Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Request Username

Can't sign in? Forgot your username?

Enter your email address below and we will send you your username

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username

Create a new account

Change Password

Too ShortWeakMediumStrongVery StrongToo Long

Your password must have 8 characters or more and contain 3 of the following:

  • a lower case character, 
  • an upper case character, 
  • a special character 
  • or a digit
Too Short

Password Changed Successfully

Your password has been changed

close
  • Forgot password? Reset ithere
    Fields with * are mandatory
    Don't have an account? Create onehere
  • Fields with * are mandatory
    Already have an account? Loginhere

Can't sign in? Forgot your password?

Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password.

Verify Phone

Congrats!

Your Phone has been verified

CLOSE
asmj logoasmj journals
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logo

ABSTRACT

Planctomycetes represent a remarkable clade in the domainBacteria because they play crucial roles in global carbon and nitrogen cycles and display cellular structures that closely parallel those of eukaryotic cells. Studies onPlanctomycetes have been hampered by the lack of genetic tools, which we developed forPlanctomyces limnophilus.

TEXT

ThePlanctomycetes represent a remarkable clade within the domainBacteria. They display cellular features once thought to be the sole domain of members ofEukarya. Some species have elaborate membrane-enclosed compartments, at times resembling the eukaryotic nucleus, and the capability to carry out endocytosis using membrane coat-like proteins (3,6,7,9). In addition,Planctomycetes are major players in the global nitrogen and carbon cycles and perform reactions such as the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium with the aid of subcellular organelles known as anammoxosomes (6,11,13). Despite recent progress in revealing the complex subcellular structures of severalPlanctomycetes, in-depth analyses of these unusual features have been hampered by the lack of genetic tools. Since not allPlanctomycetes are available as pure cultures and some species have doubling times of up to 30 days (12), selecting an appropriate model organism in which to develop a genetic toolbox is essential. After analyzing several species (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), we chosePlanctomyces limnophilus to develop methods for gene transfer and mutagenesis. The key criteria for selecting this species were (i) it displays one of the fastest growth rates among the culturedPlanctomycetes (6 to 14 days to detect a colony), (ii) plasmids and bacteriophage have been described (5,16,15), and (iii) the genome sequence is available. However, the unusual cell biology is a key hallmark ofPlanctomycetes, and little was known aboutP. limnophilus in this regard (4,6). Thus, we first set out to perform cell biological analyses of this species using high-pressure cryofixation, freeze substitution, and thin sectioning in conjunction with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (6). Cryofixation of entire colonies scraped from agar plates was performed with a Leica EM PACT-2 followed by freeze-substitution in acetone with 2% osmium tetroxide at −80°C for 50 h. Afterward, the temperature was increased over a span of 14 h to −20°C and finally brought to +20°C over 22 h. Samples were washed twice for 30 min in fresh acetone and then embedded in TAAB epon. Sections were cut at 50 nm and poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and subsequent analysis was done with a Tecnai G2 Spirit Bio TWIN microscope. The life cycle ofP. limnophilus involves the production of two distinct cell types, somewhat reminiscent of the phylogenetically very distantCaulobacter crescentus. There are sessile cells with a holdfast (hs) and a noncellular stalk that allows surface anchoring (Fig. 1A and B). The second cell type contains a single polar flagellum (Fig. 1C and D). Although these findings had been preliminarily described before (4), negative staining of whole cells points toward two types of crateriform structures (large [LCS] and small [SCS]) on the cell surface ofP. limnophilus. Such structures are common amongPlanctomycetes and had been used for taxonomic purposes in the past (10). Interestingly, our micrographs (Fig. 1C and D) indicate that the putative LCS are distributed across the entire cell, while putative SCS are limited to the pole where the flagellum (FL) is located. The subcellular analysis inFig. 2A shows what appears to be close to a typicalBlastopirellula-type of cell organization (2), with a cytoplasmic membrane (CM) confining the paryphoplasm (Py) and an intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) dividing it from the pirellulosome (Pi). The ICM and CM both are about 6-nm-wide lipid bilayers (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, different cells have different shapes of Py and Pi. Serial sections of individual cells (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) revealed that the shapes of Py and Pi change along thez axis, and thusP. limnophilus subcellular structures are not rotationally symmetrical. In summary, the finding thatP. limnophilus displays the characteristic subcellular compartmentalization of thePlanctomycetes provided us with the necessary impetus to develop genetic tools for its manipulation. Such tools would makeP. limnophilus relevant as a model for investigating the molecular basis of planctomycete compartmentalization in general.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. TEM analysis of negative-stainedP. limnophilus cells in either sessile (A and B) or swarmer (C and D) state of the life cycle, which is similar to yet distinct from that previously reported (12a). (A) The holdfast substance (hs) is positioned at the end of the multifiber stalk (st) and attaches cells to a surface. Attachment is further supported by fibrous structures (fi). (B) High-resolution micrographs of the stalk attachment at the cell pole and of the holdfast structure. (C) Swarmer cell with flagellum (fl) and so-called large crateriform structures (lcs) dispersed all over the cell surface. Further magnification (D) reveals in addition small crateriform structures (scs) at the pole of the cell, where the flagellar hook (flh) is attached.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. TEM analysis of thin sections fromP. limnophilus cells revealed an intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) that divides the cytoplasm into a paryphoplasm (Py) and a pirellulosome (Pi). Within the ICM of the Pi, the nucleoid is not covered by a further membrane but is always condensed, while the size and organization of Py and Pi differ between individual cells (A to C). (A′ to C′) Colors of cell compartments are false (for illustration only).

Development of a gene transfer system and transposon mutagenesis.

We choose the Epicentre EZ-Tn5 R6Kγori/Kan-2 Tnp transposome kit to develop our gene transfer protocol. Unlike plasmids, which have host ranges that are often limited, EZ-Tn5 insertion does not require any form of replication. In addition, a comparable approach was recently employed to demonstrate gene transfer intoVerrucomicrobium spinosum, which belongs to the same superphylum asP. limnophilus (1,14). After determining thatP. limnophilus was indeed sensitive to kanamycin (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), fresh electrocompetent cells were prepared by washing cells from 400 ml of a broth culture at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4 (PYGV medium;http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php), containing about 4 × 108 cells, twice with equal volumes of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Cells were resuspended in 400 μl of washing buffer, and aliquots of 100 μl were dispensed into 0.2-mm gapped electroporation cuvettes along with 1 μl of EZ-Tn5 solution and 1 μl of TypeOne restriction inhibitor (Epicentre). Electroporation was performed with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser Xcell (capacity [C], 25 μF; resistance [PC], 200 Ω; voltage [V], 1.0 kV). Cells were immediately diluted in 1 ml PYGV medium and plated onto PYGV agar supplemented with 30 μg/ml kanamycin. After 14 days of incubation at 30°C in the dark, 3.75 × 107 CFU/ml (±1.8 × 107) could be detected on control plates without antibiotic, indicating that about 40% of cells survived electroporation. Colonies on kanamycin-containing plates arose only when the mixtures had contained EZ-Tn5; not a single colony was observed in the mixtures without DNA. In general, up to 1.5 × 103 transformants were obtained per microgram of DNA using 108 cells. Thus, transformation efficiency is by far lower than averageEscherichia coli performance (107 CFU/μg DNA and better). From three independent transformations, we picked 10 random colonies and used those cells to inoculate fresh liquid medium. To verify Tn5 integration, DNA was isolated using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit, and Tn5 insertion sites within the genome were analyzed by modified arbitrary PCR (8). We used primer ARB1 (8) and CJ318 (5′-CAGACCGTTCCGTGGCAAAGCAAA-3′) for the first PCR (95°C for 5 min; 6 rounds of 95°C for 30 s, 30°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min and 30 s; and 30 rounds of 95°C for 30 s, 45°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 4 min), while oligonucleotides ARB2 (8) and CJ319 (5′-ACCTACAACAAAGCTCTCATCAACC-3′) were used for the second PCR (95°C for 1 min and 30 rounds of 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min, and a final elongation at 72°C for 4 min). The DNA sequence of purified PCR products (Qiagen MiniElut gel extraction kit) revealed nine insertion sites within the genome, as shown inFig. 3 andTable 1. Thus, mutagenesis was effective as evidenced by disruption of the genes listed inTable 1. While chromosomal insertions showed some regional selectivity, no significant regional bias among the nine different disrupted genes was found (Fig. 3,Table 1). Interestingly neither the ICM nor the condensed nucleoid as described in the present study formed a barrier for gene transfer and chromosomal integration. This is the first report of gene transfer and mutagenesis of aPlanctomycetes thus far, and it opens the door to in-depth genetic analyses of this bacterium, such as generation of defined deletion mutants or expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion proteins.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.P. limnophilus genome map with highlighted positions of Tn5 transposon insertions as revealed by modified arbitrary PCR. The distribution appears random, although the sample number of nine does not allow statistical analysis.
Table 1.
Table 1. Predicted functions of genes in theP. limnophilus genome that have been disrupted by Tn5 transposon insertions of 10 representative analyzed mutantsa
Mutant no.Disrupted genePredicted function of disrupted gene
1Plim_2159SppA (signal peptide peptidase)
2Plim_2165Hypothetical protein
3Plim_1621Putative thioredoxin-like protein
4Plim_3595Hypothetical protein
5Plim_4202Tetratricopeptide (TPR)
6Plim_3308Heme-binding protein
7Plim_0300Hypothetical proteinb
8NDND
9Plim_2177Acriflavine resistance protein A
10Plim_0649Phosphoglycerate mutase
a
Gene functions were annotated by five iterations of Ψ-BLAST against the NCBI database. ND, not determined.
b
APlanctomycetes-specific protein.

Acknowledgments

We thank John Fuerst, Evgeny Sagulenko, and Rudolf Amann for scientific discussion and Elizabeth Benecci from the HMS EM Facility for technical assistance.
The project was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JO 893/1-1) and the Marie Curie IOF Program (FP7) of the European Union (CoGniSePlanctomyces).

Supplemental Material

File(aem-aem05132-11-s01.doc)
File(aem-aem05132-11-s02.tif)
File(aem-aem05132-11-s03.tif)
File(aem-aem05132-11-s04.tif)
File(aem-aem05132-11-s05.doc)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Domman D. B., Steven B. T., and Ward N. L. 2011. Random transposon mutagenesis ofVerrucomicrobium spinosum DSM 4136(T).Arch. Microbiol. 193:307–312.
2.
Fuerst J. A. 2005. Intracellular compartmentation inPlanctomycetes.Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59:299–328.
3.
Fuerst J. A. and Webb R. I. 1991. Membrane-bounded nucleoid in the eubacteriumGemmata obscuriglobus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:8184–8188.
4.
Hirsch P. and Müller M. 1985.Planctomyces limnophilus sp. nov., a stalked and budding bacterium from freshwater.Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 6:276–280.
5.
Labutti K. et al. 2010. Complete genome sequence ofPlanctomyces limnophilus type strain (Mu 290).Stand. Genomic Sci. 3:47–56.
6.
Lindsay M. R. et al. 2001. Cell compartmentalisation inPlanctomycetes: novel types of structural organisation for the bacterial cell.Arch. Microbiol. 175:413–429.
7.
Lonhienne T. G. et al. 2010. Endocytosis-like protein uptake in the bacteriumGemmata obscuriglobus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:12883–12888.
8.
O'Toole G. A. and Kolter R. 1998. Initiation of biofilm formation inPseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis.Mol. Microbiol. 28:449–461.
9.
Santarella-Mellwig R. et al. 2010. The compartmentalized bacteria of thePlanctomycetes-Verrucomicrobia-Chlamydiae superphylum have membrane coat-like proteins.PLoS Biol. 8:e1000281.
10.
Schmidt J. M. and Starr M. P. 1978. Morphological diversity of freshwater bacteria belonging to theBlastocaulis-Planctomyces group as observed in natural populations and enrichments.Curr. Microbiol. 1:325–330.
11.
Strous M. et al. 1999. Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete.Nature 400:446–449.
12.
Strous M., Heijnen J. J., Kuenen J. G., and Jetten M. S. M. 1998. The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 50:589–596.
12a.
Tekniepe B. L., Schmidt J. M., and Starr M. P. 1981. Life cycle of a budding and appendaged belonging to morphotype IV of the Blastocaulis-Planctomyces group.Curr. Microbiol. 50:1–6.
13.
van Niftrik L. A. et al. 2004. The anammoxosome: an intracytoplasmic compartment in anammox bacteria.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 233:7–13.
14.
Wagner M. and Horn M. 2006. ThePlanctomycetes,Verrucomicrobia,Chlamydiae and sister phyla comprise a superphylum with biotechnological and medical relevance.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17:241–249.
15.
Ward N. et al. 2006. The orderPlanctomycetales, including the generaPlanctomyces,Pirellula,Gemmata andIsosphaera and the Candidatus generaBrocadia,Kuenenia andScalindua, p. 757–793.In Dworkin M. (ed.),The prokaryotes, vol. 7. Springer, New York, NY.
16.
Ward-Rainey N., Rainey F. A., Wellington E. M., and Stackebrandt E. 1996. Physical map of the genome ofPlanctomyces limnophilus, a representative of the phylogenetically distinct planctomycete lineage.J. Bacteriol. 178:1908–1913.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume77Number1615 August 2011
Pages:5826 -5829
PubMed:21724885

Copyright

© 2011 American Society for Microbiology.

History

Received: 13 April 2011
Accepted: 20 June 2011
Published online: 4 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

ChristianJogler[email protected]
Harvard Medical School, Department for Microbiology and Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
Frank OliverGlöckner
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
RobertoKolter
Harvard Medical School, Department for Microbiology and Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from theCrossref Cited by service.

Citations

Citation
text copied
JoglerCGlöcknerFO,KolterR. 2011. Characterization of Planctomyces limnophilus and Development of Genetic Tools for Its Manipulation Establish It as a Model Species for the Phylum Planctomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol77:.

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Copied!

Copying failed.

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

Advertisement
Advertisement
American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated byASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MOREabout the privacy policy

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp