Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


skip to main content
10.1145/3323994.3369898acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
group

Export Citations

    • Please download or close your previous search result export first before starting a new bulk export.
      Preview is not available.
      By clicking download,a status dialog will open to start the export process. The process may takea few minutes but once it finishes a file will be downloadable from your browser. You may continue to browse the DL while the export process is in progress.

    Mapping Out Human-Centered Data Science:Methods, Approaches, and Best Practices

    Published:06 January 2020Publication History
    Metrics
    Total Citations40
    Total Downloads677
    Last 12 Months67
    Last 6 weeks7

    New Citation Alert added!

    This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:

    You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.

    To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.

    Manage my Alerts

    New Citation Alert!

    Abstract

    Social media platforms and social network sites generate a multitude of digital trace behavioral data, the scale of which often necessitates the use of computational data science methods. On the other hand, the socio-behavioral and often relational nature of the social media data requires the attention to context of user activity traditionally associated with qualitative analysis. Human-Centered Data Science (HCDS) attempts to bridge this gap by both harnessing the power of computational techniques and accounting for highly situated and nuanced nature of the social media activity. In this workshop we plan to consider the methods, pitfalls, and approaches of how to do HCDS effectively. Moreover, from collating and organizing these approaches we hope to progress to considering best (or at least common) practices in HCDS.

    References

    [1]
    2017 Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from https://sites.google.com/view/whi2017/home
    [2]
    2018 Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from https://sites.google.com/view/whi2018/home
    [3]
    Baumer, E. P., Guha, S., Quan, E., Mimno, D., & Gay, G. K. (2015). How Social Media Non-use Influences the Likelihood of Reversion: Self Control, Being Surveilled, Feeling Freedom, and Socially Connecting. Social Media + Society, Vol 1, No. 2.
    [4]
    Baumer, E. P., Mimno, D., Guha, S., Quan, E., & Gay, G. K. (2017). Comparing Grounded Theory and Topic Modeling: Extreme Divergence or Unlikely Convergence? Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology.
    [5]
    Baumer, E. P., Xu X., Chu C., Guha, S., & Gay, G. K. (2017). When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW.In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
    [6]
    Hadi Daneshvar and Stuart Anderson. Challenges and opportunities of health and care co-production with social media: A qualitative study. Proc. InfraHealth 2017.
    [7]
    Dourish, P. (2014). Reading and Interpreting Ethnography. Ways of Knowing in HCI.
    [8]
    Ethics in Natural Language Processing. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from http://ethicsinnlp.com/.
    [9]
    Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from http://www.fatml.org/.
    [10]
    Gillespie, T., & Seaver, N. Critical Algorithm Studies: a Reading List. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from https://socialmediacollective.org/readinglists/ critical-algorithm-studies/
    [11]
    Gluesing, J., Riopelle, K., & Danowski, J. (2014). Mixing Ethnography and Information Technology Data Mining to Visualize Innovation Networks in Global Networked Organizations. Mixed Methods Social Networks Research: Design and Applications, 36, 203.
    [12]
    Halfaker, A., Geiger, R. S., & Terveen, L. G. (2014). Snuggle: Designing for efficient socialization and ideological critique. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 311--320). ACM.
    [13]
    Helga Hambrock. Digging deeper and finding the gems of a social media platform for a community of academic researchers. Proc. mLearn 2017, art. 30.
    [14]
    Haroz, S., Kosara, R., & Franconeri, S. (2015). The Connected Scatterplot for Presenting Paired Time Series.
    [15]
    Human Centered Data Science @ CSCW 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from https://cscw2016hcds.wordpress.com/backgroundoverview/.
    [16]
    Human Centered Machine Learning at CHI 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from http://hcml2016.goldsmithsdigital.com/
    [17]
    Kay, M., Nelson, G., & Hekler, E. (2016). Researcher-centered design of statistics: Why Bayesian statistics better fit the culture and incentives of HCI. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
    [18]
    Kay, M., Patel, S. N., & Kientz, J. A. (2015). How Good is 85%?: A Survey Tool to Connect Classifier Evaluation to Acceptability of Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 347- 356). ACM.
    [19]
    Kay, M., & Heer, J. (2016). Beyond Weber's Law: A Second Look at Ranking Visualizations of Correlation. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(1), 469--478.
    [20]
    Kogan, M., Palen, L., & Anderson, K. M. (2015). Think local, retweet global: Retweeting by the geographically-vulnerable during Hurricane Sandy. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 981--993). ACM.
    [21]
    Kogan, M., Anderson, J., Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., & Soden, R. (2016). Finding the Way to OSM Mapping Practices: Bounding Large Crisis Datasets for Qualitative Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2783--2795). ACM.
    [22]
    Kogan, M., & Palen, L. Conversations in the Eye of the Storm: At-Scale Features of Conversational Structure in a High-Tempo, High-Stakes Microblogging Environment. In Proc. CHI 2018.
    [23]
    Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google flu: traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203--1205.
    [24]
    Lohr, S. & Singer, N. (2016, November 10). How data failed us in calling an election. The New York Times, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/techno logy/the-data-said-clinton-would-win-why-youshouldnt- have-believed-it.html
    [25]
    Muller, M., Guha, S., Baumer, E. P., Mimno, D., & Shami, N. S. (2016). Machine Learning and Grounded Theory Method: Convergence, Divergence, and Combination. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 3--8). ACM.
    [26]
    Joel Penney. Young people as political influencers on social media: Skepticism and network thinking. Proc. SMSociety 2018, 355--359.
    [27]
    Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proc. KDD 2016.
    [28]
    Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A. L., & Vieweg, S. (2010). Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 241--250). ACM.
    [29]
    Frederic Stutzman and Woodrow Hartzog. Boundary regulation in social media. Proc. CSCW 2012, 769--778.
    [30]
    Szafir, D. A., Haroz, S., Gleicher, M., & Franconeri, S. (2016). Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations. Journal of vision, 16(5), 11--11.
    [31]
    Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010, April). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1079--1088). ACM.
    [32]
    Wilson, A., Kim, B., Herlands, W. Interpretable Machine Learning for Complex Systems. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from https://nips.cc/Conferences/2016/Schedule'showE vent=6238
    [33]
    Wilson, A., Yosinski, J., Simard, P., Caruana, R., Herlands, W. Interpretable ML Symposium. Retrieved October 8, 2018 from http://interpretable.ml/

    Cited By

    View all
    • Bennett SCatanzariti BTollon F(2025)“Everybody knows what a pothole is”: representations of work and intelligence in AI practice and governanceAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-024-02162-0Online publication date: 27-Jan-2025
    • Alvarado Garcia AYang TMiceli M(2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
    • Choudari SSanwal RSharma NShastri SSingh DDeepa G(2024)Data Science collaboration in Human AI: Decision Optimization using Human-centered Automation2024 Second International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (IC3TES)10.1109/IC3TES62412.2024.10877543(1-6)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    • Developing a Research Agenda for Human-Centered Data Science

      CSCW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion

      The study and analysis of large and complex data sets offer a wealth of insights in a variety of applications. Computational approaches provide researchers access to broad assemblages of data, but the insights extracted may lack the rich detail that ...

    • Mobilizing Social Media Data: Reflections of a Researcher Mediating between Data and Organization

      CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

      This paper examines the practices involved in mobilizing social media data from their site of production to the institutional context of non-profit organizations. We report on nine months of fieldwork with a transnational and intergovernmental ...

    • Constructing social media knowledge graphs with social scientists

      HCI '16: Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Companion Volume

      The increasing adoption and widespread use of social media provides significant opportunities for social scientists to discover novel insights of varying aspects of human behaviour. In response to increasing interest and research in this area, a wide ...

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GROUP '20: Companion Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
    January 2020
    168 pages
    ISBN:9781450367677
    DOI:10.1145/3323994
    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 January 2020

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. human-centered data science
    2. qualitative methods
    3. quantitative methods
    4. social media data

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    GROUP '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Apr 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • Bennett SCatanzariti BTollon F(2025)“Everybody knows what a pothole is”: representations of work and intelligence in AI practice and governanceAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-024-02162-0Online publication date: 27-Jan-2025
    • Alvarado Garcia AYang TMiceli M(2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
    • Choudari SSanwal RSharma NShastri SSingh DDeepa G(2024)Data Science collaboration in Human AI: Decision Optimization using Human-centered Automation2024 Second International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (IC3TES)10.1109/IC3TES62412.2024.10877543(1-6)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
    • Yang TMiceli M(2024)"Guilds" as Worker Empowerment and Control in a Chinese Data Work PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869048:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • Linke DMüller-Birn C(2024)Identifying Characteristics of Reflection Triggers in Data Science Ethics EducationProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677486(466-473)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
    • McKee K(2024)Human Participants in AI Research: Ethics and Transparency in PracticeIEEE Transactions on Technology and Society10.1109/TTS.2024.34461835:3(279-288)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • Braun MMeacham D(2024)A Plea for (In)Human-centred AIPhilosophy & Technology10.1007/s13347-024-00785-137:3Online publication date: 27-Jul-2024
    • Aubin Le Quéré MSchroeder HRandazzo CGao JEpstein ZPerrault SMimno DBarkhuus LLi H(2024)LLMs as Research Tools: Applications and Evaluations in HCI Data WorkExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636301(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Muller MKantosalo AMaher MMartin CWalsh G(2024)GenAICHI 2024: Generative AI and HCI at CHI 2024Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636294(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Kommiya Mothilal RGuha SAhmed S(2024)Towards a Non-Ideal Methodological Framework for Responsible MLProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642501(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Copied!

    Copying failed.

    Share on social media

    Affiliations

    MarinaKogan
    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    AaronHalfaker
    Wikimedia Research, San Francisco, CA, USA
    ShionGuha
    Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
    CeciliaAragon
    University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
    MichaelMuller
    IBM, Cambridge, MA, USA
    StuartGeiger
    Berkeley Institute for Data Science, Berkeley, CA, USA
    View Table of Conten
    Your Search Results Download Request

    We are preparing your search results for download ...

    We will inform you here when the file is ready.

    Download now!
    Your Search Results Download Request

    Your file of search results citations is now ready.

    Download now!
    Your Search Results Download Request

    Your search export query has expired. Please try again.


    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp