Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Genetics
  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA

Nature Geneticsvolume 23page147 (1999)Cite this article

The Human Genome Project, from one perspective, began in 1981 with the publication1 of the complete sequence of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The Cambridge reference sequence (CRS), as it is now designated, continues to be indispensable for studies of human evolution, population genetics and mitochondrial diseases. It has been recognized for some time, however, that the CRS differs at several sites from the mtDNA sequences obtained by other investigators2,3. These discrepancies may reflect either true errors in the original sequencing analysis or rare polymorphisms in the CRS mtDNA. A further complication is that the original mtDNA sequence was principally derived from a single individual of European descent, although it also contained some sequences from both HeLa and bovine mtDNA (ref. 1). To resolve these uncertainties, we have completely resequenced the original placental mtDNA sample.

The results of the resequencing confirm that there are both errors and rare polymorphisms in the CRS (Table 1). There are 11 nucleotide positions at which the original sequence contains the incorrect nucleotide (all sequences here refer to that of the CRS mtDNA L-strand), one of which involves the CC doublet at positions 3,106 and 3,107 in the original sequence, which is actually a single cytosine residue. The other errors are mistakes in the identification of single base pairs and typically involve the incorrect assignment of a guanine residue. Errors at nt 14,272 and 14,365 result from the use of the bovine mtDNA sequence at ambiguous sites1. There are an additional seven nucleotide positions at which the original CRS is correct and which represent rare (or even private) polymorphic alleles. Six of these polymorphisms are single base pair substitutions, although one involves the simple repeat of cytosine residues at nt 311–315. The CRS has five residues in this repeat, whereas most other human mtDNAs have six.

Table 1 Reanalysis of the Cambridge reference sequence

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

¥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Anderson, S. et al.Nature290, 457–465 (1981).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, M.D. et al.Genetics130, 163–173 (1992).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Howell, N., McCullough, D.A., Kubacka, I., Halvorson, S. & Mackey, D.Am. J. Hum. Genet.50, 1333–1337 (1992).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Torroni, A. et al.Genetics144, 1835–1850 (1996).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamminen, T. et al.Eur. J. Hum. Genet.5, 271–279 (1997).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torroni, A. et al.Am. J. Hum. Genet.62, 1137–1152 (1998).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell, N. & McCullough, D.A.Am. J. Hum. Genet.47, 629–634 (1990).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell, N. et al.Genetics140, 285–302 (1995).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Biggin, M.D., Gibson, J.J. & Hong, G.F.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA80, 3963–3965 (1983).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Coulson and F. Sanger for their generous donation of the original placental mtDNA sample. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (R.M.A. and D.M.T.), Wellcome Trust (D.M.T., P.F.C., R.N.L. and N.H.) and the John Sealy Memorial Endowment Fund (N.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK

    Richard M. Andrews

  2. Biology Division 0656, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, 77555-0656, Texas, USA

    Iwona Kubacka & Neil Howell

  3. Department of Neurology, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK

    Patrick F. Chinnery, Robert N. Lightowlers & Douglass M. Turnbull

Authors
  1. Richard M. Andrews
  2. Iwona Kubacka
  3. Patrick F. Chinnery
  4. Robert N. Lightowlers
  5. Douglass M. Turnbull
  6. Neil Howell

Corresponding author

Correspondence toDouglass M. Turnbull.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, R., Kubacka, I., Chinnery, P.et al. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA.Nat Genet23, 147 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/13779

Download citation

This article is cited by

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp