Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Article
  • Published:

Scleromochlus and the early evolution of Pterosauromorpha

Naturevolume 610, pages313–318 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Pterosaurs, the first vertebrates to evolve powered flight, were key components of Mesozoic terrestrial ecosystems from their sudden appearance in the Late Triassic until their demise at the end of the Cretaceous1,2,3,4,5,6. However, the origin and early evolution of pterosaurs are poorly understood owing to a substantial stratigraphic and morphological gap between these reptiles and their closest relatives6, Lagerpetidae7.Scleromochlus taylori, a tiny reptile from the early Late Triassic of Scotland discovered over a century ago, was hypothesized to be a key taxon closely related to pterosaurs8, but its poor preservation has limited previous studies and resulted in controversy over its phylogenetic position, with some even doubting its identification as an archosaur9. Here we use microcomputed tomographic scans to provide the first accurate whole-skeletal reconstruction and a revised diagnosis ofScleromochlus, revealing new anatomical details that conclusively identify it as a close pterosaur relative1 within Pterosauromorpha (the lagerpetid + pterosaur clade).Scleromochlus is anatomically more similar to lagerpetids than to pterosaurs and retains numerous features that were probably present in very early diverging members of Avemetatarsalia (bird-line archosaurs). These results support the hypothesis that the first flying reptiles evolved from tiny, probably facultatively bipedal, cursorial ancestors1.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

9,800 Yen / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Newly revealed anatomical features ofS. taylori.
Fig. 2: Comparisons of selected features ofS. taylori and pterosauromorphs.
Fig. 3: Time-calibrated strict consensus tree focused on Pterosauromorpha and different positions ofS. taylori based on interpretations of the phylogenetic scores for the ankle.
Fig. 4: Digital 3D life reconstruction ofS. taylori.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The taxon–character data matrices for the phylogenetic analyses for TNT and MrBayes are available in Nexus and TNT formats in the Supplementary Information and in MorphoBank athttps://morphobank.org/index.php/Projects/ProjectOverview/project_id/4327. The µCT datasets and videos of the six specimens ofS. taylori are available in MorphoSource athttps://www.morphosource.org/projects/000414456/?locale=en (the videos are also available as Supplementary Information files).

References

  1. Padian, K. inThird Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems Tübingen 1984 Short Papers (eds Reif, W.-E. & Westphal, F.) 163–168 (Tübingen Attempto, 1984).

  2. Padian, K. The origins and aerodynamics of flight in extinct vertebrates.Palaeontology28, 413–433 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Witton, M. P.Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).

  4. Sereno, P. C. Basal archosaurs: phylogenetic relationships and functional implications.Soc. Vertebr. Paleontol. Mem.2, 1–53 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benton, M. J.Scleromochlus taylori and the origin of dinosaurs and pterosaurs.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B354, 1423–1446 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalla Vecchia, F. M. inAnatomy, Phylogeny and Palaeobiology of Early Archosaurs and their Kin (eds Nesbitt, S. J. et al.) 119–155 (Geological Society London, 2013).

  7. Ezcurra, M. D. et al. Enigmatic dinosaur precursors bridge the gap to the origin of Pterosauria.Nature588, 445–449 (2020).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Huene, F. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Archosaurier. Geologische und Palaeontologische Abhandlungen.Neue Folge13, 1–53 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett, S. C. Reassessment of the Triassic archosauriformScleromochlus taylori: neither runner nor biped, but hopper.PeerJ8, e8418 (2020).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodward, A. S. On a new dinosaurian reptile (Scleromochlus Taylori, gen. et sp. nov.) from the Trias of Lossiemouth, Elgin.Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond.63, 140–144 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benton, M. J. & Walker, A. D. Palaeoecology, taphonomy, and dating of Permo-Triassic reptiles from Elgin, north-east Scotland.Palaeontology28, 207–234 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foffa, D. et al. Revision ofErpetosuchus (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) and new erpetosuchid material from the Late Triassic ‘Elgin reptile’ fauna based on μCT scanning techniques.Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb.111, 209–233 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nesbitt, S. J. et al. The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan.Nature544, 484–487 (2017).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gauthier, J. A. inThe Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight, Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences Vol. 8 (ed. Padin, K.) 1–55 (California Academy of Sciences, 1986).

  15. Desojo, J. B., et al. inAnatomy, Phylogeny and Palaeobiology of Early Archosaurs and their Kin (eds Nesbitt, S. J. et al.) 203–239 (Geological Society London, 2013).

  16. Nesbitt, S. J. The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.352, 1–292 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ezcurra, M. D. The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriforms.PeerJ4, e1778 (2016).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kellner, A. W. A. Comments on Triassic pterosaurs with discussion about ontogeny and description of new taxa.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.87, 669–689 (2015).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dzik, J. A beaked herbivorous archosaur with dinosaur affinities from the early Late Triassic of Poland.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.23, 556–574 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Padian, K. Were pterosaur ancestors bipedal or quadrupedal? Morphometric, functional, and phylogenetic considerations.ZittelianaB28, 21–33 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yáñez, I., Pol, D., Leardi, J. M., Alcober, O. A. & Martínez, R. N. An enigmatic new archosauriform from the Carnian–Norian, Upper Triassic, Ischigualasto Formation of northwestern Argentina.Acta Palaeontol. Pol.66, 509–533 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCabe, M. B., Mason, B. & Nesbitt, S. J. The first pectoral and forelimb material assigned to the lagerpetidLagerpeton chanarensis (Archosauria: Dinosauromorpha) from the upper portion of the Chañares Formation, Late Triassic.Palaeodiversity14, 121–131 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Müller, R. T., Langer, M. C. & Dias-da-Silva, S. Ingroup relationships of Lagerpetidae (Avemetatarsalia: Dinosauromorpha): a further phylogenetic investigation on the understanding of dinosaur relatives.Zootaxa4392, 149–158 (2018).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Irmis, R. B. et al. A late Triassic dinosauromorph assemblage from New Mexico and the rise of dinosaurs.Science317, 358–361 (2007).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kammerer, C. F., Nesbitt, S. J., Flynn, J. J., Ranivoharimanana, L. & Wyss, A. R. A tiny ornithodiran archosaur from the Triassic of Madagascar and the role of miniaturization in dinosaur and pterosaur ancestry.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA117, 17932–17936 (2020).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sereno, P. C. & Arcucci, A. B. Dinosaurian precursors from the Middle Triassic of Argentina:Lagerpeton chanarensis.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.13, 385–399 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hone, D. W. E., Tischlinger, H., Frey, E. & Röper, M. A new non-pterodactyloid pterosaur from the Late Jurassic of southern Germany.PLoS ONE7, e39312 (2012).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Demuth, O. E., Rayfield, E. J. & Hutchinson, J. R. 3D hindlimb joint mobility of the stem-archosaurEuparkeria capensis with implications for postural evolution within Archosauria.Sci. Rep.10, 15357 (2020).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrett, P. M. & Maidment, S. C. R. The evolution of ornithischian quadrupedality.J. Iber. Geol.43, 363–377 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Padian, K. A functional analysis of flying and walking in pterosaurs.Paleobiology9, 218–239 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kubo, T. & Kubo, M. O. Associated evolution of bipedality and cursoriality among Triassic archosaurs: a phylogenetically controlled evaluation.Paleobiology38, 474–485 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Campione, N. E., Evans, D. C., Brown, C. M. & Carrano, M. T. Body mass estimation in non-avian bipeds using a theoretical conversion to quadruped stylopodial proportions.Methods Ecol. Evol.5, 913–923 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Britt, B. B. et al.Caelestiventus hanseni gen. et sp. nov. extends the desert-dwelling pterosaur record back 65 million years.Nat. Ecol. Evol.2, 1386–1392 (2018).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Behrensmeyer, A. K. et al. Taphonomy and paleocommunity reconstruction of a pterosaur-bearing fossil assemblage in the Upper Triassic of Arizona.J. Vertebr. Paleontol.Program and Abstracts61, 60 (2019).

