Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Letter
  • Published:

A Middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins

Naturevolume 422, pages61–65 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

The origin of orangutans has long been debated.Sivapithecus is considered to be the closest ancestor of orangutans because of its facial–palatal similarities1, but its dental characteristics2 and postcranial skeleton2,3 do not confirm this phylogenetic position. Here we report a new Middle Miocene hominoid, cf.Lufengpithecus chiangmuanensis n. sp. from northern Thailand. Its dental morphology relates it to thePongo clade, which includesLufengpithecus4,5,Sivapithecus2,Gigantopithecus6,Ankarapithecus7 and possiblyGriphopithecus8. Our new species displays striking dental resemblances with living orangutans and appears as a more likely candidate to represent an ancestor of this ape. In addition, it originates from the geographic area of Pleistocene orangutans. But surprisingly, the associated flora shows strong African affinities, demonstrating the existence of a temporary floral and faunal dispersal corridor between southeast Asia and Africa during the Middle Miocene, which may have played a critical role in hominoid dispersion.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Stratigraphic section of Ban Sa coalmine bearing cf.Lufengpithecus chiangmuanensis.
Figure 2: Simplified pollen diagram of four samples collected from the middle lignite seam in Ban Sa section.
Figure 3: cf.Lufengpithecus chiangmuanensis n. sp.
Figure 4: Virtual vertical sections through the mesial cusps of M2 of presumed male cf.Lufengpithecus chiangmuanensis (left) and extantPongo pygmeus (right) showing comparable relative enamel thickness and dentine penetrance.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pilbeam, D. New hominoid skull material from the Miocene of Pakistan.Nature295, 232–234 (1982)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ward, S. inFunction, Phylogeny, and Fossils: Miocene Hominoid Evolution and Adaptations (eds Begun, D. R., Ward, C. V. & Rose, M. D.) 269–290 (Plenum, New York, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilbeam, D., Rose, M. D., Barry, J. C. & Shah, S. M. I. NewSivapithecus humeri from Pakistan and the relationship ofSivapithecus andPongo.Nature348, 237–239 (1990)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, R. A revision of the classification of the Lufeng great apes.Acta Anthropol. Sin.6, 263–271 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison, T., Ji, X. & Su, D. On the systematic status of the Late Neogene hominoids from Yunnan Province, China.J. Hum. Evol.43, 207–227 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simons, E. L. & Chopra, S. R. K.Gigantopithecus (Pongidae, Hominoidea) A new species from north India.Postilla138, 1–18 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kappelman, J. et al. inGeology and Paleontology of the Sinap Formation (eds Fortelius, M., Kappelman, J., Bernor, R. & Sen, S.) (Columbia University Press, New York, in press)

  8. Alpagut, B., Andrews, P. & Martin, L. New hominoid specimens from the Middle Miocene site at Pasalar, Turkey.J. Hum. Evol.19, 397–422 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barry, J. C. et al. Faunal and environmental change in the Late Miocene Siwaliks of northern Pakistan.Paleobiology Memoirs3 (28), 1–71 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan, M. E., Kingston, J. D. & Marino, B. D. Carbon isotopic evidence for the emergence of C4 plants in the Neogene from Pakistan and Kenya.Nature367, 162–165 (1994)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerling, T. E. et al. Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary.Nature389, 153–158 (1997)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pajunen, H.Proc. Symp. Int. Peat Soc., Jamaica, 25 February–1 March 1985 (ed. Heikurainen, L.) 186–197 (Int. Peat Soc., Helsinki, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Badgley, C., Guoqin, Q., Wanyong, C. & Defen, H. Paleoecology of a Miocene, tropical, upland fauna: Lufeng, China.Nat. Geogr. Res.4, 178–195 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hooijer, D. A. Prehistoric teeth of man and of the orang-utan from central Sumatra, with notes on the fossil orang-utan from Java and Southern China.Zool. Med.29, 175–301 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelley, J. & Plavcan, J. M. A simulation test of hominoid species number at Lufeng, China: implications for the use of the coefficient of variation in paleotaxonomy.J. Hum. Evol.35, 577–596 (1998)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelley, J., Anwar, M., McCollum, M. A. & Ward, S. C. The anterior dentition ofSivapithecus parvada, with comments on the phylogenetic significance of incisor heteromorphy in Hominoidea.J. Hum. Evol.28, 503–517 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, R. & Oxnard, C. E. Ramapithecines from China: evidence from tooth dimensions.Nature306, 258–260 (1983)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Swarts, J. D. inOrangutan Biology (ed. Schwartz, J. H.) 263–270 (Oxford University Press, London, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, L. Significance of enamel thickness in hominid evolution.Nature314, 260–263 (1985)

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, L.The Relationships of the Later Miocene Hominoidea. Thesis, Univ. London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz, J. H. inFunction, Phylogeny, and Fossils: Miocene Hominoid Evolution and Adaptations (eds Begun, D. R., Ward, C. V. & Rose, M. D.) 363–388 (Plenum, New York, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, J. H.Lufengpithecus and its potential relationship to an orang-utan clade.J. Hum. Evol.19, 591–605 (1990)

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harrison, T. & Rook, L. inFunction, Phylogeny, and Fossils: Miocene Hominoid Evolution and Adaptations (eds Begun, D. R., Ward, C. V. & Rose, M. D.) 327–362 (Plenum, New York, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Remus, D., Webster, M. & Krawkan, K. Rift architecture and sedimentology of the Phetchabun intermontane basin, central Thailand.J. Southeast Asian Earth Sci.8, 421–432 (1993)

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, N. M. & McGee, V. E. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy: stochastic properties of data, sampling problems, and the evolution of interpretations.J. Geophys. Res.88, 1213–1221 (1983)

    Article ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Andrews, L. de Bonis, J. Kappelman, J. Kelley and D. Pilbeam for comments, help, discussion and providing comparative materials; J. H. Schwartz and J. Kappelman for improving our manuscript; E. Boller, J. Baruchel and the ID 19 beamline staff of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) for their help in obtaining microtomographic images; A. Sritulakarn and N. Wongchai for providing facilities in Chiang Muan coal mine; B. Marandat for preparing fossils and making casts; H. Tong for translating Chinese documents; J. Barry, P. Tassy, G. Métais and S. Ducrocq for identifying associated large mammals. This work was supported by the Wenner-Gren and the Fyssen Foundations, the Department of Mineral Resources (Bangkok) and TRF-CNRS Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paleontology Section, Geological Survey Division, Department of Mineral Resources, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Yaowalak Chaimanee

  2. Palynologie et Paléoenvironnements, I.S.E.M., cc 061, Place Eugene Bataillon, Montpellier, 34095, France

    Dominique Jolly & Danielle Duzer

  3. Paleomagnetismo, Instituto de Geofisica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 04510 DF, Mexico, Mexico

    Mouloud Benammi

  4. Paléontologie, I.S.E.M., cc 064, Université Montpellier II, Place Eugene Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France

    Paul Tafforeau, Issam Moussa & Jean-Jacques Jaeger

Authors
  1. Yaowalak Chaimanee

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominique Jolly

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mouloud Benammi

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Tafforeau

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Danielle Duzer

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Issam Moussa

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean-Jacques Jaeger

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJean-Jacques Jaeger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaimanee, Y., Jolly, D., Benammi, M.et al. A Middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins.Nature422, 61–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01449

Download citation

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp