Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • Letter
  • Published:

Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats

Naturevolume 403, pages188–192 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

Bats (order Chiroptera) are one of the few orders of mammals that echolocate and the only group with the capacity for powered flight. The order is subdivided into Microchiroptera and Megachiroptera, with an array of characteristics defining each group1, including complex laryngeal echolocation systems in microbats and enhanced visual acuity in megabats. The respective monophylies of the two suborders have been tacitly assumed, although microbat monophyly is uncorroborated by molecular data. Here we present a phylogenetic analysis of bat relationships using DNA sequence data from four nuclear genes and three mitochondrial genes (total of 8,230 base pairs), indicating that microbat families in the superfamily Rhinolophoidea are more closely related to megabats than they are to other microbats. This implies that echolocation systems either evolved independently in rhinolophoids and other microbats or were lost in the evolution of megabats. Our data also reject flying lemur (order Dermoptera) as the bat sister group, indicating that presumed shared derived characters for flying lemurs and bats2 are convergent features that evolved in association with gliding and flight, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscription info for Japanese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Japanese customers. Please go tonatureasia.com to subscribe to this journal.

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

￥ 4,980

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Maximum likelihood trees with branch lengths drawn proportional to amount of sequence change and with maximum likelihood bootstrap figures indicated.
Figure 2: Bootstrap support using neighbour-joining with logdet distances, for various phylogenetic associations.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novacek, M. J. inProceedings of the 5th International Bat Research Conference (eds Wilson, D. E. & Gardner, A. L. ) 317–330 (Texas Tech, Lubbock, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons, N. B.Bat relationships and the origin of flight.Symp. Zool. Soc. London67, 27–43 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, J. E. & Smith,, J. D. inBats: A Natural History (Heffers, England, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simmons, N. B. & Geisler, J. H. Phylogenetic relationships ofIcaronycteris,Archaeonycteris,Hassianycteris andPalaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.235, 1–182 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pumo,, D. E. et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of a neotropical fruit bat,Artibeus jamaicensis, and a new hypothesis of relationships of bats to other Eutherian mammals.J. Mol. Evol.47, 709–717 (1998).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Springer, M. S., Amrine, H. M., Burk, A. & Stanhope, M. J. Additional support for Afrotheria and Paenungulata, the performance of mitochondrial versus nuclear genes, and the impact of data partitions with heterogenous base composition.Syst. Biol.48, 65–75 (1999).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swofford,, D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1998).

  8. Cummings, M. P., Otto, S. P. & Wakeley, J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis.Mol. Biol. Evol.12, 814–822 (1995).

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J. & Hillis,, D. M. inMolecular Systematics (eds Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K.) 407–514 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutcheon, J. M., Kirsh, J. A. W & Pettigrew,, J. D. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. III.The question of microchiropteran monophyly.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B353, 607–617 (1998).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodburne, M. O. & Swisher,, C. C. inGeochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation (eds Beggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M. & Hardenbol, J.)Special Publ. Soc. Sedim. Geol.54 335–364 (Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Altringham, J. D.Bats: Biology and Behaviour. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1996).

  13. Miller, G. S. The families and genera of bats.Bull. US Natl Mus.57, 1–282 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novacek, M. J. & Wyss, A. R. Higher-level relationships of the recent eutherian orders: morphological evidence.Cladistics2, 257–287 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beard,, K. C. inPrimates and their relatives in phylogenetic perspective (ed. MacPhee, R. D. E.) 63–90 (Plenum, New York, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Rayner, J. M. V. The cost of being a bat.Nature350, 383–384 (1991).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gould, E. Evidence for echolocation in the Tenrecidae of Madagascar.Proc. Am. Phil. Soc.109, 352–360 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tomasi, T. E. Echolocation by the short-tailed shrewBlarina brevicauda.J. Mammal.60, 751–759 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forsman, K. A. & Malmquist,, M. G. Evidence for echolocation in the common shrew,Sorex araneus.J. Zool. Lond.216, 655–662 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Speakman,, J. R & Racey, P. A. No cost of echolocation for bats in flight.Nature350, 421–423 (1991).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalko, E. K. V. Coupling of sound emission and wing-beat in naturally foraging European pipistrelle (Microchiroptera: Vespertilionidae).Folia Zool.43, 363–376 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Springer, M. S. et al. Endemic African mammals shake the phylogenetic tree.Nature388, 61–64 (1997).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanhope, M. J. et al. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95, 9967–9972 (1998).

    Article ADS CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order within Hominoidea.J. Mol. Evol.29, 170–179.

  25. Templeton, A. R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes.Evolution37, 221–244 (1983).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons-Weiler, J., Hoelzer, G. A. & Tausch, R. J. Relative Apparent Synapomorphy Analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal.Mol. Biol. Evol.13, 749–757 (1996).

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Training and Mobility of Researchers programme of the European Commission to M.J.S., and the National Science Foundation to M.S.S.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Emma C. Teeling & Mark Scally

    Present address: Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, California, 92521, USA

  2. Michael J. Stanhope

    Present address: Bioinformatics, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 1250 South Collegeville Road, UP1345, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426-0989, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen's University of Belfast, Biology and Biochemistry, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK

    Emma C. Teeling, Mark Scally & Michael J. Stanhope

  2. Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, 92521, California, USA

    Diana J. Kao, Michael L. Romagnoli & Mark S. Springer

Authors
  1. Emma C. Teeling
  2. Mark Scally
  3. Diana J. Kao
  4. Michael L. Romagnoli
  5. Mark S. Springer
  6. Michael J. Stanhope

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMichael J. Stanhope.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teeling, E., Scally, M., Kao, D.et al. Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats.Nature403, 188–192 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35003188

Download citation

This article is cited by

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Advertisement

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox.Sign up for Nature Briefing
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp