810Accesses
3Altmetric
Abstract
This experimental study examines the effects of bias toward persons with disabilities (PWDs) upon the employment interview decision process. The design and operationalization of the study permitted examination of the effects of specific disabilities, interview performance, and the resulting interaction between disability and interview performance, using 630 undergraduate students at a major university in the southwestern United States as subjects. The results indicate that (1) interview performance has a favorable, significant main effect upon subsequent HRM decisions, (2) specific disabilities, that is, child care demands, HIV-positive status, and being wheelchair-bound, have unfavorable, significant main effects upon subsequent HRM decisions, and (3) the presence of any of the disabilities decreased the favorable impact of superior interview performance. The limitations of the structured interview to mitigate bias were demonstrated. Given the pervasive, unfavorable treatment directed toward PWDs, it appears that the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (1993) is warranted. The public policy implications of these results and recommendations for future research were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, J. (1963). Toward understanding of inequity.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,67, 422–436.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U. S. C. A. § 12101et seq.(West 1993).
Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (1988).The Measurement of Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities: Method, Psychometrics and Scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Arvey, R. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects.Psychological Bulletin,86, 736–765.
Arvey, R., & Campion, J. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research.Personnel Psychology,35, 281–322.
Arvey, R., & Sackett, P. (1993). Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In Schmitt, N., Borman, W.,et al.(Eds.),Personnel Selection in Organizations, 171–202. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bernstein, V., Hakel, M., & Harlan, A. (1975). The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability?Journal of Applied Psychology,60, 266–268.
Blanchard, F., Crandall, C., Brigham, J., & Vaughan, L. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 993–997.
Bodenhausen, G. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In Mackie, D., & Hamilton, D. (Eds.),Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, 13–38. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bressler, R., & Lacy, A. (1980). An analysis of the relative job progression of the perceptibly physically handicapped.Academy of Management Journal,23, 132–143.
Campion, M. (1983). Personnel selection for physically demanding jobs: Reviewand recommendations.Personnel Psychology,36, 527–550.
Campion, M., Campion, J., & Hudson, J. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 998–1002.
Campion, M., Pursell, E., & Brown, B. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview.Personnel Psychology,41, 25–42.
Cascio, W. (1991).Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
Cesare, S., Tannenbaum, R., & Dalessio, A. (1990). Interviewer's decisions related to applicant handicap type and rater empathy.Human Performance,3, 157–171.
Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms.Administrative Science Quarterly,36, 459–484.
Chirikos, T. (1989). Aggregate economic losses from disability in the United States: A preliminary assay.Milbank Quarterly,67, 59–91.
Christman, L., & Slaten, B. (1991). Attitudes toward people with disabilities and judgments of employment potential.Perceptual and Motor Skills,72, 467–475.
Crosby, F., & Clayton, S. (1990). Affirmative action and the issue of expectancies.Journal of Social Issues,46, 61–79.
Crystal, S. (1994). Sources of outpatient care and insurance status over the course of AIDS: Implications for health policy.AIDS and Public Policy Journal,9, 129–137.
Czajka, J., & DeNisi, A. (1988). Effects of emotional disability and clear performance standards on performance ratings.Academy of Management Journal,31, 394–404.
Dougherty, T., Turban, D., & Callender, J. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 659–665.
Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993).The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Eder, R., & Ferris, G. (Eds.). (1989).The Employment Interview: Theory, Research and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Eisenberg, M. (1982). Disability as stigma. In Eisenberg, M., Griggins, C., & Duval, R. (Eds.),Disabled Persons as Second-Class Citizens: Vol. 2. Springer Series on Rehabilitation, 3–12. New York: Springer.
Esses, V., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In Mackie, D., & Hamilton, D. (Eds.),Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, 137–166. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fee, E., & Fox, D. (Eds.). (1992).AIDS: The Making of a Chronic Disease. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Feild, H., & Gatewood, R. (1989). Development of a selection interview: A job content strategy. In Eder, R., & Ferris, G. (Eds.),The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice, 145–157. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Feldblum, C. (1991). Employment protections.Milbank Quarterly,69, 81–110.
Feldman, J. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 127–148.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gething, L. (1992). Judgments by health professionals of personal characteristics of people with a visible physical disability.Social Science and Medicine,34, 809–815.
Gilliland, S. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 691–704.
Goffman, E. (1963).Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gordon, H., & Leighty, R. (1988). Importance of specialized cognitive function in the selection of military pilots.Journal of Applied Psychology,73, 38–45.
Green, S., & Liden, R. (1980). Contextual and attributional influences on control decisions.Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 453–458.
Green, S., & Mitchell, T. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,23, 429–458.
Guion, R., & Gibson, W. (1988). Personnel selection and placement.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 349–374.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1987).Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
Hakel, M. (1986). Personnel selection and placement.Annual Review of Psychology,37, 351–380.
Hargrett, N. (1981). Potential behavioral consequences of attribution of locus of control.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 63–68.
Harris, M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research.Personnel Psychology,42, 691–726.
Heaton, R., Velin, R., McCutchan, A., Gulevich, S., Atkinson, J., Wallace, M., Godfrey, H., Kirson, D., & Grant, I. (1994). Neuropsychological impairment in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infection: Implications for employment.Psychosomatic Medicine,56, 8–17.
Heilman, M., Block, C., & Lucas, J. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts.Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 536–544.
Hitt, M., & Barr, S. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing.Journal of Applied Psychology,74, 53–61.
Huffcutt, A., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 184–190.
Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin,96, 72–98.
Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.Academy of Management Journal,38, 635–672.
Janz, T. (1989). The patterned behavior description interview: The best prophet of the future is in the past. In Eder, R., & Ferris, G. (Eds.),The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice, 158–168. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kass, N., Faden, R., Fox, R., & Dudley, J. (1991). Loss of private health insurance among homosexual men with AIDS.Inquiry,28, 249–254.
Katz, I., Hass, G., Parisi, N., Astone, J., McEvaddy, D., & Lucido, D. (1987). Lay people's and health care personnel's perceptions of cancer, AIDS, cardiac, and diabetic patients.Psychological Reports,60, 615–629.
Keenan, R. (1989). Selection interviewing. InInternational Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Kerlinger, F. (1986).Foundations of Behavioral Research. For Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kerr, N., & Bodman, D. (1994). Disability research methods: An argument for the use of galileian modes of thought in disability research.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9, 99–122.
Kinicki, A., Lockwood, C., Hom, P., & Griffeth, R. (1990). Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: Aggregate and individual analyses.Journal of Applied Psychology,75, 477–486.
Kravitz, D., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity.Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 928–938.
Krefting, L., & Brief, A. (1976). The impact of applicant disability on evaluative judgments in the selection process.Academy of Management Journal,19, 675–680.
Lado, A., & Wilson, M. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competencybased perspective.Academy of Management Review,19, 699–727.
LaPlante, M. (1991). Medical conditions associated with disability. In Thompson-Hoffman, S., & Storck, I. (Eds.),Disability in the United States: A Portrait From National Data, 34–72. New York: Springer.
Latham, G. (1989). The reliability, validity, and practicality of the situational interview. In Eder, R., & Ferris, G. (Eds.),The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice, 169–182. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Latham, G., & Saari, L. (1984). Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview.Journal of Applied Psychology,4, 569–573.
Latham, G., Saari, L., Pursell, E., & Campion, M. (1980). The situational interview.Journal of Applied Psychology,65,422–427.
Lin, T., Dobbins, G., & Farh, J. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 363–371.
Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. (1994). Review of research on psychosocial adaptation to neuromuscular disorders: I. Cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, and Parkinson's disease.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9, 201–230.
Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990).Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Marchioro, C., & Bartels, L. (1994). Perceptions of a job interviewee with a disability.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9, 383–394.
Maurer, S., & Fay, C. (1988). Effect of situational interviews, conventional structured interviews, and training on interview agreement: An experimental analysis.Personnel Psychology,41, 329–344.
Maxwell, S., & Arvey, R. (1993). The search for predictors with high validity and low adverse impact: Compatible or incompatible goals?Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 433–437.
Mayfield, E. (1964). The selection interview: A re-evaluation of published research.Personnel Psychology,17, 239–260.
McDaniel, M., Whetzel, D., Schmidt, F., & Maurer, S. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,79, 599–616.
Miceli, N. (1997). An investigation of bias toward persons with disabilities in employment selection decisions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1996).Dissertation Abstracts International,57(8), 3580A. (University Microfilms No. AAT97-00604.)
Motowidlo, S., Carter, G., Dunnette, M., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J., & Vaughan, M. (1992). Studies of the structured behavioral interview.Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 571–587.
Oi, W. (1992).Work for Americans with disabilities.The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science,523, 159–174.
Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B., Tindale, R., & Spring, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview.Journal of Applied Pyschology,79, 909–917.
Pulakos, E., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity.Personnel Psychology,48, 289–308.
Ravaud, J., Madiot, B., & Ville, I. (1992). Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment.Social Science and Medicine,35, 951–958.
Reilly, R., & Chao, G. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures.Personnel Psychology,35, 1–62.
Rose, G., & Brief, A. (1979). Effects of handicap and job characteristics on selection evaluations.Personnel Psychology,32, 385–392.
Rowe, P. (1963). Individual differences in selection decisions.Journal of Applied Psychology,47, 304–307.
Rynes, S. (1989). The employment interview as a recruitment device. In Eder, R., & Ferris, G. (Eds.),The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice, 127–141. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview.Personnel Psychology,29, 79–101.
Schmitt, N., & Noe, R. (1986). Personnel selection and equal employment opportunity. InInternational Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester, NY: Wiley.
Schmitt, N., & Robertson, I. (1990). Personnel selection.Annual Review of Psychology,41, 289–319.
Seccombe, K., Clarke, L., & Coward, R. (1994). Discrepancies in employer-sponsored health insurance among Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites: The effects of sociodemographic and employment factors.Inquiry,31, 221–229.
Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others.Memory and Cognition,21, 546–556.
Singer, M., & Bruhns, C. (1991). Relative effect of applicant work experience and academic qualifications on selection interview decisions: A study of between-sample generalizability.Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 550–559.
Stata Corporation. (1995).Stata Statistical Software: Release 4.0. Reference Manual, Vols.1–3. College Station, TX: Author.
Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. (1993). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In Mackie, D., & Hamilton, D. (Eds.),Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, 111–136. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stubbins, J. (1988). The politics of disability. In Yuker, H. (Ed.),Attitudes Toward Persons With Disabilities, 22–32. New York: Springer.
Toothaker, L. (1986).Introductory Statistics: For the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Trevino, L. (1992). Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education, and management.Journal of Business Ethics,11, 445–459.
Tucker, D., & Rowe, P. (1979). Relationship between expectancy, causal attributions, and final hiring decisions in the employment interview.Journal of Applied Psychology,64, 27–34.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991).Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Vol.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Employment Service.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1992).The Americans With Disabilities Act: Questions and Answers. Washington, DC: Author. (USEEOC Publication No. EEOC-BK-15.)
Vroom, V. (1964).Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical summary.Personnel Psychology,2, 17–46.
Wallace, M., & Fay, C. (1988).Compensation Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
Weekley, J., & Gier, J. (1987). Reliability and validity of the situational interview for a sales position.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 484–487.
Weiner, B. (1986).An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer.
Westbrook, M., Legge, V., & Pennay, M. (1993). Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society.Social Science and Medicine,36, 615–623.
Wiesner, W., & Cronshaw, S. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview.Journal of Occupational Psychology,61, 275–290.
Wright, B. (1991). Labeling: The need for greater person-environment individualization. In Snyder, C., & Forsyth, D. (Eds.),Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology, 469–487. New York: Pergamon.
Wright, O. (1969). Summary of research on the selection interviewsince 1964.Personnel Psychology,22, 391–413.
Wright, P., Ferris, S., Hiller, J., & Kroll, M. (1995). Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation.Academy of Management Journal,38, 272–287.
Yelin, E., Greenblatt, R., Hollander, H., & McMaster, J. (1991). The impact of HIV-related illness on employment.American Journal of Public Health,81, 79–84.
Yuker, H. (Ed.). (1988).Attitudes Toward Persons With Disabilities. New York: Springer.
Yuker, H. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9(5), 3–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
CBA, Ohio Northern University, Ada, Ohio
Nicholas S. Miceli
School of Business Administration, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi
Michael Harvey
Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
M. Ronald Buckley
- Nicholas S. Miceli
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Michael Harvey
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- M. Ronald Buckley
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miceli, N.S., Harvey, M. & Buckley, M.R. Potential Discrimination in Structured Employment Interviews.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal13, 15–38 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014430107659
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative