Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


1932
Annual Reviews logo
Skip to content

Review Article

Free

Political Responses to Economic Shocks

Abstract

How does the experience of economic shocks affect individuals' political views and voting behavior? Inspired partly by the fallout of the financial crisis of 2008, research on this question has proliferated. Findings from studies covering a broadening range of countries and economic contexts highlight several notable patterns. Economic shocks—e.g., job loss or sharp drop in income—exert a significant and theoretically predictable, if often transient, effect on political attitudes. In contrast, the effect on voting behavior is more limited in magnitude and its manifestations less understood. Negative economic shocks tend to increase support for more expansive social policy and for redistribution, strengthening the appeal of the left. But such shocks also tend to decrease trust in political institutions, thus potentially driving the voters to support radical or populist parties, or demobilizing them altogether. Further research is needed to detect the conditions that lead to these distinct voting outcomes.

    Loading

    Article metrics loading...

    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
    2019-05-11
    2026-02-13

    Metrics

    Download as PowerPoint
    Loading full text...

    Full text loading...

    /deliver/fulltext/polisci/22/1/annurev-polisci-050517-110713.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

    Literature Cited

    1. AhlquistJ,CopelovitchM,WalterS2018.The political consequences of economic shocks. Evidence from Poland CIS Work. Pap. 97 Cent. Comp. Int. Stud., Univ. Zurich Zurich, Switz.:
      [Google Scholar]
    2. AlesinaA,GiulianoP2011. Preferences for redistribution.Handbook of Social Economics1A J Benhabib, A Bisin, MO Jackson93–132 Amsterdam: North-Holland
      [Google Scholar]
    3. AlesinaA,La FerraraE2005. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities.J. Public Econ.89:897–931
      [Google Scholar]
    4. AlganY,GurievS,PapaioannouE,PassariE2017. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism.Brookings Pap. Econ. Act.2017:2309–400https://muse.jhu.edu/article/688908/pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    5. AltJE,JensenA,LarreguyHA,LassenDD,MarshallJ2017.Contagious political concerns: Identifying unemployment shock information transmission using the Danish Population Network Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco CA: Aug. 31–Sept. 3.https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jmarshall/files/unemployment_and_networks_v10.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    6. AndersonCJ2007. The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.10:271–96
      [Google Scholar]
    7. AngristJD,PischkeJ-S2008.Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    8. AutorDH,DornD,HansonGH2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States.Am. Econ. Rev.103:2121–68
      [Google Scholar]
    9. AutorDH,DornD,HansonG,MajlesiK2016.Importing political polarization? NBER Work. Pap. 22637
      [Google Scholar]
    10. BaguesM,Esteve-VolartB2016. Politicians luck of the draw: evidence from the Spanish Christmas lottery.J. Political Econ.124:1269–94
      [Google Scholar]
    11. Ballard-RosaC,MalikM,RickardS,ScheveK2017.The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society Nov. 17–18 Austin, TX:
      [Google Scholar]
    12. BarrA,MillerL,UbedaP2016. Moral consequences of becoming unemployed.PNAS113:4676–81
      [Google Scholar]
    13. BartelsLM2014. Ideology and retrospection in electoral responses to the Great Recession.Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo185–223 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    14. BartoliniS2007.The political mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    15. BechtelMM,HainmuellerJ2011. How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short- and long-term electoral returns to beneficial policy.Am. J. Political Sci.55:852–68
      [Google Scholar]
    16. BrunnerE,RossSL,WashingtonE2011. Economics and policy preferences: causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals.Rev. Econ. Stat.93:888–906
      [Google Scholar]
    17. CampbellA,ConversePE,MillerWE,StokesDE1960.The American Voter Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    18. CharlesKK,StephensMJr.2013. Employment, wages, and voter turnout.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.5:111–43
      [Google Scholar]
    19. CheY,LuY,PierceJR,SchottPK,TaoZ2017.Does trade liberalization with China influence U.S. elections? NBER Work. Pap. 22178
      [Google Scholar]
    20. ChenJ2013. Voter partisanship and the effect of distributive spending on political participation.Am. J. Political Sci.57:200–17
      [Google Scholar]
    21. ColantoneI,StanigP2018a. Global competition and Brexit.Am. Political Sci. Rev.112:201–18
      [Google Scholar]
    22. ColantoneI,StanigP2018b. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe.Am. J. Political Sci.2:4936–53
      [Google Scholar]
    23. CrucesG,Perez-TrugliaR,TetazM2013. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment.J. Public Econ.98:100–12
      [Google Scholar]
    24. DanckertB2017. Facing unemployment: personal and vicarious unemployment experiences generate favourable perceptions of unemployed people.Eur. Sociol. Rev.33:779–90
      [Google Scholar]
    25. DancygierR,DonnellyM2014. Attitudes toward immigration in good times and bad.Mass Politics in Tough times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo,148–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    26. DavisSJ,Von WachterT,HallRE,RogersonR2011.Recessions and the costs of job loss NBER Work. Pap. 17638
      [Google Scholar]
    27. De La OA2013. Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico.Am. J. Political Sci.57:1–14
      [Google Scholar]
    28. DehdariS2018.Economic distress and support for far-right parties—evidence from Sweden Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30–Sept. 2 Boston, MA:
      [Google Scholar]
    29. DippelC,GoldR,HeblichS2015.Globalization and its (dis-)content:Trade shocks and voting behavior NBER Work. Pap. 23209
      [Google Scholar]
    30. DohertyD,GerberAS,GreenDP2006. Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: a study of lottery winners.Political Psychol27:441–58
      [Google Scholar]
    31. DuchRM,StevensonRT2008.The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    32. DuranteR,PuttermanL,Van der WeeleJ2014. Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: an experimental study.J. Eur. Econ. Assoc.12:1059–86
      [Google Scholar]
    33. DustmannC,EichengreenB,OttenS,SapirA,TabelliniG,ZoegaG2017.Europe's trust deficit: causes and remedies CEPR Work. Pap. Monit. Int. Integr. Ser. No. 1 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
      [Google Scholar]
    34. EmmeneggerP,MarxP,SchraffD2015. Labour market disadvantage, political orientations and voting: how adverse labour market experiences translate into electoral behaviour.Soc.-Econ. Rev.13:189–213
      [Google Scholar]
    35. EmmeneggerP,MarxP,SchraffD2017. Off to a bad start: unemployment and political interest during early adulthood.J. Politics79:315–28
      [Google Scholar]
    36. EsareyJ,SalmonT,BarrilleauxC2012. Social insurance and income redistribution in a laboratory experiment.Political Res. Q.65:685–98
      [Google Scholar]
    37. Fernández-AlbertosJ,KuoA2015. Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: evidence from a survey experiment.Political Sci. Res. Methods6:183–110
      [Google Scholar]
    38. Fernández-AlbertosJ,KuoA2016. Economic hardship and policy preferences in the Eurozone periphery: evidence from Spain.Comp. Political Stud.49:874–906
      [Google Scholar]
    39. FismanR,JakielaP,KarivS2015. How did distributional preferences change during the Great Recession.J. Public Econ.128:84–95
      [Google Scholar]
    40. GayC2012. Moving to opportunity: the political effects of a housing mobility experiment.Urban Affairs Rev48:147–79
      [Google Scholar]
    41. GerberA,GreenD1999. Misperceptions about perceptual bias.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.2:189–210
      [Google Scholar]
    42. GiulianoP,SpilimbergoA2013. Growing up in a recession.Rev. Econ. Stud.81:787–817
      [Google Scholar]
    43. GolderM2016. Far right parties in Europe.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.19:477–97
      [Google Scholar]
    44. GourevitchP1986.Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    45. GuisoL,HerreraH,MorelliM,SonnoT2017.Demand and supply of populism Work. Pap. 610 Innocenzo Gasparini Inst. Econ. Res., Bocconi Univ. Milan, Italy:ftp://ftp.igier.unibocconi.it/wp/2017/610.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    46. HackerJS,RehmP,SchlesingerM2013. The insecure American: economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes.Perspect. Politics11:23–49
      [Google Scholar]
    47. HainmuellerJ,HopkinsDJ2014. Public attitudes toward immigration.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.17:225–49
      [Google Scholar]
    48. HallAB,YoderJ,KarandikarN2017.Economic distress and voting: evidence from the subprime mortgage crisis Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, IL:
      [Google Scholar]
    49. HäusermannS,KurerT,SchwanderH2014. High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences.Soc.-Econ. Rev.13:235–58
      [Google Scholar]
    50. HealyA,LenzGS2017. Presidential voting and the local economy: evidence from two population-based data sets.J. Politics79:1419–32
      [Google Scholar]
    51. HealyA,MalhotraN2013. Retrospective voting reconsidered.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.16:285–306
      [Google Scholar]
    52. HibbsDA1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy.Am. Political Sci. Rev.71:1467–87
      [Google Scholar]
    53. HoboltSB,De VriesC2016. Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections.Electoral Stud44:504–14
      [Google Scholar]
    54. HoboltSB,TilleyJ2016. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis.West Eur. Politics39:971–91
      [Google Scholar]
    55. HoutM,BrooksC,ManzaJ1993. The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies.Int. Sociol.8:259–77
      [Google Scholar]
    56. IversenT,SoskiceD2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences.Am. Political Sci. Rev.95:875–93
      [Google Scholar]
    57. IyengarS,WestwoodSJ2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization.Am. J. Political Sci.59:690–707
      [Google Scholar]
    58. JensenJB,QuinnDP,WeymouthS2017. Winners and losers in international trade: the effects on US presidential voting.Int. Organ.71:423–57
      [Google Scholar]
    59. KaradjaM,MollerstromJ,SeimD2017. Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution.Rev. Econ. Stat.99:201–12
      [Google Scholar]
    60. KorpiW1983.The Democratic Class Struggle London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
      [Google Scholar]
    61. KriesiH,GrandeE,LachatR,DolezalM,BornschierS et al.2008.West European Politics in the Age of Globalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    62. KrosnickJA,AlwinDF1989. Aging and susceptibility to attitude change.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.57:416
      [Google Scholar]
    63. KuziemkoI,NortonMI,SaezE,StantchevaS2015. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments.Am. Econ. Rev.105:1478–508
      [Google Scholar]
    64. LeeW,RoemerJE2006. Racism and redistribution in the United States: a solution to the problem of American exceptionalism.J. Public Econ.90:1027–52
      [Google Scholar]
    65. MalgouyresC2017.Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections Res. Pap. RSCAS 2017/21 Robert Schuman Cent. Advanced Stud., European University Inst. Fiesole, Italy:
      [Google Scholar]
    66. MalhotraN,MargalitY2010. Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public's response to the financial crisis of 2008.J. Politics72:852–67
      [Google Scholar]
    67. ManacordaM,MiguelE,VigoritoA2011. Government transfers and political support.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.3:1–28
      [Google Scholar]
    68. MaresI2006.Taxation, Wage Bargaining, and Unemployment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    69. MargalitY2011. Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in US elections.Am. Political Sci. Rev.105:166–88
      [Google Scholar]
    70. MargalitY2012. Lost in globalization: international economic integration and the sources of popular discontent.Int. Stud. Q.56:484–500
      [Google Scholar]
    71. MargalitY2013. Explaining social policy preferences: evidence from the Great Recession.Am. Political Sci. Rev.107:80–103
      [Google Scholar]
    72. MarténL2019. Demand for redistribution: individuals' response to economic shocks.Scand. J. Econ.121:1225–42
      [Google Scholar]
    73. MarxK2010 (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy.Marx Today91–94 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
      [Google Scholar]
    74. MarxP,NguyenC2016. Are the unemployed less politically involved? A comparative study of internal political efficacy.Eur. Sociol. Rev.32:634–48
      [Google Scholar]
    75. McConnellC,MargalitY,MalhotraN,LevenduskyM2018. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era.Am. J. Political Sci.62:5–18
      [Google Scholar]
    76. MeltzerAH,RichardSF1981. A rational theory of the size of government.J. Political Econ.89:914–27
      [Google Scholar]
    77. MuddeC2004. The populist zeitgeist.Gov. Opposition39:541–63
      [Google Scholar]
    78. MuddeC,KaltwasserCR2017.Populism: A Very Short Introduction New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    79. NaumannE,BussC,BährJ2015. How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: a real panel approach.Eur. Sociol. Rev.32:81–92
      [Google Scholar]
    80. NeundorfA,SorokaS2018. The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state.West Eur. Politics41:400–27
      [Google Scholar]
    81. NewcombTM1967.Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students After Twenty-Five Years New York: Wiley
      [Google Scholar]
    82. NorrisP2005.Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    83. O'GradyT2017. How do economic circumstances determine preferences? Evidence from long-run panel data.Br. J. Political Sci.Nov:1–26
      [Google Scholar]
    84. OreopoulosP,von WachterT,HeiszA2012. The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.4:1–29
      [Google Scholar]
    85. OwensLA,PedullaDS2013. Material welfare and changing political preferences: the case of support for redistributive social policies.Soc. Forces92:1087–113
      [Google Scholar]
    86. PageBI,ShapiroRY2010.The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    87. PetersonE2016. The rich are different: the effect of wealth on partisanship.Political Behav38:33–54
      [Google Scholar]
    88. Pop-ElechesC,Pop-ElechesG2012. Targeted government spending and political preferences.Q. J. Political Sci.7:285–320
      [Google Scholar]
    89. PowdthaveeN,OswaldAJ2014.Does money make people right-wing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners IZA Disc. Pap. 7934 Inst. Labor Econ. Bonn:
      [Google Scholar]
    90. RedlawskDP2002. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making.J. Politics64:1021–44
      [Google Scholar]
    91. RogowskiR1987. Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade.Am. Political Sci. Rev.81:1121–37
      [Google Scholar]
    92. RuedaD2007.Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    93. SchlozmanKL,VerbaS1979.Insult to Injury: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    94. SchwandtH,von WachterT2017.Unlucky cohorts: earnings, income, and mortality effects from entering the labor market in a recession Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/pdf/papers/pew/Schwandt_vonWachter_Cohorts_final.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    95. TaberCS,LodgeM2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.Am. J. Political Sci.50:755–69
      [Google Scholar]
    96. TilleyJ,NeundorfA,HoboltSB2018. When the pound in people's pocket matters: how changes to personal financial circumstances affect party choice.J. Politics80:555–69
      [Google Scholar]
    97. WrightJR2012. Unemployment and the democratic electoral advantage.Am. Political Sci. Rev.106:685–702
      [Google Scholar]
    98. ZuccoC2013. When payouts pay off: conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10.Am. J. Political Sci.57:810–22
      [Google Scholar]
    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
    Loading

    Most Read This Month

    Article
    content/journals/polisci
    Journal
    5
    3
    false
    en
    Loading

    Most CitedMost Cited RSS feed

    knowable Logo

    Science needs us — and you

    Support nonprofit Knowable Magazine and bring facts to light

    Related Articles from Annual Reviews

    /content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    4
    4

    Literature Cited

    1. AhlquistJ,CopelovitchM,WalterS2018.The political consequences of economic shocks. Evidence from Poland CIS Work. Pap. 97 Cent. Comp. Int. Stud., Univ. Zurich Zurich, Switz.:
      [Google Scholar]
    2. AlesinaA,GiulianoP2011. Preferences for redistribution.Handbook of Social Economics1A J Benhabib, A Bisin, MO Jackson93–132 Amsterdam: North-Holland
      [Google Scholar]
    3. AlesinaA,La FerraraE2005. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities.J. Public Econ.89:897–931
      [Google Scholar]
    4. AlganY,GurievS,PapaioannouE,PassariE2017. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism.Brookings Pap. Econ. Act.2017:2309–400https://muse.jhu.edu/article/688908/pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    5. AltJE,JensenA,LarreguyHA,LassenDD,MarshallJ2017.Contagious political concerns: Identifying unemployment shock information transmission using the Danish Population Network Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco CA: Aug. 31–Sept. 3.https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jmarshall/files/unemployment_and_networks_v10.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    6. AndersonCJ2007. The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.10:271–96
      [Google Scholar]
    7. AngristJD,PischkeJ-S2008.Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    8. AutorDH,DornD,HansonGH2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States.Am. Econ. Rev.103:2121–68
      [Google Scholar]
    9. AutorDH,DornD,HansonG,MajlesiK2016.Importing political polarization? NBER Work. Pap. 22637
      [Google Scholar]
    10. BaguesM,Esteve-VolartB2016. Politicians luck of the draw: evidence from the Spanish Christmas lottery.J. Political Econ.124:1269–94
      [Google Scholar]
    11. Ballard-RosaC,MalikM,RickardS,ScheveK2017.The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society Nov. 17–18 Austin, TX:
      [Google Scholar]
    12. BarrA,MillerL,UbedaP2016. Moral consequences of becoming unemployed.PNAS113:4676–81
      [Google Scholar]
    13. BartelsLM2014. Ideology and retrospection in electoral responses to the Great Recession.Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo185–223 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    14. BartoliniS2007.The political mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    15. BechtelMM,HainmuellerJ2011. How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short- and long-term electoral returns to beneficial policy.Am. J. Political Sci.55:852–68
      [Google Scholar]
    16. BrunnerE,RossSL,WashingtonE2011. Economics and policy preferences: causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals.Rev. Econ. Stat.93:888–906
      [Google Scholar]
    17. CampbellA,ConversePE,MillerWE,StokesDE1960.The American Voter Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    18. CharlesKK,StephensMJr.2013. Employment, wages, and voter turnout.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.5:111–43
      [Google Scholar]
    19. CheY,LuY,PierceJR,SchottPK,TaoZ2017.Does trade liberalization with China influence U.S. elections? NBER Work. Pap. 22178
      [Google Scholar]
    20. ChenJ2013. Voter partisanship and the effect of distributive spending on political participation.Am. J. Political Sci.57:200–17
      [Google Scholar]
    21. ColantoneI,StanigP2018a. Global competition and Brexit.Am. Political Sci. Rev.112:201–18
      [Google Scholar]
    22. ColantoneI,StanigP2018b. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe.Am. J. Political Sci.2:4936–53
      [Google Scholar]
    23. CrucesG,Perez-TrugliaR,TetazM2013. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment.J. Public Econ.98:100–12
      [Google Scholar]
    24. DanckertB2017. Facing unemployment: personal and vicarious unemployment experiences generate favourable perceptions of unemployed people.Eur. Sociol. Rev.33:779–90
      [Google Scholar]
    25. DancygierR,DonnellyM2014. Attitudes toward immigration in good times and bad.Mass Politics in Tough times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo,148–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    26. DavisSJ,Von WachterT,HallRE,RogersonR2011.Recessions and the costs of job loss NBER Work. Pap. 17638
      [Google Scholar]
    27. De La OA2013. Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico.Am. J. Political Sci.57:1–14
      [Google Scholar]
    28. DehdariS2018.Economic distress and support for far-right parties—evidence from Sweden Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30–Sept. 2 Boston, MA:
      [Google Scholar]
    29. DippelC,GoldR,HeblichS2015.Globalization and its (dis-)content:Trade shocks and voting behavior NBER Work. Pap. 23209
      [Google Scholar]
    30. DohertyD,GerberAS,GreenDP2006. Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: a study of lottery winners.Political Psychol27:441–58
      [Google Scholar]
    31. DuchRM,StevensonRT2008.The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    32. DuranteR,PuttermanL,Van der WeeleJ2014. Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: an experimental study.J. Eur. Econ. Assoc.12:1059–86
      [Google Scholar]
    33. DustmannC,EichengreenB,OttenS,SapirA,TabelliniG,ZoegaG2017.Europe's trust deficit: causes and remedies CEPR Work. Pap. Monit. Int. Integr. Ser. No. 1 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
      [Google Scholar]
    34. EmmeneggerP,MarxP,SchraffD2015. Labour market disadvantage, political orientations and voting: how adverse labour market experiences translate into electoral behaviour.Soc.-Econ. Rev.13:189–213
      [Google Scholar]
    35. EmmeneggerP,MarxP,SchraffD2017. Off to a bad start: unemployment and political interest during early adulthood.J. Politics79:315–28
      [Google Scholar]
    36. EsareyJ,SalmonT,BarrilleauxC2012. Social insurance and income redistribution in a laboratory experiment.Political Res. Q.65:685–98
      [Google Scholar]
    37. Fernández-AlbertosJ,KuoA2015. Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: evidence from a survey experiment.Political Sci. Res. Methods6:183–110
      [Google Scholar]
    38. Fernández-AlbertosJ,KuoA2016. Economic hardship and policy preferences in the Eurozone periphery: evidence from Spain.Comp. Political Stud.49:874–906
      [Google Scholar]
    39. FismanR,JakielaP,KarivS2015. How did distributional preferences change during the Great Recession.J. Public Econ.128:84–95
      [Google Scholar]
    40. GayC2012. Moving to opportunity: the political effects of a housing mobility experiment.Urban Affairs Rev48:147–79
      [Google Scholar]
    41. GerberA,GreenD1999. Misperceptions about perceptual bias.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.2:189–210
      [Google Scholar]
    42. GiulianoP,SpilimbergoA2013. Growing up in a recession.Rev. Econ. Stud.81:787–817
      [Google Scholar]
    43. GolderM2016. Far right parties in Europe.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.19:477–97
      [Google Scholar]
    44. GourevitchP1986.Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    45. GuisoL,HerreraH,MorelliM,SonnoT2017.Demand and supply of populism Work. Pap. 610 Innocenzo Gasparini Inst. Econ. Res., Bocconi Univ. Milan, Italy:ftp://ftp.igier.unibocconi.it/wp/2017/610.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    46. HackerJS,RehmP,SchlesingerM2013. The insecure American: economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes.Perspect. Politics11:23–49
      [Google Scholar]
    47. HainmuellerJ,HopkinsDJ2014. Public attitudes toward immigration.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.17:225–49
      [Google Scholar]
    48. HallAB,YoderJ,KarandikarN2017.Economic distress and voting: evidence from the subprime mortgage crisis Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, IL:
      [Google Scholar]
    49. HäusermannS,KurerT,SchwanderH2014. High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences.Soc.-Econ. Rev.13:235–58
      [Google Scholar]
    50. HealyA,LenzGS2017. Presidential voting and the local economy: evidence from two population-based data sets.J. Politics79:1419–32
      [Google Scholar]
    51. HealyA,MalhotraN2013. Retrospective voting reconsidered.Annu. Rev. Political Sci.16:285–306
      [Google Scholar]
    52. HibbsDA1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy.Am. Political Sci. Rev.71:1467–87
      [Google Scholar]
    53. HoboltSB,De VriesC2016. Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections.Electoral Stud44:504–14
      [Google Scholar]
    54. HoboltSB,TilleyJ2016. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis.West Eur. Politics39:971–91
      [Google Scholar]
    55. HoutM,BrooksC,ManzaJ1993. The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies.Int. Sociol.8:259–77
      [Google Scholar]
    56. IversenT,SoskiceD2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences.Am. Political Sci. Rev.95:875–93
      [Google Scholar]
    57. IyengarS,WestwoodSJ2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization.Am. J. Political Sci.59:690–707
      [Google Scholar]
    58. JensenJB,QuinnDP,WeymouthS2017. Winners and losers in international trade: the effects on US presidential voting.Int. Organ.71:423–57
      [Google Scholar]
    59. KaradjaM,MollerstromJ,SeimD2017. Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution.Rev. Econ. Stat.99:201–12
      [Google Scholar]
    60. KorpiW1983.The Democratic Class Struggle London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
      [Google Scholar]
    61. KriesiH,GrandeE,LachatR,DolezalM,BornschierS et al.2008.West European Politics in the Age of Globalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    62. KrosnickJA,AlwinDF1989. Aging and susceptibility to attitude change.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.57:416
      [Google Scholar]
    63. KuziemkoI,NortonMI,SaezE,StantchevaS2015. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments.Am. Econ. Rev.105:1478–508
      [Google Scholar]
    64. LeeW,RoemerJE2006. Racism and redistribution in the United States: a solution to the problem of American exceptionalism.J. Public Econ.90:1027–52
      [Google Scholar]
    65. MalgouyresC2017.Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections Res. Pap. RSCAS 2017/21 Robert Schuman Cent. Advanced Stud., European University Inst. Fiesole, Italy:
      [Google Scholar]
    66. MalhotraN,MargalitY2010. Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public's response to the financial crisis of 2008.J. Politics72:852–67
      [Google Scholar]
    67. ManacordaM,MiguelE,VigoritoA2011. Government transfers and political support.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.3:1–28
      [Google Scholar]
    68. MaresI2006.Taxation, Wage Bargaining, and Unemployment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    69. MargalitY2011. Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in US elections.Am. Political Sci. Rev.105:166–88
      [Google Scholar]
    70. MargalitY2012. Lost in globalization: international economic integration and the sources of popular discontent.Int. Stud. Q.56:484–500
      [Google Scholar]
    71. MargalitY2013. Explaining social policy preferences: evidence from the Great Recession.Am. Political Sci. Rev.107:80–103
      [Google Scholar]
    72. MarténL2019. Demand for redistribution: individuals' response to economic shocks.Scand. J. Econ.121:1225–42
      [Google Scholar]
    73. MarxK2010 (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy.Marx Today91–94 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
      [Google Scholar]
    74. MarxP,NguyenC2016. Are the unemployed less politically involved? A comparative study of internal political efficacy.Eur. Sociol. Rev.32:634–48
      [Google Scholar]
    75. McConnellC,MargalitY,MalhotraN,LevenduskyM2018. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era.Am. J. Political Sci.62:5–18
      [Google Scholar]
    76. MeltzerAH,RichardSF1981. A rational theory of the size of government.J. Political Econ.89:914–27
      [Google Scholar]
    77. MuddeC2004. The populist zeitgeist.Gov. Opposition39:541–63
      [Google Scholar]
    78. MuddeC,KaltwasserCR2017.Populism: A Very Short Introduction New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    79. NaumannE,BussC,BährJ2015. How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: a real panel approach.Eur. Sociol. Rev.32:81–92
      [Google Scholar]
    80. NeundorfA,SorokaS2018. The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state.West Eur. Politics41:400–27
      [Google Scholar]
    81. NewcombTM1967.Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students After Twenty-Five Years New York: Wiley
      [Google Scholar]
    82. NorrisP2005.Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    83. O'GradyT2017. How do economic circumstances determine preferences? Evidence from long-run panel data.Br. J. Political Sci.Nov:1–26
      [Google Scholar]
    84. OreopoulosP,von WachterT,HeiszA2012. The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession.Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.4:1–29
      [Google Scholar]
    85. OwensLA,PedullaDS2013. Material welfare and changing political preferences: the case of support for redistributive social policies.Soc. Forces92:1087–113
      [Google Scholar]
    86. PageBI,ShapiroRY2010.The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
      [Google Scholar]
    87. PetersonE2016. The rich are different: the effect of wealth on partisanship.Political Behav38:33–54
      [Google Scholar]
    88. Pop-ElechesC,Pop-ElechesG2012. Targeted government spending and political preferences.Q. J. Political Sci.7:285–320
      [Google Scholar]
    89. PowdthaveeN,OswaldAJ2014.Does money make people right-wing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners IZA Disc. Pap. 7934 Inst. Labor Econ. Bonn:
      [Google Scholar]
    90. RedlawskDP2002. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making.J. Politics64:1021–44
      [Google Scholar]
    91. RogowskiR1987. Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade.Am. Political Sci. Rev.81:1121–37
      [Google Scholar]
    92. RuedaD2007.Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies New York: Oxford Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    93. SchlozmanKL,VerbaS1979.Insult to Injury: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
      [Google Scholar]
    94. SchwandtH,von WachterT2017.Unlucky cohorts: earnings, income, and mortality effects from entering the labor market in a recession Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/pdf/papers/pew/Schwandt_vonWachter_Cohorts_final.pdf
      [Google Scholar]
    95. TaberCS,LodgeM2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.Am. J. Political Sci.50:755–69
      [Google Scholar]
    96. TilleyJ,NeundorfA,HoboltSB2018. When the pound in people's pocket matters: how changes to personal financial circumstances affect party choice.J. Politics80:555–69
      [Google Scholar]
    97. WrightJR2012. Unemployment and the democratic electoral advantage.Am. Political Sci. Rev.106:685–702
      [Google Scholar]
    98. ZuccoC2013. When payouts pay off: conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10.Am. J. Political Sci.57:810–22
      [Google Scholar]

    FromKnowable Magazine:

    knowable magazine Teen Brain Bootcamp Special

    knowable magazine from Annual Reviews


    Bluesky share image


    Climate Resource Center, Article Collection from Annual Reviews


    Journal News

    This is a required field
    Please enter a valid email address
    Approval was a Success
    Invalid data
    An Error Occurred
    Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
    Annual Reviews:
    http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
    10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
    SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2026 Movatter.jp