Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Publisher LogoGenome Research

Skip to main page content

Advanced Search
  • Cellecta

Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design

  1. X. Shirley Liu1,2
  1. 1Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
  2. 2Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA;
  3. 3Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
  4. 4Program in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA;
  5. 5Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092 China;
  6. 6Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA;
  7. 7Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA;
  8. 8McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
  9. 9Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
  1. Corresponding authors:myles_brown{at}dfci.harvard.edu,xsliu{at}jimmy.harvard.edu
  1. 10 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionized mammalian somatic cell genetics. Genome-wide functional screens using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout or dCas9 fusion-mediated inhibition/activation (CRISPRi/a) are powerful techniques for discovering phenotype-associated gene function. We systematically assessed the DNA sequence features that contribute to single guide RNA (sgRNA) efficiency in CRISPR-based screens. Leveraging the information from multiple designs, we derived a new sequence model for predicting sgRNA efficiency in CRISPR/Cas9 knockout experiments. Our model confirmed known features and suggested new features including a preference for cytosine at the cleavage site. The model was experimentally validated for sgRNA-mediated mutation rate and protein knockout efficiency. Tested on independent data sets, the model achieved significant results in both positive and negative selection conditions and outperformed existing models. We also found that the sequence preference for CRISPRi/a is substantially different from that for CRISPR/Cas9 knockout and propose a new model for predicting sgRNA efficiency in CRISPRi/a experiments. These results facilitate the genome-wide design of improved sgRNA for both knockout and CRISPRi/a studies.

Footnotes

  • ReceivedFebruary 23, 2015.
  • AcceptedJune 10, 2015.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (seehttp://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described athttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • Add to DiggDigg
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Add to Google+Google+
  • Add to RedditReddit
  • Add to TwitterTwitter

What's this?

« Previous |Next Article »Table of Contents

This Article

  1. »AbstractFree
  2. Full TextFree
  3. Full Text (PDF)Free
  4. Supplemental Material
  5. All Versions of this Article:
    1. gr.191452.115v1
    2. gr.191452.115v2
    3. 25/8/1147most recent

Article Category

Services

  1. Alert me when this article is cited
  2. Alert me if a correction is posted
  3. Similar articles in this journal
  4. Similar articles in Web of Science
  5. Article Metrics
  6. Similar articles in PubMed
  7. Download to citation manager
  8. Permissions

Citing Articles

  1. Load citing article information
  2. Citing articles via Web of Science
  3. Citing articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

  1. Articles by Xu, H.
  2. Articles by Liu, X. S.
  3. Search for related content

PubMed/NCBI

  1. PubMed citation
  2. Articles by Xu, H.
  3. Articles by Liu, X. S.

Share

    • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
    • Add to DeliciousDelicious
    • Add to DiggDigg
    • Add to FacebookFacebook
    • Add to Google+Google+
    • Add to RedditReddit
    • Add to TwitterTwitter

    What's this?

Current Issue

  1. March 2025, 35 (3)
  1. Current Issue
  1. Alert me to new issues of Genome Research

Copyright © 2025 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

  • Print ISSN:1088-9051
  • Online ISSN:1549-5469

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp