- Letter
- Published:
Structure- and function-based design ofPlasmodium-selective proteasome inhibitors
- Hao Li1,2 nAff6,
- Anthony J. O’Donoghue3 nAff6,
- Wouter A. van der Linden1,
- Stanley C. Xie4,
- Euna Yoo2,
- Ian T. Foe2,
- Leann Tilley4,
- Charles S. Craik3,
- Paula C. A. da Fonseca5 &
- …
- Matthew Bogyo2
Naturevolume 530, pages233–236 (2016)Cite this article
18kAccesses
231Citations
180Altmetric
Abstract
The proteasome is a multi-component protease complex responsible for regulating key processes such as the cell cycle and antigen presentation1. Compounds that target the proteasome are potentially valuable tools for the treatment of pathogens that depend on proteasome function for survival and replication. In particular, proteasome inhibitors have been shown to be toxic for the malaria parasitePlasmodium falciparum at all stages of its life cycle2,3,4,5. Most compounds that have been tested against the parasite also inhibit the mammalian proteasome, resulting in toxicity that precludes their use as therapeutic agents2,6. Therefore, better definition of the substrate specificity and structural properties of thePlasmodium proteasome could enable the development of compounds with sufficient selectivity to allow their use as anti-malarial agents. To accomplish this goal, here we use a substrate profiling method to uncover differences in the specificities of the human andP. falciparum proteasome. We design inhibitors based on amino-acid preferences specific to the parasite proteasome, and find that they preferentially inhibit the β2-subunit. We determine the structure of theP. falciparum 20S proteasome bound to the inhibitor using cryo-electron microscopy and single-particle analysis, to a resolution of 3.6 Å. These data reveal the unusually openP. falciparum β2 active site and provide valuable information about active-site architecture that can be used to further refine inhibitor design. Furthermore, consistent with the recent finding that the proteasome is important for stress pathways associated with resistance of artemisinin family anti-malarials7,8, we observe growth inhibition synergism with low doses of this β2-selective inhibitor in artemisinin-sensitive and -resistant parasites. Finally, we demonstrate that a parasite-selective inhibitor could be used to attenuate parasite growthin vivo without appreciable toxicity to the host. Thus, thePlasmodium proteasome is a chemically tractable target that could be exploited by next-generation anti-malarial agents.
This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution
Access options
Subscription info for Japanese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
¥ 4,980
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
Accession codes
References
Voges, D., Zwickl, P. & Baumeister, W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis.Annu. Rev. Biochem.68, 1015–1068 (1999)
Gantt, S. M. et al. Proteasome inhibitors block development ofPlasmodium spp.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42, 2731–2738 (1998)
Czesny, B., Goshu, S., Cook, J. L. & Williamson, K. C. The proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin has potentPlasmodium falciparum gametocytocidal activity.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.53, 4080–4085 (2009)
Kreidenweiss, A., Kremsner, P. G. & Mordmüller, B. Comprehensive study of proteasome inhibitors againstPlasmodium falciparum laboratory strains and field isolates from Gabon.Malar. J.7, 187 (2008)
Prudhomme, J. et al. Marine actinomycetes: a new source of compounds against the human malaria parasite.PLoS ONE3, e2335 (2008)
Prasad, R. et al. BlockingPlasmodium falciparum development via dual inhibition of hemoglobin degradation and the ubiquitin proteasome system by MG132.PLoS ONE8, e73530 (2013)
Mok, S. et al. Population transcriptomics of human malaria parasites reveals the mechanism of artemisinin resistance.Science347, 431–435 (2015)
Mbengue, A. et al. A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance inPlasmodium falciparum malaria.Nature520, 683–687 (2015)
Aminake, M. N., Arndt, H. D. & Pradel, G. The proteasome of malaria parasites: a multi-stage drug target for chemotherapeutic intervention?Int. J. Parasitol.Drugs Drug Resist.2, 1–10 (2012)
Li, H. et al. Assessing subunit dependency of thePlasmodium proteasome using small molecule inhibitors and active site probes.ACS Chem. Biol.9, 1869–1876 (2014)
Li, H. et al. Validation of the proteasome as a therapeutic target inPlasmodium using an epoxyketone inhibitor with parasite-specific toxicity.Chem. Biol.19, 1535–1545 (2012)
Stadtmueller, B. M. & Hill, C. P. Proteasome activators.Mol. Cell41, 8–19 (2011)
Li, H. et al. Identification of potent and selective non-covalent inhibitors of thePlasmodium falciparum proteasome.J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 13562–13565 (2014)
O’Donoghue, A. J. et al. Destructin-1 is a collagen-degrading endopeptidase secreted byPseudogymnoascus destructans, the causative agent of white-nose syndrome.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, 7478–7483 (2015)
O’Donoghue, A. J. et al. Global identification of peptidase specificity by multiplex substrate profiling.Nature Methods9, 1095–1100 (2012)
Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gevaert, K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo.Nature Methods6, 786–787 (2009)
Harris, J. L., Alper, P. B., Li, J., Rechsteiner, M. & Backes, B. J. Substrate specificity of the human proteasome.Chem. Biol.8, 1131–1141 (2001)
Kisselev, A. F., van der Linden, W. A. & Overkleeft, H. S. Proteasome inhibitors: an expanding army attacking a unique target.Chem. Biol.19, 99–115 (2012)
Bogyo, M. et al. Covalent modification of the active site threonine of proteasomal β subunits and theEscherichia coli homolog HslV by a new class of inhibitors.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA94, 6629–6634 (1997)
da Fonseca, P. C. A. & Morris, E. P. Cryo-EM reveals the conformation of a substrate analogue in the human 20S proteasome core.Nature Commun.6, 7573–7576 (2015)
Harshbarger, W., Miller, C., Diedrich, C. & Sacchettini, J. Crystal structure of the human 20S proteasome in complex with carfilzomib.Structure23, 418–424 (2015)
Meshnick, S. R. Artemisinin: mechanisms of action, resistance and toxicity.Int. J. Parasitol.32, 1655–1660 (2002)
Ashley, E. A. et al.; Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration (TRAC). Spread of artemisinin resistance inPlasmodium falciparum malaria.N. Engl. J. Med.371, 411–423 (2014)
Straimer, J. et al. Drug resistance. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance inPlasmodium falciparum clinical isolates.Science347, 428–431 (2015)
Dogovski, C. et al. Targeting the cell stress response ofPlasmodium falciparum to overcome artemisinin resistance.PLoS Biol.13, e1002132 (2015)
Britton, M. et al. Selective inhibitor of proteasome’s caspase-like sites sensitizes cells to specific inhibition of chymotrypsin-like sites.Chem. Biol.16, 1278–1289 (2009)
Bedford, L., Paine, S., Sheppard, P. W., Mayer, R. J. & Roelofs, J. Assembly, structure, and function of the 26S proteasome.Trends Cell Biol.20, 391–401 (2010)
Palmer, J. T., Rasnick, D., Klaus, J. L. & Brömme, D. Vinyl sulfones as mechanism-based cysteine protease inhibitors.J. Med. Chem.38, 3193–3196 (1995)
Arastu-Kapur, S. et al. Identification of proteases that regulate erythrocyte rupture by the malaria parasitePlasmodium falciparum. NatureChem. Biol.4, 203–213 (2008)
Zhou, H. J. et al. Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047).J. Med. Chem.52, 3028–3038 (2009)
Scheres, S. H. W. Semi-automated selection of cryo-EM particles in RELION-1.3.J. Struct. Biol.189, 114–122 (2015)
Frank, J. et al. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields.J. Struct. Biol.116, 190–199 (1996)
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.J. Comput. Chem.25, 1605–1612 (2004)
Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps.Nature Methods11, 63–65 (2014)
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis.Nature Protocols10, 845–858 (2015)
Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Mitra, K., Frank, J. & Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics.Structure16, 673–683 (2008)
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot.Acta Crystallogr. D66, 486–501 (2010)
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine.Acta Crystallogr. D68, 352–367 (2012)
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.Acta Crystallogr. D66, 12–21 (2010)
Verdoes, M. et al. A fluorescent broad-spectrum proteasome inhibitor for labeling proteasomesin vitro andin vivo.Chem. Biol.13, 1217–1226 (2006)
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy.J. Mol. Biol.333, 721–745 (2003)
Acknowledgements
This work was support by National Institutes of Health grants R01AI078947, R01EB05011 to M.B., and by the Medical Research Council grant MC-UP-1201/5 to P.C.A.dF. H.L. was supported by an NSS-PhD scholarshpip from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) Singapore. W.A.v.d.L. was supported by a Rubicon fellowship from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). A.J.O. and C.S.C. were supported by the Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research (PBBR) and the Sandler Foundation. I.T.F. was supported by American Heart Association grant 14POST20280004. We acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. We thank K. Chotivanich for providing PL2 and PL7 parasites. We thank E. Yeh’s group for help withP. falciparum D10 culture and for use of their equipment. We thank J. Boothroyd for providing the human fibroblast cells. We thank E. Morris and R. Henderson for discussions on image processing, FEI fellows and C. Savva for assisting in the use of the Titan Krios microscope, S. Chen for EM support, and J. Grimmet and T. Darling for computing support.
Author information
Hao Li & Anthony J. O’Donoghue
Present address: †Present addresses: Molecular Engineering Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138673 (H.L.); Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA (A.J.O.).,
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
Hao Li & Wouter A. van der Linden
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
Hao Li, Euna Yoo, Ian T. Foe & Matthew Bogyo
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, California, USA
Anthony J. O’Donoghue & Charles S. Craik
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia
Stanley C. Xie & Leann Tilley
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK
Paula C. A. da Fonseca
- Hao Li
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Anthony J. O’Donoghue
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Wouter A. van der Linden
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Stanley C. Xie
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Euna Yoo
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Ian T. Foe
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Leann Tilley
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Charles S. Craik
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Paula C. A. da Fonseca
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
- Matthew Bogyo
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
H.L., A.J.O., L.T., C.S.C., P.C.A.dF. and M.B. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. H.L., W.L. and E.Y. performed chemical synthesis and analysis. H.L., S.C.X. and I.T.F. performed the inhibitor studies. P.C.A.dF. did the electron microscopy and image analysis. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence toPaula C. A. da Fonseca orMatthew Bogyo.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Activity, substrate specificity and inhibition of human andP. falciparum 20S proteasome.
a–c, Substrate cleavage profile of activated human andP. falciparum 20S proteasome.a, Activation of the human andP. falciparum 20S proteasome by human PA28α. Activity was determined by cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate Suc-LLVY-amc. Error bars, s.d.n = 3 purified proteasome in technical replicates.b,c, iceLogos of cleavage sequences that are uniquely processed either by theP. falciparum (b) or by the human proteasome (c). Amino acids that are most and least favoured at each position are shown above and below the axis, respectively. Lower-case ‘n’, norleucine; amino acids in black text are statistically significant(P < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed Student’st-test).d,e, Inhibition potencies of the vinyl sulfone inhibitors.d, Table of IC50 values for each inhibitor in 1-h treatedP. falciparum and human 20S proteasome. IC50 values are determined from three independent experiments of inhibitor pretreatment followed by activity labelling of the 20S proteasome (n = 3 purified proteasome). Gels inFig. 1f andExtended Data Fig. 2b were quantified to calculate the IC50 values (for gel source data and replicates, seeSupplementary Fig. 1a, b). Data are mean ± s.d.e, Table of EC50 values for each of the inhibitors in 1 h and 72 h treatment ofP. falciparum at ring stage or non-confluent HFFs. Data are mean ± s.d.;n = 6 parasite cultures from two independent experiment of triplicates forP. falciparum treatments;n = 9 cell cultures from three independent experiments of triplicates for HFF treatment, except for 1 h WLW-vs, 1 h LLW-vs, and 72 h LLL-vs, wheren = 6 cell cultures from two independent experiments of triplicates.
Extended Data Figure 2 Proteasome inhibitors preferentially inhibit β2 of theP. falciparum proteasome.
a, Vinyl sulfone inhibitors are synthesized from the Boc-protected amino acid by first generating the Weinreb amide, followed by the Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction and standard peptide coupling.b, Purified human 20S proteasome was pre-treated for 1 h at 37 °C with each inhibitor followed by addition of activity-based probe MV151 (ref.40) to assess for human proteasome activities (for gel source data, seeSupplementary Fig. 1b).c, HFF orP. falciparum culture was treated for 1 h at 37 °C with each inhibitor, followed by compound washout and post-lysis activity-based probe labelling. Gel shown for WLL-vs inP. falciparum is derived fromFig. 4c at the indicated concentrations to allow for direct comparison with other compounds (for gel source data, seeSupplementary Fig. 1e).
Extended Data Figure 3 Evaluation of the final cryo-EM map and molecular model of theP. falciparum 20S proteasome core.
a–e, Evaluation of the single-particle analysis of theP. falciparum 20S proteasome core bound to the inhibitor WLW-vs.a, Cryo-EM image of the sample analysed, with molecular images of side views of the complex (normal to its long axis) indicated by rings. The image greyscale was inverted to show the protein densities in white.b, Individual sections of the 3D map, as determined by the 3D reconstruction algorithm (without further sharpening, masking, or Fourier filtering), are represented as grey scale. These sections are 1 Å thick and reveal the quality of the reconstruction, as the protein densities are clearly resolved against a very smooth background, with regions showing the pattern of α-helices (box) and the clear separation of sheet-forming β-strands (arrows) indicated.c, Evaluation of the model of theP. falciparum 20S proteasome core using MolProbity39.d, Resolution estimate of the cryo-EM map by Fourier shell correlation. The curves correspond to the correlation obtained against the protein model (red) and the correlation between maps determined from two halves of the data (blue). The resolution was estimated from the curve against the model where the 0.5 correlation coefficient criterion41 yields an estimate of 3.6 Å. The correlation coefficient can be seen to fall to a local minimum at ~6 Å and then recover at higher resolutions for both Fourier shell correlation curves. This behaviour is consistent with the rotationally averaged amplitude spectra of both the cryo-EM map and the coordinates (e). This region of the amplitude spectra contains reduced structural information, typical of protein scattering, indicating that these effects in the Fourier shell correlation curves arise from a genuine local reduction in the signal:noise ratio.f–h, Accessibility of the human 20S proteasome active sites to the inhibitor WLW-vs, using the protein model of the human proteasome core complex bound to an LLL-vs inhibitor20. Protein coordinates of the human proteasome 20S core (PDB 5A0Q) β2 (f), β1 (g), and β5 (h) active sites were aligned to the coordinates of theP. falciparum proteasome β2-subunit bound to the WLW-vs inhibitor. The model of the human 20S proteasome active sites is represented as van der Waals surfaces with the superimposed WLW-vs inhibitor shown as sticks.
Extended Data Figure 4 Intact cell treatment andin vivo treatment of vinyl sulfone inhibitors.
a, WLW-vs was incubated in early trophozoiteP. falciparum culture for 3 h, washed out, and the parasite lysate was incubated with probe BMV037. Top gel, the fluorescent scan; bottom gel, the silver stain. For gel source data, seeSupplementary Fig. 1f.b, Body weight of WLL-vs- and vehicle-treated Balb/c mice after compound treatment by tail vein injection (Fig. 4e), expressed as a percentage of the original body weight on day 3 before compound treatment. Body weight of vehicle-treated mice decreased after day 6 of infection as part of the response to the natural resolution of theP. chabaudi infection. Treatment day is indicated by arrow;n = 6 mice for each group; error bars, s.d.e, Balb/c female mice infected with 1 × 106P. chabaudi parasites from passage host on day 0 were treated with a single bolus dose of vehicle (45% polyethylene glycol (relative molecular mass 400), 35% propylene glycol, 10% ethanol, 10% DMSO, and 10% (w/v) 2-hydroxyproyl-β-cyclodextrin;n = 4 mice) or WLL-vs at 40 mg kg−1 (n = 5 mice), 60 mg kg−1 (n = 4 mice), and 80 mg kg−1 (n = 3 mice) formulated in the vehicle. Treatment was performed on day 2 after infection as indicated by the arrow and administered by intraperitoneal injection. Parasitaemia was monitored daily by Giemsa stain of thin blood smears. Error bars, s.d.
Extended Data Figure 5 Assessing off-target activities of WLL-vs.
a, Structures of WLL-vs and its diastereomer WL(d)L-vs.b, Dose–response curves of WLL-vs and WL(d)L-vs after 72 h treatment inP. falciparum. Error bars, s.d. (n = 6 parasite cultures for WLL-vs from triplicates of two independent experiments, andn = 8 parasite cultures for WL(d)L-vs over three independent experiments).c, PurifiedP. falciparum 20S proteasome was treated for 1 h at 37 °C with 10 μM of WLL-vs and WL(d)L-vs (left) or a range of concentrations of WL(d)L-vs. Residual activity was assessed by probe BMV037 (for gel source data, seeSupplementary Fig. 1g).d, A mixed-stage culture ofP. falciparum was treated for 1 h with WLL-vs at 37 °C, followed by BODIPY-TMR-DCG04 for a further 1 h. Samples were directly loaded onto SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for analysis. JPM-OEt (100 μM) was included as positive control. The fluorescent scan is shown at the top and the Coomassie stain is shown at the bottom. For gel source data, seeSupplementary Fig. 1h.e, Geimsa stain of 1 h treatedP. falciparum ring 24 h after inhibitor was added. Scale bar, 600 μm.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
This file contains Supplementary Figure 1, showing the raw data for Figures 1f, 4c and Extended Data Figures 2b, 2c, 4a, 5c, 5d. (PDF 1629 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., O’Donoghue, A., van der Linden, W.et al. Structure- and function-based design ofPlasmodium-selective proteasome inhibitors.Nature530, 233–236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16936
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
Cryptic enzymatic assembly of peptides armed with β-lactone warheads
- Guangcai Xu
- Daniele Torri
- Jason Micklefield
Nature Chemical Biology (2024)
Growing and making nano- and microcrystals
- Robert L. Shoeman
- Elisabeth Hartmann
- Ilme Schlichting
Nature Protocols (2023)
Antimalarial drug discovery: progress and approaches
- Jair L. Siqueira-Neto
- Kathryn J. Wicht
- Elizabeth A. Winzeler
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2023)
Dinuclear and mononuclear metal(II) polypyridyl complexes against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum and their mode of action
- Jing Wei Lai
- Mohd Jamil Maah
- Chew Hee Ng
Malaria Journal (2022)
Repurposing the Pathogen Box compounds for identification of potent anti-malarials against blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum with PfUCHL3 inhibitory activity
- Hina Bharti
- Aakriti Singal
- Alo Nag
Scientific Reports (2022)


