• Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.Nucleic Acids Res.,25, 3389-3402.

  Google Scholar 

• The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plantArabidopsis thaliana.Nature,408, 796-815.

  Google Scholar 

• Blanc, G., Barakat, A., Guyot, R., Cooke, R., and Delseny, M. (2000) Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome.Plant Cell,12, 1093-1101.

  Google Scholar 

• Conery, J.S., and Lynch, M. (2001) Nucleotide substitutions and the evolution of duplicate genes. InPacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2001 (Eds., Altman, R.B., Dunker, A.K., Hunter, L., Lauderdale, K. and Klein, T.E.), World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 167-178.

  Google Scholar 

• Easteal, S., and Collet, C. (1994) Consistent variation in aminoacid substitution rate, despite uniformity of mutation rate: protein evolution in mammals is not neutral.Mol. Biol. Evol.,11, 643-647.

  Google Scholar 

• Friedman, R., and Hughes, A.L. (2001) Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes.Genome Res.,11, 1842-1847.

  Google Scholar 

• Grant, D., Cregan, P., and Shoemaker, R.C. (2000) Genome organization in dicots: genome duplication inArabidopsis and synteny between soybean andArabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,97, 4168-4173.

  Google Scholar 

• Grubbs, F. (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples.Technometrics,11, 1-21.

  Google Scholar 

• Haldane, J.B.S. (1933) The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution.Am. Nat.,67, 5-19.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, T.A. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT.Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.,41, 95-98.

  Google Scholar 

• Holland, P. (1992) Homeobox genes in vertebrate evolution.BioEssays,14, 267-273.

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, A.L. (1999) Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history.J. Mol. Evol.,48, 565-576.

  Google Scholar 

• Koch, M., Haubold, B., and Mitchell-Olds, R. (2001) Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidicmatK and nuclearChs sequences.Am. J. Bot.,88, 534-544.

  Google Scholar 

• Kowalski, S.P., Lan, T.-H., Feldmann, K.A., and Paterson, A.H. (1994) Comparative mapping ofArabidopsis thaliana andBrassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization.Genetics,138, 499-510.

  Google Scholar 

• Ku, H.-M., Vision, T., Liu, J., and Tanksley, S.D. (2000) Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato andArabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,97, 9121-9126.

  Google Scholar 

• Leitch, I.J., and Bennett, M.D. (1997) Polyploidy in angiosperms.Trends Plant. Sci.,2, 470-476.

  Google Scholar 

• Li, W.-H. (1993) Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution.J. Mol. Evol.,36, 96-99.

  Google Scholar 

• .Li, W.-H. (1997)Molecular Evolution, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, X., Kaul, S., Rounsley, S., Shea, T.P., Benito, M.-I., Town, C.D., Fujii, C.Y., Mason, T., Bowman, C.L., Barnstead, M., Feldblyum, T.V., Buell, C.R., Ketchum, K.A., Lee, J., Ronning, C.M., Koo, H.L., Moffat, K.S., Cronin, L.A., Shen, M., Pai, G., Van Aken, S., Umayam, L., Tallon, L.J., Gill, J.E., Adams, M.D., Carrera, A.J., Creasy, T.H., Goodman, H.M., Somerville, C.R., Copenhaver, G.P., Preuss, D., Nierman, W.C., White, O., Eisen, J.A., Salzberg, S.L., Fraser, C.M., and Venter, J.C. (1999) Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the plantArabidopsis thaliana.Nature,402, 761-768.

  Google Scholar 

• Lukashin, A.V., and Borodovsky, M. (1998) GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding.Nucleic Acids Res.,26, 1107-1115.

  Google Scholar 

• Lynch, M., and Conery, J.S. (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes.Science,290, 1151-1155.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, K., Schüller, C., Wambutt, R., Murphy, G., Volckaert, G., Pohl, T., Düsterhöft, A., Stiekema, W., Entian, K.-D., Terryn, N., Harris, B., Ansorge, W., Brandt, P., Grivell, L., Rieger, M., Weichselgartner, M., de Simone, V., Obermaier, B., Mache, R., Müller, M., Kreis, M., Delseny, M., Puigdomenech, P., Watson, M., Schmidtheini, T., Reichert, B., Portatelle, D., Perez-Alonso,, M., Boutry, M., Bancroft, I., Vos, P., Hoheisel, J., Zimmermann, W., Wedler, H., Ridley, P., Langham, S.-A., McCullagh, B., Bilham, L., Robben, J., Van der Schueren, J., Grymonprez, B., Chuang, Y.-J., Vandenbussche, F., Braeken, M., Weltjens, I., Voet, M., Bastiaens, I., Aert, R., Defoor, E., Weitzenegger, T., Bothe, G., Ramsperger, U., Hilbert, H., Braun, M., Holzer, E., Brandt, A., Peters, S., van Staveren, M., Dirkse, W., Mooijman, P., Klein Lankhorst, R., Rose, M., Hauf, J., Kötter, P., Berneiser, S., Hempel, S., Feldpausch, M., Lamberth, S., Van den Daele, H., De Keyser, A., Buysschaert, C., Gielen, J., Villarroel, R., De Clercq, R., Van Montagu, M., Rogers, J., Cronin, A., Quail, M., Bray-Allen, S., Clark, L., Foggett, J., Hall, S., Kay, M., Lennard, N., McLay, K., Mayes, R., Pettett, A., Rajandream, M.-A., Lyne, M., Benes, V., Rechmann, S., Borkova, D., Blöcker, H., Scharfe, M., Grimm, M., Löhnert, T.-H., Dose, S., de Haan, M., Maarse, A., Schäfer, M., Müller-Auer, S., Gabel, C., Fuchs, M., Fartmann, B., Granderath, K., Dauner, D., Herzl, A., Neumann, S., Argiriou, A., Vitale, D., Liguori, R., Piravandi, E., Massenet, O., Quigley, F., Clabauld, G., Mündlein, A., Felber, R., Schnabl, S., Hiller, R., Schmidt, W., Lecharny, A., Aubourg, S., Chefdor, F., Cooke, R., Berger, C., Montfort, A., Casacuberta, E., Gibbons, T., Weber, N., Vandenbol, M., Bargues, M., Terol, J., Torres, A., Perez-Perez, A., Purnelle, B., Bent, E., Johnson, S., Tacon, D., Jesse, T., Heijnen, L., Schwarz, S., Scholler, P., Heber, S., Francs, P., Bielke, C., Frishman, D., Haase, D., Lemcke, K., Mewes, H.W., Stocker, S., Zaccaria, P., Bevan, M., Wilson, R.K., de la Bastide, M., Habermann, K., Parnell, L., Dedhia, N., Gnoj, L., Schutz, K., Huang, E., Spiegel, L., Sehkon, M., Murray, J., Sheet, P., Cordes, M., Abu-Threideh, J., Stoneking, T., Kalicki, J., Graves, T., Harmon, G., Edwards, J., Latreille, P., Courtney, L., Cloud, J., Abbott, A., Scott, K., Johnson, D., Minx, P., Bentley, D., Fulton, B., Miller, N., Greco, T., Kemp, K., Kramer, J., Fulton, L., Mardis, E., Dante, M., Pepin, K., Hillier, L., Nelson, J., Spieth, J., Ryan, E., Andrews, S., Geisel, C., Layman, D., Du, H., Ali, J., Berghoff, A., Jones, K., Drone, K., Cotton, M., Joshu, C., Antonoiu, B., Zidanic, M., Strong, C., Sun, H., Lamar, B., Yordan, C., Ma, P., Zhong, J., Preston, R., Vil, D., Shekher, M., Matero, A., Shah, R., Swaby, I'K., O'shaughnessy, A., Rodriguez, M., Hoffman, J., Till, S., Granat, S., Shohdy, N., Hasegawa, A., Hameed, A., Lodhi, M., Johnson, A., Chen, E., Marra, M., Martienssen, R., and Mc-Combie, W.R. (1999) Sequence and analysis of chromosome 4 of the plantArabidopsis thaliana.Nature,402, 769-777.

  Google Scholar 

• Nei, M., and Gojobori, T. (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions.Mol. Biol. Evol.,3, 418-426.

  Google Scholar 

• Ohno, S. (1970)Evolution by Gene Duplication, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Paterson, A.H., Lan, T.-H., Reischmann, K.P., Chang, C., Lin, Y.-R., Liu, S.-C., Burow, M.D., Kowalski, S.P., Katsar, C.S., Del-Monte, T.A., Feldmann, K.A., Schertz, K.F., and Wendel, J.F. (1996) Toward a unified genetic map of higher plants, transcending the monocot-dicot divergence.Nature Genet.,14, 380-382.

  Google Scholar 

• 1).

• Robinson-Rechavi, M., Marchand, O., Escriva, H., and Laudet, V. (2001) An ancestral whole-genome duplication may not have been responsible for the abundance of duplicated fish genes.Curr. Biol.,11, R458-R459.

  Google Scholar 

• Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.Mol. Biol. Evol.,4, 406-425.

  Google Scholar 

• Sankoff, D. (2001) Gene and genome duplication.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.,11, 681-684.

  Google Scholar 

• Skrabanek, L., and Wolfe, K.H. (1998) Eukaryote genome duplication-where's the evidence?Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.,8, 694-700.

  Google Scholar 

• Stefansky, W. (1972) Rejecting outliers in factorial designs.Technometrics,14, 469-479.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, J.S., Van De Peer, Y., Braasch, I., and Meyer, A. (2001a) Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.,B 356, 1661-1679.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, J.S., Van de Peer, Y., and Meyer, A. (2001b) Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation.Trends Genet.,17, 299-301.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, J.S., Van de Peer, Y., and Meyer, A. (2001c) Revisiting recent challenges to the ancient fish-specific genome duplication hypothesis.Curr. Biol.,11, R1005-R1007.

  Google Scholar 

• Terryn, N., Heijnen, L., De Keyser, A., Van Asseldonck, M., De Clercq, R., Verbakel, H., Gielen, J., Zabeau, M., Villarroel, R., Jesse, T., Neyt, P., Hogers, R., Van den Daele, H., Ardiles, W., Schueller, C., Mayer, K., Déhais, P., Rombauts, S., Van Montagu, M., Rouzé, P., and Vos, P. (1999) Evidence for an ancient chromosomal duplication inArabidopsis thaliana by sequencing and analyzing a 400-kb contig of theAPETALA2 locus on chromosome 4.FEBS Lett.,445, 237-245.

  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.Nucleic Acids Res.,22, 4673-4680.

  Google Scholar 

• Van de Peer, Y., and De Wachter, R. (1994) TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment.Comput. Appl. Biosci.,10, 569-570.

  Google Scholar 

• Van de Peer, Y., Taylor, J.S., Braasch, I., and Meyer, A. (2001) The ghost of selection past: rates of evolution and functional divergence of anciently duplicated genes.J. Mol. Evol.,53, 436-446.

  Google Scholar 

• Van de Peer, Y., Frickey, T., Taylor, J.S., and Meyer, A. (2002) Dealing with saturation at the amino acid level: a case study based on anciently duplicated zebrafish genes.Gene, 295, 205-211.

  Google Scholar 

• Vandepoele, K., Saeys, Y., Simillion, C., Raes, J., and Van de Peer, Y. (2002) A new tool for the Automatic Detection of Homologous Regons (ADHoRe) and its application to microcolinearity betweenArabidopsis and rice.Genome Res., in press.

• 40.Vision, T.J., Brown, D.G., and Tanksley, S.D. (2000) The origins of genomic duplications inArabidopsis.Science,290, 2114-2117.

  Google Scholar 

• Wang, Y., and Gu, X. (2000) Evolutionary patterns of gene families generated in the early stage of vertebrates.J. Mol. Evol.,51, 88-96.

  Google Scholar 

• Wendel, J.F. (2000) Genome evolution in polyploids.Plant Mol. Biol.,42, 225-249.

  Google Scholar 

• Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., and Chase, M.W. (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree.Proc. R. Soc. Lond.,B 268, 2211-2220.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolfe, K.H. (2001) Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization.Nature Rev. Genet.,2, 333-341.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, Y.-W., Lai, K.-N., Tai, P.-Y., and Li, W.-H. (1999) Rates of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm mitochondrial DNA sequences and dates of divergence betweenBrassica and other angiosperm lineages.J. Mol. Evol.,48, 597-604.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, Z. (1997) PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.Comput. Appl. Biosci.,13, 555-556.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, Z., and Nielsen, R. (2000) Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models.Mol. Biol. Evol.,17, 32-43.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeng, L.-W., Comeron, J.M., Chen, B., and Kreitman, M. (1998) The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change inDrosophila.Genetica,103, 369-382.

  Google Scholar 

Download references