Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Journal Logo

Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.

Export to

Original Articles

Sensitivity to Change and Internal Consistency of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and Derivation of a Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Sim, Julius PhD; Jordan, Kelvin PhD; Lewis, Martyn PhD; Hill, Jonathan MSc; Hay, Elaine M. MD; Dziedzic, Krysia PhD

Author Information

Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK

Supported by the Arthritis Research Campaign (arc).

Reprints: Julius Sim, PhD, Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK (e-mail:[email protected])

Received for publication February 11, 2006; accepted July 18, 2006

The Clinical Journal of Pain22(9):p 820-826, November 2006. |DOI:10.1097/01.ajp.0000210937.58439.39

Abstract

Objectives 

To estimate the sensitivity to change and internal consistency of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and derive its minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Methods 

Data on 311 participants in a randomized controlled trial of physical therapy for neck pain were analyzed, between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Cronbach α was used to estimate internal consistency. Three methods of evaluating the NPQ's sensitivity to change were used; Cohen's effect size, standardized response mean, and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic. The smallest change on the NPQ that can be construed as clinically important (the MCID) was obtained by (1) comparing values derived from different methods that account for the measurement error of the questionnaire with improvements in other neck pain-specific measures, and then (2) examining the impact of the addition of an independent measure (“anchor”) relating to participants' subjective rating of improvement.

Results 

Cronbach α was 0.79 for the whole scale. Using all participants, Cohen'sd was 0.78, standardized response mean was 0.71, and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic was 0.93. Using only participants who stated they had improved, the estimates were 1.35, 1.27, 1.45, respectively. The MCID for the NPQ was determined as a 25% reduction in score from baseline together with a patient's global rating of their neck pain of at least “better.”

Conclusions 

These results show high internal consistency and sensitivity to change for the NPQ, and provide an MCID that allows participants with varying levels of severity to demonstrate improvement.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Log InAccess through Ovid
Email to Colleague

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your Name:
Colleague's Email:
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Message:

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.



Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp