- Review Article
- Published:
The perfect mix: recent progress in adjuvant research
Nature Reviews Microbiologyvolume 5, pages396–397 (2007)Cite this article
7235Accesses
10Altmetric
Key Points
New vaccines are often less immunogenic than previous vaccines, and adjuvants are therefore required to assist in the induction of potent and persistent immune responses, to reduce the amount of antigen and limit the number of injections.
Some new vaccines also need adjuvants that are capable of inducing potent cell-mediated immunity in addition to an antibody response, such as T helper (TH) 1 responses and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses.
Recent advances in basic immunology have demonstrated the crucial role of some innate immune signals in modulating — both quantitatively and qualitatively — the subsequent adaptive response. Among these, some agonists of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) would in theory constitute promising adjuvants.
Vaccine research can take advantage of these discoveries to design and develop more focused and efficient adjuvants, such as new synthetic agonists of TLRs.
Moreover, new formulations can combine different immunostimulants, including TLR agonists and non-TLR 'classical' adjuvants. These compounds can act in synergy, and targeting them towards antigen-presenting cells could further increase and focus their action.
In parallel, new biochemical and immunological tools and assays have been developed to characterize and evaluate these new adjuvants, bothin vitro andin vivo. The combination of information obtained in several assays, for example in animal models and human primary or transformed cells, can provide more accurate information on the potency and safety of these new adjuvants before use on humans.
Vaccine research scientists can now chose between a larger panel of compounds and technologies to design and develop the formulation that would drive the most efficient and safest response with respect to each considered pathogen, keeping in mind that each antigen–adjuvant couple is unique.
Abstract
Developing efficient and safe adjuvants for use in human vaccines remains both a challenge and a necessity. Past approaches have been largely empirical and generally used a single type of adjuvant, such as aluminium salts or emulsions. However, new vaccine targets often require the induction of well-defined cell-mediated responses in addition to antibodies, and thus new immunostimulants are required. Recent advances in basic immunology have elucidated how early innate immune signals can shape subsequent adaptive responses and this, coupled with improvements in biochemical techniques, has led to the design and development of more specific and focused adjuvants. In this Review, I discuss the research that has made it possible for vaccinologists to now be able to choose between a large panel of adjuvants, which potentially can act synergistically, and combine them in formulations that are specifically adapted to each target and to the relevant correlate(s) of protection.
This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution
Access options
Subscription info for Japanese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others

“World in motion” – emulsion adjuvants rising to meet the pandemic challenges
References
Ulmer, J. B., Valley, U. & Rappuoli, R. Vaccine manufacturing: challenges and solutions.Nature Biotechnol.24, 1377–1383 (2006).
Hunter, R. L. Overview of vaccine adjuvants: present and future.Vaccine20, S7–S12 (2002).
Schijns, V. & O'Hagan, D. (Eds)Immunopotentiators in Modern Vaccines. (Academic Press, Elsevier, 2006).
Bianchi, M. E. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger.J. Leukoc. Biol.81, 1–5 (2007).
Steinman, R. M. & Hemmi, H. Dendritic cells: translating innate to adaptive immunity.Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.311, 17–58 (2006).
Mosmann, T. R., Cherwinski, H., Bond, M. W., Giedlin, M. A. & Coffman, R. L. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins.J. Immunol.136, 2348–2357 (1986).
Mosmann, T. R. & Sad, S. The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more.Immunol. Today17, 138–146 (1996).
Harrington, L. E., Mangan, P. R. & Weaver, C. T. Expanding the effector CD4 T-cell repertoire: the TH17 lineage.Curr. Opin. Immunol.18, 349–356 (2006).
Belkaid, Y. & Rouse, B. T. Natural regulatory T cells in infectious disease.Nature Immunol.6, 353–360 (2005).
Lanzavecchia, A. & Sallusto, F. Understanding the generation and function of memory T cell subsets.Curr. Opin. Immunol.17, 326–332 (2005).
Pulendran, B. & Ahmed, R. Translating innate immunity into immunological memory: implications for vaccine development.Cell124, 849–863 (2006).
Schijns, V. E. Induction and direction of immune responses by vaccine adjuvants.Crit. Rev. Immunol.21, 75–85 (2001).
Barr, T. A., Carlring, J. & Heath, A. W. Co-stimulatory agonists as immunological adjuvants.Vaccine24, 3399–3407 (2006).
Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P. & Janeway, C. A. Jr. A human homologue of theDrosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity.Nature388, 394–397 (1997).
Lemaitre, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J. M. & Hoffmann, J. A. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response inDrosophila adults.Cell86, 973–983 (1996).
Poltorak, A. et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations inTlr4 gene.Science282, 2085–2088 (1998).References 14, 15 and 16 identified and demonstrated the critical role of Toll and TLRs in immune defence, which opened new perspectives in basic and applied immunology.
Iwasaki, A. & Medzhitov, R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses.Nature Immunol.5, 987–995 (2004).
Akira, S. TLR signaling.Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.311, 1–16 (2006).
Flacher, V. et al. Human langerhans cells express a specific TLR profile and differentially respond to viruses and gram-positive bacteria.J. Immunol.177, 7959–7967 (2006).
Jarrossay, D., Napolitani, G., Colonna, M., Sallusto, F. & Lanzavecchia, A. Specialization and complementarity in microbial molecule recognition by human myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells.Eur. J. Immunol.31, 3388–3393 (2001).
Agrawal, S. et al. Cutting edge: different Toll-like receptor agonists instruct dendritic cells to induce distinct TH responses via differential modulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Fos.J. Immunol.171, 4984–4989 (2003).
Dillon, S. et al. A Toll-like receptor 2 ligand stimulates TH2 responsesin vivo, via induction of extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Fos in dendritic cells.J. Immunol.172, 4733–4743 (2004).
Blander, J. M. & Medzhitov, R. Toll-dependent selection of microbial antigens for presentation by dendritic cells.Nature440, 808–812 (2006).
Yarovinsky, F., Kanzler, H., Hieny, S., Coffman, R. L. & Sher, A. Toll-like receptor recognition regulates immunodominance in an antimicrobial CD4+ T cell response.Immunity25, 655–664 (2006).References 23 and 24 show that in addition to their role in cell activation TLRs also have a direct role in foreign antigen presentation,in vitro (Ref. 23) andin vivo (Ref. 24). Activated TLRs and antigen should preferentially be in the same cargo for optimal presentation to T cells.
Ruprecht, C. R. & Lanzavecchia, A. Toll-like receptor stimulation as a third signal required for activation of human naive B cells.Eur. J. Immunol.36, 810–816 (2006).
Pasare, C. & Medzhitov, R. Control of B-cell responses by Toll-like receptors.Nature438, 364–368 (2005).
Nemazee, D., Gavin, A., Hoebe, K. & Beutler, B. Toll-like receptors and antibody responses.Nature441, E4 (2006).
Gavin, A. L. et al. Adjuvant-enhanced antibody responses in the absence of Toll-like receptor signaling.Science314, 1936–1938 (2006).
Sakaguchi, S. Control of immune responses by naturally arising CD4+ regulatory T cells that express toll-like receptors.J. Exp. Med.197, 397–401 (2003).
Sutmuller, R. P. et al. Toll-like receptor 2 controls expansion and function of regulatory T cells.J. Clin. Invest.116, 485–494 (2006).
Caramalho, I. et al. Regulatory T cells selectively express toll-like receptors and are activated by lipopolysaccharide.J. Exp. Med.197, 403–411 (2003).
Peng, G. et al. Toll-like receptor 8-mediated reversal of CD4+ regulatory T cell function.Science309, 1380–1384 (2005).
Pasare, C. & Medzhitov, R. Toll pathway-dependent blockade of CD4+CD25+ T cell-mediated suppression by dendritic cells.Science299, 1033–1036 (2003).
Pasare, C. & Medzhitov, R. Toll-dependent control mechanisms of CD4 T cell activation.Immunity21, 733–741 (2004).
Meylan, E., Tschopp, J. & Karin, M. Intracellular pattern recognition receptors in the host response.Nature442, 39–44 (2006).
Fritz, J. H., Ferrero, R. L., Philpott, D. J. & Girardin, S. E. Nod-like proteins in immunity, inflammation and disease.Nature Immunol.7, 1250–1257 (2006).
Traub, S., von Aulock, S., Hartung, T. & Hermann, C. MDP and other muropeptides — direct and synergistic effects on the immune system.J. Endotoxin Res.12, 69–85 (2006).
Lemesre, J. L. et al. Protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis infection in dogs immunized with purified excreted secreted antigens ofLeishmania infantum promastigotes.Vaccine23, 2825–2840 (2005).
Kato, H. et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses.Nature441, 101–105 (2006).
Hornung, V. et al. 5′-Triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I.Science314, 994–997 (2006).
Pichlmair, A. et al. RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5′-phosphates.Science314, 997–1001 (2006).
Peiser, L., Mukhopadhyay, S. & Gordon, S. Scavenger receptors in innate immunity.Curr. Opin. Immunol.14, 123–128 (2002).
Robinson, M. et al. Myeloid C-type lectins in innate immunity.Nature Immunol.7, 1258–1265 (2006).
Bonifaz, L. et al. Efficient targeting of protein antigen to the dendritic cell receptor DEC-205 in the steady state leads to antigen presentation on major histocompatibility complex class I products and peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance.J. Exp. Med.196, 1627–1638 (2002).
't Hart, B. A. & van Kooyk, Y. Yin-Yang regulation of autoimmunity by DCs.Trends Immunol.25, 353–359 (2004).
Klesney-Tait, J., Turnbull, I. R. & Colonna, M. The TREM receptor family and signal integration.Nature Immunol.7, 1266–1273 (2006).
Fujii, S. et al. Glycolipid α-C-galactosylceramide is a distinct inducer of dendritic cell function during innate and adaptive immune responses of mice.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 11252–11257 (2006).
Moser, B. & Brandes, M. γδ T cells: an alternative type of professional APC.Trends Immunol.27, 112–118 (2006).
Dougan, G. & Hormaeche, C. How bacteria and their products provide clues to vaccine and adjuvant development.Vaccine24, S13–S19 (2006).
Kaisho, T. & Akira, S. Toll-like receptors as adjuvant receptors.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1589, 1–13 (2002).
Kandimalla, E. R., Yu, D. & Agrawal, S. Towards optimal design of second-generation immunomodulatory oligonucleotides.Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther.4, 122–129 (2002).
McCluskie, M. J & Krieg, A. M. Enhancement of infectious disease vaccines through TLR9-dependent recognition of CpG DNA.Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.311, 155–178 (2006).
Hawkins, L. D. et al. A novel class of endotoxin receptor agonists with simplified structure, toll-like receptor 4-dependent immunostimulatory action, and adjuvant activity.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.300, 655–661 (2002).This reference shows how new synthetic TLR4 agonists can be designed, characterized and evaluatedin vitro andin vivo using tools such as transformed cell lines expressing TLR4 and MD2, and NF-κB reporter genes.
Persing, D. H. et al. Taking toll: lipid A mimetics as adjuvants and immunomodulators.Trends Microbiol.10, S32–S37 (2002).
Johnston, D., Zaidi, B. & Bystryn, J. C. TLR7 imidazoquinoline ligand 3M-019 is a potent adjuvant for pure protein prototype vaccines.Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 01 Dec 2006 (doi:10.1007/500262-006-0262-3).
Trinchieri, G. & Sher, A. Cooperation of Toll-like receptor signals in innate immune defence.Nature Rev. Immunol.7, 179–190 (2007).This reference presents a comprehensive review on the positive and negative interactions existing between TLRs and other PRRs.
Sato, S. et al. Synergy and cross-tolerance between Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2- and TLR4-mediated signaling pathways.J. Immunol.165, 7096–7101 (2000).
Roelofs, M. F. et al. The expression of Toll-like receptors 3 and 7 in rheumatoid arthritis synovium is increased and costimulation of Toll-like receptors3, 4, and 7/8 results in synergistic cytokine production by dendritic cells.Arthritis Rheum.52, 2313–2322 (2005).
Napolitani, G., Rinaldi, A., Bertoni, F., Sallusto, F. & Lanzavecchia, A. Selected Toll-like receptor agonist combinations synergistically trigger a T helper type 1-polarizing program in dendritic cells.Nature Immunol.6, 769–776 (2005).
Bagchi, A. et al. MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways in synergy, priming, and tolerance between TLR agonists.J. Immunol.178, 1164–1171 (2007).References 59 and 60 show that stimulation of TLRs coupled to complementary pathways is synergistic, and that some combinations can be preferred to others, depending on which type of immune response is to be induced.
Querec, T. et al. Yellow fever vaccine YF-17D activates multiple dendritic cell subsets via TLR2, 7, 8, and 9 to stimulate polyvalent immunity.J. Exp. Med.203, 413–424 (2006).
Takada, H. & Uehara, A. Enhancement of TLR-mediated innate immune responses by peptidoglycans through NOD signaling.Curr. Pharm. Des.12, 4163–4172 (2006).
Fritz, J. H. et al. Synergistic stimulation of human monocytes and dendritic cells by Toll-like receptor 4 and NOD1- and NOD2-activating agonists.Eur. J. Immunol.35, 2459–2470 (2005).
van Heel, D. A. et al. Synergy between TLR9 and NOD2 innate immune responses is lost in genetic Crohn's disease.Gut54, 1553–1557 (2005).
Watanabe, T., Kitani, A. & Strober, W. NOD2 regulation of Toll-like receptor responses and the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease.Gut54, 1515–1518 (2005).
HogenEsch, H. Mechanisms of stimulation of the immune response by aluminum adjuvants.Vaccine20 (Suppl. 3), 34–39 (2002).
Romero Méndez, I. Z., Shi, Y., HogenEsch, H. & Hem, S. L. Potentiation of the immune response to non-adsorbed antigens by aluminum-containing adjuvants.Vaccine25, 825–833 (2007).
Rimaniol, A. C. et al. Aluminium hydroxide adjuvant induces macrophage differentiation towards a specialized antigen-presenting type.Vaccine22, 3127–3135 (2004).
Jordan, M. B., Mills, D. M., Kappler, J., Marrack, P. & Cambier, J. C. Promotion of B cell immune responses via an alum-induced myeloid cell population.Science304, 1808–1810 (2004).
Aucouturier, J., Dupuis, L., Deville, S., Ascarateil, S. & Ganne, V. Montanide ISA 720 and 51: a new generation of water in oil emulsions as adjuvants for human vaccines.Expert Rev. Vaccines.1, 111–118 (2002).
Podda, A. & Del Giudice, G. MF59-adjuvanted vaccines: increased immunogenicity with an optimal safety profile.Expert Rev. Vaccines2, 197–203 (2003).References 70 and 71 review the different steps followed to develop two prototype W/O and O/W emulsions from the bench to human use, taking safety and immunogenicity into consideration.
Kim, Y. J. et al. Synthetic studies of complex immunostimulants fromQuillaja saponaria: synthesis of the potent clinical immunoadjuvant QS-21Aapi.J. Am. Chem. Soc.128, 11906–11915 (2006).
Marciani, D. J. et al. Fractionation, structural studies, and immunological characterization of the semi-syntheticQuillaja saponins derivative GPI-0100.Vaccine21, 3961–3971 (2003).This reference illustrates how 'classical' adjuvants such as saponins can be further optimized and characterized with respect to safety and immunogenicity, using semi-synthesis and fractionation.
Sanders, M. T., Brown, L. E., Deliyannis, G. & Pearse, M. J. ISCOM-based vaccines: the second decade.Immunol. Cell Biol.83, 119–128 (2005).
Ennis, F. A. et al. Augmentation of human influenza A virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory by influenza vaccine and adjuvanted carriers (ISCOMS).Virology259, 256–261 (1999).
Leserman, L. Liposomes as protein carriers in immunology.J. Liposome Res.14, 175–189 (2004).
O'Hagan, D. T. & Singh, M. Microparticles as vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems.Expert Rev. Vaccines2, 269–283 (2003).
Singh, M. et al. Polylactide-co-glycolide microparticles with surface adsorbed antigens as vaccine delivery systems.Curr. Drug Deliv.3, 115–120 (2006).
Guy, B. et al. Design, characterization and preclinical efficacy of a cationic lipid adjuvant for influenza split vaccine.Vaccine19, 1794–1805 (2001).
Reddy, S. T., Swartz, M. A. & Hubbell, J. A. Targeting dendritic cells with biomaterials: developing the next generation of vaccines.Trends Immunol.27, 573–579 (2006).
Boscardin, S. B. et al. Antigen targeting to dendritic cells elicits long-lived T cell help for antibody responses.J. Exp. Med.203, 599–606 (2006).This reference shows that one needs to co-deliver a maturation stimulus when targeting receptors such as CLRs on APCs in contrast to previous studies showing that targeting these receptors without stimulus can induce tolerance.
Fifis, T. et al. Size-dependent immunogenicity: therapeutic and protective properties of nano-vaccines against tumors.J. Immunol.173, 3148–3154 (2004).
Moron, G., Dadaglio, G. & Leclerc, C. New tools for antigen delivery to the MHC class I pathway.Trends Immunol.25, 92–97 (2004).
Yamasaki, Y., Ikenaga, T., Otsuki, T., Nishikawa, M. & Takakura, Y. Induction of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by immunization with negatively charged soluble antigen through scavenger receptor-mediated delivery.Vaccine25, 85–91 (2007).
Schellack, C. et al. IC31, a novel adjuvant signaling via TLR9, induces potent cellular and humoral immune responses.Vaccine24, 5461–5472 (2006).
Taneichi, M. et al. Antigen chemically coupled to the surface of liposomes are cross-presented to CD8+ T cells and induce potent antitumor immunity.J. Immunol.177, 2324–2330 (2006).
Moingeon, P., Haensler, J. & Lindberg, A. Towards the rational design of Th1 adjuvants.Vaccine19, 4363–4372 (2001).
Erdile, L. F. & Guy, B. OspA lipoprotein ofBorrelia burgdorferi is a mucosal immunogen and adjuvant.Vaccine15, 988–996 (1997).
Yoder, A. et al. Tripalmitoyl-S-glyceryl-cysteine-dependent OspA vaccination of toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice results in effective protection fromBorrelia burgdorferi challenge.Infect. Immun.71, 3894–3900 (2003).
Wilson, N. S. et al. Systemic activation of dendritic cells by Toll-like receptor ligands or malaria infection impairs cross-presentation and antiviral immunity.Nature Immunol.7, 165–172 (2006).
Sanchez, V. et al. Formulation of single or multipleH. pylori antigens with DC Chol adjuvant induce protection by systemic route in mice. Optimal prophylactic combinations are different from therapeutic ones.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.30, 157–165 (2001).
Yewdell, J. W. Confronting complexity: real-world immunodominance in antiviral CD8+ T cell responses.Immunity25, 533–543 (2006).
Pattnaik, P. et al. Immunogenicity of a recombinant malaria vaccine based on receptor binding domain ofPlasmodium falciparum EBA-175.Vaccine25, 806–813 (2007).
Joseph, A. et al. Liposomal immunostimulatory DNA sequence (ISS-ODN): an efficient parenteral and mucosal adjuvant for influenza and hepatitis B vaccines.Vaccine20, 3342–3354 (2002).
Aurelian, L. Herpes simplex virus type 2 vaccines: new ground for optimism?Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.11, 437–445 (2004).
Drachenberg, K. J., Wheeler, A. W., Stuebner, P. & Horak, F. A well-tolerated grass pollen-specific allergy vaccine containing a novel adjuvant, monophosphoryl lipid A, reduces allergic symptoms after only four preseasonal injections.Allergy56, 498–505 (2001).
Creticos, P. S. et al. Immunotherapy with a ragweed-Toll-like receptor 9 agonist vaccine for allergic rhinitis.N. Engl. J. Med.355, 1445–1455 (2006).
Krieg, A. M. Therapeutic potential of Toll-like receptor 9 activation.Nature Rev. Drug Discov.5, 471–484 (2006).
Kretschmer, K. et al. Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen.Nature Immunol.6, 1219–1227 (2005).
Barber, D. L. et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection.Nature439, 682–687 (2006).
Trautmann, L. et al. Upregulation of PD-1 expression on HIV-specific CD8+ T cells leads to reversible immune dysfunction.Nature Med.12, 1198–1202 (2006).
Freeman, G. J., Wherry, E. J., Ahmed, R. & Sharpe, A. H. Reinvigorating exhausted HIV-specific T cells via PD-1-PD-1 ligand blockade.J. Exp. Med.203, 2223–2227 (2006).
Pol, S. & Michel, M. L. Therapeutic vaccination in chronic hepatitis B virus carriers.Expert Rev. Vaccines5, 707–716 (2006).
Freytag, L. C. & Clements, J. D. Mucosal adjuvants.Vaccine23, 1804–1813 (2005).
Jones, B., Pascopella, L. & Falkow, S. Entry of microbes into the host: using M cells to break the mucosal barrier.Curr. Opin. Immunol.7, 474–483 (1995).
Clark, M. A., Blair, H. Liang, L. et al. Targeting polymerised liposome vaccine carriers to intestinal M cells.Vaccine20, 208–217 (2001).
Lavelle, E. C. Targeted delivery of drugs to the gastrointestinal tract.Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst.18, 341–386 (2001).
Pizza, M. et al. Mucosal vaccines: non toxic derivatives of LT and CT as mucosal adjuvants.Vaccine19, 2534–2541 (2001).
Glenn, G. M. et al. Transcutaneous immunization and immunostimulant strategies: capitalizing on the immunocompetence of the skin.Expert Rev. Vaccines2, 253–267 (2003).
Weltzin, R., Guy, B., Thomas, W. D. Jr, Giannasca, P. J. & Monath, T. P. Parenteral adjuvant activities ofEscherichia coli heat-labile toxin and its B subunit for immunization of mice against gastricHelicobacter pylori infection.Infect. Immun.68, 2775–2782 (2000).
Sesardic, D. Regulatory considerations on new adjuvants and delivery systems.Vaccine24, S86–S87 (2006).
Marshak-Rothstein, A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease.Nature Rev. Immunol.6, 823–835 (2006).
Bluestone, J. A., St Clair, E. W. & Turka, L. A. CTLA4Ig: bridging the basic immunology with clinical application.Immunity24, 233–238 (2006).
Suntharalingam, G. et al. Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412.N. Engl. J. Med.355, 1018–1028 (2006).
Hanke, T. Lessons from TGN1412.Lancet368, 1569–1570 (2006).
Mestas, J. & Hughes, C. C. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology.J. Immunol.172, 2731–2738 (2004).This reference presents a useful synthesis of the similarities and differences between mouse and human immunology, which should be considered when evaluating vaccines and adjuvants in this animal model.
Nahori, M. A. et al. Differential TLR recognition of leptospiral lipid A and lipopolysaccharide in murine and human cells.J. Immunol.175, 6022–6031 (2005).
Gorden, K. K., Qiu, X. X., Binsfeld, C. C., Vasilakos, J. P. & Alkan, S. S. Cutting edge: activation of murine TLR8 by a combination of imidazoquinoline immune response modifiers and polyT oligodeoxynucleotides.J. Immunol.177, 6584–6587 (2006).
Liu, T., Matsuguchi, T., Tsuboi, N., Yajima, T. & Yoshikai, Y. Differences in expression of toll-like receptors and their reactivities in dendritic cells in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.Infect. Immun.70, 6638–6645 (2002).
Potter, C. W. & Jennings, R. Effect of priming on subsequent response to inactivated influenza vaccine.Vaccine21, 940–945 (2003).
Spisek, R. et al. Maturation of dendritic cells by bacterial immunomodulators.Vaccine22, 2761–2768 (2004).
Sanchez, V., Hessler, C., DeMonfort, A., Lang, J. & Guy, B. Comparison by flow cytometry of immune changes induced in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells upon infection with dengue 2 live-attenuated vaccine or 16681 parental strain.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.46, 113–123 (2006).
Dunzendorfer, S., Lee, H. K., Soldau, K. & Tobias, P. S. TLR4 is the signalling but not the lipopolysaccharide uptake receptor.J. Immunol.173, 1166–1170 (2004).
Burdin, N., Guy, B. & Moingeon, P. Immunological foundations to the quest for new vaccine adjuvants.BioDrugs18, 79–93 (2004).
Jacques, P. et al. The immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile of a candidate hepatitis B vaccine in an adult vaccine non-responder population.Vaccine20, 3644–3649 (2002).
Harper, D. M. et al. Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial.Lancet367, 1247–1255 (2006).
Dupont, J. et al. A controlled clinical trial comparing the safety and immunogenicity of a new adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine with a standard hepatitis B vaccine.Vaccine24, 7167–7174 (2006).
Cooper, C. L. et al. CPG 7909, an immunostimulatory TLR9 agonist oligodeoxynucleotide, as adjuvant to Engerix-B HBV vaccine in healthy adults: a double-blind phase I/II study.J. Clin. Immunol.24, 693–701 (2004).
Vajdy, M. et al. Hepatitis C virus polyprotein vaccine formulations capable of inducing broad antibody and cellular immune responses.J. Gen. Virol.87, 2253–2262 (2006).
Wille-Reece, U. et al. Toll-like receptor agonists influence the magnitude and quality of memory T cell responses after prime-boost immunization in nonhuman primates.J. Exp. Med.203, 1249–1258 (2006).
Kumar, S. et al. CpG oligodeoxynucleotide and Montanide ISA 51 adjuvant combination enhanced the protective efficacy of a subunit malaria vaccine.Infect. Immun.72, 949–957 (2004).
Garcon, N., Heppner, D. G. & Cohen, J. Development of RTS, S/AS02: a purified subunit-based malaria vaccine candidate formulated with a novel adjuvant.Expert Rev. Vaccines2, 231–238 (2003).This reference presents an example of the co-development of a vaccine antigen with a complex adjuvant formulation, composed of an oil-in-water emulsion containing MPL and QS21. It presents the different steps followed to select the best formulation, from preclinical evaluation to application in clinical trials
Alonso, P. L. et al. Duration of protection with RTS, S/AS02A malaria vaccine in prevention ofPlasmodium falciparum disease in Mozambican children: single-blind extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.Lancet366, 2012–2018 (2005).
Stewart, V. A. et al. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) in a multi-formulation comparator trial of the anti-falciparum malaria vaccine candidate RTS, S in rhesus macaques.Vaccine24, 6493–6502 (2006).
Zaks, K. et al. Efficient immunization and cross-priming by vaccine adjuvants containing TLR3 or TLR9 agonists complexed to cationic liposomes.J. Immunol.176, 7335–7345 (2006).
Kazzaz, J. et al. Encapsulation of the immune potentiators MPL and RC529 in PLG microparticles enhances their potency.J. Control Release110, 566–573 (2005).
Xie, H. et al. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides adsorbed onto polylactide-co-glycolide microparticles improve the immunogenicity and protective activity of the licensed anthrax vaccine.Infect. Immun.73, 828–833 (2005).
Acknowledgements
I wish to acknowledge J. Almond, N. Burdin, P. Chaux, F. Dalençon, J. Haensler and E. Trannoy for their support, discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. They synergized efficiently to help me formulate my work and target it in the right direction. Innate immunity and adjuvants are large fields and I apologize for not having mentioned numerous important works because of space constraints.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Research Department, sanofi pasteur, Campus Merieux, Marcy l'Etoile, 69280, France
Bruno Guy
- Bruno Guy
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- T helper cell
(TH cell). A T cell that has cell-surface antigen receptors that bind fragments of antigens displayed by MHC class II molecules, which are expressed at the surface of antigen-presenting cells. Activated TH cells express cytokines and membrane-associated co-stimulatory molecules that help other immune cells carry out their specific functions. TH cells can be divided into subsets according to their cytokine-secretion profiles.
- Dendritic cell
(DC). 'Professional' antigen-presenting cells that are found in the T-cell areas of lymphoid tissues and as minor cellular components in most tissues. They have a branched or dendritic morphology and are the most potent stimulators of naive T-cell responses.
- CD4+ T cell
A subpopulation of T cells that express the CD4 receptor. These cells aid in immune responses and are therefore referred to as T helper cells.
- CD8+ T cell
A subpopulation of T cells that express the CD8 receptor. CD8+ T cells recognize antigens that are presented on the surface of host cells by MHC class I molecules, leading to their destruction, and are therefore also known as cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
- Regulatory T (TReg) cell
A population of CD4+ T cells that naturally express high levels of CD25 (the interleukin-2 receptor a-chain) and the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (Foxp3), and that have suppressive regulatory activity towards effector T cells and other immune cells.
- TH1 cell
(T helper 1 cell). A type of activated TH cell that promotes responses associated with the production of a particular set of cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-2, interferon (IFN)-γ and tumour-necrosis factor (TNF), the main function of which is to stimulate phagocytosis-mediated defences against intracellular pathogens.
- TH2 cell
(T helper 2 cell). A type of activated TH cell that participates in phagocytosis-independent responses and downregulates pro-inflammatory responses that are induced by TH1 cells. TH2 cells secrete interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-6.
- Pattern-recognition receptor
(PRR). A host receptor (such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) or NOD-like receptors (NLRs)) that can sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns and initiate signalling cascades that lead to an innate immune response. These can be membrane bound (such as TLRs) or soluble cytoplasmic receptors (such as NLRs).
- Pathogen-associated molecular pattern
(PAMP). A molecular pattern that is found in microorganisms but not mammalian cells. Examples include bacterial lipopolysaccharides, hypomethylated DNA, flagellin and double-stranded RNA.
- Tolerance
Immunological tolerance (central or peripheral) results from different mechanisms preventing the immune system mounting responses against (self) antigens. Peripheral tolerance occurs when mature lymphocytes encounter antigens and undergo anergy, deletion or suppression. In particular, T-cell anergy is defined by defective proliferation by previously primed T cells following restimulation, reflecting a selective defect in the activation of some TCR-induced signalling pathways.
- Natural killer T cells
(NKT cells). A subpopulation of T cells that expresses both NK-cell and T-cell markers.
- γδ T cells
A minor population of T cells that express the γδ T-cell receptor (TCR), and that are more abundant in epithelial-rich tissues such as the skin, gut and reproductive tract. Like NKT cells, γδ T cells can be cytolytic and produce high levels of cytokines and chemokines.
- M cells
(Microfold cells). Specialized epithelial cells that deliver antigens by transepithelial vesicular transport from the gut lumen directly to intraepithelial lymphocytes and to subepithelial lymphoid tissues.
- Langerhans cell
Dendritic, antigen-presenting cells that contain characteristic racquet-shaped granules, known as Birbeck granules, and which express the CD1a antigen. Principally found in the stratified squamous epithelium.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guy, B. The perfect mix: recent progress in adjuvant research.Nat Rev Microbiol5, 396–397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1681
Issue Date: