1. Thakrar, A. P. et al. Child mortality in the US and 19 OECD comparator nations: a 50-year time-trend analysis.Health Aff. (Millwood)37, 140–149 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

2. Roser, M. Link between health spending and life expectancy: US is an outlier. InOur World in Datahttps://ourworldindata.org/the-link-between-life-expectancy-and-health-spending-us-focus(2017).

3. Singh, H. et al. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations.BMJ Qual. Saf.23, 727–731 (2014).

   PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

4. Berwick, D. M. & Hackbarth, A. D. Eliminating waste in US health care.JAMA307, 1513–1516 (2012).

   CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Wang, X. et al. ChestX-ray8: hospital-scale chest X-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02315 (2017).

6. Li, Z. et al. Thoracic disease identification and localization with limited supervision. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06373 (2017).

7. Singh, R. et al. Deep learning in chest radiography: detection of findings and presence of change.PLoS ONE13, e0204155 (2018).

   PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8. Nam, J. G. et al. Development and validation of deep learning–based automatic detection algorithm for malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs.Radiologyhttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180237 (2018).

9. Lindsey, R., et al. Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, 11591–11596 (2018).

10. Gale, W. et al. Detecting hip fractures with radiologist-level performance using deep neural networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06504 (2017).

11. Rajpurkar, P. MURA dataset: towards radiologist-level abnormality detection in musculoskeletal radiographs. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06957(2017).

12. Ridley, E. L. Deep learning shows promise for bone age assessment. InAunt Minniehttps://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=119011 (2017).

13. Lakhani, P. & Sundaram, B. Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks.Radiology284, 574–582 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Bar, A. et al. Compression fractures detection on CT. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01671 (2017).

15. Ridley, E. L. Deep-learning algorithm can stratify lung nodule risk. InAunt Minniehttps://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=rca&sub=rsna_2017&pag=dis&ItemID=119166 (2017).

16. Yasaka, K. et al. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for differentiation of liver masses at dynamic contrast-enhanced CT: a preliminary study.Radiology286, 887–896 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Liu, F. et al. Joint shape representation and classification for detecting PDAC in abdominal CT scans. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1804.10684(2018).

18. Shadmi, R. et al. Fully-convolutional deep-learning based system for coronary calcium score prediction from non-contrast chest CT. In2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) (IEEE, 2018).

19. Arbabshirani, M. R. et al. Advanced machine learning in action: identification of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography scans of the head with clinical workflow integration.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 9 (2018).

20. Chilamkurthy, S. et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.Lancet392, 2388–2396 (2018).

21. Chilamkurthy, S. et al. Development and validation of deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT ccans. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05854 (2018).

22. Lieman-Sifry, J. et al. FastVentricle: cardiac segmentation with ENet. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04296(2017).

23. Madani, A.. et al. Fast and accurate view classification of echocardiograms using deep learning.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 6 (2018).

24. Zhang, J. et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.Circulation138, 1623–1635 (2018).

25. Yee, K. M. AI algorithm matches radiologists in breast screening exams. InAunt Minniehttps://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=119385 (2017).

26. Lehman, C. D. et al. Mammographic breast density assessment using deep learning: clinical implementation.Radiology http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180694 (2018).

27. Titano, J. J. et al. Automated deep-neural-network surveillance of cranial images for acute neurologic events.Nat. Med.24, 1337–1341 (2018).

28. Saito, T. & Rehmsmeier, M. The precision–recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets.PLoS ONE10, e0118432 (2015).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29. Lobo, J. et al. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.17, 145–151 (2007).

30. Keane, P. & Topol, E. With an eye to AI and autonomous diagnosis.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 40 (2018).

31. Abramoff, M. et al. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 39 (2018).

32. Kanagasingam, Y. et al. Evaluation of artificial intelligence–based grading of diabetic retinopathy in primary care.JAMA Netw. Open1, e182665 (2018).

33. Coudray, N. et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.Nat. Med.24, 1559–1567 (2018).

34. Liu, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence–based breast cancer nodal metastasis detection.Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0147-OA (2018).

35. Steiner, D. F., et al. Impact of Deep Learning Assistance on the Histopathologic Review of Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Breast Cancer.Am. J. Surg. Pathol.42, 1636–1646 (2018).

36. Mori, Y. et al. Real-time use of artificial intelligence in identification of diminutive polyps during colonoscopy.Ann. Intern. Med.169, 357–366 (2018).

37. Wang, P. et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning algorithm for the detection of polyps during colonoscopy.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 741–748 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

38. Long, E. et al. An artificial intelligence platform for the multihospital collaborative management of congenital cataracts.Nat. Biomed. Eng.1, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

39. Acs, B. & Rimm, D. L. Not just digital pathology, intelligent digital pathology.JAMA Oncol.4, 403–404 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Yu, K. H. et al. Predicting non–small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features.Nat. Commun.7, 12474 (2016).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41. Ehteshami Bejnordi, B. et al. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer.JAMA318, 2199–2210 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42. Golden, J. A. Deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases from breast cancer: helping artificial intelligence be seen.JAMA318, 2184–2186 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

43. Cruz-Roa, A. et al. Accurate and reproducible invasive breast cancer detection in whole-slide images: a deep learning approach for quantifying tumor extent.Sci. Rep.7, 46450 (2017).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44. Wong, D. & Yip, S. Machine learning classifies cancer.Nature555, 446–447 (2018).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Capper, D. et al. DNA methylation–based classification of central nervous system tumours.Nature555, 469–474 (2018).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46. Yang, S. J. et al. Assessing microscope image focus quality with deep learning.BMC Bioinformatics19, 77 (2018).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47. Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.Nature542, 115–118 (2017).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

48. Haenssle, H. A. et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.Ann. Oncol.29, 1836–1842 (2018).

49. Han, S. S. et al. Classification of the clinical images for benign and malignant cutaneous tumors using a deep learning algorithm.J. Invest. Dermatol.138, 1529–1538 (2018).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

50. Wong, T. Y. & Bressler, N. M. Artificial intelligence with deep learning technology looks into diabetic retinopathy screening.JAMA316, 2366–2367 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. Gulshan, V. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs.JAMA316, 2402–2410 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. Burlina, P. M. et al. Automated grading of age-related macular degeneration from color fundus images using deep convolutional neural networks.JAMA Ophthalmol.135, 1170–1176 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53. Kermany, D. S. et al. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning.Cell172, 1122–1131.e1129 (2018).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

54. Ting, D. S. W. et al. AI for medical imaging goes deep.Nat. Med.24, 539–540 (2018).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

55. Rampasek, L. & Goldenberg, A. Learning from everyday images enables expert-like diagnosis of retinal diseases.Cell172, 893–895 (2018).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

56. De Fauw, J. et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease.Nat. Med.24, 1342–1350 (2018).

57. Mutlu, U. et al. Association of retinal neurodegeneration on optical coherence tomography with dementia: a population-based study.JAMA Neurol.75, 1256–1263 (2018).

58. Poplin, R. et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 158–164 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

59. All eyes are on AI.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 139 (2018).

60. Brown, J. M. et al. Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks.JAMA Ophthalmol.136, 803–810 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

61. Willems, J. et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.N. Engl. J. Med.325, 1767–1773 (1991).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

62. Strodthoff, N. & Strodthoff, C. Detecting and interpreting myocardial infarctions using fully convolutional neural networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07385 (2018).

63. Rajpurkar, P. et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01836(2017).

64. Holme, Ø. & Aabakken, L. Making colonoscopy smarter with standardized computer-aided diagnosisAnn. Intern. Med.169, 409–410 (2018).

65. Petrone, J. FDA approves stroke-detecting AI software.Nat. Biotechnol.36, 290 (2018).

66. Hsu, J. & Spectrum. AI could make detecting autism easier. InThe Atlantichttps://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/07/ai-autism-diagnosis-screening-bottleneck/564890/ (2018).

67. Lundberg, S. et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 749–760 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

68. Peters, A. Having a heart attack? This AI helps emergency dispatchers find out. InFast Companyhttps://www.fastcompany.com/40515740/having-a-heart-attack-this-ai-helps-emergency-dispatchers-find-out (2018).

69. Patel, N. M. et al. Enhancing next-generation sequencing-guided cancer care through cognitive computing.Oncologist23, 179–185 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

70. De Graaf, M. Will Al replace fertility doctors? Why computers are the only ones that can end the agony of failed IVF cycles, miscarriages, and risky multiple birth. InDaily Mailhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6257891/Study-finds-artificial-intelligence-better-doctor-crucial-stage-IVF.html (2018).

71. Gurovich, Y. et al. DeepGestalt—identifying rare genetic syndromes using deep learning. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07637 (2017).

72. Bahl, M. et al. High-risk breast lesions: a machine learning model to predict pathologic upgrade and reduce unnecessary surgical excision.Radiology286, 810–818 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

73. Coiera, E. et al. The digital scribe.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 58 (2018).

74. The burden of depression.Nature515, 163 (2014).

75. Cao, B. et al. DeepMood: modeling mobile phone typing dynamics for mood detection. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08986 (2018).

76. Mohr, D. C. et al. A solution-focused research approach to achieve an implementable revolution in digital mental health.JAMA Psychiatry75, 113–114 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

77. Frankel, J. How artificial intelligence could help diagnose mental disorders. InThe Atlantichttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/08/could-artificial-intelligence-improve-psychiatry/496964/ (2016).

78. Barrett, P. M. et al. Digitising the mind.Lancet389, 1877 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

79. Firth, J. et al. The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World Psychiatry16, 287–298 (2017).

80. Fitzpatrick, K. K. et al. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial.JMIR Ment. Health4, e19 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

81. Eichstaedt, J. C. et al. Facebook language predicts depression in medical records.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, 11203–11208 (2018).

82. Chekroud, A. M. et al. Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach.Lancet Psychiatry3, 243–250 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

83. Schnyer, D. M. et al. Evaluating the diagnostic utility of applying a machine learning algorithm to diffusion tensor MRI measures in individuals with major depressive disorder.Psychiatry Res.264, 1–9 (2017).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

84. Reece, A. G. & Danforth, C. M. Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression.EPJ Data Science6, 15 (2017).

85. Wager, T. D. & Woo, C. W. Imaging biomarkers and biotypes for depression.Nat. Med.23, 16–17 (2017).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

86. Walsh, C. G. et al. Predicting risk of suicide attempts over time through machine learning.Clin. Psychol. Sci.5, 457–469 (2017).

87. Franklin, J. C. et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research.Psychol. Bull.143, 187–232 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

88. Just, M. A. et al. Machine learning of neural representations of suicide and emotion concepts identifies suicidal youth.Nat. Hum. Behav.1, 911–919 (2017).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

89. Chung, Y. et al. Use of machine learning to determine deviance in neuroanatomical maturity associated with future psychosis in youths at clinically high risk.JAMA Psychiatry75, 960–968 (2018).

90. Yang, Z. et al. Clinical assistant diagnosis for electronic medical record based on convolutional neural network.Sci. Rep.8, 6329 (2018).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

91. Avati, A. et al. Improving palliative care with deep learning. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06402 (2017).

92. Cleret de Langavant, L. et al. Unsupervised machine learning to identify high likelihood of dementia in population-based surveys: development and validation study.J. Med. Internet. Res.20, e10493 (2018).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

93. Oh, J. et al. A generalizable, data-driven approach to predict daily risk ofClostridium difficile infection at two large academic health centers.Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol.39, 425–433 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

94. Bennington-Castro, J. AI can predict when we’ll die—here’s why that’s a good thing. InNBC Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/ai-can-predict-when-we-ll-die-here-s-why-ncna844276 (2018).

95. Elfiky, A. et al. Development and application of a machine learning approach to assess short-term mortality risk among patients with cancer starting chemotherapy.JAMA Netw. Open1, e180926 (2018).

96. Rajkomar, A. et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 18 (2018).

97. Miotto, R. et al. Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records.Sci. Rep.6, 26094 (2016).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

98. Mathotaarachchi, S. et al. Identifying incipient dementia individuals using machine learning and amyloid imaging.Neurobiol. Aging.59, 80–90 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

99. Yoon, J. et al. Personalized survival predictions via Trees of Predictors: an application to cardiac transplantation.PLoS ONE13, e0194985 (2018).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

100. Wong, A. et al. Development and validation of an electronic health record–based machine learning model to estimate delirium risk in newly hospitalized patients without known cognitive impairment.JAMA Netw. Open1, e181018 (2018).

101. Alaa, A. M. & van der Schaar, M. Prognostication and risk factors for cystic fibrosis via automated machine learning.Sci. Rep.8, 11242 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

102. Horng, S. et al. Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning.PLoS ONE12, e0174708 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

103. Henry, K. E. et al. A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock.Sci. Transl. Med.7, 299ra122 (2015).

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

104. Culliton, P. et al. Predicting severe sepsis using text from the electronic health record. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11536 (2017).

105. Razavian, N. et al. Multi-task prediction of disease onsets from longitudinal lab tests.PMLR56, 73–100 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

106. Shameer, K. et al. Predictive modeling of hospital readmission rates using electronic medical record-wide machine learning: a case-study using Mount Sinai Heart Failure Cohort.Pac. Symp. Biocomput.22, 276–287 (2017).

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

107. Bhagwat, N. et al. Modeling and prediction of clinical symptom trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease using longitudinal data.PLoS Comput. Biol.14, e1006376 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

108. Komorowski, M. et al. The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.Nat. Med.24, 1716–1720 (2018).

109. Zaidi, D. AI is transforming medical diagnosis, prosthetics, and vision aids. InVenture Beathttps://venturebeat.com/2017/10/30/ai-is-transforming-medical-diagnosis-prosthetics-and-vision-aids/ (2017).

110. Putin, E. et al. Deep biomarkers of human aging: application of deep neural networks to biomarker development.Aging8, 1021–1033 (2016).

     CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

111. Wang, Z. et al. Predicting age by mining electronic medical records with deep learning characterizes differences between chronological and physiological age.J. Biomed. Inform.76, 59–68 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

112. Horvath, S. & Raj, K. DNA methylation–based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing.Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 371–384 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

113. Rose, S. Machine Learning for Prediction in Electronic Health Data.JAMA Netw. Open1, e181404(2018).

114. Haque, A. et al. Towards vision-based smart hospitals: a system for tracking and monitoring hand hygiene compliance. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00163 (2017).

115. Suresh, H. et al. Clinical intervention prediction and understanding with deep neural networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08498 (2017).

116. Kwolek, B. & Kepski, M. Human fall detection on embedded platform using depth maps and wireless accelerometer.Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.117, 489–501 (2014).

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

117. Prasad, N. et al. A reinforcement learning approach to weaning of mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06300 (2018).

118. Maier-Hein, L. et al. Surgical data science for next-generation interventions.Nat. Biomed. Eng.1, 691–696 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

119. Hung, A. J. et al. Automated performance metrics and machine learning algorithms to measure surgeon performance and anticipate clinical outcomes in robotic surgery.JAMA Surg.153, 770–771 (2018).

120. Gehlbach, P. L. Robotic surgery for the eye.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 627–628 (2018).

121. Nikolov, S. et al. Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04430 (2018).

122. Zhu, B. et al. Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning.Nature555, 487–492 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

123. Harvey, H. Can AI enable a 10 minute MRI? InTowards Data Sciencehttps://towardsdatascience.com/can-ai-enable-a-10-minute-mri-77218f0121fe (2018).

124. Ridley, E. L. Artificial intelligence guides lower PET tracer dose. InAunt Minniehttps://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=119572 (2018).

125. Beam, A. L. & Kohane, I. S. Translating artificial intelligence into clinical care.JAMA316, 2368–2369 (2016).

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

126. Tuegel, E. J. et al. Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin.Int. J. Aerosp.2011, 154798 (2011).

127. Tarassenko, L. & Topol, E. Monitoring the health of jet engines and people.JAMAhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16558 (2018).

128. Buhr, S. FDA clears AliveCor’s Kardiaband as the first medical device accessory for the Apple Watch. InTechCrunchhttps://techcrunch.com/2017/11/30/fda-clears-alivecors-kardiaband-as-the-first-medical-device-accessory-for-the-apple-watch/ (2017).

129. Victory, J. What did journalists overlook about the Apple Watch ‘heart monitor’ feature? InHealthNewsReviewhttps://www.healthnewsreview.org/2018/09/what-did-journalists-overlook-about-the-apple-watch-heart-monitor-feature/ (2018).

130. Fingas, R. Apple Watch Series 4 EKG tech got FDA clearance less than 24 hours before reveal. InAppleInsiderhttps://appleinsider.com/articles/18/09/18/apple-watch-series-4-ekg-tech-got-fda-clearance-less-than-24-hours-before-reveal (2018).

131. Carroll, A. E. That new apple watch EKG feature? There are more downs than ups. InThe New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/08/upshot/apple-watch-heart-monitor-ekg.html (2018).

132. Levine, B. & Brown, A. Onduo delivers diabetes clinic and coaching to your smartphone. InDiatribehttps://diatribe.org/onduo-delivers-diabetes-clinic-and-coaching-your-smartphone (2018).

133. Han, Q. et al. A hybrid recommender system for patient–doctor matchmaking in primary care. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03265 (2018).

134. Zmora, N. et al. Taking it personally: personalized utilization of the human microbiome in health and disease.Cell. Host. Microbe.19, 12–20 (2016).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

135. Korem, T. et al. Bread affects clinical parameters and induces gut microbiome–associated personal glycemic responses.Cell. Metab.25, 1243–1253 e1245 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

136. Zeevi, D. et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses.Cell163, 1079–1094 (2015).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

137. Hall, H. et al. Glucotypes reveal new patterns of glucose dysregulation.PLoS Biol.16, e2005143 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

138. Albers, D. J. et al. Personalized glucose forecasting for type 2 diabetes using data assimilation.PLoS. Comput. Biol.13, e1005232 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

139. Hulman, A. et al. Glucose patterns during an oral glucose tolerance test and associations with future diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality rate.Diabetologia61, 101–107 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

140. Thaiss, C. A. et al. Hyperglycemia drives intestinal barrier dysfunction and risk for enteric infection.Science359, 1376–1383 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

141. Wu, D. et al. Glucose-regulated phosphorylation of TET2 by AMPK reveals a pathway linking diabetes to cancer.Nature559, 637–641 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

142. Bally, L. et al. Closed-loop insulin delivery for glycemic control in noncritical care.N. Engl. J. Med.379, 547–556 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

143. Christiansen, E. M. et al. In silico labeling: predicting fluorescent labels in unlabeled images.Cell173, 792–803 e719 (2018).

144. Sullivan, D. P. & Lundberg, E. Seeing more: a future of augmented microscopy.Cell173, 546–548 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

145. Ounkomol, C. et al. Label-free prediction of three-dimensional fluorescence images from transmitted-light microscopy.Nat. Methods15, 917–920 (2018).

146. Ota, S. et al. Ghost cytometry.Science360, 1246–1251 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

147. Nitta, N. et al. Intelligent image-activated cell sorting.Cell175, 266–276 e213 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

148. Weigert, M. et al. Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.1101/236463 (2017).

149. Gut, G. et al. Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states.Science361, eaar7042 (2018).

150. Sullivan, D. P. et al. Deep learning is combined with massive-scale citizen science to improve large-scale image classification.Nat. Biotechnol.36, 820–828 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

151. Poplin, R. et al. Creating a universal SNP and small indel variant caller with deep neural networks. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.1101/092890 (2016).