  35. Jenkins, F. A. Jr, Shubin, N. H., Gatesy, S. M. & Padian, K. A diminutive pterosaur (Pterosauria: Eudimorphodontidae) from the Greenlandic Triassic.Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.156, 151–170 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martínez, R. N., Andres, B., Apaldetti, C. & Cerda, I. A. The dawn of the flying reptiles: first Triassic record in the southern hemisphere.Pap. Palaeontol.8, e1424 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Simms, M. J. & Ruffell, A. H. Synchroneity of climatic change and extinctions in the Late Triassic.Geology17, 265–268 (1989).

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roghi, G., Gianolla, P., Minarelli, L., Pilati, C. & Preto, N. Palynological correlation of Carnian humid pulses throughout western Tethys.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.290, 89–106 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Benton, M. J., Bernardi, M. & Kinsella, C. The Carnian Pluvial episode and the origin of dinosaurs.J. Geol. Soc.175, 1019–1026 (2018).

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dunne, E. M., Farnsworth, A., Greene, S. E., Lunt, D. J. & Butler, R. J. Climatic drivers of latitudinal variation in Late Triassic tetrapod diversity.Palaeontology64, 101–117 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, J., Angielczyk, K. D. & Abdala, F. Permo-Triassic tetrapods and their climate implications.Glob. Planet. Change205, 103618 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chiarenza, A. A., Mannion, P. D., Farnsworth, A., Carrano, M. & Varela, S. Climatic constraints on the biogeographic history of Mesozoic dinosaurs.Curr. Biol.32, 570–585 (2022).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mancuso, A. C. et al. Paleoenvironmental and biotic changes in the Late Triassic of Argentina: testing hypotheses of abiotic forcing at the basin scale.Front. Earth Sci.10, 883788 (2022).

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kellner, A. W. A. Remarks on pterosaur taphonomy and paleoecology.Acta Geol. Leopold.39, 175–189 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dean, C. D., Mannion, P. D. & Butler, R. J. Preservational bias controls the fossil record of pterosaurs.Palaeontology59, 225–247 (2016).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Davies, T. G. et al. Open data and digital morphology.Proc. R. Soc. B284, 20170194 (2017).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ezcurra, M. D. et al. Deep faunistic turnovers preceded the rise of dinosaurs in southwestern Pangaea.Nat. Ecol. Evol.1, 1477–1483 (2017).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ezcurra, M. D. & Butler, R. J. The rise of the ruling reptiles and ecosystem recovery from the Permo-Triassic mass extinction.Proc. R. Soc. B285, 20180361 (2018).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Butler, R. J. et al. Cranial anatomy and taxonomy of the erythrosuchid archosauriform ‘Vjushkovia triplicostata’ Huene, 1960, from the Early Triassic of European Russia.R. Soc. Open Sci.6, 191289 (2019).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Spiekman, S. N. F., Ezcurra, M. D., Butler, R. J., Fraser, N. C. & Maidment, S. C. R.Pendraig milnerae, a new small-sized coelophysoid theropod from the Late Triassic of Wales.R. Soc. Open Sci.8, 210915 (2021).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis.Cladistics24, 774–786 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics.Cladistics32, 221–238 (2016).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ronquist, F., van der Mark, P. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. inThe Phylogenetic Handbook: a Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing (eds Lemey, P. et al.) 210–266 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

  54. Benton, M. J. et al. Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history.Palaeontol. Electronica18, 1–106 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ezcurra, M. D., Scheyer, T. M. & Butler, R. J. The origin and early evolution of Sauria: reassessing the Permian saurian fossil record and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence.PLoS ONE9, e89165 (2014).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Benton, M. J. & Walker, A. D.Erpetosuchus, a crocodile-like basal archosaur from the Late Triassic of Elgin, Scotland.Zool. J. Linn. Soc.136, 25–47 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bernardi, M., Gianolla, P., Petti, F. M., Mietto, P. & Benton, M. J. Dinosaur diversification linked with the Carnian Pluvial episode.Nat. Commun.9, 1499 (2018).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Fernandez, T. G. Davies and E. G. Martin-Silverstone for scanning the specimens; A. A. Chiarenza for discussion and assistance; G. Ugueto for creating the artwork that accompanies this paper; M. Humpage for the 3D reconstruction of the skeleton; A. Fitch for sharing the photograph ofRaeticodactylus used in Fig.2; and S. Hartman for permission to use silhouettes from phylopic.org. This study was supported by the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851–Science Fellowship awarded to D.F. R.J.B., E.M.D., A.F., D.J.L. and P.J.V. were supported by a Leverhulme Research Project Grant (RPG-2019-365).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, UK

    Davide Foffa, Nicholas C. Fraser, Stephen L. Brusatte & Stig Walsh

  2. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Davide Foffa, Emma M. Dunne & Richard J. Butler

  3. Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Davide Foffa & Sterling J. Nesbitt

  4. GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Department of Geography and Geosciences, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany

    Emma M. Dunne

  5. School of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Nicholas C. Fraser, Stephen L. Brusatte & Stig Walsh

  6. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment (TPESRE), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Alexander Farnsworth

  7. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Alexander Farnsworth, Daniel J. Lunt & Paul J. Valdes

  8. Natural History Museum, London, UK

    Paul M. Barrett

Authors
  1. Davide Foffa

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma M. Dunne

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sterling J. Nesbitt

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard J. Butler

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicholas C. Fraser

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephen L. Brusatte

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alexander Farnsworth

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniel J. Lunt

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paul J. Valdes

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Stig Walsh

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paul M. Barrett

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.F. designed the project with input from N.C.F., S.W., R.J.B., S.L.B. and P.M.B. D.F. processed the μCT data and described the material. D.F., with the assistance of S.J.N. and P.M.B., scored the phylogenetic matrices and conducted the phylogenetic analyses. D.F. wrote the bulk of the manuscript and created the figures. P.M.B. conducted sedimentological tests on the specimens. All authors contributed to the writing, discussions and conclusions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toDavide Foffa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Hans Dieter-Sues, Martin Ezcurra, Lawrence Tanner and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Life reconstruction ofScleromochlus taylori.

Artwork by Gabriel Ugueto (high-resolution version).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Digital rendering ofScleromochlus taylori specimens from µCT scans.

Holotype NHMUK PV R3556, dorsal view (top left); NHMUK PV R3557, ventral view (right); NHMUK PV R3914, ventral view (bottom left). Red shading highlights the skeleton traces on the digital peels, while solid red rendering indicates previously unknown body parts.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Strict consensus phylogenetic tree of analysis including indeterminate ankle scores.

Absolute and present/contradicted group bootstrap frequencies (respectively left and right above the branches) and Bremer support values (below the branches). Note that in ~95% of the most parsimonious treesScleromochlus is found as the earliest-diverging lagerpetid (it is alternatively found as the earliest-diverging member of a lagerpetid clade also composed ofIxalerpeton, Kongonaphon andLagerpeton).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Strict consensus phylogenetic tree of analysis using scores for an advanced fused mesotarsal ankle.

Absolute and present/contradicted group bootstrap frequencies (respectively left and right above the branches) and Bremer support values (below the branches). Note that in ~95% of the most parsimonious treesScleromochlus is found as the earliest-diverging lagerpetid (it is alternatively found as the earliest-diverging member of a lagerpetid clade also composed ofIxalerpeton, Kongonaphon andLagerpeton).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Strict consensus phylogenetic tree of analysis using scores for an “intermediate” mesotarsal ankle.

Absolute and present/contradicted group bootstrap frequencies (respectively left and right above the branches) and Bremer support values (below the branches).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Strict consensus phylogenetic tree of analysis based on scores for a crurotarsal ankle.

Absolute and present/contradicted group bootstrap frequencies (respectively left and right above the branches) and Bremer support values (below the branches).

Extended Data Fig. 7 Bayesian inference convergence topology trees.

The position ofScleromochlus taylori remains the same regardless of the scoring strategy of the ankle. The alternative topology within Pterosauria is found only when using the ‘crurotarsal ankle’ settings.

Extended Data Table 1 Table of measurements

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Table of Contents; a URL containing a link to access Supplementary Datasets; Historical background; legends for Supplementary Videos and Supplementary References

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foffa, D., Dunne, E.M., Nesbitt, S.J.et al.Scleromochlus and the early evolution of Pterosauromorpha.Nature610, 313–318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05284-x

Download citation

This article is cited by

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp