Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
Download PDF

Evolution of woodcutting behaviour in Early Pliocene beaver driven by consumption of woody plants

Scientific Reportsvolume 10, Article number: 13111 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Modern beavers (Castor) are prolific ecosystem engineers and dramatically alter the landscape through tree harvesting and dam building. Little is known, however, about the evolutionary drivers of their woodcutting behaviour. Here we investigate if early woodcutting behaviour in Castoridae was driven by nutritional needs. We measured stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes (δ13C andδ15N) of coeval subfossil plants and beaver collagen (Dipoides sp.) from the Early Pliocene, High Arctic Beaver Pond fossil locality (Ellesmere Island), in order to reconstructDipoides sp. diet. Isotopic evidence indicates a diet of woody plants and freshwater macrophytes, supporting the hypothesis that this extinct semiaquatic beaver engaged in woodcutting behaviour for feeding purposes. In a phylogenetic context, the isotopic evidence implies that woodcutting and consumption of woody plants can be traced back to a small-bodied, semiaquatic Miocene castorid, suggesting that beavers have been consuming woody plants for over 20 million years. We propose that the behavioural complex (swimming, woodcutting, and consuming woody plants) preceded and facilitated the evolution of dam building. Dam building and food caching behaviours appear to be specializations for cold winter survival and may have evolved in response to late Neogene northern cooling.

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Beavers today are renowned for their woodcutting behaviour and construction abilities. The extant genusCastor harvests trees and shrubs for sustenance (particularly during the winter1), but also for the purpose of lodge and dam building. These behaviours have a profound effect on regional hydrology, nutrient flow across the landscape, and local biodiversity, thus making them exemplary “ecosystem engineers”2,3,4. Modern beavers also are known to feed on trees. This food source is particularly important for northern populations that survive freezing winters, subsisting on their underwater caches of leafy branches5,6.

Castoridae is a diverse family of herbivorous Holarctic rodents, originating during the late Eocene7,8,9. The only definitive evidence of woodcutting in extinct beavers is from the Pliocene-aged High Arctic Beaver Pond fossil site, which preserves evidence of beaver-cut wood and a possible dam-core associated with the extinct beaver genus,Dipoides (species not yet described)9,10,11. Examination ofDipoides sp. incisors and cut marks on wood from the Beaver Pond site suggest thatDipoides sp. woodcutting performance was poorer than that of modernCastor11. The appearance of woodcutting inDipoides sp., a distant relative ofCastor, implies that this behaviour originated 20 to 24 Ma ago, in a group of semiaquatic beavers that includes both extant species (Castor canadensis andCastor fiber), the small Holarctic genusDipoides, and the North American Ice Age giant beaverCastoroides7,9,12. And yet recent research shows that the diet of Ice AgeCastoroides, a close relative ofDipoides, was dominated by submerged plants, not trees and shrubs13. This finding, alongside a lack of definitive evidence of lodges or dams at the Beaver Pond site highlights the question: Does the cut wood at the Beaver Pond site represent a means of gathering food?

Here, we present stable carbon and nitrogen isotope data for Pliocene-age (i) plant macrofossils and (ii) bone collagen from High ArcticDipoides sp. subfossil remains. The specimens originate from a peat deposit at the Beaver Pond fossil site, located on Ellesmere Island (locally known as Umingmak Nuna, meaning “land of muskoxen”), situated within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (78° 33′ N, 82° 25′ W) (Fig. 1). We reconstruct High ArcticDipoides sp. palaeodiet within the context of coeval terrestrial and freshwater plant macrofossil remains excavated from the same ~ 4 Ma old peat layer. The Beaver Pond site provides a very rare opportunity for such a palaeodiet reconstruction using coeval herbivore and plant remains.

Figure 1
figure 1

Map of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The Beaver Pond site is located near the head of Strathcona Fiord, Ellesmere Island (78° 33′ N, 82° 25′ W). Base map created in Adobe Illustrator (version 24.2.1),https://www.adobe.com/uk/products/illustrator.html.

The Beaver Pond fossil site

The Beaver Pond site is a succession of fossiliferous peat deposits interspersed within 40 m of sandy, cross-bedded, fluvial deposits and capped with glacial till14. The thickest peat deposit within this sequence, which yielded material for this study, sits 380 m above present day sea-level overlooking Strathcona Fiord. Most recent terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide burial dating of sands above this peat layer have yielded a date of 3.9 + 1.5/− 0.5 Ma15, placing the minimum age of peat formation during the late Early Pliocene (late Zanclean). This peat unit is characterized by an abundance of beaver-cut sticks10,11 and has yielded a wide array of beautifully preserved plant macrofossils, invertebrates, and vertebrate fossil remains (Fig. 2). Rybczynski and Harington16, Matthews and Fyles17, Hutchison and Harington18, Tedford and Harington10, Dawson and Harington19, Murray et al.20, Mitchell et al.21, Gosse et al.22, and Wang et al.23 provide detailed descriptions of Pliocene terrestrial flora and faunal assemblages associated with the Beaver Pond site.

Figure 2
figure 2

(A) An in-situ macrofossil cone within the Beaver Pond fossiliferous peat deposit. Scale bar is 1 cm. (B) Excavation of the peat deposit at the Beaver Pond site (2008), Strathcona Fiord, Ellesmere Island. White arrow indicates person for scale. (C) A beaver-cut stick excavated from the Beaver Pond site. Cut marks produced byDipoides sp. Photographs by M. Lipman.

Ellesmere Island today is a polar desert, with sparse flora and very little precipitation24. The landscape was very different during the Early Pliocene warm period, when the climate supported wetland habitat surrounded by open larch forest10,21,22,25. During the Pliocene, Ellesmere Island was on the eastern edge of a large coastal plain, where intense Neogene thawing and weathering liberated sediment to create a thick, continuous clastic wedge across the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (referred to as the Beaufort Formation in the western Canadian Arctic islands). It is hypothesized that northwest passages did not exist during the Pliocene, as they had yet to be incised by fluvial and glacial erosion22,26. This unbroken coastal plain altered ocean circulation patterns in the High Arctic, and along with the Bering Isthmus that connected North American and Eurasia until 5.5 Ma ago27 would have enabled the migration of terrestrial species across the Neogene High Arctic10.

Late Early Pliocene mean global temperature was 2–3 °C above modern28 and high latitude regions experienced amplified warming. Pliocene Arctic mean annual temperature was near freezing, which is ~ 15–22 °C warmer than present day, and tree line was ~ 2000 km further north15,24,29,30,31,32,33. Summer temperatures at the Beaver Pond site reached 20 °C, while winter temperatures were more moderate than present day, with a low of ~ – 12 °C24. Despite the relatively mild conditions, the Beaver Pond site still experienced total darkness and subzero temperatures during the winter months.

There is no modern analog for the ecological community found at the Beaver Pond site, although the flora of present-day Labrador (Canada) is considered to be similar22,34,35,36. The Beaver Pond macrofossil assemblage indicates a larch forest, although birch, alder, spruce, pine, cedar, and cold-adapted woody shrubs were also present (see Matthews and Fyles17 for a complete list of identified flora). The Beaver Pond site supported higher faunal biodiversity than any modern near-tree line communities.

The remains of a complex faunal community were discovered at the Beaver Pond site, including beaver (Dipoides sp., see below), three-toed horse, bear, badger, “deerlet”, water fowl, fish and a rabbit relative10,22. Pliocene-age sites with similar fauna and flora community composition are very rare—Idaho in mid-continent North America, and the high altitude Yushe Basin, in northeastern China are the only known sites with similar (but not equivalent) faunal assemblages37,38.

Dipoides ecology

The most common vertebrate remains at the Beaver Pond site belong toDipoides, an extinct genus of beaver known from the Neogene of Eurasia and North America, represented by 12 different species7,39,40,41. Although not directly related to the extantCastor, both genera share semiaquatic and woodcutting behaviours9,11,42.

The Beaver Pond site is the only known locality with sufficiently well-preserved plant macrofossils to record evidence ofDipoides sp. woodcutting behaviour. The peat deposits are hypothesized to be the remnants of an ancient beaver pond due to the presence of many beaver-cut sticks, and even a cluster of cut sticks, cobbles, and silt that resemble the core of a beaver dam10.

Here we use stable isotope data to understandDipoides sp. diet and elucidate the purpose of their woodcutting behaviour. Our study aims to describe the relative contributions of woody vegetation and aquatic plants to the diet ofDipoides sp. using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of contemporary sub-fossil skeletal and plant macrofossil material from the Beaver Pond site. This new information is used to better interpret (i) the ecological impact ofDipoides sp. on the Pliocene landscape, (ii)Dipoides sp. potential for winter survival strategies such as underwater food caching, and (iii) the evolutionary context of tree-exploitation within the Castoridae family.

Stable isotopes and palaeodiet

The stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope compositions of an animal’s bodily tissues correlate closely with that of its diet, when adjusted for13C- and15N-enrichment that occurs during collagen formation and with each successive trophic level43,44. Well-preserved bone collagen is therefore a useful integrator of an animal’s diet. In addition, sufficient context is required to accurately describe the nutrient flow between subsequent trophic levels of an ecosystem. In particular, the diet of an organism must be interpreted within the context of an appropriate dietary baseline. This baseline is composed of isotopically defined food or “menu-items” available to the organism.

The isotopic composition of primary producers at the base of the food chain control theδ13C andδ15N of the dietary baseline for herbivores. Theδ13C andδ15N of primary producers depend on physiology (i.e. which photosynthetic pathway the plant employs) and the isotopic composition of bioavailable sources of C and N (i.e. atmospheric CO2). Casey and Post45 provide a thorough review of how primary producerδ13C andδ15N vary with physiology and local terrestrial and aquatic environmental conditions. A particular challenge in many forested-wetland environments, however, is that the carbon and nitrogen isotope range of terrestrial and freshwater plants overlap. There are, however, sufficient differences between theδ13C andδ15N of terrestrial vegetation utilizing the C3-photosynthetic pathway and vascular freshwater plants (macrophytes) for them to serve as useful endmembers of herbivore diet in such environments (see Methodology).

Another challenge is that the isotopic composition of regional and global C and N baselines (and subsequently, that of primary producers that use them) can change over time46,47. Hence, reconstructing the diet of herbivores that lived thousands or millions of years ago can be problematic when using isotopic data, as is very rare to find sufficiently preserved coeval plant material and faunal remains from the same geologic locality. Typically, isotopic data for modern plants are all that are available in palaeodiet studies. Fortunately, much of this concern is alleviated at the Beaver Pond site, given the excellent organic preservation of coeval plant and animal tissues.

Results

Bone collagen stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes

Dipoides sp. (n = 5) bone collagen stable isotope results (δ13Ccol andδ15Ncol) are presented in Table1.Dipoides sp.δ13Ccol ranges from − 20.8 to − 19.1‰, with a mean of − 20.3‰, andδ15Ncol ranges from + 3.2 to + 5.8‰, with a mean of + 4.7‰ (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Beaver Pond siteDipoides sp.*, modernCastor canadensis, and PleistoceneCastoroides bone collagenδ13C,δ15N, and preservation parameter data.
Figure 3
figure 3

Comparison of bone collagenδ13C andδ15N among PlioceneDipoides sp. (4 Ma, from the Beaver Pond Site, Ellesmere Island), modernCastor canadensis (collected 2013–2014, from Yukon Territory), and PleistoceneCastoroides (late Pleistocene, from Beringia, Yukon Territory and Ohio, USA).Castor canadensis andCastoroides carbon isotope compositions are corrected for Suess effects appropriate to their time period (see text).Castor canadensis andCastoroides isotope data from Plint et al.13.

Atomic C:N ratio and carbon and nitrogen contents (wt%) were used to assess collagen preservation forDipoides skeletal material (Table1). All specimen parameters are within the accepted range for well-preserved archaeological or palaeontological skeletal material from temperate or polar regions reported by van Klinken48 (acceptable parameters: C wt% = 34.8 ± 8.8%; N wt% =  ~ 11–16%; atomic C:N = 3.1–3.5).

Plant macrofossil species diversity

By volume, the Beaver Pond peat sample examined in this study consisted of 85% bryophytes, 10% wood and twigs, and 5% macrofossils. Eleven genera were identified, representing a diverse assemblage of terrestrial and freshwater plants (Table2). Seven taxa were analyzed for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions (Scorpidium scorpioides,Larix,Betula, Stuckenia filiformis,Scheuchzeria sp.,Cornus sericea,Menyanthes trifoliata) (Table2). The dominant moss type wasScorpidium scorpioides (hooked scorpion moss).Larix (larch—a deciduous conifer) was the only conifer species identified from this peat sample (although many other tree species have been previously identified from the Beaver Pond site—seeIntroduction). Plant macrofossils from multiple genera (Myrica,Shepherdia,Potamogeton, andHippuris) and from three species ofCarex (Carex aquatilis,Carex diandra, andCarex maritime) were also recognized, but in insufficient quantities for stable isotope analysis.

Table 2 Beaver Pond site plant macrofossil taxonomic identification,δ13C,δ15N, and C and N (wt%) abundances.

Plant macrofossil stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes

Plant macrofossil stable isotope results are presented in Table2 and Fig. 4. Macrofossilδ13C,δ15N, C (wt%), N (wt%), C/N (wt%), and atomic C:N ratios are all within the range expected for terrestrial and freshwater plants (Table2, Figs. 4 and5). Beaver Pond plant macrofossilδ13C andδ15N range from − 36.6 to − 22.7‰, and + 0.1 to + 4.8‰, respectively.

Figure 4
figure 4

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope results for the Beaver Pond site plant macrofossils.

Figure 5
figure 5

Beaver Pond plant macrofossil carbon and nitrogen content represented by C/N (wt%).

The chemical and elemental compositions of plants vary widely by species, life history stage (i.e. senescence), and environment conditions. For these reasons, atomic C:N ratio and carbon and nitrogen content are not considered to be infallible indicators of organic preservation in subfossil plants49. That said, the plant macrofossil C (wt%) values obtained in the present study are within or close to the mean carbon content for modern plants (between ~ 40 and 47%) (Metcalfe and Mead49, and references therein). Plant macrofossil N (wt%) values are lower than the mean nitrogen contents of modern plants (between ~ 1 and 3%) but are not outside the reported range for modern plants.

Stable isotope analysis in R (SIAR) mixing model

Next, we evaluateDipoides sp.δ13Ccol andδ15Ncol within the context of the isotopic dietary baseline composed of coeval terrestrial and freshwater vegetation from the High Arctic Beaver Pond fossil site. The faunal and plant macrofossil isotope data were incorporated into a Bayesian mixing model to determine the relative input of terrestrial versus freshwater plants toDipoides sp. diet (Fig. 6). This also allowed us to better assess the connection betweenDipoides sp. woodcutting behaviour and its consumption of woody plants.

Figure 6
figure 6

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions of plant functional groups andDipoides sp. bone collagen generated using SIAR mixing model. Plant functional groupings include terrestrial woody plants (larch, birch, and red-osier dogwood), vascular freshwater macrophytes (pondweed, podgrass, and bogbean), and bryophytes (Hooked scorpion moss).Dipoides sp. bone collagenδ13C andδ15N are corrected for trophic enrichment factors to render them comparable to the three plant functional groups (represented by their mean and a range of 2SD). TheDipoides sp. data, once so corrected, overlap with the plant functional groups that contributed significantly to their diet.

The SIAR model is a statistical tool that uses biotracers (stable isotopes) to estimate the relative input of different sources to a product or mixture. In (palaeo)ecology, mixing models use the stable isotope compositions of different food sources to infer their relative contributions to the composition of overall diet, and assess the probability that the inferred proportions are correct. There are systematic differences in the isotopic composition between a consumer’s collagen and its diet, both for carbon and for nitrogen. Hence, a correction factor must be applied to render data for consumers and possible diet items directly comparable.

Plant macrofossils were divided into three sources, or functional types: terrestrial woody plants, vascular freshwater macrophytes, and bryophytes (mosses). These groupings were created to assess how terrestrial and freshwater resources contributed separately toDipoides sp. diet. The functional types were statistically defined and their relative contribution to diet was assessed using scripts from SIAR V4 in R Studio 3.1.2 (Stable Isotope Analysis in R: An Ecologist’s Guide). Based on existing literature, respective bone collagen-to-diet offsets of + 4.2‰ and + 3.0‰ were subtracted fromDipoides sp.δ13Ccol andδ15Ncol when incorporated into the mixing model50,51,52,53.

Discussion

Dipoides sp. palaeoecology

The Bayesian mixing model indicates thatDipoides sp. consumed both woody plants and freshwater macrophytes in approximately equal proportions (Figs. 6 and7), although it relied slightly more on freshwater macrophytes. This suggests thatDipoides sp. spent a greater proportion of time feeding in the water than on land.

Figure 7
figure 7

(a) Proportion versus Source Boxplot generated using SIAR, indicating the relative proportion that moss, woody vegetation, and aquatic macrophytes contributed to the diet ofDipoides sp. at the Beaver Pond site. Darker shaded areas indicate highest probability of source proportion. The Proportion versus Source Boxplots for (b) extantCastor canadensis and (c) late PleistoceneCastoroides have been included for comparison. Note the differences in dietary Source data used to distinguishC. canadensis andCastoroides diet (primarily the sub-division of aquatic plants into categories based on habitat within the water column). b and c from Plint et al.13.

The distribution ofDipoides sp.δ13Ccol andδ15Ncol is not entirely enclosed within the three primary producer functional groups analyzed (Fig. 6). This is likely the result of the relatively small plant macrofossil sample size. Submerged aquatic macrophytes, for example, are under-represented in the plant macrofossils available for stable isotope analysis. Macrophytes have highly variableδ13C and may have contributed more toDipoides sp. diet than the mixing model suggests. Submerged macrophytes can be highly enriched in13C because of physiological differences (primarily the use of13C-enriched dissolved bicarbonate) or environmental conditions in the water column (i.e. boundary-layer effect)54,55,56. In addition, tree bark is more enriched in13C than tree foliage57 and may have been a key resource forDipoides sp.

The results of the dietary mixing model support the interpretation that woody plants were an important contributor toDipoides sp. diet. It is likely thatDipoides sp. also used shrubs and trees as a source of construction material10,11, but more evidence is needed to confirm this. Similar to extantCastor,Dipoides sp. may have also demonstrated regional differences in diet, where northern and southern populations utilized different resources according to their availability.

Nitrogen content and C/N as indicators of forage quality

Plant macrofossil nitrogen content (N wt%) and C/N are indicators of forage quality and may be used to interpret the relative nutrition of dietary inputs. Plants with high N (wt%) contain more protein and energy—likewise, low N (wt%) correlates with low plant digestibility, high fiber and high lignin compound content58. Beaver Pond plant macrofossil N (wt%) and C/N are highly variable (Table2, Fig. 5). Although there is considerable variability in C/N ratios depending upon which plant part was analyzed (i.e. seeds versus woody tissue), woody vegetation tends to have higher C/N ratios than macrophytes, and thus tends to be of lower food quality. However, the increased structural tissues in woody plants may have rendered them more effective winter cache foods.

In extremely seasonal environments such as the High Arctic, herbivores must use plant resources in a highly efficient manner. Herbivores must consume the highest quality forage possible during the brief growing season to maximize nutrient and energy gain. High quality forage typically includes young leaves with high nitrogen content, minimal structural (fibrous) tissues, and low defense compound content59,60.

Within the Beaver Pond macrofossil assemblage, pod grass (an emergent macrophyte) and birch have the highest nitrogen content and lowest C/N (Fig. 5). A larger sample set is necessary to confirm this observation; however, current data supports the conclusion that emergent macrophytes and deciduous broadleaf trees were among the more nutritious types of forage available toDipoides sp. at the Beaver Pond site. It should be noted that forage quality is not the only factor that governs herbivore feeding behaviour. Animals may preferentially target plants with higher biomass to minimize energy expenditure traveling between forage sites or select plants that grow in locations that minimize the risk of predation.

The C/N of high Arctic shrubs decreases over the course of the growing season58. As there is no time-constraint on macrofossil deposition at the Beaver Pond site, variation in C/N may also be due to differences in plant phenological stage at time of incorporation into the peat layer. The incorporation of senescent plants into the peat deposit at the end of each growing season may in part account for the lower than expected macrofossil N (wt%) values reported from this site.

Beaver Pond site flora δ13C and δ15N

The Beaver Pond macrofossil assemblage contains a diverse range of terrestrial and freshwater plant species. The identified plant species in this study concur with previous interpretations that this was an open-forest landscape interspersed with shallow wetlands. Larch trees and cool-climate woody shrubs dominated the forest community. The wetlands supported both vascular macrophytes and dense assemblages of bryophytes.

The macrofossilδ13C are all within the range expected for primary producers utilizing the C3 photosynthetic pathway and accessing either ambient or dissolved atmospheric CO2 as their dominant carbon source. Theδ15N of the macrofossils are also within the expected range for a riparian ecosystem in a cool climate biome.

WhileDipoides sp. most likely consumed leafy tree branches and woody tissues (cambium), it is worth noting that plant seeds and cone bracts were analyzed in this study due to ease of macrofossil taxonomic identification. Leafδ13C is typically lower than that of other plant parts61, although there is no clear pattern in intra-plant variation ofδ15N.

Moss

Samples of the dominant Beaver Pond site bryophyte,Scorpidium (hooked scorpion moss), have very lowδ13C for a primary producer (− 36.6 to − 34.6‰). This pattern is consistent with modern mosses collected from freshwater habitats in Subarctic and Arctic regions13,62,63,64.

Environmental conditions dictate mossδ13C rather than species-specific physiological differences. Peat mosses can grow partially or fully submerged in water. Given that mid-Pliocene atmospheric CO2 concentration levels were similar to modern (~ 400 ppm)15,65,66, moss exposed to the atmosphere would preferentially have used the abundant12CO2, resulting in lowδ13C. Alternatively, lowδ13C in peat mosses can also indicate an underwater growing environment rich in13C-depleted respired CO2 from surrounding plants62.

Moss macrofossilδ15N is relatively high for a photosynthetic organism (mean =  + 4.8‰). This is indicative of either the presence of15N-enriched sources of bioavailable N (i.e. dissolved nitrates, organic proteins such as urea or amino acids), or increased nutrient availability45,61. Unlike vascular plants, mosses do not uptake compounds through their roots. Rather, they obtain nutrients from wet or dry deposition through their leaves67,68. Today, beaver ponds are considered to be N sinks, with elevated rates of bacterially mediated denitrification69. These bacterial processes result in15N-enriched products that are readily dissolved and used by plants (including moss) living in an aqueous environment. Decomposition processes also increase plantδ15N over time47 and remineralized organic debris decomposing in wetlands may be particularly15N-enriched.

Beaver Pond bulk peat samples and moss macrofossils show a similar isotopic pattern (lowδ13C and highδ15N), which suggests that hooked scorpion moss contributed substantially to peat biomass accumulation at the Beaver Pond site.

Macrophytes

Beaver Pond macrophyteδ13C fall well within the albeit very wide known range for modern freshwater plants (− 50 to − 11‰, see Osmond et al.70, Keeley and Sandquist54, Mendonça et al.55, and Chappuis et al.56). It is reasonable to assume, however, that the very small sample size in this study hides the potential extent of the carbon isotope variability of macrophytes at the site.

Pod grass and bogbean are classified as emergent macrophytes (they grow rooted in water-logged substrates, but their leaves are exposed to the atmosphere), while pondweed grows entirely submerged. Submerged macrophytes become more enriched in13C as the dissolved CO2 pool (the dominant carbon source) becomes increasingly limited54.

The Beaver Pond site pondweedδ13C is relatively low (− 26.5‰) for a submerged macrophyte. This indicates that it grew in an aquatic environment with adequate dissolved CO2. This is in keeping with the interpretation that the Beaver Pond was a fen (near neutral pH, cool water temperature) during the Pliocene. A lowδ13C may also indicate high influx of terrestrial organic biomass or mosses (with lowδ13C) into the water that subsequently remineralized and contributed to the dissolved inorganic carbon pool.

Environmental conditions strongly influence aquatic plantδ15N. Beaver Pond macrophyteδ15N (range =  + 0.2 to + 2.7‰) indicate interspecific access and use of a variety of different sources of bioavailable N within the water column and substrate. The most likely N sources are microbial-fixed atmospheric N2 (which ranges from –2 to + 2‰), the products of nitrification/denitrification processes (15N-enriched NH4+ or NOx), and remineralized15N-enriched organic material (either terrestrial or aquatic)71,72,73.

Larch

Larch (the extinct speciesLarix groenlandii) is the most common vascular plant species in this macrofossil assemblage.

There is an offset of ~ 2‰ between theδ13C of (i) larch shoots/buds (which bear the needles) and cone bracts, and (ii) larch seeds. Larch shoots and cones (δ13C range = ‒25.4 to − 25.1‰; mean = − 25.3‰) are more depleted of13C than larch seeds (δ13C range = − 23.3 to − 22.7‰, mean = − 23.1‰). This could be indicative of seasonal physiological or environmental conditions experienced by larch trees at the Beaver Pond site. The cones and shoots of extant larch trees begin growing in the early spring and have lowerδ13C, whereas their seeds (higherδ13C) do not develop and mature until mid to late summer74.

A number of physiological and environmental conditions could be responsible for this offset between needle/-bearing structures and seeds. Atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (aridity) induces stomatal closure in vascular plants75. This restricts not only the rate of water leaving the needle/tree, but also that of atmospheric CO2 entering it. Stomatal closure reduces CO2 entry and results in less discrimination against13CO2. High levels of solar irradiance in the summer increase the rate of CO2 assimilation. Plants growing at very high latitudes experience 24-h of daylight during the summer. This creates a greater demand for CO2 to maintain photosynthesis and less discrimination against13CO2. Both aridity and increased light levels could contribute to why Beaver Pond larch tissues grown late in the summer are more13C-enriched than those grown in the early spring/the previous fall.

Alternatively, trees can use water and carbon (in the form of sugars) stored during the previous year to promote new growth during the early spring when leaves are absent and light levels are low. Tissues that develop early in the growing season (i.e. needle-bearing buds and shoots) can therefore reflect theδ13C of photosynthetic conditions from the previous growing season76,77. In addition, differences in the macromolecular (lipid, protein, sugar) composition of larch buds/needles versus seeds could account for their offset inδ13C (i.e. lipids are typically more13C-depleted than proteins).

Larchδ15N (mean =  + 2.7‰) indicate that these conifer trees had access to N sources other than “light” fixed atmospheric N2. Given the proximity of wetlands, the root systems of larch trees may have had access to15N-enriched dissolved nitrates in the surrounding water-logged soils. Increasing foliar N concentration due to atmospheric N deposition also drives up plantδ15N78,79.

Aridity may also have influenced terrestrial plants growing at the Beaver Pond site. Higher rainfall is inversely correlated withδ15N, where rainier ecosystems tend to produce more15N-depleted plants80.

Similar toδ13C, there is an offset inδ15N (and N wt%) between larch needle-bearing structures (mean =  + 3.8‰; 0.9%) and larch seeds (mean =  + 2.1‰; 0.3%). This could indicate differences in the macromolecular composition of these different tissue types (where high N content typically indicates higher tissue protein content).

Comparison ofDipoides within Castoridae

The composition ofDipoides sp. diet differs from that of other members of Castoridae that lived in North America during the late Cenozoic. Pliocene High ArcticDipoides sp. (n = 5), modern subarcticCastor canadensis (n = 4) (Table1), and late PleistoceneCastoroides ohioensis (n = 11) (Table1)δ13Ccol andδ15Ncol are compared in Fig. 3. A correction for the Suess effect was first necessary render theδ13C of all three genera comparable. The carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO2 has changed over time with global climatic conditions. More recently, anthropogenic burning of fossil fuels that has rapidly released CO2 enriched in12C into the atmosphere46,81. Hence, a correction is needed when comparingδ13C of organic samples from different time periods to account for this isotopic variation in the primary carbon source of photosynthetic organisms at the base of the food web.

Suess effect corrections of + 2.02‰ and − 0.1‰ were applied to theδ13Ccol of modernC. canadensis (collected in 2013 and 2014) andCastoroides (late Pleistocene in age), respectively. These corrections were based on the averageδ13C of atmospheric CO2 (δ13CCO2) calculated from Pliocene dual-benthic and planktonic foraminifera proxy records, spanning from ~ 4.1 to 3.8 Ma (averageδ13CCO2 = − 6.55‰)76. These foraminifera proxy records are approximately contemporary with the Beaver Pond site. Averageδ13CCO2 for 2014 (− 8.57‰) was compiled from the Scripps CO2 monitoring program. Averageδ13CCO2 for the late Pleistocene (− 6.45‰) was compiled using ice core data from Schmitt et al.82.

Plants growing during these three different time periods (Pliocene, late Pleistocene, and modern/2014) would reflect theδ13C of contemporary atmospheric CO2. Therefore, changes inδ13CCO2 help explain differences inδ13C betweenDipoides sp. and modernC. canadensis. Additional factors, however, are important in explaining the wide range ofδ13C and large enrichment in13C measured forCastoroides.

Dipoides sp. diet composition differs from that ofCastoroides (the Pleistocene giant beaver) (Figs. 3 and7).Castoroides’ highδ13Ccol andδ15Ncol (meanδ13Ccol = − 17.6‰ and meanδ15Ncol =  + 5.8‰) indicate a diet composed predominantly of aquatic (particularly submerged) macrophytes and minimal woody plant material (Table1)13.

In comparison withCastoroides, bothDipoides sp. andC. canadensis have a relatively small range ofδ13Ccol andδ15Ncol (Table1) (Fig. 3).Dipoides sp. meanδ13Ccol andδ15Ncol are higher than those of modernC. canadensis (Fig. 3). This is attributable to either variation in diet between the two species, or changes in global C and N baselines over geologic time.

Previous mixing model studies predict that extantC. canadensis diet is composed of approximately equal proportions of woody terrestrial plants and aquatic macrophytes13. However, this can vary by latitude and season. For example, extantC. canadensis in the Canadian subarctic vary their winter diet significantly depending on habitat83. It is worth noting that extantC. canadensis does not occur north of 70° latitude and High ArcticDipoides sp. living at 78° latitude may have employed different dietary strategies.

Dipoides sp. may have relied more heavily thanC. canadensis on underwater stores of tree branches to survive the long, dark polar winter. Tree bark is more13C-enriched than leafy vegetation57 and increased consumption could account for the higherδ13Ccol seen inDipoides sp. Variation in the quantity and type of macrophytes consumed by each beaver species could also account for this difference (i.e. emergent and floating macrophytes are, on average more15N-enriched than submerged macrophytes).

Changes in the isotopic composition of the C and N baseline between the Pliocene and the present could also account for the isotopic offset between beaver species. Further investigation of possible changes in theδ15N baseline of flora in terrestrial high latitude environments during the Pliocene would be a valuable avenue of future research.

Dipoides sp. behaviour and evolutionary implications

Evidence from the Beaver Pond site has implications for our understanding ofDipoides sp. ecology. These data also contribute to our understanding of the evolution of behavioural transitions within Castoridae. In particular, howCastor’s distinctive complex of behavioural traits (tree harvesting, underwater food caching, and construction behaviour) may have evolved. A new hypothesis of behavioural evolution in castorids based on evidence from the fossil record (i.e. fossil burrows, cut wood, and stable isotope measurements) and skeletal-dental morphology is mapped onto a simplified phylogenetic tree in Fig. 842,84,85,86,87.

Figure 8
figure 8

Simplified Castoridae phylogeny showing behavioural reconstructions, including new evidence of woody plant consumption inDipoides sp. Diagram based on phylogenetic analysis by Rybczynski9, which used a matrix of 88 morphological characters and 38 taxa. The origination of dam building is a minimum age (~ 7–8 Ma), corresponding to the time of divergence ofCastor canadensis andC. fiber, inferred from molecular evidence96 and supported by fossil evidence97. Legend: CIRCLE—taxa that burrowed (Dipoides andCastoroides may have burrowed, but direct fossil evidence is currently lacking); WP—taxa with significant woody plant contribution to their diet; NWP—taxa that did not generally consume woody plants (the terrestrial burrowing clade is associated with open plains and unforested habitat, and therefore assumed to have not consumed significant amounts of woody plants); Plio—Pliocene; Q—Quaternary. Age range sources:Castor96,97,103, nowdatabase.org;Steneofiber eseri104; Fossorial clade84,86,94,105;Eutypomys94, Fossilworks.org, nowdatabase.org;Dipoides, includingD. tanneri: Fossilworks.org, nowdatabase.org;Castoroides106, Fossilworks.org, nowdatabase.org. Fossil taxa behavioural evidence sources:Steneofiber eseri104;Castoroides13;Dipoides (this study); Fossorial clade90.

Castoridae is a group of herbivorous rodents comprising roughly two dozen genera. Most fossil castorids fall within two major groups: a clade of fossorial specialists (Palaeocastorinae) and a semiaquatic clade42,84,86,88,89,90. The latter includesCastor andDipoides. Members of the fossorial clade (~ 7 genera) possess striking specializations such large digging claws, extremely reduced tails, and broad, procumbent incisors for digging. In some cases, specimens have been found within fossil burrows (i.e.Palaeocastor, or “The devil’s corkscrew” burrows discovered in the plains of North America88). The semiaquatic group comprises two subfamilies, Castorinae (~ 6 genera, includingSteneofiber and the extantCastor), and Castoroidinae (~ 7 genera, includingDipoides and the giant beaver,Castoroides). The oldest definitive Castorinae in the fossil record isSteneofiber eseri from the early Miocene (France, MN2, ~ 23 Ma).S. eseri shows evidence of living in family groups and swimming specializations91. This, in combination with aDNA evidence12, suggests Castorinae and Castoroidinae are derived from a semiaquatic ancestor in the early Miocene.

Digging behaviour was not just characteristic of the fossorial group and appears within the semiaquatic clade as well.Castor, though not morphologically highly specialized for the task, digs bank burrows and creates extensive canal systems92. In addition, the extinct semiaquatic beaverSteneofiber eseri was found within a burrow91. Considering the phylogenetic distribution of burrowing behaviour within the Castorid tree (Fig. 8), it is likely that the common ancestor of the fossorial and semiaquatic clades also burrowed. Thus, the appearance of burrowing behaviour withinCastor andSteneofiber are seen as a retention of a primitive trait9.

If burrowing behaviour in semiaquatic castorids is the primitive condition, it is likelyDipoides burrowed as well, as seen in other semiaquatic rodents today such asCastor, but alsoCrossomys (earless water rat),Myocastor (nutria), andOndatra (muskrat)92. It is also possible thatDipoides constructed lodges. ExtantCastor andOndatra are known to construct burrows and lodges, depending on the characteristics of the habitat. Bank burrows are associated with stream environments, whereas lodges are better suited to calmer waters92. UnlikeCastor, extantOndatra construct their push-up lodges using cattails and other fibrous vegetation rather than wood. The abundance of cut wood at the Beaver Pond site11 suggests thatDipoides sp. had the option to incorporate wood into their nesting structures, and possibly built lodges.

Given the occurrence of woodcutting and woody plant consumption within both subfamilies of semiaquatic castorids (represented byCastor andDipoides in Fig. 8), it seems likely these behaviours appeared in the common ancestor of the semiaquatic group. Woody plant consumption may have preadapted castorids to exploit colder environments that arose during and after the late Miocene.Castor canadensis does not hibernate, but builds and sink rafts of branches and foliage to use as a source of fresh food during the winter months1,93.Dipoides sp. may have also engaged in this behaviour and used underwater caches of branches as a primary food source to survive the consecutive months of darkness during the high latitude winter when plants become dormant. The use of woody plants in this way may have been key to allowing beavers to disperse between North American and Eurasia, which required crossing the Bering Isthmus94, a high latitude landmass. Curiously, given that a diet rich in woody plants appears to be the primitive condition of semiaquatic castorids, the absence of woody plant consumption seen in the Pleistocene giant beaverCastoroides13 must be interpreted here as an evolutionary loss and potentially a leading factor in their extinction (Fig. 8).

Among living mammals,Castor’s dam construction is a unique and highly derived behaviour – an evolutionary puzzle, associated with a set of innate behavioural specializations95. For example, dam construction is well known to be triggered by the sound of running water alone95. The presence of such “hard-wired” behaviours may be associated with the ancient origins of this behaviour. Molecular and fossil occurrence records indicate that the split between Eurasian and North AmericanCastor arose around 7.5 Ma ago96,97, implying that dam building behaviour itself is at least as old.

Definitive fossil evidence for dam building by an extinct beaver is currently lacking. Consequently, dam building behaviour is shown as possibly arising only on the lineage leading toCastor. Hypothetically, dam building may have arisen from beavers collecting branches near their burrow/lodge for feeding purposes and the accumulations of sticks could have dammed streams by happenstance. The effects may have been multifold. A deeper pond is an effective defense mechanism and provides a safe refuge from predators. Raised water levels also create more favourable conditions for underwater food caching of branches in sub-freezing winter conditions because the deeper water would prevent an underwater food cache from being locked in ice. As such, natural selection would have favoured animals that maintained the dam, presumably as an extension of their pre-existing nesting behaviour such as lodge building. In this scenario, the climate cooling that started around 15 Ma ago and continued into the Pleistocene would have provided an interval where behaviours promoting over-wintering survival, such as underwater food caching branches and dam building, would have been increasingly reinforced by natural selection.

It seems unlikely that the common ancestor of all semiaquatic beavers was a dam-builder. ExtantCastor is a large powerful rodent weighing 12–25 kg, with some individuals as large as 40 kg92. Its body size is one factor that allows the animal to harvest branches and whole trees to build lodges and maintain dams over multiple years. The Beaver Pond siteDipoides sp. was also a large rodent and was roughly two-thirds the size of an average extantCastor. In contrast, the less-derived semiaquatic beavers, such as the MioceneEucastor tortus (Castoroidinae) andSteneofiber eseri (Castorinae) were small (~ 1 kg, or less), suggesting that the common ancestor of the semiaquatic lineage was also small bodied. Although the common ancestor of the semiaquatic beaver lineage is inferred to have consumed woody plants (this study), and may have used branches in creating food piles and wood for lodge construction, it would have been too small to have had the capacity to build and maintain dams. As such, ifDipoides sp. did exhibit dam building behaviour, it would be the result of parallel evolution within the Castoroidinae and Castorinae lineages.

Conclusions

Here, we reconstruct Pliocene High ArcticDipoides sp. palaeodiet from bone collagenδ13C andδ15N within the context of an isotopic dietary baseline composed of coeval ~ 4 Ma old terrestrial and freshwater plant macrofossil remains. The Beaver Pond site provides a very rare opportunity for such a palaeodiet reconstruction using coeval herbivore and plant remains. A Bayesian mixing model indicates thatDipoides sp. diet was composed of approximately equal proportions of woody plant material and freshwater macrophytes, with slightly more emphasis on macrophyte consumption.Dipoides sp. dietary preferences lie somewhere in between those of other North American late Cenozoic semiaquatic beavers (extantCastor and extinct Pleistocene giant beaver,Castoroides).

The consumption of woody plant material suggests that a proportion of the assemblage of the wood cut byDipoides sp. at the Beaver Pond fossil site was the result of harvesting for consumption, possibly as part of an underwater winter food cache. The results also suggest that the early Miocene ancestor of the semiaquatic beaver lineage engaged in woodcutting and consumed woody plants as part of its diet. Swimming, woodcutting, and a diet of woody plants could have set the stage for the evolution of dam building behaviours—advantageous traits that may have been selected for by the cooling climate of the late Neogene, and which have resulted inCastor’s modern role as a keystone species and ecosystem engineer.

Methods

TheDipoides sp. skeletal material and the plant macrofossils used in this study originated from the Beaver Pond fossil site, Unit III, as defined by Mitchell et al.21. Unit III is a peat layer that yielded the majority of the beaver-cut sticks and vertebrate faunal remains discovered at the site. It is interpreted to have been a rich fen connected to open water, within a larch-dominated forest ecosystem21.

