Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content
1887
  • search icon
  • account icon
  • shopping cart icon
  • Other

    Open Access

    International Code of Nomenclature of ProkaryotesOpen Access

    Prokaryotic Code (2008 Revision)

    Abstract

    This volume contains the edition of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes that was presented in draft form and available for comment at the Plenary Session of the Fourteenth International Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology (BAM), Montréal, 2014, together with updated lists of conserved and rejected bacterial names and of Opinions issued by the Judicial Commission. As in the past it brings together those changes accepted, published and documented by the ICSP and the Judicial Commission since the last revision was published. Several new appendices have been added to this edition. Appendix 11 addresses the appropriate application of the Candidatus concept, Appendix 12 contains the history of the van Niel Prize, and Appendix 13 contains the summaries of Congresses. The full-text version of this article contains chapters 1-4 of the Code, and their associated references. All other material, including foreword, prefaces, and appendices, can be found in the PDF version.

    • Published Online:
    © 2019 IUMS
    Loading

    Article metrics loading...

    /content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    2019-01-11
    2026-02-17

    Metrics

    Download as PowerPoint
    Loading full text...

    Full text loading...

    /deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/1A/S1.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

    References

    1. SkermanVBD,SneathPHA,McGowanV. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names.Int J Syst Evol Microbiol1980; 30:225–420
      [Google Scholar]
    2. TindallBJ,De VosP,TrüperHG. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; XIth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology: Minutes of the meetings, 23, 24 and 27 July 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA.Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2008; 58:1737–1745
      [Google Scholar]
    3. TrüperHG,de'ClariL. Taxonomic note: necessary correction of specific epithets formed as substantives (nouns) “in Apposition”.Int J Syst Bacteriol1997; 47:908–909
      [Google Scholar]
    4. GardanL,ShafikH,BelouinS,BrochR,GrimontF et al. DNA relatedness among the pathovars ofPseudomonas syringae and description ofPseudomonas tremae sp. nov. andPseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (ex Šutič and Dowson 1959).Int J Syst Bacteriol1999; 49:469–478
      [Google Scholar]
    5. AshC,PriestFG,CollinsMD.Paenibacillus gen. nov. InValidation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 51.Int J Syst Bacteriol1994; 44:852
      [Google Scholar]
    6. RoopRM,SmibertRM,JohnsonJL,KriegNR. Designation of the neotype strain forCampylobacter sputorum (Prévot) Véron and Chatelain 1973.Int J Syst Bacteriol1986; 36:348
      [Google Scholar]
    7. Judicial Commission Opinion 38. Conservation of the generic nameLactobacillus Beijerinck.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:104
      [Google Scholar]
    8. Judicial Commission Opinion 39. Rejection of the generic nameGaffkya Trevisan.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:104–105
      [Google Scholar]
    9. Judicial Commission Opinion 31. Conservation ofVibrio Pacini 1854 as a bacterial generic name, conservation ofVibrio cholerae Pacini 1854 as the nomenclatural type species of the bacterial genusVibrio, and designation of neotype strain ofVibrio cholerae Pacini.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1965; 15:185–186
      [Google Scholar]
    10. Judicial Commission Opinion 15. Conservation of the family nameEnterobacteriaceae, of the name of the type genus, and designation of the type species.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1958; 8:73–74
      [Google Scholar]
    11. KellyDP,WoodAP. Reclassification of some species ofThiobacillus to the newly designated generaAcidithiobacillus gen. nov.,Halothiobacillus gen. nov. andThermithiobacillus gen. nov.Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2000; 50:511–516
      [Google Scholar]
    12. KochC,KlatteS,SchumannP,BurghardtJ,KroppenstedtRM et al. Transfer ofArthrobacter picolinophilus Tate and Ensign 1974 toRhodococcus erythropolis.Int J Syst Evol Microbiol1995; 45:576–577
      [Google Scholar]
    13. SlyLI,CahillMM,OsawaR,FujisawaT. The tannin-degrading speciesStreptococcus gallolyticus andStreptococcus caprinus are subjective synonyms.Int J Syst Bacteriol1997; 47:893–894
      [Google Scholar]
    14. Judicial Commission Opinion 10. Invalidity of the bacterial generic nameMüllerina de Petschenko 1910 and of the species nameMüllerina paramecii. InOpinions 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1954; 4:141–158
      [Google Scholar]
    15. Judicial Commission Opinion 20. Status of new generic names of bacteria published without names of included species.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1958; 8:160–162
      [Google Scholar]
    16. RajHD. A new species -Microcyclus flavus.Int J Syst Bacteriol1970; 20:61–81
      [Google Scholar]
    17. CohnF. Untersuchungen über Bakterien.Beitrage Biol Pflanz1872; 1:127–224 (in German)
      [Google Scholar]
    18. CatoEP,MooreWEC,NygaardG,HoldemanLV.Actinomyces meyeri sp. nov., specific epithet rev.Int J Syst Bacteriol1984; 34:487–489
      [Google Scholar]
    19. XieCH,YokotaA. Reclassification ofAlcaligenes latus strains IAM 12599T and IAM 12664 andPseudomonas saccharophila asAzohydromonas lata gen. nov., comb. nov.,Azohydromonas australica sp. nov. andPelomonas saccharophila gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively.Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2005; 55:2419–2425
      [Google Scholar]
    20. Judicial Commission Opinion 49. Conservation of the generic nameRhodopseudomonas Czurda and Maresch emend. van Niel.Int J Syst Bacteriol1974; 24:551
      [Google Scholar]
    21. Judicial Commission Opinion 48. Rejection of the nameAerobacter liquefaciens Beijerinck and conservation of the nameAeromonas Stanier withAeromonas hydrophila as the type species.Int J Syst Bacteriol1973; 23:473–474
      [Google Scholar]
    22. GoodfellowM,PirouzT. Numerical classification of sporoactinomycetes containingmeso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall.J Gen Microbiol1982; 128:503–527
      [Google Scholar]
    23. WhitePB. Notes on organisms serologically related toS. enteritidis Gärtner: I. The Dublin and Tokyo types ofSalmonella.J Hyg (Lond)1930; 29:443–445
      [Google Scholar]
    24. BergeyDH,HarrisonFC,BreedRS,HammerBW,HuntoonFM et al.Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1st ed. Washington, DC: Society of American Bacteriologists;1923
      [Google Scholar]
    25. BernardetJ-F,SegersP,VancanneytM,BertheF,KerstersK et al. Cutting a gordian knot: emended classification and description of the genusFlavobacterium, emended description of the familyFlavobacteriaceae, and proposal ofFlavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (basonym,Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978).Int J Syst Bacteriol1996; 46:128–148
      [Google Scholar]
    26. PedersonCS. GenusLactobacillus Beijerinck, 1901. InBreedRS,MurrayEGD, andSmithNR. (eds)Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1957 pp.542–552
      [Google Scholar]
    27. PridhamTG,LyonsAJ,SeckingerHL. Comparison of some dried holotype and neotype specimens of streptomycetes with their living counterparts.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1965; 15:191–237
      [Google Scholar]
    28. BreedRS,MurrayEGD,SmithNR. (eds)Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins;1957
      [Google Scholar]
    29. RogosaM.Peptococcaceae, a new family to include the Gram-positive, anaerobic cocci of the generaPeptococcus,Peptostreptococcus, andRuminococcus.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:234–237
      [Google Scholar]
    30. BøvreK. Proposal to divide the genusMoraxella Lwoff 1939 emend. Henriksen and Bøvre 1968 into two subgenera – subgenusMoraxella (Lwoff 1939) Bøvre 1979 and subgenusBranhamella (Catlin 1970) Bøvre 1979.Int J Syst Bacteriol1979; 29:403–406
      [Google Scholar]
    31. WhitmoreA. An account of a glanders-like disease occurring in Rangoon.J Hyg (Lond)1913; 13:1–34
      [Google Scholar]
    32. Judicial Commission Opinion 14. Names of bacterial genera to be rejected as later synonyms of names of genera of protozoa. InOpinions 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1954; 4:141–158
      [Google Scholar]
    33. SchwabacherH,LucasDR,RimingtonC.Bacterium melaninogenicum; a misnomer.J Gen Microbiol1947; 1:109–120
      [Google Scholar]
    34. LesselEF. Status of the nameProteus morganii and designation of the neotype strain.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:55–57
      [Google Scholar]
    35. Judicial Commission Opinion 46. Rejection of the generic nameAerobacter Beijerinck.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:110
      [Google Scholar]
    36. Judicial Commission Opinion 45. Rejection of the nameLeuconostoc citrovorum (Hammer) Hucker and Pederson.Int J Syst Bacteriol1971; 21:109–110
      [Google Scholar]
    37. BuchananRE,HoltJG,LesselEF.Index Bergeyana. An annotated alphabetic Listing of Names of the Taxa of the Bacteria Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins;1966
      [Google Scholar]
    38. Judicial Commission Opinion 60. Rejection of the nameYersinia pseudotuberculosis subsp.pestis (van Loghem) Bercovier,et al. 1981 and conservation of the nameYersinia pestis (Lehmann and Neumann) van Loghem 1944 for the plague bacillus.Int J Syst Bacteriol1985; 35:540
      [Google Scholar]
    39. Judicial Commission Opinion 1. The correct spelling of the specific epithet in the species nameBacillus megaterium de Bary 1884.Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon1951; 1:35–36
      [Google Scholar]
    40. SneathPHA. Correction of orthography of epithets in Pasteurella and some problems with recommendations on latinization. Letter to the Editor.Int J Syst Bacteriol1992; 42:658–659
      [Google Scholar]
    41. Judicial Commission Opinion No. 3.: The Gender of Generic Names Ending in -bacter.Int J Syst Bacteriol1951; 1:36–37
      [Google Scholar]
    /content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    Loading
    International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol69, S1 (2019);https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    /content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    /content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    Loading

    Data & Media loading...

    Most read this month

    Article
    content/journal/ijsem
    Journal
    5
    3
    false
    en
    Loading

    Most citedMost Cited RSS feed

    We Recommend

    Access key

    • Subscribed Subscribed content
    • Open Access Open Access content
    • Free Trial Free Trial content
    • Frees Free content

    Microbiology Horizons: the new interdisciplinary journal

    White text on illustration of petri dish reading Discover our new journal

    Find out more about our newest title, Microbiology Horizons, bringing together insights on new technologies and solutions in microbiology to address global challenges.

    Fee Free Open Access Publishing via Publish and Read

    Are you eligible forfree Open Access publishing via a Publish and Read agreement inInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, the official publication for novel microbial taxa? Check if your institution is signed uphere

    This is a required field
    Please enter a valid email address
    Approval was a Success
    Invalid data
    An error occurred
    Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
    Microbiology Society:
    http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2026 Movatter.jp