Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Reviews Immunology
  • Review Article
  • Published:

War and peace at mucosal surfaces

Nature Reviews Immunologyvolume 4pages953–964 (2004)Cite this article

Key Points

  • The intestine and its commensal microflora have established a homeostatic process of unresponsiveness that prevents intestinal inflammation and its deleterious clinical effects.

  • This process of microbial tolerance is an enigma that is just starting to be deciphered in molecular terms, with intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) having an important role at the interface between microorganisms and the mucosa.

  • 'Tolerance' to bacteria is a consequence of a complex array of factors, which include the following: the lack of pathogenic factors in commensal microorganisms, which hampers their access to, and engagement of, the epithelial lining; a degree of 'blindness' of the intestinal epithelium to pathogen-associated molecular patterns, particularly resulting from the lack of expression of some important Toll-like receptors by IECs; and molecular crosstalk that actively maintains a situation of innate and adaptive immune tolerance between bacteria and host tissues.

  • This delicate balance is disrupted by invasive microorganisms that elicit a strong innate immune response, which thereby results in an inflammatory reaction, leading to disruption and destruction of the intestinal barrier.

  • The long co-evolution of bacteria (both commensal and pathogenic microorganisms) with their mammalian hosts, and the resultant reciprocal selective pressure, is likely to provide us with essential tools and concepts for deciphering the complex mechanisms that maintain the fragile balance between homeostasis and intestinal inflammation.

Abstract

That we live with numerous bacteria in our gut without any adverse effects is a remarkable feat by the body's immune system, particularly considering the wealth of sensing and effector systems that are available to trigger inflammatory or innate immune responses to microbial intrusion. So, a fine line seems to exist between the homeostatic balance maintained in the presence of commensal gut flora and the necessarily destructive response to bacterial pathogens that invade the gut mucosa. This review discusses the mechanisms for establishing and controlling the 'dialogue' between unresponsiveness and initiation of active immune defences in the gut.Si vis pacem, para bellum. (If you wish for peace, prepare for war.)

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

¥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Expression of TLRs and NOD2 by luminal surface versus crypt epithelial cells in the small intestine.
Figure 2: Bacteria trigger a pro-inflammatory programme in intestinal epithelial cells, using various strategies.
Figure 3: Steps ofYersinia spp. translocation of the intestinal epithelium and development of the infectious process leading to mesenteric lymphadenitis.
Figure 4: Steps ofShigella spp. translocation of the intestinal epithelium and development of the infectious process leading to bacillary dysentery.
Figure 5: Strategies that allowSalmonella spp. to cross the intestinal barrier, survive in intestinal tissues and spread systemically.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rescigno, M., Rotta, G., Valzasina, B. & Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P. Dendritic cells shuttle microbes across gut epithelial monolayers.Immunobiology204, 572–581 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kagnoff, M. F. & Eckmann, L. Epithelial cells as sensors for microbial infection.J. Clin. Invest.100, 6–10 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Madara, J. L., Nash, S., Moore, R. & Atisook, K. Structure and function of the intestinal epithelial barrier in health and disease.Monogr. Pathol.31, 306–324 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Staehelin, L. A., Mukherjee, T. M. & Williams, A. W. Freezeetch appearance of the tight junctions in the epithelium of large and small intestine of mice.Protoplasma67, 165–184 (1969).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, J. R. inMicrobial Pathogenesis of the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 1–22 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Turner, J. R. et al. Physiological regulation of epithelial junctions is associated with myosin light-chain phosphorylation.Am. J. Physiol.273, C1378–C1385 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furuse, M., Sasaki, H., Fujimoto, K. & Tsukita, S. A single gene product, claudin-1 or -2, reconstitutes tight junction strands and recruits occludin in fibroblasts.J. Cell Biol.143, 391–401 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Furuse, M., Fujimoto, K., Sato, N., Hirase, T. & Tsukita, S. Overexpression of occludin, a tight junction-associated integral membrane protein, induces the formation of intracellular multilamellar bodies bearing tight junction-like structures.J. Cell Sci.109, 429–435 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Specian, R. D. & Neutra, M. R. Mechanisms of rapid mucus secretion in goblet cells stimulated by acetylcholine.J. Cell Biol.85, 626–640 (1980).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kindon, H., Pothoulakis, C., Thim, L., Lynch-Devaney, K. & Podolsky, D. K. Trefoil peptide protection of intestinal epithelial barrier function: cooperative interaction with mucin glycoprotein.Gastroenterology109, 516–523 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wadolkowsky, E. A., Laux, D. C. & Cohen, P. S. Colonization of the streptomycin-treated mouse large intestine by a human fecalEscherichia coli strain: role of growth in mucus.Infect. Immun.56, 1030–1035 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider, D. R. & Parker, C. D. Purification and characterization of the mucinase ofVibrio cholerae.J. Infect. Dis.145, 474–482 (1982).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallance, B. A., Chan, C. & Finlay, B. B. inMicrobial Pathogenesis and the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 423–437 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hecht, G. A. inMicrobial Pathogenesis and the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 285–300 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. White, S. H., Wimley, W. C. & Selsted, M. E. Structure, function and membrane integration of defensins.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.5, 521–527 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehrer, R. I. & Ganz, T. Defensins of vertebrate animals.Curr. Opin. Immunol.14, 96–102 (2002).An excellent review of defensins.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouelette, A. J. & Bevins, C. L. Paneth cell defensins and innate immunity of the small bowel.Inflamm. Bowel Dis.7, 43–50 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O'Neil, D. A. et al. Expression and regulation of the human β-defensins hBD1 and hBD2 in intestinal epithelium.J. Immunol.163, 6718–6724 (1999).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehrer, R. I. & Ganz, T. Cathelicidins: a family of endogenous antimicrobial peptides.Curr. Opin. Hematol.9, 18–22 (2002).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCormick, B. A., Parkos, C. A., Colgan, S. P., Carnes, D. K. & Madara, J. L. Apical secretion of a pathogen-elicited epithelial chemoattractant (PEEC) activity in response to surface colonization of intestinal epithelia bySalmonella typhimurium.J. Immunol.160, 455–456 (1998).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tato, C. M. & Hunter, C. A. Host-pathogen interactions: subversion and utilization of the NF-κB pathway during infection.Infect. Immun.70, 3311–3317 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Neutra, M. R., Sansonetti, P. J. & Kraehenbuhl, J. P. inMicrobial Pathogenesis and the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 23–42 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Owen, R. Uptake and transport of intestinal macromolecules and microorganisms by M cells in Peyer's patches — a personal and historical perspective.Semin. Immunol.11, 1–7 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujimura, Y., Hosobe, M. & Kihara, T. Ultrastructural study of M cells from colonic lymphoid nodules obtained by colonoscopic biopsy.Dig. Dis. Sci.37, 1089–1098 (1992).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. MacPherson, A. J. & Uhr, T. Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria.Science303, 1662–1665 (2004).A research article about T-cell independent generation of IgA specificity.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lode, M. J. et al. Bacterial flagellin is a dominant antigen in Crohn disease.J. Clin. Invest.113, 1296–1306 (2004).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Macpherson, A. J. & Harris, N. L. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system.Nature Rev. Immunol.4, 478–485 (2004).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rescigno, M. et al. Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria.Nature Immunol.2, 361–367 (2001).Unravels an original pathway of crossing the epithelium.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pickard, K. M., Bremner, A. R., Gordon, J. N. & MacDonald, T. T. Immune responses.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol.18, 271–285 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sansonetti, P. J. & Phalipon, A. M cells as ports of entry for enteroinvasive pathogens: mechanisms of interaction, consequences for the disease process.Semin. Immunol.11, 193–203 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Didierlaurent, A., Sirard, J. -C., Kraehenbuhl, J. -P. & Neutra, M. R. How the gut senses its content.Cell. Microbiol.4, 61–72 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ming, S. & Goldman, H.Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C. A. Decoding the patterns of self and non-self by the innate immune system.Science296, 298–300 (2002).An outstanding introduction to the concept of innate immunity.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aderem, A. & Ulevitch, R. J. Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response.Nature406, 782–787 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S. & Medzhitov, R. Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis.Cell118, 229–241 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwandner, R., Dziarski, R., Wesche, H., Rothe, M. & Kirschning, C. J. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2.J. Biol. Chem.274, 17406–17409 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Poltorak, A. et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations inTlr4 gene.Science282, 2085–2088 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gewirtz, A. T., Navas, T. A., Lyons, S., Godowski, P. J. & Madara, J. L. Bacterial flagellin activates baso-laterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression.J. Immunol.167, 1882–1885 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bauer, S. et al. Human TLR9 confers responsiveness to bacterial DNA via species-specific CpG motif recognition.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 9237–9242 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Girardin, S. et al. Nod1 detects a unique muropeptide from Gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan.Science300, 1584–1587 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chamaillard, M. et al. An essential role for Nod1 in host recognition of bacterial peptidoglycan containing diaminopimelic acid.Nature Immunol.4, 702–707 (2003).References 40 and 41 identify NOD1 as an intracellular sensor for bacteria that allows discrimination between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria on the basis of differences in their PGN.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Girardin, S. et al. Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection.J. Biol. Chem.278, 8869–8872 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Inohara, N. et al. An induced proximity model for NF-κB activation of the Nod1/RICK and RIP signaling pathways.J. Biol. Chem.275, 27823–27831 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Girardin, S. E. et al. CARD4/Nod1 mediates NF-κB and JNK activation by invasiveShigella flexneri.EMBO Rep.2, 736–742 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hornef, M. W., Frisan, T., Vandewalle, A., Normark, S. & Richter-Dahlfors, A. Toll-like receptor 4 resides in the Golgi apparatus and colocalizes with internalized lipopolysaccharide in intestinal epithelial cells.J. Exp. Med.195, 559–570 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ortega-Cava, C. F. et al. Strategic compartmentalization of Toll-like receptor 4 in the mouse gut.J. Immunol.170, 3977–3985 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hugot J. P. et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease.Nature411, 599–603 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ogura, Y. et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease.Nature411, 603–606 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lala, S. et al. Crohn's disease and theNOD2 gene: a role for Paneth cells.Gastroenterology125, 47–57 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Berg, R. D. The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora.Trends Microbiol.4, 430–435 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hooper, L. V., Midtvedt, T. & Gordon, J. I. How host–microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine.Annu. Rev. Nutr.22, 283–307 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weintraub, A., Zahninger, U., Wollenweber, H. W., Seydel, U. & Rietschel, E. Structural characterization of the lipid A component ofBacteroides fragilis strain NCTC 9343 lipopolysaccharide.Eur. J. Biochem.183, 425–431 (1989).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Golenbock, D. T., Hampton, R. Y., Qureshi, N., Takayama, K. & Raetz, C. R. Lipid A-like molecules that antagonize the effects of endotoxins on human monocytes.J. Biol. Chem.266, 19490–19498 (1991).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, P. D. et al. Intestinal macrophages lack CD14 and CD89 and consequently are down-regulated for LPS- and IgA-mediated activities.J. Immunol.167, 2651–2656 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Abreu, M. T. et al. Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide.J. Immunol.167, 1609–1616 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Naik, S., Kelly, E. J., Meijer, L., Petterson, S. & Sanderson, I. R. Absence of Toll-like receptor-4 explains endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in human intestinal epithelium.J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.32, 449–453 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hayashi, F. et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5.Nature410, 1099–1103 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gewirtz, A. T. et al.Salmonella typhimurium translocates flagellin across intestinal epithelia, inducing a pro-inflammatory response.J. Clin. Invest.107, 99–109 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sierro, F. et al. Flagellin stimulation of intestinal epithelial cells triggers CCL20-mediated migration of dendritic cells.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 13722–13727 (2001).An important paper about transepithelial signalling by bacteria.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, S. K. et al.Helicobacter pylori flagellins have very low intrinsic activity to stimulate human gastric epithelial cells via TLR5.Microbes Infect.5, 1345–1356 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fernandez, M. I. et al. Anti-inflammatory role for intracellular dimeric immunoglobulin A by neutralization of lipopolysaccharide in epithelial cells.Immunity18, 739–749 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Odenbreit, S. et al. Translocation ofHelicobacter pylori CagA into gastric epithelial cells by type IV secretion.Science287, 1497–1500 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Janssens, S., Burns, K., Tschopp, R. & Beyaert, R. Regulation of interleukin-1 and NF-κB activation by alternative splicing of MyD88.Curr. Biol.12, 467–471 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kobayashi, K. et al. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signalling.Cell110, 191–202 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Su, C. G. et al. A novel therapy for colitis utilizing PPAR-γ ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response.J. Clin. Invest.104, 383–389 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Desreumaux, P. et al. Attenuation of colon inflammation through activators of the retinoid X receptor (RXR)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) heterodimer. A basis for new therapeutic strategies.J. Exp. Med.193, 827–838 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kelly, D. et al. Commensal anaerobic gut bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling of PPAR-γ and RelA.Nature Immunol.5, 104–112 (2004).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Neish, A. S. Prokaryotic regulation of epithelial responses by inhibition of IκB-α ubiquitination.Science289, 1560–1563 (2000).Coins the idea that non-pathogenic bacteria could mediate anti-inflammatory signals.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Jijon, H. et al. DNA from probiotic bacteria modulates murine and human epithelial and immune functions.Gastroenterology126, 1358–1373 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Duchmann, R., Schmitt, E., Knolle, P., Meyer zum Büschenfelde, K. H. & Neurath, M. Tolerance towards resident intestinal flora in mice is abrogated in experimental colitis and restored by treatment with interleukin-10 or antibodies to interleukin-12.Eur. J. Immunol.26, 934–938 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chen, Y. et al. Oral tolerance in myelin basic protein T cell receptor transgenic mice: suppression of auto-immune encephalomyelitis and dose-dependent induction of regulatory cells.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93, 388–391 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. MacDonald, T. M. Breakdown of tolerance to the intestinal bacterial flora in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Clin. Exp. Immunol.102, 445–447 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Hacker, J. inMolecular Infection Biology: Interactions Between Microorganisms and Cells (eds Hacker, J. & Heesemann, J.) 225–270 (Wiley-Liss, Heidelberg, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Cossart, P. & Sansonetti P. J. Bacterial invasion: the paradigms of enteroinvasive pathogens.Science304, 242–248 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sansonetti, P. J., Kopecko, D. J. & Formal, S. B. Involvement of a large plasmid in the invasive ability ofShigella flexneri.Infect. Immun.35, 852–860 (1982).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Isberg, R. R. Discrimination between intracellular uptake and surface adhesion of bacterial pathogens.Science252, 934–938 (1991).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Galan, J. E.Salmonella entry into mammalian cells: different yet converging signal transduction pathways?Trends Cell Biol.4, 196–199 (1994).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hueck, C. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.62, 379–433 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Baumler, A. J., Tsolis, R. M. & Heffron, F. Thelpf fimbrial operon mediates adhesion ofSalmonella typhimurium to murine Peyer's patches.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93, 279–283 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Marra, A. & Isberg, R. R. Invasin-dependent and invasin-independent pathways for translocarion ofYersinia pseudotuberculosis across the Peyer's patch intestinal epithelium.Infect. Immun.65, 3412–3421 (1997).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Sansonetti, P. J., Arondel, J., Cantey, J. R., Prévost, M. C. & Huerre, M. Infection of rabbit Peyer's patches byShigella flexneri: effect of adhesive or invasive bacterial phenotypes on follicle-associated epithelium.Infect. Immun.64, 2752–2764 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Darwin, K. H. & Miller, V. L. Molecular basis of the interaction ofSalmonella with the intestinal mucosa.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.12, 405–428 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Kelsall, B. L. & Strober, W. Distinct populations of dendritic cells are present in the subepithelial dome and T cell regions of murine Peyer's patches.J. Exp. Med.183, 237–247 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Cornelis, G. R. TheYersinia Ysc–Yop 'type III' weaponry.Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.3, 742–752 (2002).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Grassl, G. A., Bohn, E., Müller, Y., Bühler, O. T. & Autenrieth, I. B. Interaction ofYersinia enterocolitica with epithelial cells: invasin beyond invasion.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.293, 41–54 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Fernandez, M. I. & Sansonetti, P. J. inMicrobial Pathogenesis and the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 455–479 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Zychlinsky, A. et al.In vivo apoptosis inShigella flexneri infections.Infect. Immun.64, 5357–5365 (1996).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Raqib, R. et al. Apoptosis in acute shigellosis is associated with increased production of Fas/Fas ligand, perforin, caspase-1, and caspase-3, but reduced production of Bcl-2 and interleukin-2.Infect. Immun.70, 3199–3207 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Zychlinsky, A., Prevost, M. C. & Sansonetti, P. J.Shigella flexneri induces apoptosis in infected macrophages.Nature358, 167–169 (1992).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Hilby, H. et al.Shigella-induced apoptosis is dependent on caspase-1 which binds to IpaB.J. Biol. Chem.273, 32895–32900 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Perdomo, J. J., Gounon, P. & Sansonetti, P. J. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte transmigration promotes invasion of colonic epithelial monolayer byShigella flexneri.J. Clin. Invest.93, 633–643 (1994).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Perdomo, J. J. et al. Acute inflammation causes epithelial invasion and mucosal destruction in experimental shigellosis.J. Exp. Med.180, 1307–1319 (1994).First evidence that inflammation disrupts the epithelial barrier and promotes bacterial invasion.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sansonetti, P. J., Arondel, J., Cavaillon, J. M. & Huerre, M. Role of IL-1 in the pathogenesis of experimental shigellosis.J. Clin. Invest.96, 884–892 (1995).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Sansonetti, P. J. et al. Caspase-1 activation of IL-1β and IL-18 are essential forShigella flexneri induced inflammation.Immunity12, 581–590 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Way, S. S., Borczuk, A. C., Dominitz, R. & Goldberg, M. An essential role for γ interferon in innate resistance toShigella flexneri infection.Infect. Immun.66, 1342–1348 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Weinrauch, Y., Drujan, D., Shapiro, S. D., Weiss, J. & Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil elastase targets virulence factors of enterobacteria.Nature417, 91–94 (2002).Shows that neutrophil elastase is essential for the degradation of bacterial virulence factors.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Brinkmann, V. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria.Science303, 1532–1535 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sansonetti, P. J. Rupture, invasion and inflammatory destruction of the intestinal barrier byShigella, making sense of prokaryote–eukaryote cross-talk.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.25, 3–14 (2001).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ingersoll, M. A. et al. The ShiA protein encoded by theShigella flexneri SHI-2 pathogenicity island attenuates inflammation.Cell. Microbiol.5, 797–807 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Islam, D. et al. Downregulation of bactericidal peptides in enteric infections: a novel immune escape mechanism with bacterial DNA as a potential regulator.Nature Med.7, 180–185 (2001).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Monack, D. M. et al.Salmonella exploits caspase-1 to colonize Peyer's patches in a murine typhoid model.J. Exp. Med.192, 249–258 (2000).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Holden, D. W. Trafficking of theSalmonella vacuole in macrophages.Traffic3, 161–169 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hensel, M., Shea, J. E. & Holden, D. Genes encoding putative effector proteins of the type III secretion system ofSalmonella pathogenicity island 2 are required for bacterial virulence and proliferation in macrophages.Mol. Microbiol.30, 163–174 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Meresse, S., Steele-Mortimer, O., Finlay, B. B. & Gorvel, J. -P. The rab7 GTPase controls the maturation ofSalmonella typhimurium-containing vacuoles in HeLa cells.EMBO J.18, 4394–4403 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Steele-Mortimer, O., Méresse, S., Gorvel, J. -P., Toh, B. H. & Finlay, B. B. Biogenesis ofSalmonella typhimurium-containing vacuoles in epithelial cells involves interactions with the early endocytic pathway.Cell. Microbiol.1, 33–49 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Salcedo, S. P. & Holden, D. SseG, a virulence protein that targetsSalmonella to the Golgi network.EMBO J.22, 5003–5014 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Gaillard, J. -L., Berche, P., Frehel, C., Gouin, E. & Cossart, P. Entry ofListeria monocytogenes into cells is mediated by internalin, a repeat protein reminiscent of surface antigens from Gram-positive cocci.Cell65, 1127–1141 (1991).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Pron, B. et al. Comprehensive study of the intestinal stage of listeriosis in a rat ligated ileal-loop system.Infect. Immun.66, 747–755 (1998).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Lecuit, M. et al. A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier.Science292, 1722–1725 (2001).Example of a rational switch of species specificity that allows the modelling of a human disease in mice.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Tang, P., Rosenshine, I., Cossart, P. & Finlay, B. B. Listeriolysin O activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in eukaryotic cells.Infect. Immun.6, 2359–2361 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Izadpanah, A., Dwinnel, M. B., Eckmann, L., Varki, N. M. & Kagnoff, M. F. Regulated MIP-3α/CCL20 production by human intestinal epithelium: mechanisms for modulating mucosal immunity.Am. J. Physiol.280, G710–G719 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Mariathasan, S. et al. Differential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf.Nature430, 213–218 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. McCormick, B. A., Colgan, S. P., Archer, C. D., Miller, S. I. & Madara, J. L.Salmonella typhimurium attachment to human intestinal monolayers; transcellular signaling to subepithelial neutrophils.J. Cell Biol.123, 895–907 (1993).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Mrsny, R. J. et al. Identification of hepoxilin A3 in inflammatory events: a required role in neutrophil migration across intestinal epithelia.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 7421–7426 (2004).Identifies the first transepithelial chemoattractant.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. McCormick, B. A. inMicrobial Pathogenesis and the Intestinal Epithelial Cell (ed. Hecht, G. A.) 439–453 (American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington DC, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Takeuchi, A., Spring, H., Labrec, E. H. & Formal, S. B. Experimental bacillary dysentery: an electron microscopic study of the response of intestinal mucosa to bacterial invasion.Am. J. Pathol.4, 1011–1044 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Singer, M. & Sansonetti, P. J. IL-8 is a key chemokine regulating neutrophil recruitment in a new mouse model ofShigella-induced colitis.J. Immunol.173, 4197–4206 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Sansonetti, P. J., Arondel, J., Huerre, M., Harada, A. & Katsushima, K. Interleukin-8 controls bacterial transepithelial translocation at the cost of epithelial destruction in experimental shigellosis.Infect Immun.67, 1471–1480 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Vazquez-Torres, A. et al. Extraintestinal dissemination ofSalmonella by CD18-expressing phagocytes.Nature401, 804–808 (1999).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Sundquist, M., Rydstrom, A. & Wick, M. J. Immunity toSalmonella from a dendritic point of view.Cell. Microbiol.6, 1–11 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Girardin, S. E., Hugot, J. -P. & Sansonetti, P. J. Lessons from Nod2 studies: towards a link between Crohn's disease and bacterial sensing.Trends Immunol.24, 652–658 (2003).

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank D. Philpott and A. Phalipon for careful reading of this manuscript and for relevant comments. I also express my gratitude to all (present and past) members of Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France). P.J.S. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute scholar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, U389 INSERM and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75724 cedex 15, France

    Philippe J. Sansonetti

Authors
  1. Philippe J. Sansonetti

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Entrez Gene

BD1

CXCL8

IκBα

IL-1β

LL37

NOD1

NOD2

PPAR-γ

TLR4

Glossary

MICROVILLI

Multiple extensions of the apical pole of intestinal epithelial cells that are caused by membranous evaginations around actin bundles. Together, these extensions form the brush border, which physically protects the apical pole, particularly against pathogens.

BRUSH BORDER

Formed by the microvilli. It provides a large increase of the apical surface, thereby increasing the capacity of the epithelial surface for absorbing nutrients and exchanging water and electrolytes.

PERISTALSIS

An activity of the intestinal muscular layer that leads to unilateral movement, promoting the movement of the intestinal content from proximal to distal zones.

PATHOGEN-ASSOCIATED MOLECULAR PATTERNS

(PAMPs). Molecular motifs that are characteristic of prokaryotes and are thereby recognized by the mammalian innate immune system.

PATTERN-RECOGNITION RECEPTORS

(PRRs). Host receptors (such as Toll-like receptors) that can sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns and initiate signalling cascades (involving the activation of nuclear factor-κB) that lead to an innate immune response.

TYPE IV SECRETORY SYSTEM

A type of molecular syringe that Gram-negative bacteria have. It enables these bacteria to deliver DNA (by species such asAgrobacterium) and protein effectors (by species such asHelicobacter pylori) into eukaryotic cells.

TYPE III SECRETORY SYSTEM

(TTSS). A molecular syringe that is prevalent in pathogenic and symbiotic Gram-negative bacteria. TTSSs can deliver effector molecules into eukaryotic target cells.

Rights and permissions

This article is cited by

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp