• Antia, S. D., Jones, P. B., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2009). Academic status and progress in communication in deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general education classrooms.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 293–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arbib, M. A. (2009). Evolving the language ready brain and the social mechanisms that supportlanguage. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 263–271.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bedny, M., Richardson, H., & Saxe, R. (2015). “Visual” cortex responses to spoken language in blind children.The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 11674–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2015). Language: UG or not to be, that is the question.PLoS Biology, 13, e1002063. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002063.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Corballis, M. C. (2010). Mirror neurons and the evolution of language.Brain & Language, 112, 25–35.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Corina, D. P. (1998). Studies of neural processing in deaf signers: Toward a neurocognitive model of language processing in the deaf.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 35–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Corina, D. P., Lawyer, L. A., & Cates, D. (2013). Cross-linguistic differences in the neural representation of human language: Evidence from users of signed languages.Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 587. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00587.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Corina, D. P., McBurney, S. L., Dodrill, C., Hinshaw, K., Brinkley, J., & Ojemann, G. (1999). Functional roles of Broca’s area and supramarginal gyrus: Evidence from cortical stimulation mapping in a deaf signer.NeuroImage, 10, 570–581.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Curtiss, S. (1977).Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern day “wild child”. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999).How language comes to children: From birth to two years (M. DeBevoise, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. The co-evolution of language and the human brain. London: Penguin books.

  Google Scholar 

• Dolata, J. K., Davis, B. L., & Macneilage, P. F. (2008). Characteristics of the rhythmic organization of vocal babbling: Implications for an amodal linguistic rhythm.Infant Behavior & Development, 31, 422–431.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Emmorey, K. (2002).Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Emmorey, K., Petrich, J. A., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). Bimodal bilingualism and the Frequency-Lag Hypothesis.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18, 1–11.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding.Science, 308, 662–667.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fujii, S., & Wan, C. Y. (2014). The role of rhythm in speech and language rehabilitation: The SEP hypothesis.Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, 777.

  Google Scholar 

• Ghazanfar, A. A., & Takahashi, D. Y. (2014). Facial expressions and the evolution of the speech rhythm.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1196–1207.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140, 186–209.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hockett, C. D. (1960). The origin of speech. Reprint fromScientific American, 603.

  Google Scholar 

• Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979).The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Knoors, H., & Marschark, M. (2012). Language planning for the 21^st century: Revisiting bilingual language policy for deaf children.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17, 291–305.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kovelman, I., Mashco, K., Millott, L., Mastic, A., Moiseff, B., & Shalinsky, M. H. (2012). At the rhythm of language: Brain bases of language-related frequency perception in children.Neuroimage, 60, 673–682.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krentz, U. C., & Corina, D. P. (2008). Preference for language in early infancy: The human language bias is not speech specific.Developmental Science, 11(1), 1–9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lenneberg, E. (1967).Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Lieberman, P. (2000).Human language and our reptilian brain: The subcortical bases of speech, syntax and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lieberman, P. (2015). Language did not spring forth 100 000 years ago.PLoS Biology, 13, E1002064. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002064.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MacNeilage, P. F., & Davies, B. L. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms.Science, 288, 527–531.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayberry, R. (1995). Mental phonology and language comprehension or What does that sign mistake mean? In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.),Language, gesture, and space (pp. 355–370). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayberry, R., & Eichen, E. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood. Another look at the critical period for language acquisition.Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486–512.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Newport, E. L. (1991). Contrasting conceptions of the critical period for language. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.),The epigenesist of mind: Essays in biology and cognition (pp. 111–130). Cambridge, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Nyström, P. (2008). The infant mirror neuron system studied with high density EEG.Social Neuroscience, 3(3-4), 334–347.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (1988). The role of audition in baby babbling.Child Development, 59, 441–449.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Petitto, L. A., Holowka, S., Sergio, L. E., Levy, B., & Ostry, D. J. (2004). Baby hands that move to the rhythm of language: Hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands.Cognition, 93, 43–73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Petitto, L. A., & Marentetto, P. F. (1991). Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language.Science, 251, 1483–1496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within a grasp.Trends in Neoroscience, 21, 188–194.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rydberg, E., Gellerstedt, L. C., & Danemark, B. (2010). The position of the deaf in the Swedish labor market.American Annals of the Deaf, 155, 68–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Teoh, S. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2004). Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part 1. Clinical results.Laryngoscope, 114, 1536–1540.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thelen, E. (1991). Motor aspects of emergent speech: A dynamic approach. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbush, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.),Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 329–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J.F. (2004). Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science 7(3), 270–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates.Developmental Science, 10(2), 159–171.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references