Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Letter
  • Published:

The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China

Naturevolume 526, pages696–699 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The hominin record from southern Asia for the early Late Pleistocene epoch is scarce. Well-dated and well-preserved fossils older than∼45,000 years that can be unequivocally attributed toHomo sapiens are lacking1,2,3,4. Here we present evidence from the newly excavated Fuyan Cave in Daoxian (southern China). This site has provided 47 human teeth dated to more than 80,000 years old, and with an inferred maximum age of 120,000 years. The morphological and metric assessment of this sample supports its unequivocal assignment toH. sapiens. The Daoxian sample is more derived than any other anatomically modern humans, resembling middle-to-late Late Pleistocene specimens and even contemporary humans. Our study shows that fully modern morphologies were present in southern China 30,000–70,000 years earlier than in the Levant and Europe5,6,7. Our data fill a chronological and geographical gap that is relevant for understanding whenH. sapiens first appeared in southern Asia. The Daoxian teeth also support the hypothesis that during the same period, southern China was inhabited by more derived populations than central and northern China. This evidence is important for the study of dispersal routes of modern humans. Finally, our results are relevant to exploring the reasons for the relatively late entry ofH. sapiens into Europe. Some studies have investigated how the competition withH. sapiens may have caused Neanderthals’ extinction (see ref.8 and references therein). Notably, although fully modern humans were already present in southern China at least as early as∼80,000 years ago, there is no evidence that they entered Europe before∼45,000 years ago. This could indicate thatH. neanderthalensis was indeed an additional ecological barrier for modern humans, who could only enter Europe when the demise of Neanderthals had already started.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

￥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Geographical location and stratigraphy of the Daoxian site.
Figure 2: Daoxian human teeth (selection).
Figure 3: Metric comparison of Daoxian teeth.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dennell, R. EarlyHomo sapiens in China.Nature468, 512–513 (2010)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennell, R. inSouthern Asia, Austalia and the Search for Human Origins (eds Dennell, R. & Porr, M. ) 33–50 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storm, P. et al. U-series and radiocarbon analyses of human and faunal remains from Wajak, Indonesia.J. Hum. Evol.64, 356–365 (2013)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, G. et al. The ‘human revolution’ in lowland tropical Southeast Asia: the antiquity and behavior of anatomically modern humans at Niah Cave (Sarawak, Borneo).J. Hum. Evol.52, 243–261 (2007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hershkovitz, I. et al. Levantine cranium from Manot Cave (Israel) foreshadows the first European modern humans.Nature520, 216–219 (2015)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grine, F. E. et al. Late Pleistocene human skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and modern human origins.Science315, 226–229 (2007)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benazzi, S. et al. The makers of the Protoaurignacian and implications for Neandertal extinction.Science348, 793–796 (2015)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Villa, P. & Roebroeks, W. Neandertal demise: an archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex.PLoS ONE9, e96424 (2014)

    ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, H. et al. Improvements in230Th dating,230Th and234U half-life values, and U–Th isotopic measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectometry.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.371–372, 82–91 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xing, S., Martinón-Torres, M., Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Wu, X. & Liu, W. Hominin teeth from the early Late Pleistocene site of Xujiayao, Northern China.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.156, 224–240 (2015)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey, S. E. A morphometric analysis of maxillary molar crowns of Middle-Late Pleistocene hominins.J. Hum. Evol.47, 183–198 (2004)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xing, S. et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Longtan Cave, Hexian, China.PLoS ONE9, 3114265 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaifu, Y. Advanced dental reduction in JavaneseHomo erectus.Anthropol. Sci.114, 35–43 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaifu, Y. et al. Taxonomic affinities and evolutionary history of the early Pleistocene hominids of Java: dentognathic evidence.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.128, 709–726 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez-Robles, A. et al. Geometric morphometric analysis of the crown morphology of the lower first premolar of hominins, with special attention to PleistoceneHomo.J. Hum. Evol.55, 627–638 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey, S. E.Neandertal Dental Morphology: Implications for Modern Human Origins. PhD thesis, Arizona State Univ. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martinón-Torres, M., Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Gómez-Robles, A., Prado-Simón, L. & Arsuaga, J. L. Morphological description and comparison of the dental remains from Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos site (Spain).J. Hum. Evol.62, 7–58 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinón-Torres, M. et al. Dental evidence on the hominin dispersals during the Pleistocene.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104, 13279–13282 (2007)

    ADS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shang, H. & Trinkaus, E.The Early Modern Human from Tianyuan Cave, China (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowler, J. M. et al. New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia.Nature421, 837–840 (2003)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mellars, P. Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago? A new model.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 9381–9386 (2006)

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Oppenheimer, S. The great arc of dispersal of modern humans: Africa to Australia.Quat. Int.202, 2–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Armitage, S. J. et al. The Southern Route “Out of Africa”: evidence for an early expansion of modern humans into Arabia.Science331, 453–456 (2011)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reyes-Centeno, H. et al. Genomic and cranial phenotype data support multiple modern human dispersals from Africa and a southern route into Asia.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 7248–7253 (2014)

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Westaway, K. E. et al. Age and biostratigraphic significance of the Punung Rainforest Fauna, East Java, Indonesia, and implications forPongo andHomo.J. Hum. Evol.53, 709–717 (2007)

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, W. et al. Human remains from Zhirendong, South China, and modern human emergence in East Asia.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 19201–19206 (2010)

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Reich, D. et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.Nature468, 1053–1060 (2010)

    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, W. et al. Late Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Panxian Dadong, South China.J. Hum. Evol.64, 337–355 (2013)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott, G. R. & Turner, C. G.The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and its Variation in Recent Human Populations (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weidenreich, F.The Dentition of Sinanthropus Pekinensis: A Comparative Odontography of the Hominids 1st edn (Geological Survey of China, 1937)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y. et al. A preliminary report on the 2011 excavation at Houbeishan Fuyan Cave, Daoxian, Hunan Province.Acta Anthropol. Sinica32, 133–143 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, X. Z.Yunxi Man: Excavation Report of the Huanglong Cave (Science Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jin, C. Z. et al. TheHomo sapiens cave hominin site of Mulan Mountain, Jiangzhou District, Chongzhou, Guanxi with emphasis on its age.Chin. Sci. Bull.54, 3848–3856 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yi, G. Liujian Man.Fossils2, 15 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Woo, J. Human fossils found in Kiukiang, Kwangsi, China.Paleovertebrata Paleoanthropologica1, 97–104 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Molnar, S. Human tooth wear, tooth function and cultural variability.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.34, 175–189 (1971)

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. White, T. D. et al. PleistoceneHomo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia.Nature423, 742–747 (2003)

    ADS CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rightmire, G. P. & Deacon, H. J. New human teeth from Middle Stone Age deposits at Klasies River, South Africa.J. Hum. Evol.41, 535–544 (2001)

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bräuer, G. & Mehlman, M. J. Hominid molars from a Middle Stone Age level at the Mumba Rock Shelter, Tanzania.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.75, 69–76 (1988)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chia, L. Note on the human and some other mammalian remains from Chgyang, Hupei.Vertebr. Palasiat.1, 247–257 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  41. He, J. Preliminary study on the teeth of Jinniushan arcahicHomo sapiens.Acta Anthropol. Sinica19, 216–224 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wu, M. New discoveries of human fossils in Tongzi, Guizhou.Acta Anthropol. Sinica3, 195–201 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, M., Wang, L., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, S. Fossil human teeth and associated cultural relics from Tongzi, Guizhou Province.Vertebr. Palasiat.13, 14–23 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gu, Y . Zhoukoudian New Cave Man and their living environment.Selected Papers in Paleoanthropology 158–171 (Science Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bae, C. J. et al. Modern human teeth from Late Pleistocene Luna Cave (Guangxi, China).Quat. Int.354, 169–183 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, D. & Qi, G. Fossil human and associated mammalian fauna found from Xizhou, Yunnan.Vertebr. Palasiat.16, 33–46 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dong, X. & Fan, X. Note on human fossil teeth from Fox Cave at Qingliu.Acta Anthropol. Sinica15, 315–319 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Huang, S. & Zheng, L. The upper Pleistocene human tooth and mammalian fossil from Changwu, Xhaanxi.Acta Anthropol. Sinica1, 14–17 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Li, Y., Wu, M., Peng, S. & Zhou, S. Human tooth fossils and some mammalian remains from Tubo, Liujiang, Guangxi.Acta Anthropol. Sinica3, 322–329 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, Y., Wu, M., Peng, S. & Zhou, S. Preliminary report on the investigation of Dingmo Cave in Tiandong County, Guangxi.Acta Anthropol. Sinica4, 127–131 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Peng, S. & Wang, W. Fossil of human beings and mammal discovered in Longdong Cave at Longlin, Guangxi.Ethnoarchaeol. South China3, 187–292 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, W., Huang, Q. & Zhou, S. New found human tooth fossils in Tubo, Guangxi.Longgupo Prehistory Culture1, 104–108 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, W. & Mo, J. Human fossil teeth newly discovered in Nanshan Cave of Fusui, Guangxi.Acta Anthropol. Sinica23, 130–136 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, W., Huang, C., Xie, S. & Yan, C. Late Pleistocene hominin teeth from the Jimuyan Cave, Pingle County, Guangxi, South China.Quat. Sci.31, 699–704 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wu, X. Z., Zhao, Z., Yuan, Z. & Shen, J. Report on paleoanthropological expedition of the Northeastern part of Kwangsi.Vertebr. Palasiat.6, 408–413 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wu, X. & Zong, G. A human tooth and mammalian fossils of Late Pleistocene in Wuzhutai, Xintai, Shantong.Vertebr. Palasiat.11, 105–106 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yu, J. Fossil man and cultural artifacts from Chuandong, Puding County, Guizhou Province.J. Nanjing Univ. Nat. Sci.20, 145–155 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  58. You, Y., Dong, X., Chen, C. & Fan, X. A fossil human tooth from Qingliu, Fujian.Acta Anthropol. Sinica8, 197–202 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zheng, L. A fossil human tooth from Zhaotong, Yunnan.Acta Anthropol. Sinica4, 105–108 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, G. & Yi, G. On the remains from Liuzhou region, Guangxi.Mem. Beijing Nat. His. Mus.20, 1–21 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sládek, V., Trinkaus, E., Hillson, S. W. & Holiday, T. W.The People of the Pavlovian: Skeletal Catalogue and Osteometrics of the Gravettian Fossil Hominids from Dolní Vestonice and Pavlov (Dolní Věstonice Studies, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bailey, S., Glantz, M., Weaver, T. D. & Viola, B. The affinity of the dental remains from Obi-Rakhmat Grotto, Uzbekistan.J. Hum. Evol.55, 238–248 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Quam, R., Bailey, S. E. & Wood, B. A. Evolution of M1 crown size and cusp proportions in the genusHomo.J. Anat.214, 655–670 (2009)

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the grants from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZZD-EW-03, XDA05130101, GJHZ201314), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272034, 41302016, 41271229), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO-ALW 823.01.003), Dirección General de Investigación of the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (CGL2012-38434-C03-02, and Acción Integrada España Francia HF2007-0115), Consejería de Educación de Junta de Castilla y León (CEN074A12-2) and The Leakey Foundation (through the support of G. Getty and D. Crook). We are grateful to several people who have provided access to comparative materials and/or advice in several aspects of the manuscript: R. Blasco, J. Rosell, J. M. Parés, M. Salesa, A. Tarriño, C. Saiz, I. Hershkovitz, A. Vialet, M. A. de Lumley, C. Bernís, J. Rascón and J. Svoboda. We are also grateful to Y.-S. Lou, L.-M. Zhang and P.-P. Wei who participated in the excavations at the Daoxian site.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wu Liu, María Martinón-Torres and Xiu-jie Wu: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100044, China

    Wu Liu, Song Xing, Hao-wen Tong, Shu-wen Pei & Xiu-jie Wu

  2. UCL Anthropology, 14 Taviton Street, London, WC1H 0BW, UK

    María Martinón-Torres & José María Bermúdez de Castro

  3. Departamento de Ciencias Históricas y Geografía. University of Burgos. Hospital del Rey, s/n., Burgos, 09001, Spain

    María Martinón-Torres

  4. Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos, 09002, Spain

    María Martinón-Torres, Mark Jan Sier & José María Bermúdez de Castro

  5. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xian, 710075, China

    Yan-jun Cai

  6. Department of Earth Sciences, Paleomagnetic Laboratory ‘Fort Hoofddijk’, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 17, Utrecht, 3584 CD, The Netherlands

    Mark Jan Sier

  7. Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, PO Box 9515, Leiden, 2300 RA, The Netherlands

    Mark Jan Sier

  8. School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

    Xiao-hong Wu

  9. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, Minnesota, USA

    R. Lawrence Edwards

  10. Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

    Hai Cheng

  11. Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China

    Yi-yuan Li

  12. Cultural Relics Administration of Daoxian County, Daoxian, 425300, China

    Xiong-xin Yang

Authors
  1. Wu Liu
  2. María Martinón-Torres
  3. Yan-jun Cai
  4. Song Xing
  5. Hao-wen Tong
  6. Shu-wen Pei
  7. Mark Jan Sier
  8. Xiao-hong Wu
  9. R. Lawrence Edwards
  10. Hai Cheng
  11. Yi-yuan Li
  12. Xiong-xin Yang
  13. José María Bermúdez de Castro
  14. Xiu-jie Wu

Contributions

X.-J.W., W.L. and M.M.-T. are the corresponding authors and have contributed equally to this work. X.-J.W. and W.L. are directing the Daoxian research project. W.L., M.M.-T., S.X., X.-J.W. and J.M.B.d.C. performed the anthropological study of the Daoxian human teeth. Y.-J.C. and S.-W.P. conducted the geological studies of the Daoxian site. Y.-J.C., R.L.E. and H.C. conducted the U–Th dating of the speleothem and stalagmite samples collected from the cave. M.J.S. conducted the palaeomagnetic analysis. X.-H.W. conducted the radiocarbon dating. H.-W.T. conducted the study of the faunal remains. X.-J.W., X.-X.Y., Y.-Y.L., W.L., Y.-J.C., H.-W.T. and S.-W.P. participated in the field research.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toWu Liu,María Martinón-Torres orXiu-jie Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 The Daoxian site.

a, Entrance to the Fuyan (Daoxian) Cave.b, Image of the intact flowstone in an unexcavated area.c, Detail of the excavation at region IIC. Pink flags point toin situ human findings.d–g, Detail of the stratigraphy of region IIA (d), IIB (e), IIC (f) and IID (g). In the centre, plan view of the excavation area at the Daoxian Cave. The enlarged area shows the individual location of each human tooth. Lower pictures provide a detail of the location of each dating sample. FYS, speleothem fragment samples; FYS-S, stalagmite samples. For more details on the U-series results, seeTable 1 andSupplementary Information E.

Extended Data Figure 2 Daoxian upper teeth.

Please seeExtended Data Table 2 for detailed information. b, buccal; d, distal; l, lingual; m, mesial; o, occlusal.

Extended Data Figure 4 Palaeomagnetic and rock-magnetic analysis of Daoxian flowstone.

a, Location of the orientated handsamples. White arrow indicates sample D1, black arrow indicates sample D2.b, Zijderveld diagram of alternating field demagnetized specimen D1A. Numbers next to the graph denote alternating field step in mT.c, Isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curve up to 1T for specimens D1A and D2D.d, Progressive stepwise thermal demagnetization of an IRM up to 1T of specimen D1A.e, Projection of virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) of sample D1 with associated α95.f, Summary table of the thermal (TH), alternating field (AF), and hybrid (both AF and TH) palaeomagnetic results. ID# denotes sample identification. A, anchored; DEC, declination of characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) direction; demag, demagnetization; INC, inclination of ChRM direction; MAD, maximum angular deviation; NA, not anchored; NRM, natural remanent magnetization; Q, quality index of ChRM direction, with 1 the highest quality and 2 the lowest; VGP, virtual geomagnetic pole latitude. AF/Tinf, lowest AF level or temperature step of ChRM in mT or °C; AF/Tsup, highest AF level or temperature step of ChRM in mT or °C.

Extended Data Figure 5 Metric comparison of Daoxian teeth.

Bivariate plots of the mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) diameters of C1, P3, M1, M2, M3, I2, M1 and M3 of Daoxian and comparative samples.

Extended Data Figure 6 Morphological comparison of Daoxian teeth.

Comparative morphology of the Daoxian human teeth with other Pleistocene hominins and modern humans. Top left, upper canines. I, V: Daoxian (DX37); II, VI: Xujiayao (PA1480); III, VII: Huanglong Cave; IV, VIII: modern human. Bottom left: upper third premolars. I, II, III: Daoxian (DX13, DX 29, DX42); IV: modern human; V: Chaoxian; VI: Changyang (PA76); VII: Panxian Dadong (PA1577); VIII: Xujiayao (PA1480). Top right, upper first molars. I: Daoxian (DX28); II: Neanderthal (Petit-Puymoyen Mx6); III: Qafzeh 5; IV: Tubo (PA1471); V: Hexian (PA836); VI: Chaoxian; VII: Xujiayao (PA1480); VIII: modern human. Middle right, lower second molars. I: Daoxian (DX30); II: Neanderthal (Hortus IV); III: Dolni Vestonice (DV37); IV: Huanglong Cave; V: Xintai; VI: modern human. Bottom right, upper third molars. I, IV: Daoxian (DX17), II, VII: Xujiayao; III, VIII: Huanglong Cave; IV, IX: Tubo (PA1476); V, X: modern humans.

Extended Data Table 1 List of faunal composition at Daoxian and other Late Pleistocene localities of southern China
Extended Data Table 2 List and measurements of Daoxian teeth
Extended Data Table 3 Comparative material
Extended Data Table 4 Upper first molar relative cusp and occlusal polygon areas

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information sections A-H and Supplementary References. (PDF 343 kb)

Supplementary Information

This file contains a virtual tour through the Daoxian cave to complement the stratigraphic explanations. (PDF 4876 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Martinón-Torres, M., Cai, Yj.et al. The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China.Nature526, 696–699 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15696

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. salrol

    What about events blocking expansion "Out of Africa".

    It should be wll known the impact of the blow out of Mt Tuba about 74000 bc. The remaining ash-layers as far as in India is 0,25 - 1 meters thick 4000 km away. That blocked those groups under their way eastwards from enterring India during about 10000 years. Course - lack of food. Everything was poisoned. But people had allready passed Sumatra and continued East (New Guinea), South (Australia) and northwards from direction they eventually reached as far the Americas. There are plenty of archeology in the brasil state Piaiu.

    It also should be well known what impact the impact the great eruption of "the real Vesuvius" in 39000 bc meant. The real Vesuvius is all av Neaple-bay, there the Vesuvius and other vulcanoes are situated at the caldera range. That eruption made ash which fell all the way at least to the Ural mountains (about 0,5-1 meter in all of Ukraine for ex). That eruption must have made most Neanderthal starve.

    I have not read all the referensies, but is it taken into consideration the finds in southern Atlas Mountains dated to 300000 bc of modern humans?
    Or is it taken into consideration the finds in Caucasus of modern humans dated about 300000+ bc?
    May be the only important Out Of Africa was when H. Erectus once left Africa.

    Beside of the Neanderthals i M. East there was another obstacle making Out of Africa very difficult. The ices from the Pyreneans eastwards to the Pacifics. Both asia Minor and Atlasmountains was iced. There was only a few passages thrue those ice-bariars and probably only Neanderthals was suitable for passing.

    Modern Humans ought to allready be north of the icebariars at about 100000 bc. The theory of Out Of Africa is obsolete. The great "Joker" in describing the expansion of moder humans is their tollerant intermixing with other humans they found AND the Siberian "continent" where it looks like during the latest glacial was no ice. That´s in this vast area the Neanderthals evoluated from Denisovans and evyry interglacial was driven westwards (at least 3 times) north of the great inland Sea from Black Sea to the "feet" of Pamir. The last glacial modern humans succeeded to survive and when the Neanderthal i Europe was hit from the great eruption of real Vesuvius they had no chance to "resist" modern humans like before. The Neanderthals had been too few and was spread too much. That´s why they was mixed into m humans and not the other way.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Editorial Summary

EarlyHomo sapiens in China

A collection of 47 anatomically modern human teeth from the Fuyan Cave in Daoxian, southern China, shows that anatomically modern humans were in the region at least 80,000 years ago, and possibly as long as 120,000 years ago. That is 30,000–70,000 years earlier than in the Levant and Europe. These people were much more modern-looking than hominins in northern and central China. The discovery adds to the complexity of the human story and shows that much remains to be discovered.

Associated content

Collection

Human Evolution

Homo sapiens in China 80,000 years ago

  • Robin Dennell
NatureNews & Views

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp