Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Virology

SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets

Naturevolume 425page915 (2003)Cite this article

There is now a choice of animal models for testing therapies against the human virus.

Abstract

The reservoir of the coronavirus isolated from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)1,2 is still unknown, but is suspected to have been a wild animal species. Here we show that ferrets (Mustela furo) and domestic cats (Felis domesticus) are susceptible to infection by SARS coronavirus (SCV) and that they can efficiently transmit the virus to previously uninfected animals that are housed with them. The observation that these two distantly related carnivores can so easily be infected with the virus indicates that the reservoir for this pathogen may involve a range of animal species.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Similar content being viewed by others

Main

Serological and virological studies have indicated that Chinese ferret badgers (Melogale moschata), masked palm civets (Paguma larvata) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) can be infected with a virus that is very similar to SCV (ref.3). Domestic cats living in the Amoy Gardens apartment block in Hong Kong, where more than 100 residents contracted SARS last year, were also found to be infected with SCV.

To test the susceptibility of domestic cats and ferrets to SCV infection, we inoculated them intratracheally with 106 median tissue-culture infectious dose units (TCID50), which we obtained from patient 5688 (who died from SARS) and then passaged four times on Vero 118 cells4,5in vitro. We then took nasal, pharyngeal and rectal swabs from the animals on different days post-infection (p.i.). Four animals from each group were killed at 4 days p.i. and were necropsied according to a standard protocol4,5.

No clinical signs were seen in SCV-inoculated cats, whereas three out of six ferrets became lethargic from days 2–4 p.i. and one of these ferrets died 4 days p.i. All cats (Fig. 1a) and ferrets (Fig. 1b) shed SCV from the pharynx, starting at 2 days p.i. and continuing until days 10 and 14, respectively, as demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription (RT-PCR)5. The virus was isolated4,5 from all pharyngeal swabs taken on days 2–8 p.i. and from nasal swabs taken from two cats on days 4 and 6 p.i. SCV was not detected in nasal swabs from ferrets or in rectal swabs from cats or ferrets.

Figure 1: Daily excretion of SARS coronavirus (SCV) in ferrets and domestic cats after inoculation with the virus or exposure to infected animals.
figure 1

a, b, SCV titres per ml from cats (a) and ferrets (b) (n = 6 of each) that had been inoculated with SCV through the respiratory route. Four animals from each group were killed on the fourth day after infection, and two were kept until day 28.c, d, SCV titres from non-inoculated cats (c) and ferrets (d) (n = 2 of each) that had been housed with inoculated cats and ferrets, respectively. SCV excretion was quantified in pharyngeal swabs by using reverse transcription with the polymerase chain reaction, and was compared to a titrated SCV standard. ND, not determined.

Infection of the respiratory tract was evident in all animals tested: SCV was isolated from the trachea and lungs (seesupplementary information). Quantification of the viral titres in lung homogenates revealed relatively low SCV titres (geometric mean ± s.d.) in the lungs of SCV-inoculated cats (1 × 103 ± 0.51 TCID50 ml−1) compared with those in ferrets (1 × 106 ± 0.70 TCID50 ml−1). Histologically, SCV infection was associated with pulmonary lesions similar to those seen in SCV-infected macaques4,5, except that they were milder, particularly in SCV-infected cats, and did not feature syncytia.

In the gastrointestinal and urinary tracts, SCV was detected by RT-PCR (seesupplementary information). Follow-up of the remaining SCV-inoculated animals (n = 2 per group) revealed that they had all seroconverted5 by 28 days p.i. (neutralizing antibody titres of 40–320). Two attempts to infect suckling mice through intracerebral inoculation failed.

Non-inoculated cats (Fig. 1c; n = 2) and ferrets (Fig. 1d; n = 2) that were housed with the inoculated cats and ferrets, respectively, became infected with SCV: viral titres gradually increased from 2 days p.i. onwards, peaking at days 6–8 p.i. Neither of the cats showed clinical signs of infection, but both had seroconverted by day 28 (they had virus-neutralizing antibody titres of 40 and 160, respectively). Both ferrets were lethargic and developed conjunctivitis; they died on days 16 and 21 p.i. We established by pathological examination that the main lesions in both animals were marked hepatic lipidosis and emaciation. There was no evidence that either of these animals died from SCV-associated pneumonia, although SCV was isolated from post-mortem lung specimens of one animal.

Our results show that ferrets and domestic cats are susceptible to experimental infection by SCV, and that the virus is efficiently transmitted to animals living with them. These species might therefore be useful as animal models to test antiviral drugs or vaccine candidates against SARS.

References

  1. Ksiazek, T. G. et al.N. Engl. J. Med.348, 1953–1966 (2003).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peiris, J. S. M. et al.Lancet361, 1319–1325 (2003).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan, Y. et al.Science302, 276–278 (2003).

    Article CAS ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fouchier, R. A. M. et al.Nature423, 240 (2003).

    Article CAS ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuiken, T. et al.Lancet362, 263–270 (2003).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Virology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3015 GE, The Netherlands

    Byron E. E. Martina, Bart L. Haagmans, Thijs Kuiken, Ron A. M. Fouchier, Guus F. Rimmelzwaan, Geert van Amerongen & Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus

  2. Department of Microbiology and Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, SAR Hong Kong, China

    J. S. Malik Peiris

  3. Government Virus Unit, Shek Kip Mei, Kowloon, SAR Hong Kong, China

    Wilina Lim

Authors
  1. Byron E. E. Martina

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bart L. Haagmans

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thijs Kuiken

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ron A. M. Fouchier

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guus F. Rimmelzwaan

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geert van Amerongen

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. S. Malik Peiris

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wilina Lim

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toAlbert D. M. E. Osterhaus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp