van der MeerT,ElsasEV,LubbeR,van der BrugW2015. Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010).Party Politics21:1100–14
      [Google Scholar]
    108. van KersbergenK1995.Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State London: Routledge
      [Google Scholar]
    109. van KersbergenK2008. The Christian Democratic phoenix and modern unsecular politics.Party Politics14:3259–79
      [Google Scholar]
    110. van KersbergenK,KrouwelA2008. A double-edged sword! The Dutch centre-right and the “foreigners issue..”J. Eur. Public Policy15:3398–414
      [Google Scholar]
    111. VolkensA,KlingemannH,BaraJ,BudgeI,McDonaldM2006.Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    112. WagnerM2011. The right in the European Parliament since 1979.Perspect. Eur. Politics Soc.12:152–67
      [Google Scholar]
    113. WebbP,BaleT2014. Why do Tories defect to UKIP? Conservative Party members and the temptations of the populist radical right.Political Stud62:4961–70
      [Google Scholar]
    114. ZiblattD2017.Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    Loading
    Center-Right Political Parties in Advanced Democracies
    Annual Review of Political Science22, 17 (2019);https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    Loading

    Data & Media loading...

    Most Read This Month

    Article
    content/journals/polisci
    Journal
    5
    3
    false
    en
    Loading

    Most CitedMost Cited RSS feed

    knowable Logo

    Science needs us — and you

    Support nonprofit Knowable Magazine and bring facts to light→

    Related Articles from Annual Reviews

    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    4
    4

    Literature Cited

    1. AberbachJD,PeeleG2011.Crisis of Conservatism? The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    2. ArmingeonK,WengerV,WiedemeierF,IslerC,KnöpfelL et al.2017. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2015.http://www.cpds-data.org/
    3. ArzheimerK2015. The AfD: Finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany?.West Eur. Politics38:3535–56
      [Google Scholar]
    4. ArzheimerK,CarterE2006. Political opportunity structure and right-wing extremist party success.Eur. J. Political Res.45:3419–33
      [Google Scholar]
    5. BaleT2008. Turning round the telescope: centre-right parties and immigration and integration policy in Europe.J. Eur. Public Policy15:3315–30
      [Google Scholar]
    6. BaleT2018. Who leads and who follows? The symbiotic relationship between UKIP and the Conservatives—and populism and Euroscepticism.Politics38:3263–77
      [Google Scholar]
    7. BaleT,KrouwelA2013. Down but not out: a comparison of Germany's CDU/CSU with Christian Democratic parties in Austria, Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands.German Politics22:1–216–45
      [Google Scholar]
    8. BartelsL2013.Party systems and political change in Europe Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Aug. 29–Sept1 Chicago:
      [Google Scholar]
    9. BeerSH1965.Modern British Politics: Parties and Pressure Groups New York: Norton
      [Google Scholar]
    10. BleeKM,CreasapKA2010. Conservative and right-wing movements.Annu. Rev. Sociol.36:1269–86
      [Google Scholar]
    11. BobC2012.The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    12. BobbioN1996.Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    13. BorgSG,CastlesFG1981. The influence of the political right on public income maintenance expenditure and equality.Political Stud29:4604–21
      [Google Scholar]
    14. BornschierS,KriesiH2012. The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics.Class Politics and the Radical Right J Rydgren10–29 London: Routledge
      [Google Scholar]
    15. BurginA2012.The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets Since the Depression Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    16. CochraneC2013. The asymmetrical structure of left/right disagreement.Party Politics19:1104–21
      [Google Scholar]
    17. CowleyP,GarryJ1998. The British Conservative Party and Europe: the choosing of John Major.Br. J. Political Sci.28:3473–99
      [Google Scholar]
    18. CroninJE,RossG,ShochJ2011.What's Left of the Left Furham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    19. DahlströmC,SundellA2012. A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success.Electoral Stud31:2353–63
      [Google Scholar]
    20. DionneEJ2016.Why the Right Went Wrong: Conservatism—from Goldwater to the Tea Party and Beyond New York: Simon and Schuster
      [Google Scholar]
    21. Economist.2017. Donald Trump is remodelling the right.Economist Feb. 24.https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/02/24/donald-trump-is-remodelling-the-right
      [Google Scholar]
    22. EleyG2002.Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    23. ElisC,StimsonJ2012.Ideology in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    24. EvansG,TilleyJ2011. How parties shape class politics: explaining the decline of the class basis of party support.Br. J. Political Sci.42:1137–61
      [Google Scholar]
    25. [Google Scholar]
    26. GeddesA2008. Il rombo dei cannoni? Immigration and the centre-right in Italy.J. Eur. Public Policy15:3349–66
      [Google Scholar]
    27. GibsonEL1996.Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    28. GidronN,HallPA2017. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right.Br. J. Sociol.68:157–84
      [Google Scholar]
    29. GingrichJ2011.Making Markets in the Welfare State New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    30. GingrichJ,HäusermannS2015. The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state.J. Eur. Soc. Policy25:150–75
      [Google Scholar]
    31. GlennBJ,TelesSM.2009a. Conclusion: conservatism and American political development. See Glenn & Teles 2009b324–47
    32. GlennBJ,TelesSM2009b.Conservatism and American Political Development New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    33. GrossmannM,HopkinsDA2016.Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    34. GrossmannM,HopkinsDA2018.Placing media in conservative culture Paper presented at UT Austin New Agendas Conference, April Austin, TX:
      [Google Scholar]
    35. HackerJS,PiersonP2005.Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    36. HackerJS,PiersonP2010.Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class New York: Simon and Schuster
      [Google Scholar]
    37. HareC,PooleKT2014. The polarization of contemporary American politics.Polity46:3411–29
      [Google Scholar]
    38. Hertel-FernandezA2014. Who passes business's “model bills”? Policy capacity and corporate influence in US state politics.Perspect. Politics12:3582–602
      [Google Scholar]
    39. HirschmanAO1991.The Rhetoric of Reaction Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    40. HopkinsDJ,NoelH2017.Is John McCain more conservative than Rand Paul? Using activists' pairwise comparisons to measure ideology Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Apr6–9 Chicago:
      [Google Scholar]
    41. HuberE,StephensJD2001.Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    42. HuntingtonSP1957. Conservatism as an ideology.Am. Political Sci. Rev.51:2454–73
      [Google Scholar]
    43. IgnaziP1992. The silent counter-revolution: hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe.Eur. J. Political Res.22:13–34
      [Google Scholar]
    44. IgnaziP,WellhoferES2013. Religion, rurality and voting: secularisation, landownership and Italian electoral behaviour, 1953–2008.West Eur. Politics36:5919–45
      [Google Scholar]
    45. Invernizzi-AccettiC2018.What is Christian Democracy? New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    46. IversenT,SoskiceD2015. Democratic limits to redistribution: inclusionary versus exclusionary coalitions in the knowledge economy.World Politics67:2185–225
      [Google Scholar]
    47. IversenT,StephensJD2008. Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation.Comp. Political Stud.41:4–5600–37
      [Google Scholar]
    48. JensenC2014.The Right and the Welfare State Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    49. JostJT2009. Elective affinities: on the psychological bases of left-right differences.Psychol. Inq.20:2–3129–41
      [Google Scholar]
    50. JostJT2017. Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology.Political Psychol38:2167–208
      [Google Scholar]
    51. JostJT,GlaserJ,KruglanskiAW,SullowayFJ2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.Psychol. Bull.129:3339–75
      [Google Scholar]
    52. KabaserviceG2012.Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    53. KaiserW2007.Christian Democracy and the Origins of the European Union Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    54. KalyvasSN1996.The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    55. KalyvasSN,van KersbergenK2010. Christian democracy.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.13:1183–209
      [Google Scholar]
    56. KelemanRD2017. Europe's other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe's democratic union.Gov. Opposition52:2211–38
      [Google Scholar]
    57. KitscheltH1994.The Transformation of European Social Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    58. KitscheltH2018. Party systems and radical right-wing parties.The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right J Rydgren166–99 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    59. KitscheltH,McGannAJ1995.The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    60. KitscheltH,RehmP2014. Occupations as a site of political preference formation.Comp. Political Stud.47:121670–706
      [Google Scholar]
    61. KorpiW2006. Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: protagonists, consenters, and antagonists.World Politics58:2167–206
      [Google Scholar]
    62. KriesiH,EdgarG,LachatR,DolezalM,BornschierS,FreyT2008.West European Politics in the Age of Globalization New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    63. LelkesY,SnidermanPM2016. The ideological asymmetry of the American party system.Br. J. Political Sci.46:4825–44
      [Google Scholar]
    64. LevitskyS,ZiblattD2018.How Democracies Die New York: Crown
      [Google Scholar]
    65. LipsetSM1961.Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    66. LipsetSM,RaabE1970.The Politics of Unreason: Right Wing Extremism in America,1790–1970 New York: Harper & Row
      [Google Scholar]
    67. LipsetSM,RokkanS1967. Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: an introduction.Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives SM Lipset, S Rokkan1–64 New York: Free Press
      [Google Scholar]
    68. LowndesJE2008.From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    69. LunaJP,KaltwasserCR2014.The Resilience of the Latin American Right Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    70. LuptonRN,MyersWM,ThorntonJR2017. Party animals: asymmetric ideological constraint among Democratic and Republican Party activists.Political Res. Q.70:4889–904
      [Google Scholar]
    71. MalkaA,LelkesY,SotoCJ2017. Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test.Br. J. Political Sci. May 30.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/are-cultural-and-economic-conservatism-positively-correlated-a-largescale-crossnational-test/83AFEDEA5E004CF23631C5388E7C9F67
      [Google Scholar]
    72. MaresI2003.The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    73. MasonL2018. Ideologues without issues: the polarizing consequences of ideological identities.Public Opinion Q82:1280–30
      [Google Scholar]
    74. McCartyN,PooleKT,RosenthalH2006.Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
      [Google Scholar]
    75. MedvetzT2006. The strength of weekly ties: relations of material and symbolic exchange in the conservative movement.Politics Soc34:3343–68
      [Google Scholar]
    76. MeguidBM2005. Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success.Am. Political Sci. Rev.99:2347–59
      [Google Scholar]
    77. MichelsR1930. Conservatism.Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences ER Seligman230–32 New York: Macmillan
      [Google Scholar]
    78. MizruchiMS2013.The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    79. MuddeC2007.Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    80. MüllerJW2006. Comprehending conservatism: a new framework for analysis.J. Political Ideologies11:3359–65
      [Google Scholar]
    81. MüllerJW2011.Contesting Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    82. MüllerJW2014. The end of Christian Democracy. What the movement's decline means for Europe.Foreign Aff July 15.https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/western-europe/2014-07-15/end-christian-democracy
      [Google Scholar]
    83. MüllerJW2016.What is Populism Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    84. MullerJZ1997.Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    85. NashGH1996.The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945 Wilmington, DE: Intercoll. Stud. Inst.
      [Google Scholar]
    86. NoelA,TherienJP2008.Left and Right in Global Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    87. Pardos-PradoS2015. How can mainstream parties prevent niche party success? Center-Right parties and the immigration issue.J. Politics77:2352–67
      [Google Scholar]
    88. PaxtonRO2004.The Anatomy of Fascism New York: Vintage
      [Google Scholar]
    89. Phillips-FeinK2011. Conservatism: a state of the field.J. Am. Hist.98:3723–43
      [Google Scholar]
    90. PiersonP1995.Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    91. RémondR1969.The Right Wing in France from 1815 to De Gaulle Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    92. RicciD2009. Political science and conservative ideas: the American case.J. Political Ideologies14:2155–71
      [Google Scholar]
    93. RikerW1986.The Art of Political Manipulation New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    94. RobinC2011.The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    95. RokkanS1970.Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
      [Google Scholar]
    96. RovnyJ2013. Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition.Eur. Political Sci. Rev.5:11–26
      [Google Scholar]
    97. SandelMJ2018. Populism, liberalism, and democracy.Philos. Soc. Criticism. In press
      [Google Scholar]
    98. ShepsleK2003. Losers in politics (and how they sometimes become winners): William Riker's heresthetic.Perspect. Politics1:2307–15
      [Google Scholar]
    99. SkocpolT,Hertel-FernandezA2016. The Koch network and Republican Party extremism.Perspect. Politics14:3681–99
      [Google Scholar]
    100. SkocpolT,WilliamsonV2012.The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    101. SkowronekS2009. Afterword: an attenuated reconstruction: the conservative turn in American political development.Conservatism and American Political Development BJ Glenn, SM Teles348–64 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    102. StreeckW2017. Trump and the Trumpists.Inference: Int. Rev. Sci.3:1https://inference-review.com/article/trump-and-the-trumpists
      [Google Scholar]
    103. SwensonPA1991. Bringing capital back in, or social democracy reconsidered: employer power, cross-class alliances, and centralization of industrial relations in Denmark and Sweden.World Politics43:04513–44
      [Google Scholar]
    104. TavitsM,PotterJD2015. The effect of inequality and social identity on party strategies.Am. J. Political Sci59:3744–58
      [Google Scholar]
    105. TelesSM2008.The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    106. TurnerE2013. The CDU and party organisational change.German Politics22:1–2114–33
      [Google Scholar]
    107. van der MeerT,ElsasEV,LubbeR,van der BrugW2015. Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010).Party Politics21:1100–14
      [Google Scholar]
    108. van KersbergenK1995.Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State London: Routledge
      [Google Scholar]
    109. van KersbergenK2008. The Christian Democratic phoenix and modern unsecular politics.Party Politics14:3259–79
      [Google Scholar]
    110. van KersbergenK,KrouwelA2008. A double-edged sword! The Dutch centre-right and the “foreigners issue..”J. Eur. Public Policy15:3398–414
      [Google Scholar]
    111. VolkensA,KlingemannH,BaraJ,BudgeI,McDonaldM2006.Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    112. WagnerM2011. The right in the European Parliament since 1979.Perspect. Eur. Politics Soc.12:152–67
      [Google Scholar]
    113. WebbP,BaleT2014. Why do Tories defect to UKIP? Conservative Party members and the temptations of the populist radical right.Political Stud62:4961–70
      [Google Scholar]
    114. ZiblattD2017.Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]

    FromKnowable Magazine:

    knowable magazine Teen Brain Bootcamp Special

    knowable magazine from Annual Reviews

    Bluesky share image


    Climate Resource Center, Article Collection from Annual Reviews


    Journal News

    This is a required field
    Please enter a valid email address
    Approval was a Success
    Invalid data
    An Error Occurred
    Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
    Annual Reviews:
    http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
    SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM
    [8]ページ先頭
    ©2009-2026 Movatter.jp