Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

REVIEW ARTICLES

Pharmacological treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder comorbid with an anxiety disorder

a systematic review

Villas-Boas, Camila B.a; Chierrito, Daniellyb; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernandod; Tonin, Fernanda S.c; Sanches, Andréia C.C.a

Author Information

aCenter for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Western Paraná, Cascavel

bState University of Maringá, Maringá

cFederal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil

dResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed. Lisbon), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Correspondence to Andréia C.C. Sanches, PhD, Rua Universitária, 2069, Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Western Paraná, Cascavel, PR, CEP 85819-110, Brazil Tel: +55 453 220 3156; e-mail:[email protected]

Received May 7, 2018

Accepted October 16, 2018

International Clinical Psychopharmacology34(2):p 57-64, March 2019. |DOI:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000243

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the pharmacological options available to treat patients diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorder, for generating evidence on the safest, most-effective and tolerable pharmacotherapy. To this end, a systematic search was performed in three electronic databases (Medline, Scopus and Directory of Open Access Journals; December 2017). Randomized, double-blind, parallel-design clinical trials evaluating the efficacy, safety or tolerability of therapies for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorder in children and adolescents or adults were considered. A total of 1960 articles were retrieved from the databases, of which five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Two of these studies evaluated the drug atomoxetine, another study evaluated desipramine, and the remaining two studies evaluated methylphenidate, with fluvoxamine being associated with methylphenidate in one of the trials. Owing to the high heterogeneity among studies, it was not possible to combine data for meta-analyses. Although only few studies have been evaluated in this systematic review, the results point to a more significant benefit of atomoxetine. This is probably because this drug was studied in a wider age range and evaluated by more specific scales for both disorders. To further strengthen this evidence, randomized, controlled and multicenter clinical trials with larger sample sizes should be conducted.

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp