Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Article
  • Published:

The delayed rise of present-day mammals

Naturevolume 446, pages507–512 (2007)Cite this article

ACorrigendum to this article was published on 13 November 2008

Abstract

Did the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event, by eliminating non-avian dinosaurs and most of the existing fauna, trigger the evolutionary radiation of present-day mammals? Here we construct, date and analyse a species-level phylogeny of nearly all extant Mammalia to bring a new perspective to this question. Our analyses of how extant lineages accumulated through time show that net per-lineage diversification rates barely changed across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Instead, these rates spiked significantly with the origins of the currently recognized placental superorders and orders approximately 93 million years ago, before falling and remaining low until accelerating again throughout the Eocene and Oligocene epochs. Our results show that the phylogenetic ‘fuses’ leading to the explosion of extant placental orders are not only very much longer than suspected previously, but also challenge the hypothesis that the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event had a major, direct influence on the diversification of today’s mammals.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1:Partial representation of the mammalian supertree showing the relationships among the families (following ref.23).
Figure 2:Temporal patterns of mammalian diversification.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archibald, J. D. & Deutschmann, D. H. Quantitative analysis of the timing of the origin and diversification of extant placental orders.J. Mamm. Evol.8, 107–124 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benton, M. J. Diversification and extinction in the history of life.Science268, 52–58 (1995)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, R. J. et al. Stem Lagomorpha and the antiquity of Glires.Science307, 1091–1094 (2005)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alroy, J. New methods for quantifying macroevolutionary patterns and processes.Paleobiology26, 707–733 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Penny, D., Hasegawa, M., Waddell, P. J. & Hendy, M. D. Mammalian evolution: timing and implications from using the LogDeterminant transform for proteins of differing amino acid composition.Syst. Biol.48, 76–93 (1999)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, S. & Hedges, S. B. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution.Nature392, 917–920 (1998)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Springer, M. S. Molecular clocks and the timing of the placental and marsupial radiations in relation to the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary.J. Mamm. Evol.4, 285–302 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Springer, M. S., Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E. & O’Brien, S. J. Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 1056–1061 (2003)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bromham, L., Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. Growing up with dinosaurs: molecular dates and the mammalian radiation.Trends Ecol. Evol.14, 113–118 (1999)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, A. & Fortey, R. Evolutionary explosions and the phylogenetic fuse.Trends Ecol. Evol.13, 151–155 (1998)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Penny, D. & Phillips, M. J. The rise of birds and mammals: are microevolutionary processes sufficient for evolution?Trends Ecol. Evol.19, 516–522 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alroy, J. The fossil record of North American mammals: evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation.Syst. Biol.48, 107–118 (1999)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gingerich, P. D. Environment and evolution through the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.Trends Ecol. Evol.21, 246–253 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowen, G. J. et al. Mammalian dispersal at the Paleocene/Eocene boundary.Science295, 2062–2065 (2002)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Foote, M., Hunter, J. P., Janis, C. M. & Sepkoski, J. J. Evolutionary and preservational constraints on origins of biologic groups: divergence times of eutherian mammals.Science283, 1310–1314 (1999)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rose, K. D.The Beginning of the Age of Mammals (John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nee, S. & Mooers, A. Ø. & Harvey, P. H. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA89, 8322–8326 (1992)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kubo, T. & Iwasa, Y. Inferring the rates of branching and extinction from molecular phylogenies.Evolution49, 694–704 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harvey, P. H., May, R. M. & Nee, S. Phylogenies without fossils.Evolution48, 523–529 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pybus, O. G. & Harvey, P. H. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B267, 2267–2272 (2000)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanderson, M. J., Purvis, A. & Henze, C. Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life.Trends Ecol. Evol.13, 105–109 (1998)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L. & Steel, M. A. The (super)tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.33, 265–289 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M.Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krause, D. W. inVertebrates, Phylogeny and Philosophy: a Tribute to George Gaylord Simpson (eds Flanagan, K. M. & Lillegraven, J. A.) 95–117 (Univ. Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maas, M. C., Krause, D. W. & Strait, S. G. The decline and extinction of Plesiadapiformes (Mammalia: ?Primates) in North America: displacement or replacement?Paleobiology14, 410–431 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Springer, M. S., Stanhope, M. J., Madsen, O. & de Jong, W. W. Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree.Trends Ecol. Evol.19, 430–438 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreau, C. S., Bell, C. D., Vila, R., Archibald, S. B. & Pierce, N. E. Phylogeny of the ants: diversification in the age of angiosperms.Science312, 101–104 (2006)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Falkowski, P. G. et al. The rise of oxygen over the past 205 million years and the evolution of large placental mammals.Science309, 2202–2204 (2005)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. et al. inPhylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life (ed. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P.) 267–280 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Baum, B. R. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees.Taxon41, 3–10 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ragan, M. A. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees.Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.1, 53–58 (1992)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Swofford, D. L.PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Version 4 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tavaré, S., Marshall, C. R., Will, O., Soligo, C. & Martin, R. D. Using the fossil record to estimate the age of the last common ancestor of extant primates.Nature416, 726–729 (2002)

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Purvis, A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B348, 405–421 (1995)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Flynn, J. J., Parrish, J. M., Rakotosamimanana, B., Simpson, W. F. & Wyss, A. R. A Middle Jurassic mammal from Madagascar.Nature401, 57–60 (1999)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jones, K. E., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. & Gittleman, J. L. Bats, rocks and clocks: diversification patterns in Chiroptera.Evolution59, 2243–2255 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crawley, M. J.Statistical Computing: an Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus (John Wiley & Sons, New York/Chichester, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wood, S. N.Generalized Additive Models: an Introduction with R (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.2.1. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2005) 〈http://www.R-project.org〉.

  40. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language.Bioinformatics20, 289–290 (2004)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wood, S. N. mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R.R News1, 20–25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  42. McKenna, M. C. & Bell, S. K.Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Wong and A. Mooers provided their unpublished supertree of Geomyoidea. T. Barraclough, J. Bielby, N. Cooper, T. Coulson, M. Crawley, J. Davies, S. Fritz, N. Isaac, A. Lister, K. Lyons, G. Mace, S. Meiri, D. Orme, G. Thomas and N. Toomey all provided support and/or suggestions to improve the manuscript. Funding came from the NCEAS Phylogeny and Conservation Working Group; the BMBF; a DFG Heisenberg Scholarship; NERC studentships and grants; the Leverhulme Trust; the NSF; an Earth Institute Fellowship; and a CIPRES postdoctoral fellowship.

Author Contributions O.R.P.B.-E. developed data and computer protocols underlying the supertree and dating analyses, contributed to or performed many of the supertree analyses, generated the molecular data set and dated the supertree, and wrote major portions of the manuscript; M.C. helped develop data protocols, contributed source trees and performed many of the intraordinal supertree analyses, and helped write parts of the manuscript; K.E.J. contributed source trees, developed data protocols, collected the fossil database and performed associated analysis; R.D.E.M. provided relevant palaeontological information and first appearance dates of major clades, and collected the fossil database and performed associated analysis; R.M.D.B. contributed to and performed selected supertree analyses, and provided relevant palaeontological information; R.G. developed protocols for and performed supertree construction and macroevolutionary analyses, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; S.A.P. developed data protocols, collected source trees for and built the cetartiodactyl and perissodactyl portions of the supertree; R.A.V. provided source trees for Primates; J.L.G. provided source trees and ideas for comparative tests; and A.P. developed, conceived and performed the macroevolutionary analyses, wrote the corresponding sections of the manuscript and developed data protocols. All authors provided comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds & Marcel Cardillo

    Present address: Present addresses: Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany (O.R.P.B.-E.); Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia (M.C.).,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Tierzucht, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany,

    Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds

  2. Division of Biology, and,

    Marcel Cardillo & Andy Purvis

  3. NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK,

    Andy Purvis

  4. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London NW1 4RY, UK,

    Kate E. Jones

  5. Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024, USA,

    Ross D. E. MacPhee

  6. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia,

    Robin M. D. Beck

  7. Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK,

    Richard Grenyer

  8. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA,

    Samantha A. Price

  9. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada,

    Rutger A. Vos

  10. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA,

    John L. Gittleman

Authors
  1. Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcel Cardillo

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kate E. Jones

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ross D. E. MacPhee

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robin M. D. Beck

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard Grenyer

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Samantha A. Price

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rutger A. Vos

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. John L. Gittleman

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andy Purvis

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toOlaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available atwww.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods describing the procedures used in the paper in greater detail, Supplementary Figures 2–4 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1, 3, and 4, Supplementary Results and additional references. (PDF 795 kb)

Supplementary Information

This file was amended on 13 November 2008 because the authors discovered a bug in the Perl script relDate v.2.2 that was used in part to date the nodes in the species-level mammalian supertree presented and analysed in their Article and original Supplementary Information; see the related Corrigendum (nature07347). (PDF 606 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

This file represents Supplementary Figure 1 and contains three alternatively dated versions of the mammalian supertree (all in nexus format), providing the best estimates of the divergence times and the upper and lower confidence intervals on these dates. (TXT 351 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

This file was amended on 13 November 2008 because the authors discovered a bug in the Perl script relDate v.2.2 that was used in part to date the nodes in the species-level mammalian supertree presented and analysed in their Article and original Supplementary Information; see the related Corrigendum (nature07347). (TXT 510 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This file represents Supplementary Table 2 and presents a summary of the taxonomic identity and divergence time estimates for each node on the supertree. (XLS 289 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This file was amended on 13 November 2008 because the authors discovered a bug in the Perl script relDate v.2.2 that was used in part to date the nodes in the species-level mammalian supertree presented and analysed in their Article and original Supplementary Information; see the related Corrigendum (nature07347). (XLS 316 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

This file represents Supplementary Table 5 and summarizes the occurrence of mammalian genera in 11subepochs from the Late Triassic until Late Eocene using data from the Unitaxon database. (XLS 375 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bininda-Emonds, O., Cardillo, M., Jones, K.et al. The delayed rise of present-day mammals.Nature446, 507–512 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05634

Download citation

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Editorial Summary

The long hello

Did modern-style mammals evolve in a huge burst after the non-avian dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago, or did they take longer to assume modern forms? The debate rumbles on, with palaeontologists generally favouring a short-fuse 'burst' model, and molecular phylogeneticists suggesting that mammals had much deeper roots. Bininda-Emondset al. have used a massive set of molecular data to show that not only did mammalian evolution have deep roots, but that the extant Orders of mammals did not become established until many millions of years after the dinosaurs had gone. And the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous had little discernible effect on mammalian evolution.

Associated content

Mass survivals

  • David Penny
  • Matthew J. Phillips
NatureNews & Views

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp