- Protocol
- Published:
Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR)
- Hélène Hagège1,2,
- Petra Klous3,
- Caroline Braem1,2,
- Erik Splinter3,
- Job Dekker4,
- Guy Cathala1,2,
- Wouter de Laat3 &
- …
- Thierry Forné1,2
Nature Protocolsvolume 2, pages1722–1733 (2007)Cite this article
51kAccesses
15Altmetric
Abstract
Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology is a pioneering methodology that allowsin vivo genomic organization to be explored at a scale encompassing a few tens to a few hundred kilobase-pairs. Understanding the folding of the genome at this scale is particularly important in mammals where dispersed regulatory elements, like enhancers or insulators, are involved in gene regulation. 3C technology involves formaldehyde fixation of cells, followed by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis of the frequency with which pairs of selected DNA fragments are crosslinked in the population of cells. Accurate measurements of crosslinking frequencies require the best quantification techniques. We recently adapted the real-time TaqMan PCR technology to the analysis of 3C assays, resulting in a method that more accurately determines crosslinking frequencies than current semiquantitative 3C strategies that rely on measuring the intensity of ethidium bromide-stained PCR products separated by gel electrophoresis. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for this method, which we have named 3C-qPCR. Once preliminary controls and optimizations have been performed, the whole procedure (3C assays and quantitative analyses) can be completed in 7–9 days.
This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution
Access options
Subscription info for Japanese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carter, D., Chakalova, L., Osborne, C.S., Dai, Y.F. & Fraser, P. Long-range chromatin regulatory interactionsin vivo.Nat. Genet.32, 623–626 (2002).
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation.Science295, 1306–1311 (2002).
Dekker, J. A closer look at long-range chromosomal interactions.Trends Biochem. Sci.28, 277–280 (2003).
Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. 3C technology: analyzing the spatial organization of genomic lociin vivo.Methods Enzymol.375, 493–507 (2004).
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus.Mol. Cell10, 1453–1465 (2002).
Dostie, J. & Dekker, J. Mapping networks of physical interactions between genomic elements using 5C technology.Nat. Protoc.2, 988–1002 (2007).
Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements.Genome Res.16, 1299–1309 (2006).
Lomvardas, S. et al. Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice.Cell126, 403–413 (2006).
Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C).Nat. Genet.38, 1348–1354 (2006).
Wurtele, H. & Chartrand, P. Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended Chromosome Conformation Capture methodology.Chromosome Res.14, 477–495 (2006).
Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions.Nat. Genet.38, 1341–1347 (2006).
Heid, C.A., Stevens, J., Livak, K.J. & Williams, P.M. Real time quantitative PCR.Genome Res.6, 986–994 (1996).
Livak, K.J., Flood, S.J., Marmaro, J., Giusti, W. & Deetz, K. Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridization.PCR Methods Appl.4, 357–362 (1995).
Lutfalla, G. & Uze, G. Performing quantitative reverse-transcribed polymerase chain reaction experiments.Methods Enzymol.410, 386–400 (2006).
Vernimmen, D., De Gobbi, M., Sloane-Stanley, J.A., Wood, W.G. & Higgs, D.R. Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression.EMBO J.26, 2041–2051 (2007).
Splinter, E. et al. CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modification in the beta-globin locus.Genes Dev.20, 2349–2354 (2006).
Holland, P.M., Abramson, R.D., Watson, R. & Gelfand, D.H. Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′— —3′ exonuclease activity ofThermus aquaticus DNA polymerase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88, 7276–7280 (1991).
Dekker, J. The three “C”s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls.Nat. Methods3, 17–21 (2006).
Palstra, R.J. et al. The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation.Nat. Genet.35, 190–194 (2003).
Weber, M. et al. A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for quantification of allele ratios and correction of amplification bias.Anal. Biochem.320, 252–258 (2003).
Kurukuti, S. et al. CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103, 10684–10689 (2006).
Murrell, A., Heeson, S. & Reik, W. Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops.Nat. Genet.36, 889–893 (2004).
Milligan, L. et al. H19 gene expression is up-regulated exclusively by stabilization of the RNA during muscle cell differentiation.Oncogene19, 5810–5816 (2000).
Leighton, P.A., Saam, J.R., Ingram, R.S., Stewart, C.L. & Tilghman, S.M. An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression.Genes Dev.9, 2079–2089 (1995).
Acknowledgements
We thank Robert Feil and Franck Court for discussion and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC contract no. 3279), the “GIS Longévité” (contract no. GISLO401), the “Fond National de la Science” (ACI jeune chercheur) given to T. Forné and by funds from the “Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique” (CNRS). C.B. was supported by an ARC fellowship (JR/MLD/MDV—P05/2 and P06/2). W.L. was supported by grants from the Dutch Scientific Organization (NWO) (016-006-026) and (912-04-082). J.D. was supported by a grant from the NIH (HG003143).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
UMR5535 CNRS-UMII; IFR122; Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier; IGMM,
Hélène Hagège, Caroline Braem, Guy Cathala & Thierry Forné
IFR122, 1919, Route de Mende, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34293, France
Hélène Hagège, Caroline Braem, Guy Cathala & Thierry Forné
Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands
Petra Klous, Erik Splinter & Wouter de Laat
Program in Gene Function and Expression and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01605-0103, Massachusetts, USA
Job Dekker
- Hélène Hagège
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Petra Klous
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Caroline Braem
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Erik Splinter
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Job Dekker
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Guy Cathala
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Wouter de Laat
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Thierry Forné
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding authors
Correspondence toWouter de Laat orThierry Forné.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagège, H., Klous, P., Braem, C.et al. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR).Nat Protoc2, 1722–1733 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.243
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
Prioritization of risk genes in colorectal cancer by integrative analysis of multi-omics data and gene networks
- Ming Zhang
- Xiaoyang Wang
- Xiaoping Miao
Science China Life Sciences (2024)
A chromatin-regulated biphasic circuit coordinates IL-1β-mediated inflammation
- Ezio T. Fok
- Simone J. C. F. M. Moorlag
- Musa M. Mhlanga
Nature Genetics (2024)
GATA2 co-opts TGFβ1/SMAD4 oncogenic signaling and inherited variants at 6q22 to modulate prostate cancer progression
- Xiayun Yang
- Qin Zhang
- Gong-Hong Wei
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2023)
Epigenetic reprogramming-induced guanidinoacetic acid synthesis promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis and transcription-activating histone modifications
- Jinshou Yang
- Bo Ren
- Yupei Zhao
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2023)
Lack of GPR180 ameliorates hepatic lipid depot via downregulation of mTORC1 signaling
- Ken Yoshida
- Kazuha Yokota
- Sadahiko Iwamoto
Scientific Reports (2023)