- News
- Published:
US review rekindles cold fusion debate
Nature (2004)Cite this article
793Accesses
3Citations
3Altmetric
Energy panel split over whether experiments produced power.
This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution
Access options
Subscription info for Japanese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
￥ 4,980
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
- Geoff Brumfiel
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
cold fusion researcher at George Washington University in Washington DCProfessor of physics at the University of Maryland, Baltimore
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brumfiel, G. US review rekindles cold fusion debate.Nature (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/news041129-11
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion
- Curtis P. Berlinguette
- Yet-Ming Chiang
- Matthew D. Trevithick
Nature (2019)
Evidence for bubble fusion called into question
- Eugenie Samuel Reich
Nature (2006)
Physicists look to crystal device for future of fusion
- Mark Peplow
Nature (2005)