152. Sundaram, L. et al. Predicting the clinical impact of human mutation with deep neural networks.Nat. Genet.50, 1161–1170 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

153. Zhou, J. et al. Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk.Nat. Genet.50, 1171–1179 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

154. Zhou, J. & Troyanskaya, O. G. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model.Nat. Methods12, 931–934 (2015).

     CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

155. Luo, R., et al. Clairvoyante: a multi-task convolutional deep neural network for variant calling in single molecule sequencing. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.1101/310458 (2018).

156. Leung, M. et al. Machine learning in genomic medicine: a review of computational problems and data sets. InProceedings of the IEEE Vol. 104, 176–197 (IEEE, 2016).

157. Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks.Nat. Biotechnol.36, 983–987 (2018).

158. Riesselman, A. et al. Deep generative models of genetic variation capture the effects of mutations.Nat. Methods15, 816–822 (2018).

159. Wood, D. E. et al. A machine learning approach for somatic mutation discovery.Sci. Transl. Med.10, eaar7939 (2018).

160. Behravan, H. et al. Machine learning identifies interacting genetic variants contributing to breast cancer risk: a case study in Finnish cases and controls.Sci. Rep.8, 13149 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

161. Lin, C. et al. Using neural networks for reducing the dimensions of single-cell RNA-seq data.Nucleic Acids Res.45, e156 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

162. Angermueller, C. et al. DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning.Genome. Biol.18, 67 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

163. AlQuraishi, M. End-to-end differentiable learning of protein structure. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.1101/265231 (2018).

164. Espinoza, J. L. Machine learning for tackling microbiota data and infection complications in immunocompromised patients with cancer.J. Intern. Med.https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12746 (2018).

165. van Dijk, D. et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion.Cell174, 716–729.e727 (2018).

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

166. Zitnik, M. et al. Machine learning for integrating data in biology and medicine: principles, practice, and opportunities. Preprint athttps://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12746 (2018).

167. Camacho, D. M. et al. Next-generation machine learning for biological networks.Cell173, 1581–1592 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

168. Kim, H. K. et al. Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR–Cpf1 guide RNA activity.Nat. Biotechnol.36, 239–241 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

169. Listgarten, J. et al. Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 38–47 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

170. Caravagna, G. et al. Detecting repeated cancer evolution from multi-region tumor sequencing data.Nat. Methods15, 707–714 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

171. Manak, M. et al. Live-cell phenotypic-biomarker microfluidic assay for the risk stratification of cancer patients via machine learning.Nature Biomed. Eng.2, 761–772 (2018).

172. Hassabis, D. et al. Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence.Neuron95, 245–258 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

173. Robie, A. A. et al. Mapping the neural substrates of behavior.Cell170, 393–406 e328 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

174. Dasgupta, S. et al. A neural algorithm for a fundamental computing problem.Science358, 793–796 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

175. Januszewski, M. et al. High-precision automated reconstruction of neurons with flood-filling networks.Nat. Methods15, 605–610 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

176. Savelli, F. & Knierim, J. J. AI mimics brain codes for navigation.Nature557, 313–314 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

177. Banino, A. et al. Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents.Nature557, 429–433 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

178. Adam, G. C. Two artificial synapses are better than one.Nature558, 39–40 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

179. Wright, C. D. Phase-change devices: crystal-clear neuronal computing.Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 655–656 (2016).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

180. Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning.Nat. Neurosci.21, 1281–1289 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

181. Smalley, E. AI-powered drug discovery captures pharma interest.Nat. Biotechnol.35, 604–605 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

182. Schneider, G. Automating drug discovery.Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov.17, 97–113 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

183. Chakradhar, S. Predictable response: finding optimal drugs and doses using artificial intelligence.Nat. Med.23, 1244–1247 (2017).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

184. Lowe, D. AI designs organic syntheses.Nature555, 592–593 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

185. Luechtefeld, T. et al. Machine learning of toxicological big data enables read-across structure activity relationships (RASAR) outperforming animal test reproducibility.Toxicol. Sci.165, 198–212 (2018).

186. Hie, B. et al. Realizing private and practical pharmacological collaboration.Science362, 347–350 (2018).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

187. Bilsland, E. et al. Plasmodium dihydrofolate reductase is a second enzyme target for the antimalarial action of triclosan.Sci. Rep.8, 1038 (2018).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

188. Artificially-intelligent robot scientist ‘Eve’ could boost search for new drugs. InUniversity of Cambridge Researchhttps://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/artificially-intelligent-robot-scientist-eve-could-boost-search-for-new-drugs (2015).

189. Ross, C. & Swetlitz, I. IBM’s Watson supercomputer recommended ‘unsafe and incorrect’ cancer treatments, internal documents show. InStat Newshttps://www.statnews.com/2018/07/25/ibm-watson-recommended-unsafe-incorrect-treatments/ (2018).

190. Miliard, M. As FDA signals wider AI approval, hospitals have a role to play. InHealthcare IT Newshttps://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/fda-signals-wider-ai-approval-hospitals-have-role-play (2018).

191. Castelvecchi, D. Can we open the black box of AI?Nature538, 20–23 (2016).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

192. Knight, W. The dark secret at the heart of AI. InMIT Technology Reviewhttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/ (2017).

193. Weinberger, D. Our machines now have knowledge we’ll never understand. InBackchannelhttps://www.wired.com/story/our-machines-now-have-knowledge-well-never-understand/ (2017).

194. Kuang, C. Can A.I. be taught to explain itself? InThe New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/magazine/can-ai-be-taught-to-explain-itself.html (2017).

195. Stringhini, S. et al. Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1.7 million men and women.Lancet389, 1229–1237 (2017).

     PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

196. Wapner, J. Cancer scientists have ignored African DNA in the search for cures. InNewsweekhttps://www.newsweek.com/2018/07/27/cancer-cure-genome-cancer-treatment-africa-genetic-charles-rotimi-dna-human-1024630.html (2018).

197. Miller, A. P. Want less-biased decisions? Use algorithms. InHarvard Business Reviewhttps://hbr.org/2018/07/want-less-biased-decisions-use-algorithms (2018).

198. Brundage, M. et al. The malicious use of artificial intelligence: forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.07228.pdf (2018).

199. Finlayson, S. et al. Adversarial attacks against medical deep learning systems. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05296 (2018).

200. Haun, K. & Topol, E. The health data conundrum. InThe New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/opinion/the-health-data-conundrum.html (2017).

201. Kish, L. J. & Topol, E. J. Unpatients-why patients should own their medical data.Nat. Biotechnol.33, 921–924 (2015).

     CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

202. Heller, N. Estonia, the digital republic. InThe New Yorkerhttps://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/estonia-the-digital-republic (2017).

203. Shladover, S. The truth about “self-driving” cars. InScientific American314, 53–57 (2016).

204. Turing, A. M. On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem.P. Lond. Match. Soc.s2-42, 230–265 (1936).

205. Turing, A. M. Computing machinery and intelligence.Mind59, 433–460 (1950).

206. McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.Bull.Math. Biophys.5, 115–133 (1943).

207. Krizhevsky, A. et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. InNIPS’12 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 1097–1105 (NIPS, 2012).

208. Hu, J. et al. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1709.01507 (2017).

209. Russakovsky, O. et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0575 (2014).

210. Goodfellow, I et al.Deep Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016).

211. Yu, K.-H. et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare.Nature Biomed. Eng.2, 719–731 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

212. Korkinof, D. et al. High-resolution mammogram synthesis using progressive generative adversarial networks. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03401 (2018).

213. Baur, C. et al. Generating highly realistic images of skin lesions with GANs. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01410 (2018).

214. Kazeminia, S. et al. GANs for medical image analysis. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06222 (2018).

215. Harvey, H. FAKE VIEWS! Synthetic medical images for machine learning. InTowards Data Sciencehttps://towardsdatascience.com/harnessing-infinitely-creative-machine-imagination-6801a9fb4ca9 (2018).

216. Madani, A. et al. Deep echocardiography: data-efficient supervised and semisupervised deep learning towards automated diagnosis of cardiac disease.NPJ Digit. Med.1, 59 (2018).

Download references