1. Froude, M. J. & Petley, D. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.18, 2161–2181 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

2. Temple, P. H. & Rapp, A. Landslides in the Mgeta area, Western Uluguru mountains, Tanzania: Geomorphological effects of sudden heavy rainfall.Geogr. Ann. Ser. A Phys. Geogr.54, 157–193 (1972).

   Google Scholar 

3. Keefer, D. K. Landslides caused by earthquakes.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.95, 406–421 (1984).

   Google Scholar 

4. Palmer, J. Creeping earth could hold secret to deadly landslides.Nature548, 384–386 (2017).

   Google Scholar 

5. Mansour, M. F., Morgenstern, N. R. & Martin, C. D. Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides.Landslides8, 117–131 (2011).

   Google Scholar 

6. Reid, M. E. et al. inDebris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment Vol. 1 (eds Rickenmann, D. & Chen, C.-L.) 155–166 (Millpress, 2003).

7. Booth, A. M. et al. Transient reactivation of a deep-seated landslide by undrained loading captured with repeat airborne and terrestrial lidar.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 4841–4850 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

8. Hendron, A. J. Jr & Patton, F. D.The Vaiont Slide, a geotechnical analysis based on how geologic observations of the failure surface. Technical Report GL-85-5 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1985).

9. Intrieri, E. et al. The Maoxian landslide as seen from space: detecting precursors of failure with Sentinel-1 data.Landslides15, 123–133 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

10. Handwerger, A. L., Huang, M.-H., Fielding, E. J., Booth, A. M. & Bürgmann, R. A shift from drought to extreme rainfall drives a stable landslide to catastrophic failure.Sci. Rep.9, 1569 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

11. Federico, A. et al. Prediction of time to slope failure: a general framework.Environ. Earth Sci.66, 245–256 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

12. Carlà, T. et al. Perspectives on the prediction of catastrophic slope failures from satellite InSAR.Sci. Rep.9, 14137 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

13. Lacroix, P., Bièvre, G., Pathier, E., Kniess, U. & Jongmans, D. Use of Sentinel-2 images for the detection of precursory motions before landslide failures.Remote. Sens. Environ.215, 507–516 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

14. Desrues, M., Lacroix, P. & Brenguier, O. Satellite pre-failure detection and in situ monitoring of the landslide of the Tunnel du Chambon, French Alps.Geosciences9, 313 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

15. Wang, F. et al. Movement of the Shuping landslide in the first four years after the initial impoundment of the Three Gorges Dam Reservoir, China.Landslides5, 321–329 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

16. Dille, A. et al. Causes and triggers of deep-seated hillslope instability in the tropics–Insights from a 60-year record of Ikoma landslide (DR Congo).Geomorphology345, 106835 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

17. Nappo, N., Peduto, D., Mavrouli, O., van Westen, C. J. & Gullà, G. Slow-moving landslides interacting with the road network: analysis of damage using ancillary data, in situ surveys and multi-source monitoring data.Eng. Geol.260, 105244 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

18. Lacroix, P., Dehecq, A. & Taipe, E. Irrigation-triggered landslides in a Peruvian desert caused by modern intensive farming.Nat. Geosci.13, 56–60 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

19. Wu, S. et al. Zonation of the landslide hazards in the forereservoir region of the Three Gorges Project on the Yangtze River.Eng. Geol.59, 51–58 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

20. Mackey, B. H. & Roering, J. J. Sediment yield, spatial characteristics, and the long-term evolution of active earthflows determined from airborne lidar and historical aerial photographs, Eel River, California.Bulletin123, 1560–1576 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

21. Simoni, A., Ponza, A., Picotti, V., Berti, M. & Dinelli, E. Earthflow sediment production and Holocene sediment record in a large Apennine catchment.Geomorphology188, 42–53 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

22. Coe, J. A., McKenna, J. P., Godt, J. W. & Baum, R. L. Basal-topographic control of stationary ponds on a continuously moving landslide.Earth Surf. Process. Landf.34, 264–279 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

23. Bontemps, N., Lacroix, P., Larose, E., Jara, J. & Taipe, E. Rain and small earthquakes maintain a slow-moving landslide in a persistent critical state.Nat. Commun.11, 780 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

24. Nereson, A. L. & Finnegan, N. J. Drivers of earthflow motion revealed by an 80 yr record of displacement from Oak Ridge earthflow, Diablo Range, California, USA.Bulletin131, 389–402 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

25. Iverson, R. M. & Major, J. J. Rainfall, ground-water flow, and seasonal movement at Minor Creek landslide, northwestern California: physical interpretation of empirical relations.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.99, 579–594 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

26. Krzeminska, D., Bogaard, T., Malet, J.-P. & Van Beek, L. A model of hydrological and mechanical feedbacks of preferential fissure flow in a slow-moving landslide.Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.17, 947–959 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

27. Hungr, O., Leroueil, S. & Picarelli, L. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update.Landslides11, 167–194 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

28. Galloway, W. The landslide in the Rhymney valley.Nature73, 425–426 (1906).

    Google Scholar 

29. Miller, W. J. The landslide at Point Firmin, California.Sci. Monthly32, 464–469 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

30. Benson, W. N. Landslides and their relation to engineering in the Dunedin district, New Zealand.Econ. Geol.41, 328–347 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

31. Crandell, D. R. Movement of the Slumgullion earthflow near Lake City, Colorado.Short Papers in the Geologic and Hydrologic Sciences B136–B139 (1961).

