Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology?

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although urban ecosystems are governed by the same ecological “laws” as rural ecosystems, the relative importance of certain ecological patterns and processes differs between the two types of ecosystems. For instance, as compared to rural areas, urban habitats are usually more islandlike, more often represent early successional stages, and more easily invaded by alien species. All these features are results of the intense human influence on urban landscapes. The question then arises whether a distinct theory of urban ecology is needed for understanding ecological patterns and processes in the urban setting. The answer is no, because urban ecosystems can be successfully studied using existing ecological theories, such as the metapopulation theory. However, due to the intense human presence approaches that include the human aspect are useful in studying urban systems. For instance, the “human ecosystem model,” which emphasizes human impact by identifying social components with connections to ecology, is a useful approach in urban studies. This model, combined with the urban–rural gradient approach, forms an effective tool for studying key ecological features of urban ecosystems. Better understanding of these features would increase our ability to predict changes that land use causes in urban ecosystems, and would help to integrate ecology better into urban planning.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

ArticleOpen access11 February 2017

References

  • Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient.Biol. conserv.80, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, E. (1994) Prospects for the development of integrated regional models. InIntegrated Regional Models (P.M. Groffman and G.E. Likens, eds.), pp. 145–153. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs.Science199, 1302–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B.N.K. (1978) Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. InDiversity of Insects Faunas, Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London: Number Nine (L.A. Mound and N. Waloff, eds.), pp. 126–138. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, I. (1992) The case for urban ecology.UrbanNature Magazine1, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhme, F. and Pauleit, S. (2000) A landscape ecological masterplan for the city of Munich. InHabitat Creation andWildlife Conservation in Urban and Post-Industrial Environments (J.O. Riley and S.E. Page, eds.). Packard Publishing, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.S. (1958)The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversham, B.C., Roy, D.B. and Telfer, M.G. (1996) Urban industrial and other manmade sites as analogues of natural habitats for Carabidae.Ann. Zool. Fennici33, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, O.L. (1989)The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödde, M., Richarz, N. and Walter, B. (1995) Habitat conservation and development in the city of Düsseldorf, Germany. InUrban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning (H. Sukopp, M. Numata and A. Huber, eds.), pp. 163–171. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y. (1999) Socioecologies.Ecography22, 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y. and Levins, R. (1992)Humanity and Nature. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y., Tonteri, T., Halme, E. and Somerma, P. (1989)Kaupunkiviheriöiden kasvillisuuden vaihtelu hyönteisten esiintymistä määräävänä tekijänä (Variation in the vegetation of urban habitats as a determinant of insect occurrence). Helsingin kaupungin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston yleiskaavaosaston julkaisu YB: 5/1989. Helsinki: Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja C 1989: 4.

  • Halme, E. and Niemelä, J. (1993) Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forest.Ann. Zool. Fenn.30, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Simberloff, D. (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. InMetapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (I. Hanski and M. Gilpin, eds.), pp. 5–26. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki, J. and Suhonen, J. (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison.Ornis Fennica70, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegel, B. (1990) The distribution of carabid beetles in the urban area of west Berlin. InThe Role of Ground Beetles in Ecological and Environmental Studies (N.E. Stork, ed.), pp. 325–329. Intercept, Andover.

  • Klausnitzer, B. (1993)Ökologie der Großstadtfauna. 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P. (1997) Suomen kaupunkeja vaivaa hajanaisuus. InMitä, missä, milloin. Kansalaisen vuosikirja 1998. (H. Hollmén and A. Kemppinen, eds.), pp. 247–253. Otava, Helsinki.

  • Lawrynowicz, M. (1982) Macro-fungal flora of Lodz. InUrban, ecology, The Second European Ecological Symposium (R. Bornkamm, J.A. Lee and M.R.D. Seaward, eds.), pp. 41–47. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O. (1967)The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. (1997) A paradigm shift.Urban Ecosystems1, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology.Ecology71, 1232–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1993) Introduction: scope and need for an ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. InHumans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas (M.J. McDonnell and S.T.A. Pickett, eds.), pp. 1–5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A. and Pouyat, V. (1993) The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. InHumans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas (M.J. McDonnell and S.T.A. Pickett, eds.), pp. 175–189. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient.Urban Ecosystems1, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, J. and Halme, E. (1998) Effects of forest fragmentation on carabid assemblages in the urban setting: implications for planning and management. InUrban Ecology (J. Breuste, H. Feldmann and O. Uhlmann, eds.), pp. 692–695. Springer Verlag, Berlinq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, J., Kotze, J., Ashworth, A., Brandmayr, P., Desender, K., New, T., Penev, L., Samways, M. and Spence, J. (1999) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network.Journal of Insect Conservation3, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. (1993) Wildlife corridors. InEcology of Greenways (D.S. Smith and P.C. Hellmund, eds.), pp. 43–68. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., Burch,W.R., Jr. and Dalton, S.E. (1997a) Integrated urban ecosystem research.Urban Ecosystems1, 183–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., Burch,W.R., Jr., Dalton, S.E., Foresman, T.W., Grove, J.M. and Rowntree, R. (1997b) Aconceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas.Urban Ecosystems1, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, P., Tanskanen, A. and Siitonen, M. (1997) Vascular plants of the city of Vantaa, S. Finland—urban ecology, biodiversity and conservation.Lutukka13, 67–87. (In Finnish with an English summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, E.H. (1993) The process of plant colonization in small settlements and large cities. InHumans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas (M.J. McDonnell and S.T.A. Pickett, eds.), pp. 190–207. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebele, F. (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems.Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett.4, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W.E. (1997) Urban ecosystems: the human dimension.Urban Ecosystems1, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, M. (1982) Studies on the arthropod fauna of green urban ecosystems. InUrban Ecology, The Second European Ecological Symposium (R. Bornkamm, J.A. Lee, and M.R.D. Seaward, eds.), pp. 65–73. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.R. (1990) Success of European carabid species: preadaptation for synanthropy. InGround Beetles: Their Role in Ecological and Environmental Studies (N. Stork, ed.), pp. 129–141. Intercept Publications, Andover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.R. and Spence, D.H. (1988) Of ground-beetles and men: introduced species and the synanthropic fauna of western Canada.Mem. Ent. Soc. Can.144, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp, H. and Numata, M. (1995) Foreword. InUrban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning (H. Sukopp, M. Numata and A. Huber, eds.), p. vii. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonteri, T. and Haila, Y. (1990) Plants in a boreal city: ecological characteristics of vegetation in Helsinki and its surroundings, southern Finland.Ann. Bot. Fenn.27, 337-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepl, L. (1995) Towards a theory of urban biocoenoses. InUrban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning (H. Sukopp, M. Numata and A. Huber, eds.), pp. 3–21. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbridge, M.R. (1997) Urban ecosystems.Urban Ecosystems1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigmann, G. (1982) The colonization of ruderal biotopes in the city of Berlin by arthropods. InUrban ecology, The Second European Ecological Symposium (R. Bornkamm, J.A. Lee and M.R.D. Seaward, eds.), pp. 75–82. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, R. and Sukopp, H. (1993) Was ist Stadtökologie? In Stadtökologie (H. Sukopp and R. Wittig, eds.), pp. 1–9. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FIN-00014, Finland

    Jari Niemelä

Authors
  1. Jari Niemelä

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJari Niemelä.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp