1. Raff, R. A. Evo–devo: the evolution of a new discipline.Nature Rev. Genet.1, 74–79 (2000).

   Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. Arthur, W. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology.Nature415, 757–764 (2002).

   Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Akam, M. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B349, 313–319 (1995).

   Article CAS  Google Scholar 

4. Stern, D. L. Perspective: evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation.Evolution54, 1079–1091 (2000).

   Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Arthur, W. Intraspecific variation in developmental characters: the origin of evolutionary novelties.Am. Zool.40, 811–818 (2000).

   Google Scholar 

6. Nijhout, H. F.The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 1991).A comprehensive account of studies on evolution and development of wing patterns of butterflies and moths, up until a link between eyespot formation and the expression patterns of developmental genes was found. This has been the reference book for work on butterfly wing patterns.

   Google Scholar 

7. Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. Butterfly wing patterns — developmental mechanisms and evolutionary change.Acta Biotheor.41, 447–468 (1993).

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. Butterfly wings: the evolution of development of colour patterns.Bioessays21, 391–401 (1999).

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. McMillan, W. O., Monteiro, A. & Kapan, D. D. Development and evolution on the wing.Trends Ecol. Evol.17, 125–133 (2002).

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Nagaraju, J. Recent advances in molecular genetics of the silk moth,Bombyx mori.Curr. Sci.78, 151–161 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

11. Vane-Wright, R. I. & Boppré, M. Visual and chemical signaling in butterflies — functional and phylogenetic perspectives.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B340, 197–205 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Mallet, J. & Joron, M. Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.30, 201–233 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Endler, J. A. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis.Biol. J. Linn. Soc.22, 187–231 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Bond, A. B. & Kamil, A. C. Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey.Nature415, 609–613 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Cook, S. E., Vernon, J. G., Bateson, M. & Guilford, T. Mate choice in the polymorphic African swallowtail butterfly,Papilio dardanus — male-like females may avoid sexual harassment.Anim. Behav.47, 389–397 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Lederhouse, R. C. & Scriber, J. M. Intrasexual selection constrains the evolution of the dorsal color pattern of male black swallowtail butterflies,Papilio polyxenes.Evolution50, 717–722 (1996).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L. & Mallet, J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry.Nature411, 302–305 (2001).A recent experimental demonstration of the importance of butterfly wing-colour patterns in intraspecific recognition and mate localization.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Knuttel, H. & Fiedler, K. Host-plant-derived variation in ultraviolet wing patterns influences mate selection by male butterflies.J. Exp. Biol.204, 2447–2459 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Grant, B., Owen, D. F. & Clarke, C. A. Parallel rise and fall of melanic peppered moths in America and Britain.J. Hered.87, 351–357 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Brakefield, P. M. & Liebert, T. G. Evolutionary dynamics of declining melanism in the peppered moth in The Netherlands.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B267, 1953–1957 (2000).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

21. Majerus, M.Melanism: Evolution in Action (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

22. Joron, M. & Mallet, J. L. B. Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm?Trends Ecol. Evol.13, 461–466 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Kapan, D. D. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of mullerian mimicry.Nature409, 338–340 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Shapiro, A. Seasonal polyphenism.Evol. Biol.9, 259–333 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

25. Kingsolver, J. G. Fitness consequences of seasonal polyphenism in Western white butterflies.Evolution49, 942–954 (1995).In combination with several others by the same author (for example, reference26), this paper describes elegant field experiments that show how differences in survival and fitness result from seasonal differences in wing pattern in a butterfly species.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B. Evolutionary analyses of morphological and physiological plasticity in thermally variable environments.Am. Zool.38, 545–560 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Joron, M., Wynne, I. R., Lamas, G. & Mallet, J. Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterflyHeliconius numata.Evol. Ecol.13, 721–754 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Mallet, J. The genetics of warning color in Peruvian hybrid zones ofHeliconius erato andH. melpomene.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B236, 163–185 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Nijhout, H. F. & Wray, G. A. Homologies in the color patterns of the genusHeliconius (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc.33, 345–365 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Paulsen, S. M. & Nijhout, H. F. Phenotypic correlation structure among elements of the color pattern inPrecis coenia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).Evolution47, 593–618 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Mallet, J. Variations on a theme?Nature354, 368 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Nijhout, H. F. Symmetry systems and compartments in lepidopteran wings — the evolution of a patterning mechanism.Development (Suppl.), 225–233 (1994).

33. Nijhout, H. F. Elements of butterfly wing patterns.J. Exp. Zool.291, 213–225 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

34. Paulsen, S. M. Quantitative genetics of butterfly wing color patterns.Dev. Genet.15, 79–91 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Monteiro, A. F., Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. The evolutionary genetics and developmental basis of wing pattern variation in the butterflyBicyclus anynana.Evolution48, 1147–1157 (1994).An early study that integrates an evolutionary genetic analysis of butterfly wing patterns with an analysis of the developmental processes that underlie pattern formation. Artificial selection was used to produce divergent eyespot sizes and reciprocal transplants of eyespot organizers explored the developmental basis of the changed morphologies.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. Butterfly eyespots: the genetics and development of the color rings.Evolution51, 1207–1216 (1997).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Brakefield, P. M. The evolution–development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns ofBicyclus butterflies.Heredity80, 265–272 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Brakefield, P. M. Structure of a character and the evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns.J. Exp. Zool.291, 93–104 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

39. Beldade, P. M., Koops, K. & Brakefield, P. M. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution.Nature416, 844–847 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Clarke, C. A. & Sheppard, P. M. The genetics ofPapilio dardanus.Genetics45, 439–457 (1960).An early paper in a classic series that used experimental crosses to study the Mendelian genetics that underlie wing-pattern polymorphisms in mimetic butterfly species. The authors later extended their studies to mimicry in other species ofPapilio andHeliconius (references41, and42).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41. Clarke, C. A. & Sheppard, P. M. Further studies on the genetics of the mimetic butterflyPapilio memnon L.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B263, 35–70 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Sheppard, P. M., Turner, J. R. G., Brown, K. S., Benson, W. W. & Singer, M. C. Genetics and the evolution of müllerian mimicry inHeliconius butterflies.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B308, 433–613 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Nijhout, H. F. Developmental perspectives on evolution of butterfly mimicry.Bioscience44, 148–157 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Wijngaarden, P. J. & Brakefield, P. M. The genetic basis of eyespot size in the butterflyBicyclus anynana: an analysis of line crosses.Heredity85, 471–479 (2000).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Brakefield, P. M., Kesbeke, F. & Koch, P. B. The regulation of phenotypic plasticity of eyespots in the butterflyBicyclus anynana.Am. Nat.152, 853–860 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Brakefield, P. M. et al. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns.Nature384, 236–242 (1996).One of the first evo–devo studies to integrate approaches from evolutionary genetics with those from developmental biology. Surveys of association withDistal-less expression in butterfly lines that had been artificially selected, or mutant stocks with divergent phenotypes, provided insights into the ontogeny of eyespot formation.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

47. Blest, A. D. The function of eyespot patterns in the Lepidoptera.Behaviour11, 209–256 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. Wourms, M. K. & Wasserman, F. E. Butterfly wing markings are more advantageous during handling than during the initial strike of an avian predator.Evolution39, 845–851 (1985).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

49. French, V. Pattern formation in colour on butterfly wings.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.7, 524–529 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

50. Nijhout, H. F. Pattern formation on lepidopteran wings: determination of an eyespot.Dev. Biol.80, 267–274 (1980).Classical experiment in which surgical manipulation of pupae was used to analyse the developmental basis of butterfly eyespot formation. Both the finding of eyespot organizers and the model of eyespot formation developed by Nijhout have been extremely influential in subsequent evo–devo research on butterfly wing patterns.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. French, V. & Brakefield, P. M. Eyespot development on butterfly wings — the focal signal.Dev. Biol.168, 112–123 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. French, V. & Brakefield, P. M. The development of eyespot patterns on butterfly wings — morphogen sources or sinks.Development116, 103–109 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. Koch, P. B., Lorenz, U., Brakefield, P. M. & ffrench-Constant, R. H. Butterfly wing pattern mutants: developmental heterochrony and co-ordinately regulated phenotypes.Dev. Genes Evol.210, 536–544 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

54. Carroll, S. B. et al. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings.Science265, 109–114 (1994).The first published study to examine, in butterfly wing primordia, the expression of genes known to be involved inDrosophila wing patterning. Several candidate developmental genes were implicated in overall wing patterning and in eyespot formation in butterflies.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

55. Keys, D. N. et al. Recruitment of ahedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution.Science283, 532–534 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

56. Brunetti, C. R. et al. The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns.Curr. Biol.11, 1578–1585 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

57. French, V. inOn Growth and Form: Spatio-temporal Pattern Formation in Biology (eds Chaplain, M. A. J., Singh, G. D. & McLachlan, J. C.) 31–46 (John Wiley & Sons, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

58. Weatherbee, S. D. et al.Ultrabithorax function in butterfly wings and the evolution of insect wing patterns.Curr. Biol.9, 109–115 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

59. Takayama, E. & Yoshida, A. Color pattern formation on the wing of the butterflyPieris rapae. 1. Cautery induced alteration of scale color and delay of arrangement formation.Dev. Growth Differ.39, 23–31 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

60. Takayama, E., Motoyama, M. & Yoshida, A. Color pattern formation on the wing of a butterflyPieris rapae. 2. Color determination and scale development.Dev. Growth Differ.39, 485–491 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

61. Janssen, J. M., Monteiro, A. & Brakefield, P. M. Correlations between scale structure and pigmentation in butterfly wings.Evol. Dev.3, 415–423 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

62. Nijhout, H. F. & Paulsen, S. M. Developmental models and polygenic characters.Am. Nat.149, 394–405 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. The genetics and development of an eyespot pattern in the butterflyBicyclus anynana: response to selection for eyespot shape.Genetics146, 287–294 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. The relationship between eyespot shape and wing shape in the butterflyBicyclus anynana: a genetic and morphometrical approach.J. Evol. Biol.10, 787–802 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. Beldade, P., Brakefield, P. M. & Long, A. D. Contribution ofDistal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots.Nature415, 315–318 (2002).Recent study that combined techniques of developmental and evolutionary biology to implicate a candidate developmental gene (Distal-less) as a contributor to inter-individual variation in eyespot patterns inB. anynana butterflies.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

66. Mackay, T. F. C. Quantitative trait loci inDrosophila.Nature Rev. Genet.2, 11–20 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

67. Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K. & Weatherbee, S. D.From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (Blackwell Science, Malden, UK, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

68. Tautz, D. Evolution of transcriptional regulation.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.10, 575–579 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

69. Mallet, J. & Barton, N. H. Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone.Evolution43, 421–431 (1989).Field study of natural selection that involves reciprocal transplants of butterflies with different mimetic colour patterns and the monitoring of their survival in the presence of predatory birds. Reference23 is a more recent study on selection on mimicry.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

70. Stern, D. L. A role ofUltrabithorax in morphological differences betweenDrosophila species.Nature396, 463–466 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

71. Endler, J. A.Natural Selection in the Wild (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

72. Mousseau, T. A., Sinervo, B. & Endler, J.Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

73. Grant, P. R. & Grant, R. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.Science296, 707–711 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

74. Bell, M. A. & Foster, S. A.The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (Oxford Science, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

75. Peichel, C. et al. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species.Nature414, 901–905 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

76. Stern, D. L. Evolutionary biology — the problem of variation.Nature408, 529–531 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

77. Kopp, A., Duncan, I. & Carroll, S. B. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters inDrosophila.Nature408, 553–559 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

78. Koch, P. B. et al. Regulation of dopa decarboxylase expression during colour pattern formation in wild-type and melanic tiger swallowtail butterflies.Development125, 2303–2313 (1998).An example of pigment analysis in butterflies; molecular biological tools are used to examine the regulation of pigment pathways.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

79. Koch, P. B., Behnecke, B., Weigmann-Lenz, M. & ffrench-Constant, R. H. Insect pigmentation: activities of β-alanyldopamine synthase in wing color patterns of wild-type and melanic mutant swallowtail butterflyPapilio glaucus.Pigment Cell Res.13, 54–58 (2000).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

80. Koch, P. B. Color pattern specific melanin synthesis is controlled by ecdysteroids via dopa decarboxylase in wings ofPrecis coenia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).Eur. J. Entomol.92, 161–167 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

81. Koch, P. B. & Kaufmann, N. Pattern specific melanin synthesis and dopa decarboxylase activity in a butterfly wing ofPrecis coenia Hubner.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.25, 73–82 (1995).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

82. Galant, R., Skeath, J. B., Paddock, S., Lewis, D. L. & Carroll, S. B. Expression pattern of a butterflyachaete-scute homolog reveals the homology of butterfly wing scales and insect sensory bristles.Curr. Biol.8, 807–813 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

83. Monteiro, A. & Pierce, N. E. Phylogeny ofBicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred fromCOI,COII, andEF-1α gene sequences.Mol. Phylog. Evol.18, 264–281 (2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

84. Penz, C. M. Higher level phylogeny for the passion-vine butterflies (Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) based on early stage and adult morphology.Zool. J. Linn. Soc.127, 277–344 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

85. Brower, A. V. Z. Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry inHeliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences.Evolution50, 195–221 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

86. DeJong, R., VaneWright, R. I. & Ackery, P. R. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects.Entomol. Scand.27, 65–101 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

87. Zimmermann, M., Wahlberg, N. & Descimon, H. Phylogeny ofEuphydryas checkerspot butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data.Annls Entomol. Soc. Am.93, 347–355 (2000).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

88. Wijngaarden, P. J., Koch, P. B. & Brakefield, P. M. Artificial selection on the shape of reaction norms for eyespot size in the butterflyBicyclus anynana: direct and correlated responses.J. Evol. Biol.15, 290–300 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

89. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C.Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Addison–Wesley–Longman, Essex, UK, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

90. Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. Eyespot development on butterfly wings — the epidermal response to damage.Dev. Biol.168, 98–111 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

91. Koch, P. B. Production of [C-14] labeled 3-hydroxy-l-kynurenine in a butterfly,Heliconius charitonia L. (Heliconidae), and precursor studies in butterfly wing ommatins.Pigment Cell Res.6, 85–90 (1993).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

92. Koch, P. B. Wings of the butterflyPrecis coenia synthesize dopamine melanin by selective enzyme activity of dopadecarboxylase.Naturwissenschaften81, 36–38 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

93. Koch, P. B., Brakefield, P. M. & Kesbeke, F. Ecdysteroids control eyespot size and wing color pattern in the polyphenic butterflyBicyclus anynana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae).J. Insect Physiol.42, 223–230 (1996).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

94. Koch, P. B. Preadult changes of ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone titers in relation to diapause and pigmental variations in two lepidopteran species,Cerura vinula andAraschnia levana (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae Nymphalidae).Entomol. Genet.20, 143–155 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

95. Koch, P. B. Seasonal polyphenism in butterflies — a hormonally controlled phenomenon of pattern formation.Zool. J. Physiol.96, 227–240 (1992).Early account of the role of ecdysteroid hormones in regulating seasonal polyphenism of butterfly wing patterns.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

96. Lewis, D. L. et al. Ectopic gene expression and homeotic transformations in arthropods using recombinant Sindbis viruses.Curr. Biol.9, 1279–1287 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

97. Toshiki, T. et al. Germline transformation of the silkwormBombyx mori L. — using a piggyBac transposon-derived vector.Nature Biotechnol.18, 81–84 (2000).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

98. Wijngaarden, P. J. & Brakefield, P. M. Lack of response to artificial selection on the slope of reaction norms for seasonal polyphenism in the butterflyBicyclus anynana.Heredity87, 410–420 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

99. Rountree, D. B. & Nijhout, H. F. Genetic control of a seasonal morph inPrecis coenia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).J. Insect Physiol.41, 1141–1145 (1995).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

100. Rountree, D. B. & Nijhout, H. F. Hormonal control of a seasonal polyphenism inPrecis coenia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).J. Insect Physiol.41, 987–992 (1995).

     Article CAS  Google Scholar 

101. Riddiford, L. M. inMolecular Model Systems in the Lepidoptera (eds Goldsmith, M. R. & Wilkins, A. S.) 293–322 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995).

     Book  Google Scholar 

Download references