Review Article
Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits
- Janis L. Dickinson1,2,Benjamin Zuckerberg1 andDavid N. Bonter1
- View Affiliations and Author NotesHide Affiliations and Author Notes1Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York 14850; email:[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]2Department of Natural Resources and Graduate Field of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
- Vol. 41:149-172(Volume publication date December 2010)
- First published as a Review in Advance onAugust 11, 2010
- © Annual Reviews
- View CitationHide Citation
Janis L. Dickinson, Benjamin Zuckerberg, David N. Bonter. 2010. Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits.Annual Review Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.41:149-172.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
Abstract
Citizen science, the involvement of volunteers in research, has increased the scale of ecological field studies with continent-wide, centralized monitoring efforts and, more rarely, tapping of volunteers to conduct large, coordinated, field experiments. The unique benefit for the field of ecology lies in understanding processes occurring at broad geographic scales and on private lands, which are impossible to sample extensively with traditional field research models. Citizen science produces large, longitudinal data sets, whose potential for error and bias is poorly understood. Because it does not usually aim to uncover mechanisms underlying ecological patterns, citizen science is best viewed as complementary to more localized, hypothesis-driven research. In the process of addressing the impacts of current, global “experiments” altering habitat and climate, large-scale citizen science has led to new, quantitative approaches to emerging questions about the distribution and abundance of organisms across space and time.