32. Schulz, W. H., McKenna, J. P., Kibler, J. D. & Biavati, G. Relations between hydrology and velocity of a continuously moving landslide — evidence of pore-pressure feedback regulating landslide motion?Landslides6, 181–190 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

33. Schulz, W. H., Kean, J. W. & Wang, G. Landslide movement in southwest Colorado triggered by atmospheric tides.Nat. Geosci.2, 863–866 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

34. Schulz, W. H. et al. Landslide kinematics and their potential controls from hourly to decadal timescales: Insights from integrating ground-based InSAR measurements with structural maps and long-term monitoring data.Geomorphology285, 121–136 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

35. Schulz, W. H., Smith, J. B., Wang, G., Jiang, Y. & Roering, J. J. Clayey landslide initiation and acceleration strongly modulated by soil swelling.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 1888–1896 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

36. Helmstetter, A. & Garambois, S. Seismic monitoring of Séchilienne rockslide (French Alps): Analysis of seismic signals and their correlation with rainfalls.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.115, F03016 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

37. Mainsant, G. et al. Ambient seismic noise monitoring of a clay landslide: Toward failure prediction.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.117, F01030 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

38. Travelletti, J., Sailhac, P., Malet, J.-P., Grandjean, G. & Ponton, J. Hydrological response of weathered clay-shale slopes: Water infiltration monitoring with time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography.Hydrol. Process.26, 2106–2119 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

39. Provost, F., Hibert, C. & Malet, J.-P. Automatic classification of endogenous landslide seismicity using the Random Forest supervised classifier.Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 113–120 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

40. Delacourt, C., Allemand, P., Casson, B. & Vadon, H. Velocity field of the “La Clapière” landslide measured by the correlation of aerial and QuickBird satellite images.Geophys. Res. Lett.31, L15619 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

41. Hilley, G. E., Bürgmann, R., Ferretti, A., Novali, F. & Rocca, F. Dynamics of slow-moving landslides from permanent scatterer analysis.Science304, 1952–1955 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

42. Booth, A. M., Lamb, M. P., Avouac, J.-P. & Delacourt, C. Landslide velocity, thickness, and rheology from remote sensing: La Clapière landslide, France.Geophys. Res. Lett.40, 4299–4304 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

43. Lacroix, P., Berthier, E. & Maquerhua, E. T. Earthquake-driven acceleration of slow-moving landslides in the Colca valley, Peru, detected from Pléiades images.Remote. Sens. Environ.165, 148–158 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

44. Lacroix, P., Araujo, G., Hollingsworth, J. & Taipe, E. Self entrainment motion of a slow-moving landslide inferred from Landsat-8 time-series.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.124, 1201–1216 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

45. Bennett, G. L. et al. Historic drought puts the brakes on earthflows in Northern California.Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 5725–5731 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

46. Stumpf, A., Malet, J.-P. & Delacourt, C. Correlation of satellite image time-series for the detection and monitoring of slow-moving landslides.Remote. Sens. Environ.189, 40–55 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

47. Handwerger, A. L. et al. Widespread initiation, reactivation, and acceleration of landslides in the northern California Coast Ranges due to extreme rainfall.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.124, 1782–1797 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

48. Hutchinson, J. & Bhandari, R. Undrained loading, a fundamental mechanism of mudflows and other mass movements.Geotechnique21, 353–358 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

49. Van Asch, T. W. J., Malet, J.-P. & Bogaard, T. A. The effect of groundwater fluctuations on the velocity pattern of slow-moving landslides.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.9, 739–749 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

50. Lacroix, P., Perfettini, H., Taipe, E. & Guillier, B. Coseismic and postseismic motion of a landslide: Observations, modeling, and analogy with tectonic faults.Geophys. Res. Lett.41, 6676–6680 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

51. Handwerger, A. L., Rempel, A. W., Skarbek, R. M., Roering, J. J. & Hilley, G. E. Rate-weakening friction characterizes both slow sliding and catastrophic failure of landslides.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA113, 10281–10286 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

52. RESIF/OMIV. French multidisciplinary observatory of versant instabilities.RESIF - Réseau Sismologique et géodésique Français (RESIF/OMIV, 2006).

53. Colombo, A., Lanteri, L., Ramasco, M. & Troisi, C. Systematic GIS-based landslide inventory as the first step for effective landslide-hazard management.Landslides2, 291–301 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

54. Jaboyedoff, M. et al. inLandslides Processes — from Geomorphologic Mapping to Dynamic Modeling (eds Malet, J. P., Remaître, A. & Bogaard, T.) 131–137 (CERG Editions, 2009).

55. Malet, J.-P., Maquaire, O., Locat, J. & Remaître, A. Assessing debris flow hazards associated with slow moving landslides: methodology and numerical analyses.Landslides1, 83–90 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

56. Corsini, A., Pasuto, A., Soldati, M. & Zannoni, A. Field monitoring of the Corvara landslide (Dolomites, Italy) and its relevance for hazard assessment.Geomorphology66, 149–165 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

57. Bièvre, G. et al. Paleotopographic control of landslides in lacustrine deposits (Trièves plateau, French western Alps).Geomorphology125, 214–224 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

58. Lebourg, T., Binet, S., Tric, E., Jomard, H. & El Bedoui, S. Geophysical survey to estimate the 3D sliding surface and the 4D evolution of the water pressure on part of a deep seated landslide.Terra Nova17, 399–406 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

59. Strozzi, T. et al. Combined observations of rock mass movements using satellite SAR interferometry, differential GPS, airborne digital photogrammetry, and airborne photography interpretation.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.115, F01014 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

60. Meric, O. et al. Application of geophysical methods for the investigation of the large gravitational mass movement of Séchilienne, France.Can. Geotech. J.42, 1105–1115 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

61. Corominas, J., Moya, J., Ledesma, A., Lloret, A. & Gili, J. A. Prediction of ground displacements and velocities from groundwater level changes at the Vallcebre landslide (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain).Landslides2, 83–96 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

62. Mantovani, F., Pasuto, A., Silvano, S. & Zannoni, A. Collecting data to define future hazard scenarios of the Tessina landslide.Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.2, 33–40 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

63. Merriam, R. Portuguese bend landslide, Palos Verdes Hills, California.J. Geol.68, 140–153 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

64. Scheingross, J. S. et al. Fault-zone controls on the spatial distribution of slow-moving landslides.Bulletin125, 473–489 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

65. Roering, J. J. et al. Beyond the angle of repose: A review and synthesis of landslide processes in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California.Geomorphology236, 109–131 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

66. Nereson, A. L., Davila Olivera, S. & Finnegan, N. J. Field and remote-sensing evidence for hydro-mechanical isolation of a long-lived earthflow in central California.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 9672–9680 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

67. Schulz, W. H. & Wang, G. Residual shear strength variability as a primary control on movement of landslides reactivated by earthquake-induced ground motion: Implications for coastal Oregon, U.S.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.119, 1617–1635 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

68. Coe, J. A. et al. Seasonal movement of the Slumgullion landslide determined from Global Positioning System surveys and field instrumentation, July 1998–March 2002.Eng. Geol.68, 67–101 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

69. Zhang, X., Phillips, C. & Pearce, A. Surface movement in an earthflow complex, Raukumara Peninsula, New Zealand.Geomorphology4, 261–272 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

70. Massey, C., Petley, D., McSaveney, M. & Archibald, G. Basal sliding and plastic deformation of a slow, reactivated landslide in New Zealand.Eng. Geol.208, 11–28 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

71. Macfarlane, D. F. Observations and predictions of the behaviour of large, slow-moving landslides in schist, Clyde Dam reservoir, New Zealand.Eng. Geol.109, 5–15 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

72. Furuya, G., Sassa, K., Hiura, H. & Fukuoka, H. Mechanism of creep movement caused by landslide activity and underground erosion in crystalline schist, Shikoku Island, southwestern Japan.Eng. Geol.53, 311–325 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

73. Peyret, M. et al. Monitoring of the large slow Kahrod landslide in Alborz mountain range (Iran) by GPS and SAR interferometry.Eng. Geol.100, 131–141 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

74. Iverson, R. M. A constitutive equation for mass-movement behavior.J. Geol.93, 143–160 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

75. Malet, J.-P. & Maquaire, O. inProceedings of 1st International Conference on Fast Slope Movements (eds Malet, J.-P., Maquaire, O. & Picarelli, L.) 333–340 (Patron Editore, 2003).

76. Agliardi, F., Scuderi, M. M., Fusi, N. & Collettini, C. Slow-to-fast transition of giant creeping rockslides modulated by undrained loading in basal shear zones.Nat. Commun.11, 1352 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

77. Glueer, F., Loew, S., Manconi, A. & Aaron, J. From toppling to sliding: progressive evolution of the Moosfluh Landslide, Switzerland.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.124, 2899–2919 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

78. El Bedoui, S., Guglielmi, Y., Lebourg, T. & Pérez, J.-L. Deep-seated failure propagation in a fractured rock slope over 10,000 years: the La Clapiere slope, the south-eastern French Alps.Geomorphology105, 232–238 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

79. Le Roux, O. et al. CRE dating on the head scarp of a major landslide (Séchilienne, French Alps), age constraints on Holocene kinematics.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.280, 236–245 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

80. Guerriero, L. et al. Kinematic segmentation and velocity in earth flows: a consequence of complex basal-slip surfaces.Procedia Earth Planet. Sci.16, 146–155 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

81. Zerathe, S. et al. Morphology, structure and kinematics of a rainfall controlled slow-moving Andean landslide, Peru.Earth Surf. Process. Landf.41, 1477–1493 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

82. Bontemps, N., Lacroix, P. & Doin, M. Inversion of deformation fields time-series from optical images, and application to the long term kinematics of slow-moving landslides in Peru.Remote. Sens. Environ.210, 144–158 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

83. Van Genuchten, P. M. & De Rijke, H. On pore water pressure variations causing slide velocities and accelerations observed in a seasonally active landslide.Earth Surf. Process. Landf.14, 577–586 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

84. Handwerger, A. L., Roering, J. J. & Schmidt, D. A. Controls on the seasonal deformation of slow-moving landslides.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.377, 239–247 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

85. Malet, J.-P., Maquaire, O. & Calais, E. The use of Global Positioning System techniques for the continuous monitoring of landslides: application to the Super-Sauze earthflow (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France).Geomorphology43, 33–54 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

86. Li, X., Zhao, C., Hölter, R., Datcheva, M. & Alimardani Lavasan, A. Modelling of a large landslide problem under water level fluctuation — model calibration and verification.Geosciences9, 89 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

87. Iverson, R. M. Landslide triggering by rain infiltration.Water Resour. Res.36, 1897–1910 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

88. Aleotti, P. A warning system for rainfall-induced shallow failures.Eng. Geol.73, 247–265 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

89. Matsuura, S., Asano, S. & Okamoto, T. Relationship between rain and/or meltwater, pore-water pressure and displacement of a reactivated landslide.Eng. Geol.101, 49–59 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

90. Bayer, B., Simoni, A., Mulas, M., Corsini, A. & Schmidt, D. Deformation responses of slow moving landslides to seasonal rainfall in the Northern Apennines, measured by InSAR.Geomorphology308, 293–306 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

91. Osawa, H. et al. Seasonal transition of hydrological processes in a slow-moving landslide in a snowy region.Hydrol. Process.32, 2695–2707 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

92. Zhou, C., Yin, K., Cao, Y. & Ahmed, B. Application of time series analysis and PSO–SVM model in predicting the Bazimen landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir, china.Eng. Geol.204, 108–120 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

93. Zhang, X., Phillips, C. & Marden, M. A comparison of earthflow movement mechanisms on forested and grassed slopes, Raukumara Peninsula, North Island, New Zealand.Geomorphology6, 175–187 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

94. Terzaghi, K.Theoretical Soil Mechanics (Wiley, 1943).

95. Keefer, D. K. & Johnson, A. M.Earth flows; morphology, mobilization, and movement. Professional Paper 1264 (U.S. Government Publishing Office, 1983).

96. Picarelli, L., Urciuoli, G., Ramondini, M. & Comegna, L. Main features of mudslides in tectonised highly fissured clay shales.Landslides2, 15–30 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

97. Fiolleau, S. et al. Seismic characterization of a clay-block rupture in Harmalière landslide, French Western Alps.Geophys. J. Int.221, 1777–1788 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

98. Lu, N. & Godt, J. Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions.Water Resour. Res.44, W11404 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

99. Lu, N. & Godt, J. W.Hillslope Hydrology and Stability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

100. Iverson, R. M. et al. Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity.Science290, 513–516 (2000).

     Google Scholar 

101. Van Asch, T. W. J., Hendriks, M. R., Hessel, R. & Rappange, F. E. Hydrological triggering conditions of landslides in varved clays in the French Alps.Eng. Geol.42, 239–251 (1996).

     Google Scholar 

102. Van Asch, T. J. W., Buma, J. & Van Beek, L. P. H. A view on some hydrological triggering systems in landslides.Geomorphology30, 25–32 (1999).

     Google Scholar 

103. Hu, X. et al. Mobility, thickness, and hydraulic diffusivity of the slow-moving Monroe landslide in California revealed by L-band satellite radar interferometry.J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth124, 7504–7518 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

104. Bièvre, G., Jongmans, D., Winiarski, T. & Zumbo, V. Application of geophysical measurements for assessing the role of fissures in water infiltration within a clay landslide (Trièves area, French Alps).Hydrol. Process.26, 2128–2142 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

105. Krzeminska, D. M., Bogaard, T. A., van Asch, T. W. J. & van Beek, L. P. H. A conceptual model of the hydrological influence of fissures on landslide activity.Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.16, 1561–1576 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

106. Bièvre, G. et al. Influence of environmental parameters on the seismic velocity changes in a clayey mudflow (Pont-Bourquin Landslide, Switzerland).Eng. Geol.245, 248–257 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

107. Helmstetter, A. et al. Slider block friction model for landslides: Application to Vaiont and La Clapiere landslides.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth109, B02409 (2004).

     Google Scholar 

108. Du, J., Yin, K. & Lacasse, S. Displacement prediction in colluvial landslides, Three Gorges Reservoir, China.Landslides10, 203–218 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

109. Miao, H., Wang, G., Yin, K., Kamai, T. & Li, Y. Mechanism of the slow-moving landslides in Jurassic red-strata in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China.Eng. Geol.171, 59–69 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

110. Tofani, V., Dapporto, S., Vannocci, P. & Casagli, N. Infiltration, seepage and slope instability mechanisms during the 20–21 November 2000 rainstorm in Tuscany, central Italy.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.6, 1025–1033 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

111. Keqiang, H., Xiangran, L., Xueqing, Y. & Dong, G. The landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China and the effects of water storage and rain on their stability.Environ. Geol.55, 55–63 (2008).

     Google Scholar 

112. Hu, X., Lu, Z., Pierson, T. C., Kramer, R. & George, D. L. Combining InSAR and GPS to determine transient movement and thickness of a seasonally active low-gradient translational landslide.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 1453–1462 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

113. Bièvre, G., Joseph, A. & Bertrand, C. Preferential water infiltration path in a slow-moving clayey earthslide evidenced by cross-correlation of hydrometeorological time series (Charlaix landslide, French Western Alps).Geofluids2018, 9593267 (2018).Special issue “The Role and Impact of Geofluids in Geohazards”.

     Google Scholar 

114. Keefer, D. K. et al. Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall.Science238, 921–925 (1987).

     Google Scholar 

115. Krøgli, I. K. et al. The Norwegian forecasting and warning service for rainfall- and snowmelt-induced landslides.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.18, 1427–1450 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

116. Berti, M. & Simoni, A. Observation and analysis of near-surface pore-pressure measurements in clay-shales slopes.Hydrol. Process.26, 2187–2205 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

117. Preuth, T., Glade, T. & Demoulin, A. Stability analysis of a human-influenced landslide in eastern Belgium.Geomorphology120, 38–47 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

118. Calabro, M. D., Schmidt, D. A. & Roering, J. J. An examination of seasonal deformation at the Portuguese Bend landslide, southern California, using radar interferometry.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.115, F02020 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

119. Helle, T. E., Nordal, S., Aagaard, P. & Lied, O. K. Long-term effect of potassium chloride treatment on improving the soil behavior of highly sensitive clay — Ulvensplitten, Norway.Can. Geotech. J.53, 410–422 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

120. Helle, T. E., Aagaard, P. & Nordal, S. In situ improvement of highly sensitive clays by potassium chloride migration.J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.143, 04017074 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

121. Bardou, E., Bowen, P., Boivin, P. & Banfill, P. Impact of small amounts of swelling clays on the physical properties of debris-flow-like granular materials. Implications for the study of alpine debris flow.Earth Surf. Process. Landf.32, 698–710 (2007).

     Google Scholar 

122. Torrance, J. K. inLandslides: Types, Mechanisms and Modeling Ch. 8 (eds Clague, J. J. & Stead, D.) 83–94 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

123. Tika, T. E., Vaughan, P. & Lemos, L. Fast shearing of pre-existing shear zones in soil.Geotechnique46, 197–233 (1996).

     Google Scholar 

124. Scaringi, G., Hu, W., Xu, Q. & Huang, R. Shear-rate-dependent behavior of clayey bimaterial interfaces at landslide stress levels.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 766–777 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

125. Molinari, A. & Perfettini, H. Fundamental aspects of a new micromechanical model of rate and state friction.J. Mech. Phys. Solids124, 63–82 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

126. Brodsky, E. E., Roeloffs, E., Woodcock, D., Gall, I. & Manga, M. A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth108, 2390 (2003).

     Google Scholar 

127. Wang, C.-y & Chia, Y. Mechanism of water level changes during earthquakes: Near field versus intermediate field.Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L12402 (2008).

     Google Scholar 

128. Sassa, K., Fukuoka, H., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. & Evans, S. Earthquake-induced-landslides: distribution, motion and mechanisms.Soils Found.36, 53–64 (1996).

     Google Scholar 

129. Wang, F., Sassa, K. & Wang, G. Mechanism of a long-runout landslide triggered by the August 1998 heavy rainfall in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.Eng. Geol.63, 169–185 (2002).

     Google Scholar 

130. Glueer, F., Loew, S. & Manconi, A. Paraglacial history and structure of the Moosfluh Landslide (1850–2016), Switzerland.Geomorphology355, 106677 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

131. Carrière, S. et al. Rheological properties of clayey soils originating from flow-like landslides.Landslides15, 1615–1630 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

132. Newmark, N. M. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.Geotechnique15, 139–159 (1965).

     Google Scholar 

133. Marc, O., Hovius, N., Meunier, P., Uchida, T. & Hayashi, S. Transient changes of landslide rates after earthquakes.Geology43, 883–886 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

134. Durand, V. et al. On the link between external forcings and slope instabilities in the Piton de la Fournaise Summit Crater, Reunion Island.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.123, 2422–2442 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

135. Bovis, M. J. & Jones, P. Holocene history of earthflow mass movements in south-central British Columbia: the influence of hydroclimatic changes.Can. J. Earth Sci.29, 1746–1755 (1992).

     Google Scholar 

136. Rutter, E. & Green, S. Quantifying creep behaviour of clay-bearing rocks below the critical stress state for rapid failure: Mam Tor landslide, Derbyshire, England.J. Geol. Soc.168, 359–372 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

137. Riva, F., Agliardi, F., Amitrano, D. & Crosta, G. B. Damage-based time-dependent modeling of paraglacial to postglacial progressive failure of large rock slopes.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.123, 124–141 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

138. Moore, P. L. & Iverson, N. R. Slow episodic shear of granular materials regulated by dilatant strengthening.Geology30, 843–846 (2002).

     Google Scholar 

139. Gabet, E. J. & Mudd, S. M. The mobilization of debris flows from shallow landslides.Geomorphology74, 207–218 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

140. Iverson, R. M. Regulation of landslide motion by dilatancy and pore pressure feedback.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.110, F02015 (2005).

     Google Scholar 

141. Iverson, R. M. & George, D. L. Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster.Géotechnique66, 175–187 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

142. Khaldoun, A. et al. Quick clay and landslides of clayey soils.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 188301 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

143. Voight, B. A method for prediction of volcanic eruptions.Nature332, 125–130 (1988).

     Google Scholar 

144. Lacroix, P. & Amitrano, D. Long-term dynamics of rockslides and damage propagation inferred from mechanical modeling.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.118, 2292–2307 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

145. Viesca, R. C. & Rice, J. R. Nucleation of slip-weakening rupture instability in landslides by localized increase of pore pressure.J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth117, B03104 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

146. Schaeffer, D. G. & Iverson, R. M. Steady and intermittent slipping in a model of landslide motion regulated by pore-pressure feedback.SIAM J. Appl. Math.69, 769–786 (2008).

     Google Scholar 

147. Collins, B. D. & Reid, M. E. Enhanced landslide mobility by basal liquefaction: The 2014 State Route 530 (Oso), Washington, landslide.GSA Bulletin132, 451–476 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

148. Chau, K. T. Onset of natural terrain landslides modelled by linear stability analysis of creeping slopes with a two-state variable friction law.Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech.23, 1835–1855 (1999).

     Google Scholar 

149. Dieterich, J. H. Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth84, 2161–2168 (1979).

     Google Scholar 

150. Rice, J. R. & Ruina, A. L. Stability of steady frictional slipping.J. Appl. Mech.50, 343–349 (1983).

     Google Scholar 

151. Wang, G., Suemine, A. & Schulz, W. H. Shear-rate-dependent strength control on the dynamics of rainfall-triggered landslides, Tokushima Prefecture, Japan.Earth Surf. Process. Landf.35, 407–416 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

152. Segall, P. & Rice, J. R. Dilatancy, compaction, and slip instability of a fluid-infiltrated fault.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth100, 22155–22171 (1995).

     Google Scholar 

153. Samuelson, J., Elsworth, D. & Marone, C. Shear-induced dilatancy of fluid-saturated faults: experiment and theory.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth114, B12404 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

154. Segall, P., Rubin, A. M., Bradley, A. M. & Rice, J. R. Dilatant strengthening as a mechanism for slow slip events.J. Geophys. Res. Solid. Earth115, B12305 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

155. Fukuzono, T. A method to predict the time of slope failure caused by rainfall using the inverse number of velocity of surface displacement.Landslides22, 8–13_1 (1985).

     Google Scholar 

156. Amitrano, D., Grasso, J. R. & Senfaute, G. Seismic precursory patterns before a cliff collapse and critical point phenomena.Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L08314 (2005).

     Google Scholar 

157. Kilburn, C. R. & Petley, D. N. Forecasting giant, catastrophic slope collapse: lessons from Vajont, Northern Italy.Geomorphology54, 21–32 (2003).

     Google Scholar 

158. Crosta, G. & Agliardi, F. Failure forecast for large rock slides by surface displacement measurements.Can. Geotech. J.40, 176–191 (2003).

     Google Scholar 

159. Rose, N. D. & Hungr, O. Forecasting potential slope failure in open pit mines–contingency planning and remediation.Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci.44, 308–320 (2007).

     Google Scholar 

160. Segalini, A., Valletta, A. & Carri, A. Landslide time-of-failure forecast and alert threshold assessment: a generalized criterion.Eng. Geol.245, 72–80 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

161. Poli, P. Creep and slip: Seismic precursors to the Nuugaatsiaq landslide (Greenland).Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 8832–8836 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

162. Bell, A. F. Predictability of landslide timing from quasi-periodic precursory earthquakes.Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 1860–1869 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

163. Fan, X. et al. Failure mechanism and kinematics of the deadly June 24th 2017 Xinmo landslide, Maoxian, Sichuan, China.Landslides14, 2129–2146 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

164. Skarbek, R. M., Rempel, A. W. & Schmidt, D. A. Geologic heterogeneity can produce aseismic slip transients.Geophys. Res. Lett.39, L21306 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

165. Bell, A. F., Naylor, M., Heap, M. J. & Main, I. G. Forecasting volcanic eruptions and other material failure phenomena: an evaluation of the failure forecast method.Geophys. Res. Lett.38, L15304 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

166. Lipovsky, B. P. & Dunham, E. M. Slow-slip events on the Whillans Ice Plain, Antarctica, described using rate-and-state friction as an ice stream sliding law.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.122, 973–1003 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

167. Minchew, B. M. & Meyer, C. R. Dilation of subglacial sediment governs incipient surge motion in glaciers with deformable beds.Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.476, 20200033 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

168. Gomberg, J., Bodin, P., Savage, W. & Jackson, M. E. Landslide faults and tectonic faults, analogs?: The Slumgullion earthflow, Colorado.Geology23, 41–44 (1995).

     Google Scholar 

169. Dmitrieva, K., Hotovec-Ellis, A. J., Prejean, S. & Dunham, E. M. Frictional-faulting model for harmonic tremor before redoubt volcano eruptions.Nat. Geosci.6, 652–656 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

170. Le Breton, M. et al. Passive radio-frequency identification ranging, a dense and weather-robust technique for landslide displacement monitoring.Eng. Geol.250, 1–10 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

171. Madson, A., Fielding, E., Sheng, Y. & Cavanaugh, K. High-resolution spaceborne, airborne and in situ landslide kinematic measurements of the Slumgullion landslide in Southwest Colorado.Remote. Sens.11, 265 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

172. Thomas, A. M., Spica, Z., Bodmer, M., Schulz, W. H. & Roering, J. J. Using a dense seismic array to determine structure and site effects of the two towers earthflow in northern California.Seismol. Res. Lett.91, 913–920 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

173. Truffert, C. et al. Large 3D resistivity and IP measurement of the Séchilienne landslide using the FullWaver system.Proc. EAGE-HAGI 1st Asia Pacfic Meeting on Near Surface Geoscience and Engineering2018, 1–4 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

174. Loke, M., Chambers, J., Rucker, D., Kuras, O. & Wilkinson, P. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method.J. Appl. Geophys.95, 135–156 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

175. Perrone, A., Lapenna, V. & Piscitelli, S. Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: A review.Earth Sci. Rev.135, 65–82 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

176. Uhlemann, S. et al. Four-dimensional imaging of moisture dynamics during landslide reactivation.J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.122, 398–418 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

177. Uhlemann, S. et al. Assessment of ground-based monitoring techniques applied to landslide investigations.Geomorphology253, 438–451 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

178. Whiteley, J. S., Chambers, J. E., Uhlemann, S., Wilkinson, P. B. & Kendall, J. M. Geophysical monitoring of moisture-induced landslides: a review.Rev. Geophys.57, 106–145 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

179. Gariano, S. L. & Guzzetti, F. Landslides in a changing climate.Earth Sci. Rev.162, 227–252 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

180. Carlà, T., Farina, P., Intrieri, E., Ketizmen, H. & Casagli, N. Integration of ground-based radar and satellite InSAR data for the analysis of an unexpected slope failure in an open-pit mine.Eng. Geol.235, 39–52 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

181. Dong, J. et al. Measuring precursory movements of the recent Xinmo landslide in Mao County, China with Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 datasets.Landslides15, 135–144 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

182. Roberts, N. J. et al. Changes in ground deformation prior to and following a large urban landslide in La Paz, Bolivia, revealed by advanced InSAR.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.19, 679–696 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

183. Walter, T. R. et al. Complex hazard cascade culminating in the Anak Krakatau sector collapse.Nat. Commun.10, 4339 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

184. Crosta, G. B. & Agliardi, F. How to obtain alert velocity thresholds for large rockslides.Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C27, 1557–1565 (2002).

     Google Scholar 

185. Bennett, G. L., Miller, S. R., Roering, J. J. & Schmidt, D. A. Landslides, threshold slopes, and the survival of relict terrain in the wake of the Mendocino Triple junction.Geology44, 363–366 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

186. Handwerger, A. L., Roering, J. J., Schmidt, D. A. & Rempel, A. W. Kinematics of earthflows in the Northern California Coast Ranges using satellite interferometry.Geomorphology246, 321–333 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

187. Dini, B., Manconi, A. & Loew, S. Investigation of slope instabilities in NW Bhutan as derived from systematic DInSAR analyses.Eng. Geol.259, 105111 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

188. Strozzi, T. et al. Satellite SAR interferometry for the improved assessment of the state of activity of landslides: A case study from the Cordilleras of Peru.Remote. Sens. Environ.217, 111–125 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

189. Pham, M. Q., Lacroix, P. & Doin, M. P. Sparsity optimization method for slow-moving landslides detection in satellite image time-series.IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.57, 2133–2144 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

190. Roering, J. J., Stimely, L. L., Mackey, B. H. & Schmidt, D. A. Using DInSAR, airborne LiDAR, and archival air photos to quantify landsliding and sediment transport.Geophys. Res. Lett.36, L19402 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

191. Kelsey, H. M. Earthflows in Franciscan melange, Van Duzen River basin, California.Geology6, 361–364 (1978).

     Google Scholar 

192. Finnegan, N. J. et al. River channel width controls blocking by slow-moving landslides in California’s Franciscan mélange.Earth Surf. Dyn.7, 879–894 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

193. Delbridge, B. G., Bürgmann, R., Fielding, E., Hensley, S. & Schulz, W. H. Three-dimensional surface deformation derived from airborne interferometric UAVSAR: application to the Slumgullion Landslide.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth121, 3951–3977 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

194. Stumpf, A., Malet, J. P., Allemand, P. & Ulrich, P. Surface reconstruction and landslide displacement measurements with Pléiades satellite images.ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.95, 1–12 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

195. Schlögel, R. et al. Multi-temporal X-band radar interferometry using corner reflectors: Application and validation at the Corvara Landslide (Dolomites, Italy).Remote Sens.9, 739 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

196. Chambers, J. et al. Three-dimensional geophysical anatomy of an active landslide in Lias Group mudrocks, Cleveland Basin, UK.Geomorphology125, 472–484 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

197. Petley, D., Mantovani, F., Bulmer, M. & Zannoni, A. The use of surface monitoring data for the interpretation of landslide movement patterns.Geomorphology66, 133–147 (2005).

     Google Scholar 

198. Massey, C. I., Petley, D. N. & McSaveney, M. Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides.Eng. Geol.159, 1–19 (2013).

     Google Scholar 

199. Baum, R. L., Messerich, J. & Fleming, R. W. Surface deformation as a guide to kinematics and three-dimensional shape of slow-moving, clay-rich landslides, Honolulu, Hawaii.Environ. Eng. Geosci.4, 283–306 (1998).

     Google Scholar 

200. O’Brien, G. A., Cox, S. C. & Townend, J. Spatially and temporally systematic hydrologic changes within large geoengineered landslides, Cromwell Gorge, New Zealand, induced by multiple regional earthquakes.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth121, 8750–8773 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

201. Casson, B., Delacourt, C., Baratoux, D. & Allemand, P. Seventeen years of the “La Clapiere” landslide evolution analysed from ortho-rectified aerial photographs.Eng. Geol.68, 123–139 (2003).

     Google Scholar 

202. Warrick, J. A., Ritchie, A. C., Schmidt, K. M., Reid, M. E. & Logan, J. Characterizing the catastrophic 2017 Mud Creek landslide, California, using repeat structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry.Landslides16, 1201–1219 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

203. Sassa, K. The movement and the mechanism of a crystalline schist landslide “Zentoku” in Japan.Proc. Interpraevent 19801, 85–106 (1980).

     Google Scholar 

204. Oppikofer, T., Jaboyedoff, M., Blikra, L., Derron, M.-H. & Metzger, R. Characterization and monitoring of the Åknes rockslide using terrestrial laser scanning.Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.9, 1003–1019 (2009).

     Google Scholar 

205. Grøneng, G., Christiansen, H. H., Nilsen, B. & Blikra, L. H. Meteorological effects on seasonal displacements of the Åknes rockslide, western Norway.Landslides8, 1–15 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

206. Ganerød, G. V. et al. Geological model of the Åknes rockslide, western Norway.Eng. Geol.102, 1–18 (2008).

     Google Scholar 

207. Kos, A. et al. Contemporary glacier retreat triggers a rapid landslide response, Great Aletsch Glacier, Switzerland.Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 12,466–12,474 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

208. Cappa, F., Guglielmi, Y., Viseur, S. & Garambois, S. Deep fluids can facilitate rupture of slow-moving giant landslides as a result of stress transfer and frictional weakening.Geophys. Res. Lett.41, 61–66 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

209. Lacroix, P. & Helmstetter, A. Location of seismic signals associated with microearthquakes and rockfalls on the Séchilienne landslide, French Alps.Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.101, 341–353 (2011).

     Google Scholar 

210. Marone, C. Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting.Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.26, 643–696 (1998).

     Google Scholar 

Download references