Plant macrofossil preparation

Plant macrofossils were isolated from bulk samples of Unit III peat and identified to taxon. Macrofossils were extracted from the peat using a combination of water-flotation and wet-sieving. Organic material greater than 0.425 mm was retained for further cleaning. Adhered sediment and moss were removed from the macrofossils using surgical forceps and repeated ultrasonic water baths. Cleaned macrofossils were dried at 26 °C for 24 h and identified to taxon using a binocular microscope.

Stable isotope analysis

Dipoides sp. bone collagen was extracted and itsδ13C andδ15N measured at the Alaska Stable Isotope Facility (UAF). Collagen extraction was performed using a modified Longin98 method of gelatinization. Organic contaminants were removed using XAD-2 resin99,100 and collagen purification was performed according to methods developed by Matheus101. Non-soluble collagenous portions were rinsed to neutral pH, but not subjected to base treatment. Collagen was gelatinized in weak HCl (pH 3) under N2 gas at 105° C until dissolved (2 to 6 h). The solution was centrifuged and filtered with a 0.45 µm syringe-type PTFE filter and the supernatant containing dissolved collagen was lyophilized and weighed to determine the percent collagen yield. Lyophilized collagen was then hydrolyzed in 6 N HCL under N2 gas for 4 h at 120 °C. The hydrolyzates were passed by gravity flow through 2 cc of compacted Serva XAD-2 HPLC resin in syringe columns to extract humates and other long-chain organic contaminants that can adhere to fossil collagen. The hydrolyzates were passed through a 0.45 µm PTFE filter placed at the distal end of each syringe column and were dried by rotary evaporation. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of the hydrolyzed collagen was performed using a GC-Isolink gas chromatography combustion system coupled to a Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope ratio mass spectrometer operated in continuous flow mode, using helium as the carrier gas.

Plant macrofossils were powdered using a ball-bearing mill and weighed into tin capsules (0.38 ± 0.02 mg). Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of macrofossil remains was conducted at the LSIS-AFAR facility at the University of Western Ontario (London, Canada). Samples were analyzed in continuous flow mode using a Costech elemental analyzer (ECS 4010), coupled to a Thermo Scientific ConFlo IV and Delta V Plus isotope ratio mass spectrometer in continuous flow mode, using helium as the carrier gas. One method duplicate (complete duplication of sample preparation and isotopic analysis) and one analytical duplicate (separate isotopic analysis of sample powder) were included for every ten samples. The carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements of the plant macrofossils were completed in separate analytical sessions. The first session was used to determineδ13C and nitrogen content (weight percent, N wt%); values ofδ15N were determined in the second session, using individually tailored weights based on each sample’s N wt%.

All isotopic results are reported inδ-notation in per mil (‰) relative to international standards. Collagenδ13C andδ15N were calibrated to VPDB and AIR, respectively. Analytical accuracy and precision were 0.0‰ forδ13C measurements, and 0.2‰ forδ15N measurements.

Plant macrofossilδ13C andδ15N were calibrated to VPDB and AIR, respectively using USGS40 (acceptedδ13C = − 26.39‰, SD =  ± 0.0‰; acceptedδ15N = − 4.52‰, SD =  ± 0.2‰) and USGS41a (acceptedδ13C =  + 36.55‰, SD =  ± 0.1‰; acceptedδ15N =  + 47.55‰, SD =  ± 0.2‰). Additional reference materials IAEA-CH-6 (acceptedδ13C = − 10.45‰, SD =  ± 0.0‰) and NIST-1547 (Peach Leaves) (internally calibratedδ15N =  + 1.98‰, SD =  ± 0.1‰) were used to evaluate instrument precision and accuracy forδ13C andδ15N, respectively. A keratin powder (Spectrum Chemicals Mfg. Corp., derived from pig skin and hair) was also included to monitor instrument drift. Combined instrument and analytical errors were ± 0.1‰ forδ13C, and ± 0.2‰ forδ15N.

TheDipoides sp. and plant macrofossil isotopic results were incorporated into a statistically-based Bayesian mixing model (SIAR V4). This approach provides a statistically robust means of evaluating the relative dietary contributions of woody plants and aquatic primary producers toDipoides sp. Diet102.

Data availability

The authors declare no limitations on data or standard operating protocol availability.

References

  1. Slough, B. G. Beaver food cache structure and utilization.J. Wildl. Manag.42, 644–646 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wright, J. P., Jones, C. G. & Flecker, A. S. An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale.Oecologia132, 96–101 (2002).

    ADS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller-Schwarze, D. & Sun, L.The Beaver: Natural History of a Wetlands Engineer (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosell, F., Bozser, O., Collen, P. & Parker, H. Ecological impact of beaversCastor fiber andCastor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems.Mammal Rev.35, 248–276 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aleksiuk, M. The seasonal food regime of arctic beavers.Ecology51, 254–270 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lancia, R. A., Dodge, W. E. & Larson, J. S. Winter activity patterns of two radio-marked beaver colonies.J. Mammal.63, 598–606 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Korth, W. W. Comments on the systematics and classification of the beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae).J. Mammal. Evol.8, 279–296 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korth, W. W. & Rybczynski, N. A new, unusual castorid (Rodentia) from the earliest Miocene of Nebraska.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.23, 667–675 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rybczynski, N. Castorid phylogenetics: implications for the evolution of swimming and tree–exploitation in beavers.J. Mammal. Evol.14, 1–35 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tedford, R. H. & Harington, C. R. An Arctic mammal fauna from the early Pliocene of North America.Nature425, 388–390 (2003).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rybczynski, N. Woodcutting behavior in beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia): estimating ecological performance in a modern and a fossil taxon.Paleobiology34, 389–402 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xenikoudakis, G.et al. Ancient DNA reveals twenty million years of aquatic life in beavers.Curr. Biol.30, R110–R111 (2020).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plint, T., Longstaffe, F. J. & Zazula, G. Giant beaver palaeoecology inferred from stable isotopes.Sci. Rep.9, 1–12 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rybczynski, N.et al. Mid-Pliocene warm–period deposits in the High Arctic yield insight into camel evolution.Nat. Commun.4, 1–9 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher, T. L.et al. Evidence for fire in the Pliocene Arctic in response to amplified temperature.Clim. Past15, 1063–1081 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rybczynski, N. & Harington, C. R. Tarsal evidence for ecomorph reconstruction in fossil lagomorphs.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.17, 72A (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews, J. V. Jr. & Fyles, J. G. Late Tertiary plant and arthropod fossils from the High Terrace Sediments on the Fosheim Peninsula of Ellesmere Island (Northwest Territories, District of Franklin).Geol. Surv. Can. Bull.529, 295–317 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchison, J. H. & Harington, C. R. A peculiar new fossil shrew (Lipotyphla, Soricidae) from the High Arctic of Canada.Can. J. Earth Sci.39, 439–443 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dawson, M. R. & Harington, C. R.Boreameryx, an unusual new artiodactyl (Mammalia) from the Pliocene of Arctic Canada and endemism in Arctic fossil mammals.Can. J. Earth Sci.44, 585–592 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray, A. M., Cumbaa, S. L., Harington, C. R., Smith, G. R. & Rybczynski, N. Early Pliocene fish remains from Arctic Canada support a pre-Pleistocene dispersal of percids (Teleostei: Perciformes).Can. J. Earth Sci.46, 557–570 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell, W. T.et al. Stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental reconstruction of a mid-Pliocene fossil site in the High Arctic (Ellesmere Island, Nunavut): evidence of an ancient peatland with evidence of beaver activity.Arctic69, 185–204 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gosse, J. C.et al. PoLAR-FIT: Pliocene landscapes and arctic remains-frozen in time.Geosci. Can.44, 47–54 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, X., Rybczynski, N., Harington, C. R., White, S. C. & Tedford, R. H. A basal ursine bear (Protarctos abstrusus) from the Pliocene High Arctic reveals Eurasian affinities and a diet rich in fermentable sugars.Sci. Rep.7, 1–14 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fletcher, T., Feng, R., Telka, A. M., Matthews, J. V. Jr. & Ballantyne, A. Floral dissimilarity and the influence of climate in the Pliocene High Arctic: Biotic and abiotic influences on five sites on the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.Front. Ecol. Environ.5, 1–19 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davies, N. S., Gosse, J. C. & Rybczynski, N. Cross-bedded woody debris from a Pliocene forested river system in the High Arctic: Beaufort Formation, Meighen Island, Canada.J. Sedim. Res.84, 19–25 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tozer, E. T. Geological reconnaissance: Prince Patrick, Eglinton, and Western Melville Islands, Arctic Archipelago, Northwest Territories.Geol. Surv. Can.55, 1–32 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gladenkov, A. Y. & Gladenkov, Y. B. Onset of connections between the Pacific and Arctic Oceans through the Bering Strait in the Neogene.Stratigr. Geol. Correl.12, 175–187 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records.Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.20, 1–17 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Elias, S. A. & Matthews, J. V. Jr. Arctic North American seasonal temperatures from the latest Miocene to the Early Pleistocene, based on mutual climatic range analysis of fossil beetle assemblages.Can. J. Earth Sci.39, 911–920 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ballantyne, A. P., Rybczynski, N., Baker, P. A., Harington, C. R. & White, D. Pliocene Arctic temperature constraints from the growth rings and isotopic composition of fossil larch.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.242, 188–200 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ballantyne, A. P.et al. Significantly warmer Arctic surface temperatures during the Pliocene indicated by multiple independent proxies.Geology38, 603–606 (2010).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Csank, A. Z., Patterson, W. P., Eglington, B. M., Rybczynski, N. & Basinger, J. F. Climate variability in the Early Pliocene Arctic: Annually resolved evidence from stable isotope values of sub-fossil wood, Ellesmere Island, Canada.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.308, 339–349 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Csank, A. Z.et al. Estimates of Arctic land surface temperatures during the early Pliocene from two novel proxies.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.304, 291–299 (2011).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hills, L. V. Late Tertiary floras Arctic Canada: an interpretation.Proc. Circ. Conf. North. Ecol. Natl. Res. Counc. Can.1, 165–171 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matthews, J. V. Jr. Plant macrofossils from the Neogene Beaufort Formation on Banks and Meighen islands, District of Franklin.Curr. Res. Part A Geol. Surv. Can.871, 73–87 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fyles, J. G., Marincovich, J. L., Matthews, J. V. Jr. & Barendregt, R. Unique mollusc find in the Beaufort formation (Pliocene) on Meighen Island, Arctic Canada.Curr. Res. Part B Geol. Surv. Can.91, 105–112 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ruez, D. R. Revision of the Blancan (Pliocene) mammals from Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Idaho.JIAS45, 1–144 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tedford, R. H., Flynn, L. J., Zhanxiang, Q., Opdyke, N. D. & Downs, W. R. Yushe Basin, China: paleomagnetically calibrated mammalian biostratigraphic standard from the late Neogene of eastern Asia.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.11, 519–526 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu, X. Evolution of Chinese Castoridae.Natl. Sci. Mus. Monogr.8, 77–97 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hugueney, M. Family Castoridae. In:The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe (Verlag F. Pfeil, 1999), 281–300.

