Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • Review Article
  • Published:

Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts

Nature Reviews Microbiologyvolume 2, pages43–56 (2004)Cite this article

Key Points

  • Trichoderma spp. are free-living fungi that are common in soil and root ecosystems. These fungi are well known for their ability to produce a wide range of antibiotic substances and for their ability to parasitize other fungi.

  • Until recently, these direct effects on other fungi were thought to be the basis for the beneficial effects ofTrichoderma spp. on plant growth and development. However, recent evidence indicates that manyTrichoderma spp., includingTrichoderma virens,Trichoderma atroviride andTrichoderma harzianum, can induce both localized and systemic resistance in a range of plants to a variety of plant pathogens, and certain strains can also have substantial influence on plant growth and development.

  • When propagativeTrichoderma structures, such as spores, are added to soil, they come into contact with plant roots and can germinate and grow on root surfaces, and someTrichoderma strains can infect the outer few root cells.Trichoderma spp. produce at least three classes of compound that elicit plant defence responses: peptides, proteins and low-molecular-weight compounds.

  • Induced resistance byTrichoderma spp. increases the expression of defence-related genes throughout the plant, at least in the short term, and is therefore similar to systemic acquired resistance (SAR). For one interaction — that betweenT. asperellum and cucumber — a longer-term response has elements in common with rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance (RISR).

  • Root colonization byTrichoderma spp. also frequently enhances root growth and development, and can therefore improve crop productivity. The greatest long-term effects on productivity are probably associated with rhizosphere-competent strains. These responses are often the result of direct effects on plants, decreased activity of deleterious root microflora, and inactivated toxic compounds in the root zone.Trichoderma spp. also increase nutrient uptake and the efficiency of nitrogen use, and can solubilize nutrients in the soil. At present, the genetic and molecular bases of these effects are unknown.

Abstract

Trichoderma spp. are free-living fungi that are common in soil and root ecosystems. Recent discoveries show that they are opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts, as well as being parasites of other fungi. At least some strains establish robust and long-lasting colonizations of root surfaces and penetrate into the epidermis and a few cells below this level. They produce or release a variety of compounds that induce localized or systemic resistance responses, and this explains their lack of pathogenicity to plants. These root–microorganism associations cause substantial changes to the plant proteome and metabolism. Plants are protected from numerous classes of plant pathogen by responses that are similar to systemic acquired resistance and rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. Root colonization byTrichoderma spp. also frequently enhances root growth and development, crop productivity, resistance to abiotic stresses and the uptake and use of nutrients.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

￥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Features of induced resistance caused byTrichoderma species.
Figure 2: Effects of root colonization byTrichoderma T-22 on induced systemic resistance and plant growth.
Figure 3: Interactions ofTrichoderma asperellum T-203 with cucumber roots, and effects of these interactions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sivasithamparam, K. & Ghisalberti, E. L. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.1 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 139–191 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howell, C. R. Cotton seedling preemergence damping-off incited byRhizopus oryzae andPythium spp. and its biological control withTrichoderma spp.Phytopathology92, 177–180 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elad, Y. Mechanisms involved in the biological control ofBotrytis cinerea incited diseases.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.102, 719–732 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimand, G., Elad, Y. & Chet, I. Effect ofTrichoderma harzianum onBotrytis cinerea pathogenicity.Phytopathology86, 1255–1260 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benitez, T., Limon, C., Delgado-Jarana, J. & Rey, M. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.2 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 101–127 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chet, I., Benhamou, N. & Haran, S. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.2 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 153–172 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howell, C. R. Mechanisms employed byTrichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts.Plant Dis.87, 4–10 (2003).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorito, M. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.2 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 73–99 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bolar, J. P. et al. Expression of endochitinase fromTrichoderma harzianum in transgenic apple increases resistance to apple scab and reduces vigor.Phytopathology90, 72–77 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolar, J. P. et al. Synergistic activity of endochitinase and exochitinase fromTrichoderma atroviride (T. harzianum) against the pathogenic fungus (Venturia inaequalis) in transgenic apple plants.Trans. Res.10, 533–543 (2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorito, M. et al. Genes from mycoparasitic fungi as a source for improving plant resistance to fungal pathogens.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95, 7860–7865 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Donzelli, B. G. G., Ostroff, G. & Harman, G. E. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of langostino shell chitin with mixtures of enzymes from bacterial and fungal sources.Carbohydr. Res.338, 1823–1833 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsey, D. L. & Baker, R. Effect of certain fungi on dwarf tomatoes grown under gnotobiotic conditions.Phytopathology57, 1262–1263 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yedidia, I., Srivastva, A. K., Kapulnik, Y. & Chet, I. Effect ofTrichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations and increased growth of cucumber plants.Plant Soil235, 235–242 (2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, Y. -C., Chang, Y. -C., Baker, R., Kleifeld, O. & Chet, I. Increased growth of plants in the presence of the biological control agentTrichoderma harzianum.Plant Dis.70, 145–148 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harman, G. E. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol. Changes in perceptions derived from research onTrichoderma harzianum T22.Plant Dis.84, 377–393 (2000).Summarizes and synthesizes much that was known about the use ofTrichoderma spp., with an emphasis on T-22 and rhizosphere competence, including new evaluations of uses and mechanisms of the organisms.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baek, J. -M., Howell, C. R. & Kenerley, C. M. The role of an extracellular chitinase fromTrichoderma virens Gv29-8 in the biocontrol ofRhizoctonia solani.Curr. Genet.35, 41–50 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Limon, M. C., Pintor-Toro, J. A. & Benitez, T. Increased antifungal activity ofTrichoderma harzianum transformants that overexpress a 33-kDa chitinase.Phytopathology89, 254–261 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapira, R., Ordentlich, A., Chet, I. & Oppenheim, A. B. Control of plant diseases by chitinase expressed from cloned DNA inEscherichia coli.Phytopathology79, 1246–1249 (1989).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Flores, A., Chet, I. & Herrera-Estrella, A. Improved biocontrol activity ofTrichoderma harzianum by over-expression of the proteinase-encoding geneprb1.Curr. Genet.31, 30–37 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brunner, K. et al. The Nag1N-acetylglucosaminidase ofTrichoderma atroviride is essential for chitinase induction by chitin and of major relevance to biocontrol.Curr. Genet.43, 289–295 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carsolio, C. et al. Role of theTrichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene,ech42, in mycoparasitism.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 929–935 (1999).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Woo, S. L. et al. Disruption of theech42 (endochitinase-encoding) gene affects biocontrol activity inTrichoderma harzianum P1.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.12, 419–429 (1999).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Migheli, Q. et al. Transformants ofTrichoderma longibrachiatum overexpressing the β-1,4-endoglucanase geneegl1 show enhanced biocontrol ofPythium ultimum on cucumber.Phytopathology88, 673–677 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuc, J. Concepts and direction of induced systemic resistance in plants and its application.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 7–12 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oostendorp, M., Kunz, W., Dietrich, B. & Staub, T. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 19–28 (2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammerschmidt, R., Metraux, J. -P. & van Loon, L. C. Inducing resistance: a summary of papers presented at the First International Symposium on Induced Resistance to Plant Diseases, Corfu, May 2000.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 1–6 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. & Pieterse, C. M. J. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.36, 453–483 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bostock, R. M. et al. Signal interactions in induced resistance to pathogens and insect herbivores.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 103–111 (2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bakker, P. A. H. M., Ran, L. X., Pieterse, C. M. J. & van Loon, L. C. Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases.Can. J. Plant Pathol.25, 5–9 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pieterse, C. M. J. & van Loon, L. C. Salicylic acid-independent plant defense pathways.Trends Plant Sci.4, 52–58 (1999).Describes the nature of RISR and its relationship to other pathways.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kloepper, J. W., Tuzun, S., Liu, L. & Wei, G. inPest Management: Biologically Based Technologies: Proceeding of the Beltsville Symposium XVII (eds Lumsden, R. D. & Vaughn, J. L.) 10–20 (American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Benhamou, N., Garand, C. & Goulet, A. Ability of non-pathogenicFusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 to induce resistance againstPythium ultimum infection in cucumber.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68, 4044–4060 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fuchs, J. G., Moenne-Loccoz, Y. & DeFago, G. Non-pathogenicFusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 induces resistance toFusarium wilt of tomato.Plant Dis.81, 492–496 (1997).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Duijff, B. J. et al. Implication of systemic induced resistance in the suppression ofFusarium wilt of tomato byPseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r and by non-pathogenicFusarium oxysporum Fo47.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.104, 903–910 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fravel, D., Olivain, C. & Alabouvette, C.Fusarium oxysporum and its biocontrol.New Phytol.157, 493–502 (2003).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hwang, J. & Benson, D. M. Expression of induced resistance in poinsietta cuttings againstRhizoctonia stem rot by treatment of stock plants with binucleateRhizoctonia.Biol. Control27, 73–80 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guenoune, D. et al. The defense response elicited byRhizoctonia solani is suppressed by colonization of the AM-fungusGlomus intraradices.Plant Sci.160, 925–932 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pozo, M. J. et al. Localized versus systemic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on defence responses ofPhytophthora infection in tomato plants.J. Exp. Bot.53, 525–534 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Koike, N. et al. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against several diseases by plant growth-promoting fungi: lignification and superoxide generation.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 523–533 (2001).Describes similarities in activity of several beneficial fungi, including some with plant-pathogenic strains of the same species or genera, in their abilities to induce systemic resistance.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bigirimana, J. et al. Induction of systemic resistance on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) byTrichoderma harzianum.Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent62, 1001–1007 (1997).Probably the first paper to clearly show induced systemic resistance resulting from an interaction between a plant and aTrichoderma strain.

    Google Scholar 

  42. De Meyer, G., Bigirimana, J., Elad, Y. & Hofte, M. Induced systemic resistance inTrichoderma harzianum T39 biocontrol ofBotrytis cinerea.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.104, 279–286 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Howell, C. R., Hanson, L. E., Stipanovic, R. D. & Puckhaber, L. S. Induction of terpenoid synthesis in cotton roots and control ofRhizoctonia solani by seed treatment withTrichoderma virens.Phytopathology90, 248–252 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harman, G. E. et al. Biological and integrated control ofBotrytis bunch rot of grape usingTrichoderma spp.Biol. Control7, 259–266 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lanzuise, S. et al. Cloning of ABC transporter-encoding genes inTrichoderma spp. to determine their involvement in biocontrol.J. Plant Pathol.84, 184 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ruocco, M. et al. ABC transporters inTrichoderma harzianum. The 7th International Mycological Congress, Book of Abstracts, Oslo, Norway, 11–17 August 2002, 354 (2002).

  47. Anderson, R. D. et al. inCellular and Molecular Aspects of the Plant Hormone Ethylene (eds Pech, J. C., Latché, A. & Balague, C.) 197–204 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Lotan, T. & Fluhr, R. Xylanase, a novel elicitor of pathogenesis-related proteins in tobacco, uses a non-ethylene pathway for induction.Plant Physiol.93, 811–817 (1990).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fuchs, Y., Saxena, A., Gamble, H. R. & Anderson, J. D. Ethylene biosynthesis-inducing protein from cellulysin is an endoxylanase.Plant Physiol.89, 138–143 (1989).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bailey, B. A., Taylor, R., Dean, J. F. D. & Anderson, J. D. Ethylene biosynthesis-inducing endoxylanase is translocated through the xylem ofNicotiana tabacum cv. xanthi plants.Plant Physiol.97, 1181–1186 (1991).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hanson, L. E. & Howell, C. R. Elicitors of plant defense responses from biological control strains ofTrichoderma virens.Phytopathology (in the press).

  52. de Wit, P. J. G. M. et al. The molecular basis of co-evolution betweenCladosporium fulvum and tomato.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek81, 409–412 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Baker, B., Zambryski, P., Staskawicz, B. & Dinesh-Kumar, S. P. Signaling in plant–microbe interactions.Science276, 726–733 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Woo, S. L. et al. Identifying biocontrol genes inTrichoderma spp. and mechanisms for activating biocontrol processes. 8th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Christchurch, New Zealand Abstracts, 268 (2003).

  55. Mach, R. L. et al. Expression of two major chitinase genes ofTrichoderma atroviride (T. harzianum P1) is triggered by different regulatory signals.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 1858–1863 (1999).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zeilinger, S. et al. Chitinase gene expression during mycoparasitic interaction ofTrichoderma harzianum with its host.Fungal Genet. Biol.26, 131–140 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Woo, S. L. et al. MycoparasiticTrichoderma strains are activated by host-derived molecules. 6th European Conference on Fungal Genetics, Abstract Book, 6–9 April 2002, Pisa, Italy, 306 (2002).

  58. Kubicek, C. P., Mach, R. L., Peterbauer, C. K. & Lorito, M.Trichoderma: from genes to biocontrol.J. Plant Pathol.83, 11–23 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dubos, B. inInnovative Approaches To Plant Disease Control (ed. Chet, I.) 107–135 (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Elad, Y. Biological control of grape grey mould byTrichoderma harzianum.Crop Protect.13, 35–38 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Metcalf, D. A. & Wilson, C. R. The process of antagonism ofSclerotium cepivorum in white rot affected onion roots byTrichoderma koningii.Plant Pathol.50, 249–257 ( 2001).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Thrane, C., Tronsmo, A. & Jensen, D. F. Endo-1,3-β-glucanase and cellulase fromTrichoderma harzianum: purification and partial characterization, induction of and biological activity against plant pathogenicPythium spp.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.103, 331–344 (1997).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Yedidia, I., Benhamou, N. & Chet, I. Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the biocontrol agentTrichoderma harzianum.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 1061–1070 (1999).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Yedidia, I., Benhamou, N., Kapulnik, Y. & Chet, I. Induction and accumulation of PR protein activity during early stages of root colonization by the mycoparasiteTrichoderma harzianum strain T-203.Plant Physiol. Biochem.38, 863–873 (2000).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Evans, H. C., Holmes, K. A. & Thomas, S. E. Mycobiota of an indigenousTheobroma species (Sterculiaceae) in Ecuador: assessing its potential for biological control of cocoa diseases.Mycol. Prog.2, 149–160 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yedidia, I. et al. Concomitant induction of systemic resistance toPseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans in cucumber byTrichoderma asperellum (T-203) and the accumulation of phytoalexins.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (in the press).

  67. Bailey, B. A. & Lumsden, R. D. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.2 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 185–204 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Harman, G. E. & Kubicek, C. P.Trichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.2 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).Together with reference 87, this reference presents much of what was known aboutTrichoderma in 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lo, C. -T., Nelson, E. B., Hayes, C. K. & Harman, G. E. Ecological studies of transformedTrichoderma harzianum strain 1295-22 in the rhizosphere and on the phylloplane of creeping bentgrass.Phytopathology88, 129–136 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Elad, Y. et al. inModern Fungicides and Antifungal Compounds II (ed. Lyr, H.) 459–467 (Intercept Ltd., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Elad, Y. & Kapat, A. The role ofTrichoderma harzianum protease in the biocontrol ofBotrytis cinerea.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.105, 177–189 (1999).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Harman, G. E., Petzoldt, R., Comis, A. & Chen, J. Interactions betweenTrichoderma harzianum strain T22 and maize inbred line Mo17 and effects of this interaction on diseases caused byPythium ultimum andColletotrichum graminicola.Phytopathology (in the press).References 43, 51, 63, 64, 66 and 72 provide the primary basis of this article and provide the data upon which many of our new concepts are based.

  73. Woo, S. L. et al. Molecular factors involved in the interaction between plants, pathogens and biocontrol fungi. 11th International Congress on Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions, Volume of Abstracts, St. Petersburg, Russia, July 18–26, 368 (2003).

  74. Datnoff, L. E., Nemec, S. & Pernezny, K. Biological control ofFusarium crown and root rot of tomato in Florida usingTrichoderma harzianum andGlomus intraradices.Biol. Control5, 427–431 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Nemec, S., Datnoff, L. E. & Strandberg, J. Efficacy of biocontrol agents in planting mixes to colonize plant roots and control root diseases of vegetables and citrus.Crop Protect.15, 735–742 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Woo, S., Fogliano, V., Scala, F. & Lorito, M. Synergism between fungal enzymes and bacterial antibiotics may enhance biocontrol.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek81, 353–356 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Whipps, J. M. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere.J. Exp. Bot.52, 487–511 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Burr, T. J., Schroth, M. N. & Suslow, T. Increased potato yields by treatment of seedpieces with specific strains ofPseudomonas fluorescens andP. putida.Phytopathology68, 1377–1383 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Bakker, A. W. & Schippers, B. Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction andPseudomonas spp-mediated plant growth-stimulation.Soil Biol. Biochem.19, 451–457 (1987).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ezzi, M. I. & Lynch, J. M. Cyanide catabolizing enzymes inTrichoderma spp.Enzymol. Microb. Technol.31, 1042–1047 (2002).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Harman, G. E. inProceedings of International Symposium on Biological Control of Plant Diseases for the New Century — Mode of Action and Application Technology (eds Tzeng, D. D.-S. & Huang, J. W.) 71–84 (National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung City, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Harman, G. E. & Donzelli, B. G. G. inEnhancing Biocontrol Agents and Handling Risks (eds Vurro, M. et al.) 114–125 (IOS, Amsterdam, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Altomare, C., Norvell, W. A., Björkman, T. & Harman, G. E. Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol fungusTrichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 2926–2933 (1999).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Ryu, C. -M. et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth inArabidopsis.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 4927–4932 ( 2003).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Hammond-Kosack, K. E., Staskawicz, B. J., Jones, J. D. G. & Baulcombe, D. C. Functional expression of a fungal avirulence gene from a modified potato virus X genome.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.8, 181–185 (1995).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Harman, G. E., Hayes, C. K. & Ondik, K. L. inTrichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.1 (eds Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.) 243–270 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kubicek, C. P. & Harman, G. E.Trichoderma and Gliocladium Vol.1. (Taylor and Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Chet, I., Harman, G. E. & Baker, R.Trichoderma hamatum: its hyphal interactions withRhizoctonia solani andPythium spp.Microb. Ecol.7, 29–38 (1981).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Viterbo, A. et al. Expression regulation of the endochitinase chit36 fromTrichoderma asperellum (T. harzianum T-203).Curr. Genet.42, 114–122 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Inbar, J., Menendez, A. & Chet, I. Hyphal interaction betweenTrichoderma harzianum andSclerotinia sclerotiorum and its role in biological control.Soil Biol. Biochem.28, 757–763 (1996).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Schirmböck, M. et al. Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonistic action ofTrichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.60, 4364–4370 (1994).

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Elad, Y., Sadowsky, Z. & Chet, I. Scanning electron microscopical observations of early stages of interaction ofTrichoderma harzianum andRhizoctonia solani.Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.88, 259–263 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Elad, Y., Chet, I. & Henis, Y. Parasitism ofTrichoderma spp. onRhizoctonia solani andSclerotium rolfsii — scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy.Phytopathology73, 85–88 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pieterse, C. M. J. et al. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance: triggering, signalling and expression.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107, 51–61 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.107 Issue 1 (2001).

  96. Lumsden, R. D., Locke, J. C., Adkins, S. T., Walter, J. F. & Ridout, C. J. Isolation and localization of the antibiotic gliotoxin produced byGliocladium virens from alginate prill in soil and soilless media.Phytopathology82, 230–235 (1992).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Lumsden, R. D. et al. Characterization of major secondary metabolites produced in soilless mix by a formulated strain of the biocontrol fungusGliocladium virens.Can. J. Microbiol.38, 1274–1280 (1992).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Wilhite, S. E. & Straney, D. C. Timing of gliotoxin biosynthesis in the fungal biological control agentGliocladium virens (Trichoderma virens).Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.45, 513–518 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Lo, C. -T., Liao, T. F. & Deng, T. C. Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to cucumber green mosaic virus by the root-colonizingTrichoderma spp.Phytopathology90 (Suppl.), S47 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Seaman, A.Efficacy of OMRI-approved products for tomato foliar disease control. New York State Integrated Pest Management Program publication 129, 164–167 (New York State Integrated Pest Management Program, New York, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ahmed, A. S., Sanchez, C. P. & Candela, M. E. Evaluation of induction of systemic resistance in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum) toPhytopthora capsici usingTrichoderma harzianum and its relation with capsidiol accumulation.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.106, 817–824 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to K. Ondik and T. Björkman for suggestions and corrections, to R. Bostock for use of the illustration inBox 3, to J. Bissett for contributions to the text inBox 1, to G. Samuels for helpful discussions and to T. Xu for unpublished information on his research on rice. This work was supported in part by the US–Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund (G.E.H. and I.C.), the Cornell Center for Advanced Technology and Advanced Biological Marketing and BioWorks, Inc. Research by M.L. was supported by the following projects: FIRB-MIUR 2002; PON-MIUR 2002; EU TRICHOEST; Project EU FAIR 98PL-4140; MIUR-MIPAF 2002; and MIUR PRIN 2002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Horticultural Sciences and Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Geneva, 14456, New York, USA

    Gary E. Harman

  2. USDA/ARS, SPARC, College Station, 77845, Texas, USA

    Charles R. Howell

  3. Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, 76100, Israel

    Ada Viterbo & Ilan Chet

  4. Dipartimento di Arboricoltura, Botanica e Patologia Vegetale, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, and Istituto CNR-IPP, Portici, 100-80055, Italy

    Matteo Lorito

Authors
  1. Gary E. Harman
  2. Charles R. Howell
  3. Ada Viterbo
  4. Ilan Chet
  5. Matteo Lorito

Corresponding author

Correspondence toGary E. Harman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G. E. Harman is co-founder, co-principal investigator and a shareholder in BioWorks, Inc., which manufactures and sellsTrichoderma harzianum strain T-22, and is a co-principal inventor, consultant and shareholder in Advanced Biological Marketing, which sells T-22 to the field-crop market.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Entrez

Avr4

Avr9

NPR1S

Glossary

AXENIC

An axenic system comprises a single type of microorganism.

TELEOMORPH

The sexual form of a fungus.

HETEROKARYOTIC

A fungus or other organism that contains multiple types of nucleus.

RHIZOBACTERIA

Bacteria that are commonly associated with, and colonize, roots.

MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI

Mycorrhizae are associations (usually mutualistic) between a fungus and the root of a plant, and are found in most plants. The fungi associate with the primary cortex of the root.

MYCOPARASITISM

Parasitism of one fungus by another fungus.

ANTIBIOSIS

Strains acting through antibiosis produce antifungal metabolites.

DICOTYLEDONOUS PLANTS

Flowering plants, the seedlings of which have two seed leaves (cotyledons).

MONOCOTYLEDONS

Flowering plants that have only one seed leaf (cotyledon).

APPRESSORIA

Specialized pressing organs from which a minute infection peg can grow and infect a cell.

PHYTOALEXINS

Low-molecular-weight compounds that have antimicrobial activity and are produced by plants in response to attack by pathogens.

XENOBIOTIC

A chemical that is present in a natural environment that does not normally occur in nature.

PETIOLE

A slender stem that supports a leaf.

ENDOPHYTE

A non-pathogenic organism living within a plant.

PHYLLOSPHERE

The area immediately adjacent to a root surface.

Rights and permissions

About this article

This article is cited by

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp