Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

Original Articles

Assessment of Pain Quality in a Clinical Trial of Gabapentin Extended Release for Postherpetic Neuralgia

Jensen, Mark P. PhD*; Chiang, Yu-Kun PhD; Wu, Jacqueline PhD

Author Information

*Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Essence Sciences, San Jose

WuMW, Danville, CA

Supported by a grant from Depomed Inc to the first author. Mark P. Jensen has received research support or consulting fees in the past year from Endo Pharmaceuticals and Depomed Inc, and is on the scientific advisory board of Fralex Therapeutics Inc. Yu-Kun Chiang is a consultant to Depomed Inc.

Reprints: Mark P. Jensen, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Box 356490, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6490 (e-mail:[email protected]).

Received for publication September 4, 2008; revised October 2, 2008; accepted October 6, 2008

The Clinical Journal of Pain25(4):p 286-292, May 2009. |DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e318192bf87

Abstract

Objective 

To replicate and extend previous research concerning the validity and utility of using pain quality measures in clinical trials.

Methods 

One hundred fifty-eight patients with moderate-to-severe postherpetic neuralgia were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment conditions: (1) extended release gabapentin (G-ER) 1800 mg once-daily administered in the evening; (2) G-ER 1800 mg asymmetric divided dose (600 mg AM and 1200 mg PM); or (3) placebo G-ER. A measure of different pain qualities, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, was administered as a secondary measure in this study before, during, and after the treatment.

Results 

The results suggest that G-ER, especially when administered twice-daily, have the greatest effects on sharp, dull, sensitive, and itchy pain. Few between-condition effects were found for the global ratings of intensity or unpleasantness, and for hot, cold, deep, or surface pain qualities.

Conclusions 

The results provide further support for the importance of assessing specific pain qualities as outcomes in clinical trials. The findings may also be used by clinicians for identifying those patients for whom G-ER may be particularly effective; that is, patients with postherpetic neuralgia presenting with pain described as sharp, dull, sensitive, or itchy.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp