1. K. M. Meyer-Abich,Korrespondenz, Individualität and Komplementarität (Steiner, Wiesbaden, 1965).

   Google Scholar 

2. D. Murdoch,Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

   Google Scholar 

3. A. Pais,Niels Bohr's Times in Physics, Philosophy, and Politics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991).

   Google Scholar 

4. W. Pauli, ed., Special issue on Complementarity,Dialectica2 (1948).

5. N. Bohr, “On the notions of causality and complementarity,”Dialectica2, 312–319 (1948).

   Google Scholar 

6. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), Chaps. 5 and 6.

   Google Scholar 

7. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,”Phys. Rev.47, 777–780 (1935).

   Google Scholar 

8. E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,”Naturwiss.23, 807–812, 823–828, 844–849.

9. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox,”Physics1, 195–200 (1964).

   Google Scholar 

10. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using timevarying analyzers,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1804–1807 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

11. D. Tjøstheim, “A commutation relation for wide sense stationary processes.”SIAM J. Appl. Math.30, 115–122 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

12. K. Gustafson and B. Misra, “Canonical commutation relations of quantum mechanics and stochastic regularity,”Lett. Math. Phys.1, 275–280 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

13. B. Misra, “Nonequilibrium entropy, Lyapounov variables, and ergodic properties of classical systems,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA75, 1627–1631 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

14. H. Atmanspacher and H. Scheingraber, “A fundamental link between system theory and statistical mechanic,”Found. Phys.17, 939–963 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

15. E. Scheibe,The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1973), pp. 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

16. H. Primas, “Mathematical and philosophical questions in the theory of open and macroscopic quantum systems,” inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. I. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

17. C. G. Jung, “Theoretische Überlegungen zum Wesen des Psychischen,” inGesammelte Werke, Band 8 (Walter, Olten, 1971), footnote 129, pp. 261f; English translation: “On the nature of the psyche.” inCollected Works, Vol. 8 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1969), footnote 130, pp. 229f.

    Google Scholar 

18. W. Pauli, “Naturwissenschaftliche and erkenntnistheoretische Aspekte der Ideen vom Unbewussten,”Dialectica8, 283–301 (1954); English translation in W. Pauli,Writings on Physics and Philosophy, C. P. Enz and K. von Meyenn, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

19. C. G. Jung,Psychologische Typen (Rascher, Zürich, 1921); English translation: “Psychological types,” inCollected Works 6 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

20. W. James,The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1 (Dover, New York, 1950), Chap. IX.

    Google Scholar 

21. E. Plaum, “Bohrs quantentheoretische Naturbeschreibung und die Psychologie,”Psychologie und Geschichte3, 94–101 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

22. P. Kruse and M. Stadler,Ambiguities in Mind and Nature (Springer, Berlin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

23. P. Jordan,Komplementarität und Verdrängung (Strom, Hamburg, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

24. P. Bernays, “Über die Ausdehnung des Begriffes der Komplementarität auf die Philosophie,”Synthese7, 66–70 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

25. E. von Weizsäcker, “Erstmaligkeit und Bestätigung als Komponenten der pragmatischen Information,” inOffene Systeme I, E. von Weizsäcker, ed. (Klett–Cotta, Stuttgart, 1974), pp. 83–113.

    Google Scholar 

26. K. Kornwachs and W. von Lucadou, “Pragmatic information as a nonclassical concept to describe cognitive systems,”Cognitive Systems1, 79–94 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

27. D. J. Chalmers,The Conscious Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

28. C. G. Jung and W. Pauli,Naturerklärung und Psyche (Rancher, Zürich, 1952); English translation:The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche (Pantheon, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

29. H. Atmanspacher and H. Primas, “The hidden side of Wolfgang Pauli,”J. Consc. Studies3, 112–126 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

30. H. Walach and H. Römer, “Complementarity is a useful concept for consciousness studies. A reminder,”Neuroendocrinology Letters21, 221–232 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

31. H. Atmanspacher, “Mind and matter as asymptotically disjoint, inequivalent representations with broken time-reversal symmetry,” in press.

32. R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

33. C. Piron,Foundations of Quantum Physics (Benjamin, Reading, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

34. H. Primas,Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics, and Reductionism (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

35. W. Thirring,Quantum Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules (Springer, Berlin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

36. B. Misra, I. Prigogine, and M. Courbage, “From deterministic dynamics to probabilistic descriptions,”Physica A98, 1–26 (1979); cf. A. S. Wightman,Math. Rev.82e, 58066 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

37. P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, “Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal,”Phys. Rev. A28, 2591–2593 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

38. R. Shaw, ‘Strange attractors, chaotic behavior, and information flow,’Z. Naturforsch.36a, 80–112 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

39. H. Atmanspacher, “Ontic and epistemic descriptions of chaotic systems,” inComputing Anticipatory Systems, D. Dubois, ed. (American Institute of Physics, New York, 2000), pp. 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

40. B. Misra and I. Prigogine, “Irreversibility and nonlocality,”Lett. Math. Phys.7, 421–429 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

41. H. Atmanspacher, “Dynamical entropy in dynamical systems,” inTime, Temporality, Now, H. Atmanspacher and E. Ruhnau, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1997), pp. 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

42. G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann, “The logic of quantum mechanics,”Ann. Math.37, 823–843 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

43. F. R. Krueger,Physik und Evolution (Parey, Berlin, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

44. H. Atmanspacher, “A propositional lattice for the logic of temporal predictions,” inSolitons and Chaos, I. Antoniou and F. J. Lambert, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1991), pp. 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

45. H. Atmanspacher, “Incommensurability of Liouvillean dynamics and information dynamic,” inParallelism, Learning, Evolution, J. D. Becker, I. Eisele, and F. W. Mündemann, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1991), pp. 482–499.

    Google Scholar 

46. S. Freud,Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse (Fischer, Frankfurt, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

47. M. Varga von Kibed, “Bemerkungen über philosophische Grundlagen und methodische Voraussetzungen zur systemischen Aufstellungsarbeit,” inPraxis des Familien–Stellens, G. Weber, ed. (Auer, Heidelberg, 1998). Compare other contributions of the author in the same volume.

    Google Scholar 

48. D. Gernert, “Towards a closed description of observation processes,”BioSystems54, 165–180 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references