Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

Original Articles

A 24-week Randomized, Controlled Trial of Memantine in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Alzheimer Disease

van Dyck, Christopher H. MD*; Tariot, Pierre N. MD; Meyers, Barnett MD; Malca Resnick, E. PhD§ for the Memantine MEM-MD-01 Study Group

Author Information

*Yale University, New Haven, CT

Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ

Weill Cornell Medical College, White Plains, NY

§Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ

Disclosure: Supported by Forest Laboratories, Inc, who provided all financial and material support for the study, as well as statistical and editorial support for the manuscript. Drs Christopher H. van Dyck, Pierre N. Tariot, and Barnett Meyers have received grant support and honoraria from Forest Laboratories, Inc, and Dr Pierre Tariot has given expert testimony related to memantine. Dr E. Malca Resnick is an employee of Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Reprints: Christopher H. van Dyck, MD, Yale University School of Medicine, One Church Street, Suite 600, New Haven, CT 06510 (e-mail:[email protected]).

Received for publication August 9, 2006; accepted March 27, 2007

Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders21(2):p 136-143, April 2007. |DOI:10.1097/WAD.0b013e318065c495

Abstract

This study examined the efficacy and safety of memantine monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer disease (AD). Patients not receiving a cholinesterase inhibitor (N=350) were randomized to receive memantine (20 mg/d) or placebo during this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Prospectively defined analyses failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of memantine treatment compared with placebo on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at week 24 end point, although a significant advantage was observed for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. The 19-item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL19) did not differ significantly between groups in any analysis. Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) did not significantly favor memantine at week 24 despite a significant advantage for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. Other secondary outcomes showed no significant treatment differences. Post hoc analyses of potentially confounding covariates and alternative methods of imputing missing data did not substantially alter the results. Because of the violations of normality assumptions for the SIB and ADCS-ADL19, nonparametric analyses were performed; statistically significant benefit of memantine over placebo was demonstrated at week 24 for the SIB but not the ADCS-ADL19. The type and incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups.

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid

Source

Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders21(2):136-143, April-June 2007.
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp