Dronedarone (SR33589), a new noniodinated benzofuran derivative structurally related to amiodarone, is currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Despite deletion of iodine from its molecular structure, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown similar electrophysiologic effects of dronedarone to those of amiodarone after short-term(1,2) as well as long-term(3) treatments. Like amiodarone, dronedarone exerts sympatholytic effects(4) and inhibits several ionic currents, namely: INa, ICaL, ICaT, If, IKr, IKs, and Isus(2,5,6). Both amiodarone and dronedarone have thus been termed "multichannel blockers," but it is not clear which ionic currents might have a fundamental role in the acute effects of amiodarone and dronedarone.
Clinical and experimental studies have indicated that vagal activation plays an important role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation(7,8). Vagal nerve stimulation or application of acetylcholine induces nonuniform shortening of the atrial refractory period and thus favors conditions for occurrence and maintenance of atrial fibrillation(9,10). Amiodarone is effective in treating atrial fibrillation(11) and inhibits the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-operated K+ current (IK(ACh)) in atrial cells(12). Therefore, the present study was conducted to examine the effects of dronedarone, compared with amiodarone, onIK(ACh) in guinea pig atrial cells.
METHODS
Cell isolation
Myocytes were enzymatically dissociated from a preparation of guinea pig atrial cells. During this procedure, all solutions were oxygenated and thermostated at 37°C. Hearts were removed from male guinea pigs weighing 250-300 g (Hartley, Charles River, France) euthanized per the Helsinki convention by cervical dislocation and placed in Ca2+-free Tyrode's solution (mM: NaCl, 137; KCl, 5.4; MgCl2, 2; HEPES-NaOH, 10; glucose, 11.5; pyruvic acid, 5; thiamine, 0.1; pH 7.35), to which to 0.9 mM CaCl2 was added.
The heart was mounted in a warmed jacketed Langendorff perfusion system and successively perfused with Ca2+-free Tyrode's solution for 5 min, Ca2+-free Tyrode's solution supplemented with collagenase (type II; 0.167 mg/ml) and protease (type IV; 0.083 mg/ml) for 6 min, and finally KB solution (mM: KCl, 25; L-glutamic acid (K), 70; MgCl2, 5; KH2PO4, 10; HEPES-KOH, 10; glucose, oxalic acid, 10; pyruvic acid, 2; taurine, 10; β-hydroxybutyric acid, 2; ATP (K), 2; phosphocreatine (Na2), 2; pH 7.2) for 10 min. The atria were excised from the heart and cut in KB solution. The supernatants were kept at 4°C and used after at least 1 h.
Experimental method and solution
The effects of amiodarone and dronedarone were studied in guinea pig atrial cells in whole cell configuration using patch clamp technique in normal Tyrode's solution (mM: NaCl, 137; KCl, 4; CaCl2, 1.8; MgCl2, 1; HEPES-NaOH, 10; glucose, 11.5; pyruvic acid, 5; thiamine, 0.1; pH 7.35) at 35 ± 1°C. Patch pipettes were filled with an intracellular-like solution (mM: KCl, 150; MgCl2, 1; HEPES-KOH, 5; β-hydroxybutyric acid, 2; ATP (K), 4; GTP (Na2) 0.1; phosphocreatine (Na2), 5; EGTA (K), 5). Amiodarone and dronedarone were daily dissolved at a concentration of 1 × 10−2M in a solution of acidified ethanol (0.5 ethanol + 0.15 ml HCl (N) + 0.35 ml H2O; pH = 2) then diluted to 1 × 10−3M in Tyrode's solution containing 5% porcine serum albumin at pH = 3. Final concentrations were obtained with Tyrode's solution and pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH (1 N). Corresponding ethanol and PSA concentrations were added to control Tyrode's solution.
Stimulation protocol
The holding potential was −50 mV. Carbachol (10 μM) was superfused for 10 s, every 2 min, to activateIK(ACh). A potential ramp from −100 mV to +60 mV was applied during carbachol perfusion at 9 s. In another series of experiments, 100 μM GTP-γ-S (10 mM stock solution in H2O at −80°C) was included in the patch pipette solution. The activatedIK(ACh) gradually decayed probably because of desensitization. Assuming that this decay was a linear function of time, inhibition ofIK(ACh) was calculated from the difference between the current level that was extrapolated from the current decay before the application of amiodarone or dronedarone and that changed by the drug.
All data are expressed in percentages of inhibition of control values as mean ± SEM independent ANOVA and Dunnett's test (RS1 computer program BBN Software Products Corp., Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.) were used for statistical appraisal of drug effects.
RESULTS
The effects of amiodarone and dronedarone on the carbachol-inducedIK(ACh) in guinea pig atrial cells were examined in whole-cell voltage clamp configuration. Application of 10 μM carbachol activated an outward K+ current at a holding potential of −50 mV. After the activation,IK(ACh) gradually declined because of desensitization(12,13).Figure 1A illustrates effects of 0.1 μM dronedarone on carbachol-inducedIK(ACh) at −50 mV. In a range of 6-8 min, dronedarone, as well as amiodarone (not shown), decreasedIK(ACh). The potential ramps(Fig. 1B) indicate that the current reversed near to −90 mV, in close agreement with the predicted reversal potential for K+ ions (−96 mV); furthermore, these ramps show that the drug effects were observed at all potentials. The inhibition ofIK(ACh) by amiodarone was also found to be voltage-independent (not illustrated).Figure 1C shows the concentration-dependent inhibitions by dronedarone and amiodarone ofIK(ACh) (percentages ofIK(ACh) inhibition were measured at least 6 min after the beginning of drug perfusion): dronedarone decreased the current by 44.7 ± 3.7% (n = 7), 76.7 ± 1.9% (n = 8), and 100 ± 0% (n = 3) of control at 0.01, 0.1, and 1 μM, respectively; amiodarone decreased the current by 31.4 ± 1.6% (n = 7), 45.0 ± 2.3% (n = 6) and 83.6 ± 5.6% (n = 11) at 0.1, 1, and 10 μM, respectively. Dronedarone and amiodarone blockedIK(ACh) with an IC50 slightly higher than 10 nM and 1 μM, respectively. This latter result of amiodarone is very close to that obtained by Watanabe et al.(12) in the same preparation (IC50 = 2.4 μM).
FIG. 1:Effects of amiodarone (AM) and dronedarone (SR) onIK(ACh) elicited by carbachol (CCh) (10 μM). Holding potential: −50 mV.A. Superimposed current traces from a typical experiment testing 0.1 μM dronedarone. Dronedarone indicates traces in the presence of drug. Zero current amplitudes are indicated by dotted lines.B. Current-potential curves obtained from potential ramps in traces A.C. Mean percentage (± SEM) of current inhibition induced by amiodarone (n = 6-11) and dronedarone (n = 3-8). The symbols indicate significant differences between bar graphs (**p < 0.01).
Because the activation ofIK(ACh) depends on the G-protein-mediated interaction between muscarinic receptors and channel proteins, dronedarone could act by uncoupling this cascade of events at different levels. Amiodarone is known to inhibit the KACh channel itself or G proteins(12). In order to dissect the effects of dronedarone on the receptor-G-protein interaction from a direct channel blockade, we tested the drug after the activation of the G-protein by intracellular perfusion with GTP-γ-S, a nonhydrolyzable GTP analog. Because the pipette solution contained GTP-γ-S (100 μM),IK(ACh) rose after establishing the whole-cell configuration. Using the same protocol as previously but without carbachol application,Figure 2A illustrates the amplitudes of GTP-induced current in control medium or in the presence of 0.1 μM, dronedarone. The current was fully activated within 3 min (n = 21). The potential ramps presented inFigure 2B were measured on steadystate currents for the control and after 6-8 min of 0.1 μM, dronedarone perfusion. As shown above with carbachol, dronedarone inhibited the GTP-γ-S-inducedIK(ACh) at all potentials. The histogram(Fig. 2C) shows that dronedarone inhibited this current by 27.6 ± 5.1% (n = 6) and 57.6 ± 3.2% (n = 8) at 0.01 and 0.1 μM, respectively.
FIG. 2:Effects of dronedarone (SR) onIK(ACh) elicited by GTP-γ-S (100 μM). Holding potential: −50 mV.A. Amplitude of GTP-γ-S-induced current from a typical experiment. Symbols (①, control; ② 0.1 μM dronedarone) show data measurement to ramp potential in B. Current potential curves from data in A.C. Mean percentage (± SEM) of current inhibited by 0.01 μM (n = 6) and 0.1 μM (n = 8) dronedarone. The symbols indicate significant differences between bar graphs (**p < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
The present study shows that dronedarone, in a concentration-dependent manner, blocks the carbachol-inducedIK(ACh) in guinea pig atrial cells. This inhibition is effective at all potentials and the IC50 is ≈ 10 nM, which is approximately 100 times lower than that of amiodarone (IC50 ≈ 1 μM). Activation ofIK(ACh) is a G-protein-mediated process triggered by the interaction of ACh with the muscarinic M2-receptor(14). Watanabe et al.(12) have shown that the IC50 of amiodarone was similar on carbachol-, adenosine- and GTP-γ-S-inducedIK(ACh), indicating that amiodarone does not interact with the M2-receptor but acts on the K(ACh) channel itself and/or GTP-binding proteins. Dronedarone, with a molecular structure close to that of amiodarone, also blocks, in the same range of concentration, both the GTP-γ-S-and the carbachol-inducedIK(ACh). These observations support the fact that dronedarone acts directly on KACh channels and/or GTP-binding proteins and not on M2 receptors.
Amiodarone is not a selective channel blocker because it inhibitsIK(ACh) and several inward (ICa(L)) and outward (IKr, IKs, IKl) currents in a narrow range of concentrations: 1 to 10 μM(12,15,16). Compared with amiodarone, dronedarone is approximately three times more potent to inhibit each of the latter Ca2+ and K+ currents(15,16), strengthening the greater in vivo activities of dronedarone observed in ventricular arrhythmia models(17,18). The present data demonstrate that dronedarone is approximately 100 times more potent than amiodarone and also than class III antiarrhythmic drugs such as sotalol, E-4031, and MS-551 in guinea pig atrial cells(19). Moreover, in contrast to amiodarone, dronedarone is a selectiveIK(ACh) blocker, because its IC50 value is smaller by at least one order of magnitude than those observed for Ca2+ and K+ currents(15,16). It has been shown that dronedarone is three times more potent than amiodarone in terminating and preventing re-induction of experimental atrial fibrillation maintained during vagal nerve stimulation in anesthetized dogs(20). Although the inhibition ofIK(ACh) by dronedarone observed in the present study may underlie in part the antiarrhythmic action of dronedarone in this experimental vagotonic atrial fibrillation, we cannot exclude participation of other channel-blocking properties of dronedarone to explain the higher potency of dronedarone than amiodarone.
At present, amiodarone is certainly the most effective drug on the market for treating and preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation, but this advantage is offset by its adverse noncardiac side effects(21,22). Its noniodinated benzofuran derivative, dronedarone, which does not lead to phospholipid accumulation in lungs and thyroid hormone metabolism modifications in rats (M. Clinet, unpublished data, 1992) is a potent inhibitor ofIK(ACh) in atrial cells, and should be a potent antiarrhythmic agent in human atrial fibrillation when vagal tone contributes to its genesis.
Acknowledgment: The authors wish to thank Dr. Isabel A. Lefevre for her help in reviewing the manuscript and S. Rognon for secretarial assistance.
REFERENCES
1. Manning A, Thisse V, Hodeige D, et al. SR33589, a new amiodarone-like antiarrhythmic agent: electrophysiological effects in anesthetized dogs.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;25:252-61.
2. Gautier P, Marion A, Bertrand JP, et al. Electrophysiological characterization of Dronedarone (SR33589), a new amiodarone-like agent, in cardiac ventricular myocytes.
Eur Heart J 1997;18(suppl):269.
3. Sun W, Sarma JSM, Singh BN. Electrophysiological effects of dronedarone (SR33589), a noniodinated benzofuran derivative, in the rabbit heart. Comparison with amiodarone.
Circulation 1999;100:2276-81.
4. Hodeige D, Heyndrickx JP, Chatelain P, et al. SR33589, a new amiodarone-like antiarrhythmic agent: anti-adrenoreceptor activity in anaesthetized and conscious dogs.
Eur J Pharmacol 1995;279:25-32.
5. Rochetti M, Bertrand JP, Nisato D, et al. Cellular electrophysiological study of dronedarone, a new amiodarone-like agent, in guinea pig sinoatrial node.
Arch Pharmacol 1998;358(1):R617.
6. Aimond F, Beck L, Gautier P, et al. Cellular and in vivo electrophysiological effects of dronedarone in normal and postmyocardial infarcted rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000;292:415-24.
7. Coumel P, Attuel P, Lavallee JP, et al. Syndrome d'arythmie auriculaire d'origine vagale.
Arch Mal Coeur 1978;71:645-56.
8. Coumel P. Autonomic influences in atrial tachyarrhythmias.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:999-1007.
9. Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke FIM, et al. Intraatrial reentry as a mechanism for atrial flutter induced by acetylcholine and rapid pacing in the dog.
Circulation 1984;70:123-35.
10. Schwartz PJ. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the autonomic nervous system. In: Campbell RNF, Janse MJ, eds.
Cardiac arrhythmias: the management of atrial fibrillation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992:1-16.
11. Chun SH, Sager PT, Stevenson WG, et al. Long-term efficacy of amiodarone for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter.
Am J Cardiol 1995;76:47-50.
12. Watanabe Y, Hara Y, Tamagawa M, et al. Inhibitory effect of amiodarone on the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-operated potassium current in guinea pig atrial cells.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996;279:617-24.
13. Carmeliet E, Mubagwa K. Desensitization of the acetylcholine-induced increase of potassium conductance in rabbit cardiac Purkinje fibers.
J Physiol (Lond) 1986;371:239-55.
14. Kurachi Y. G protein regulation of cardiac muscarinic potassium channel.
Am J Physiol 1995;269:C821-30.
15. Guillemare E, Marion A, Nisato D, et al. Acute effects of dronedarone and amiodarone on iK1, iKr and iKs in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Fund Clin Pharmacol 1999;13:389.
16. Guillemare E, Gautier P, Nisato D. Effects of dronedarone on calcium handling in cardiac ventricular myocytes.
Eur Heart J 1999;20:329.
17. Manning AS, Bruyninckx C, Ramboux J, et al. SR33589, a new amiodarone-like agent: effect on ischemia- and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in anesthetized rats.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:453-61.
18. Finance O, Manning A, Chatelain P. Effect of a new amiodarone-like agent, SR33589, in comparison to amiodarone, D,L-sotalol, and lignocaine, on ischemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias in anesthetized pigs.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26:570-6.
19. Mori K, Hara Y, Saito T, et al. Anticholinergic effects of class III antiarrhythmic drugs in guinea pig atrial cells. Different molecular mechanisms.
Circulation 1995;91:2834-43.
20. Finance O, Planchenault J, Bethegnies S, et al. Electrophysiological and anti-arrhythmic actions of a new-amiodarone-like agent dronedarone, in experimental atrial fibrillation.
J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998;30(7):A251.
21. Capucci A, Villani GQ, Aschieri D, et al. Oral amiodarone increases the efficacy of direct-current cardioversion in restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
Eur Heart J 2000;21:66-73.
22. Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, et al. Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
N Engl J Med 2000;342:913-20.