  41. Qiu, Z. D. & Li, Q. Neogene rodents from central Nei Mongol, China.Palaeontol. Sin.198, 1–676 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Samuels, J. X. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Skeletal indicators of locomotor adaptations in living and extinct rodents.J. Morphol.269, 1387–1411 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schoeninger, M. J. Diet reconstruction and ecology using stable isotope ratios. In:A Companion to Biological Anthropology (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2010), 445–464.

  44. Koch, P. L., Fox-Dobbs, K. E. N. A. & Newsome, S. D.The Isotopic Ecology of Fossil Vertebrates and Conservation Paleobiology 101–118 (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Casey, M. M. & Post, D. M. The problem of isotopic baseline: reconstructing the diet and trophic position of fossil animals.Earth Sci. Rev.106, 131–148 (2011).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Long, E. S., Sweitzer, R. A., Diefenbach, D. R. & Ben-David, M. Controlling for anthropogenically induced atmospheric variation in stable carbon isotope studies.Oecologia146, 148–156 (2005).

    ADS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tahmasebi, F., Longstaffe, F. J. & Zazula, G. Nitrogen isotopes suggest a change in nitrogen dynamics between the Late Pleistocene and modern time in Yukon, Canada.PLoS ONE13, 1–31 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van Klinken, G. J. Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements.J. Archaeol. Sci.26, 687–695 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Metcalfe, J. Z. & Mead, J. J. Do uncharred plants preserve original carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions?.J. Archaeol. Method Theory26, 844–872 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. DeNiro, M. J. & Epstein, S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta42, 495–506 (1978).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. DeNiro, M. J. & Epstein, S. Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta45, 341–351 (1981).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kelly, J. Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology.Can. J. Zool.45, 1–27 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Froehle, A. W., Kellner, C. M. & Schoeninger, M. J. FOCUS: effect of diet and protein source on carbon stable isotope ratios in collagen: follow up to Warinner and Tuross (2009).J. Archaeol. Sci.37, 2662–2670 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Keeley, J. E. & Sandquist, D. R. Carbon: freshwater plants.Plant Cell Environ.15, 1021–1035 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mendonça, R.et al. Bimodality in stable isotope composition facilitates the tracing of carbon transfer from macrophytes to higher trophic levels.Hydrobiologia710, 205–218 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chappuis, E., Seriñá, V., Martí, E., Ballesteros, E. & Gacia, E. Decrypting stable-isotope (δ13C and δ15N) variability in aquatic plants.Freshw. Biol.62, 1807–1818 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Larson, T. E. & Longstaffe, F. J. Deciphering seasonal variations in the diet and drinking water of modern White-Tailed deer by in situ analysis of osteons in cortical bone.J. Geophys. Res. Biogeol.112, 1–12 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Van der Wal, R. Trading forage quality for quantity? Plant phenology and patch choice by Svalbard reindeer.Oecologia123, 108–115 (2000).

    ADS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Crawley, M. J.Herbivory: The Dynamics of Animal–Plant Interactions (Blackwell, Hoboken, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hartley, S. E. and Jones, C. G. Plant chemistry and herbivory, or why the world is green. In:Plant Ecology (Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996), 284–324.

  61. Tahmasebi, F., Longstaffe, F. J., Zazula, G. & Bennett, B. Nitrogen and carbon isotopic dynamics of subarctic soils and plants in southern Yukon Territory and its implications for paleoecological and paleodietary studies.PLoS ONE12, 1–26 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Proctor, M. C. F., Raven, J. A. & Rice, S. K. Stable carbon isotope discrimination measurements inSphagnum and other bryophytes: physiological and ecological implications.J. Bryol.17, 193–202 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hornibrook, E. R., Longstaffe, F. J., Fyfe, W. S. & Bloom, Y. Carbon-isotope ratios and carbon, nitrogen and sulfur abundances in flora and soil organic matter from a temperate-zone bog and marsh.Geochem. J.34, 237–245 (2000).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Granath, G.et al. Environmental and taxonomic controls of carbon and oxygen stable isotope composition inSphagnum across broad climatic and geographic ranges.Biogeosciences15, 5189–5202 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lüthi, D.et al. High–resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present.Nature453, 379–382 (2008).

    ADS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Pagani, M., Liu, Z., LaRiviere, J. & Ravelo, A. C. High Earth–system climate sensitivity determined from Pliocene carbon dioxide concentrations.Nat. Geosci.3, 27–30 (2010).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Schröder, W.et al. First Europe-wide correlation analysis identifying factors best explaining the total nitrogen concentration in mosses.Atmos. Environ.44, 3485–3491 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. Harmens, H.et al. Nitrogen concentrations in mosses indicate the spatial distribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe.Environ. Pollut.159, 2852–2860 (2011).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lazar, J. G.et al. Beaver ponds: resurgent nitrogen sinks for rural watersheds in the northeastern United States.J. Environ. Qual.44, 1684–1693 (2015).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Osmond, C. B., Valaane, N., Haslam, S. M., Uotila, P. & Roksandic, Z. Comparisons of δ13C values in leaves of aquatic macrophytes from different habitats in Britain and Finland; some implications for photosynthetic processes in aquatic plants.Oecologia50, 117–124 (1981).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hoering, T. C. & Ford, H. T. The isotope effect in the fixation of nitrogen byAzotobacter.J. Am. Chem. Soc.82, 376–378 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Mariotti, A.et al. Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope fractionation: some principles: illustration for the denitrification and nitrification processes.Plant Soil62, 413–430 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Shearer, G. & Kohl, D. H. N2–fixation in field settings: estimations based on natural 15N abundance.Funct. Plant Biol.13, 699–756 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Farrar, J. L.Trees in Canada (Fitzhenry and Whiteside Limited, Markham, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Farquhar, G. D., Hubick, K. T., Condon, A. G. & Richards, R. A. Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water-use efficiency. In:Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) (Springer, 1989), 21–40.

  76. Tipple, B. J., Meyers, S. R. & Pagani, M. Carbon isotope ratio of Cenozoic CO2: a comparative evaluation of available geochemical proxies.Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.25, 1–11 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dietze, M. C.et al. Nonstructural carbon in woody plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.65, 667–687 (2014).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Swap, R. J., Aranibar, J. N., Dowty, P. R., Gihooly, W. P. III. & Macko, S. A. Natural abundance of13C and15N in C3 and C4 vegetation of southern Africa: patterns and implications.Glob. Change Biol.10, 350–358 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Craine, J. M.et al. Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability.New Phytol.183, 980–992 (2009).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Handley, L. L.et al. The 15N natural abundance (δ15N) of ecosystem samples reflects measures of water availability.Funct. Plant Biol.26, 185–199 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Keeling, R. F., Walker, S. J., Piper, S. C. & Bollenbacher, A. F. Scripps CO2 Program. Scripps Institution of Oceanography: University of California,https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu (2014).

  82. Schmitt, J.et al. Carbon isotope constraints on the deglacial CO2 rise from ice cores.Science336, 711–714 (2012).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Milligan, H. E. & Humphries, M. M. The importance of aquatic vegetation in beaver diets and the seasonal and habitat specificity of aquatic-terrestrial ecosystem linkages in a subarctic environment.Oikos119, 1877–1886 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Samuels, J. X. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Craniodental adaptations for digging in extinct burrowing beavers.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.29, 254–268 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Samuels, J. X. Cranial morphology and dietary habits of rodents.Zool. J. Linnean Soc.156, 864–888 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Calede, J. J. M. Skeletal morphology of Palaeocastor peninsulatus (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Fort Logan Formation of Montana (early Arikareean): ontogenetic and paleoecological interpretations.J. Mammal. Evol.21, 223–241 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Calede, J. J. M., Samuels, J. X. & Chen, M. Locomotory adaptations in entoptychine gophers (Rodentia: Geomyidae) and the mosaic evolution of fossoriality.J. Morphol.280, 879–907 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Peterson, O. A. Description of new rodents and discussion of the origin ofDaemonelix.Mem. Carn. Mus.32, 139–203 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Stirton, R. A. A new beaver from the Pliocene of Arizona with notes on the species ofDipoides.J. Mammal.17, 279–281 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Korth, W. W. Castoridae. In:The Tertiary Record of Rodents in North America (Springer, 1994), 135–148.

  91. Hugueney, M. & Escuillié, F. K-strategy and adaptative specialization inSteneofiber from Montaigu-le-Blin (dept. Allier, France; Lower Miocene, MN 2a, ±23 Ma): first evidence of fossil life-history strategies in castorid rodents.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.113, 217–225 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Nowak, R. M. & Walker, E. P.Walker’s Mammals of the World (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Busher, P. E. Food caching behavior of beavers (Castor canadensis): selection and use of woody species.Am. Midl. Nat.135, 343–348 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Flynn, L. J. & Jacobs, L. L. Castoroidea. In:Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America: Small Mammals, Xenarthrans, and Marine Mammals (Vol 2), 391–405 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).

  95. Wilsson, L.Observations and Experiments on the Ethology of the European Beaver (Castor fiber L.): A Study in the Development of Phylogenetically Adapted Behavior in a Highly Specialized Mammal (Doctoral Disseration, 1971).

  96. Horn, S. Mitochondrial genomes reveal slow rates of molecular evolution and the timing of speciation in beavers (Castor), one of the largest rodent species.PLoS ONE6, 1–9 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Samuels, J. X. & Zancanella, J. An early Hemphillian occurrence ofCastor (Castoridae) from the Rattlesnake Formation of Oregon.J. Paleontol.85, 930–935 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Longin, R. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating.Nature230, 241–242 (1971).

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Stafford, T. W. Jr., Brendel, K. & Duhamel, R. C. Radiocarbon, 13C and 15N analysis of fossil bone: removal of humates with XAD-2 resin.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta52, 2257–2267 (1988).

    ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Stafford, T. W. Jr., Hare, P. E., Currie, L., Jull, A. T. & Donahue, D. J. Accelerator radiocarbon dating at the molecular level.J. Archaeol. Sci.18, 35–72 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Matheus, P. E. Diet and co-ecology of Pleistocene short-faced bears and brown bears in eastern Beringia.Quat. Res.44, 447–453 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Inger, R., Jackson, A., Parnell, A. & Bearhop, S. SIAR V4 (Stable Isotope Analysis in R) An Ecologist’s Guide (2010).

  103. Schlosser, M. Extinct beaver (Castor neglectus) from Tertiary of South Germany.Neues Jahrb Geol. Part A9, 136 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Flynn, L. J. The antiquity ofRhizomys and independent acquisition of fossorial traits in subterranean Muroids.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.331, 128–156 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Samuels, J. X. & Hopkins, S. S. B. The impacts of Cenozoic climate and habitat changes on small mammal diversity of North America.Glob. Planet. Change149, 36–52 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. Hulbert, R., Kerner, A. & Morgan, G. Taxonomy of the Pleistocene giant beaverCastoroides (Rodentia: Castoridae) from the southeastern United States.Bull. Florida Mus. Nat. Hist.53, 26–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Pliocene peat sample was collected in 2006, supported by the Canadian Museum of Nature (N.R.), National Geographic Exploration Grant, Scientific Research Grant # 7902-05 (N.R.) and with logistical support by the Polar Continental Shelf Program (N.R.). Collection permit from Nunavut’s Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth (Permit No. 2006-002P), and with permission from the Qikiqtani Inuit Association and the Hamlet of Grise Fiord (Aujuittuq). Financial support for this research was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery grant (F.J.L.), Canada Research Chairs program (F.J.L.), Canada Foundation for Innovation (F.J.L.) and the Ontario Research Fund (F.J.L.). This is Western’s Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science Contribution #378.Dipoides sp. bone collagen stable isotope measurements provided by Paul Matheus (University of Alaska Fairbanks). We thank Martin Lipman for providing photographs of the Beaver Pond site, Donna Naughton for provision of map templates, and Michael Burzynski for additional advice concerning plant physiology.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Tessa Plint

    Present address: The Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK

  2. Alice Telka is deceased.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada

    Tessa Plint & Fred J. Longstaffe

  2. Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA

    Ashley Ballantyne

  3. Paleotec Services, 574 Somerset St W Suite 1, Ottawa, ON, K1R 5K2, Canada

    Alice Telka

  4. Department of Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, ON, K1P 6P4, Canada

    Natalia Rybczynski

  5. Department of Biology, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Natalia Rybczynski

Authors
  1. Tessa Plint

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fred J. Longstaffe

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashley Ballantyne

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alice Telka

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Natalia Rybczynski

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.P., F.J.L., and N.R. conceived the research design. N.R. conducted the sampling. A.T. provided palaeobotanical identification. T.P. conducted plant macrofossil stable isotope analyses and wrote the initial draft. F.J.L., N.R., and A.B. provided valuable comments and advice, and revised the various drafts of the manuscript. F.J.L. and N.R. provided funding to support the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toTessa Plint.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plint, T., Longstaffe, F.J., Ballantyne, A.et al. Evolution of woodcutting behaviour in Early Pliocene beaver driven by consumption of woody plants.Sci Rep10, 13111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70164-1

Download citation

Download PDF

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for theNature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp