957Accesses
117Citations
3Altmetric
Abstract
About ten percent of all vascular plant species world-wide are epiphytes and they are almost exclusively found in tropical forests. Therefore, they constitute a large part of the global plant biodiversity (10% of all species), and in tropical countries represent up to 25% of all vascular plant species. Focusing on the differences between epiphytes in the strict sense or ‘holo-epiphytes’ (non-parasitic plants that use other plants – usually trees – as growing sites all through their life-cycle) and ‘hemi-epiphytes’ (‘half’ epiphytes which only spend part of their life as epiphytes until their aerial roots become connected to the ground), horizontal and vertical distribution patterns of both in relation to some of their ecological requirements are compared. Vertical ecological gradients (i.e., insolation and humidity differences from the forest floor to the canopy surface) are relevant for the composition of the holo- epiphytic vegetation. For hemi-epiphytes, however, ecological differences between distinct forest habitats (i.e., horizontal gradients) are relevant, but not primarily the canopy structure, as the individual host tree structure is more important. The scale-dependence of epiphyte diversity assessment (relatively small study areas for holo-epiphytes, large study areas for hemi-epiphytes) is mainly due to the striking differences in plant sizes and related mechanical and physiological requirements.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barthlott, W., Lauer, W. & Placke, A. 1996. Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50: 317–327.
Barthlott, W., Biedinger, N., Braun, G., Feig, F., Kier, G. & Mutke, J. 1999. Terminological and methodological aspects of the mapping and analysis of global biodiversity. Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 103–110.
Berg, C. C. & Wiebes, J. T. 1992. African fig trees and fig wasps. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wet., Verhand. Afd. Natuurk., Tweede Reeks.
Biedinger, N. & Fischer, E. 1996. Epiphytic vegetation and ecology in central African forests (Rwanda, Zaire). Ecotropica 2: 121–142.
Boegner, A. 1999. Diversität und Phytogeographie der epiphytischen Angiospermen ausgewählter paläo-und neotropischer Gebiete. Unpublished diploma thesis. Botanisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn.
Bradbury, J. W. 1977. Lek mating behavior in the hammer-headed bat. Z. f. Tierpsychol. 45: 225–255.
Bradbury, J. W. 1981. The evolution of lek. Pp. 138–169. In: Alexander, R. D. & Tinckle, D. W. (eds), Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York.
Catling, P. M. & Levkovitch, L. P. 1989. Associations of vascular epiphytes in a Guatemalan cloud forest. Biotropica 21: 35–40.
Coxson, D. S. & Nadkarni, N. M. 1995. Ecological roles of epiphytes in nutrient cycles of forest ecosystems. Pp. 495–543. In: Lowman, M. D. & Nadkarni, N. M. (eds), Forest canopies. Academic Press, San Diego.
David, P. 1993. Etude comparative des préférences écologiques de quelques espè ces de Ficus hémi-épiphytes des forê ts tropicales. DEA Evolution et Ecologie, Université de Montpellier II, Pp. I-VI.
Davidson, D. W. 1988. Ecological studies of neotropical ant gardens. Ecology 69: 1138–1152.
Dudgeon, W. 1923. Succession of epiphytes in theQuercus incana forest at Landour, western Himalayas, preliminary note. J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 3: 270–272.
Dunsterville, G. C. K. 1961. How many orchids on a tree? Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. May 1961: 362–363.
Engwald, S. 1999. Ökologie und Diversität der Epiphyten eines Tiefland-und eines Bergregenwalds in Venezuela. Libri-Books on Demand. Hamburg.
Foster, R. B. & Hubbel, S. P. 1990. The floristic composition of the Barro Colorado Island forest. Pp. 99–11. In: Gentry, A. H. (ed.), Four neotropical rain forests. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Freiberg, M. 1997. Spatial and temporal pattern of temperature and humidity of a tropical premontane rain forest tree in Costa Rica. Selbyana 18: 77–84.
Gautier-Hion, A. & Michaloud, G. 1989. Are figs always keystone resources for tropical frugivorous vertebrates? A test in Gabon. Ecology 70: 1826–1833.
Gentry, A. H. & Dodson, C. H. 1987. Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar. 74: 205–233.
Groombridge, B. (ed.) 1992. Global biodiversity: status of the earth's living resources. Chapman & Hall, London.
Guy, P. R. 1977. Notes on the host species of epiphytic figs (Ficus spp.) on the flood plain of the Mana pools game reserve, Rhodesia. Kirkia 10: 559–562.
Hall, J. B. 1976. Classification and ecology of closed-canopy forest in Ghana. J. Ecology 64: 913–951.
Hall, J. B. 1978. Check-list of the vascular plants of Bia National Park and Bia Game Production Reserve. In: Martin, C. (ed.), Management plan for the Bia Wildlife Conservation Areas, Part I. Wildlife and National Parks Division, Ghana Forestry Commission. Final Report IUCN/WWF Project 1251.
Hartshorn, G. S. & Hammel, B. E. 1994. Vegetation types and floristic patterns. Pp. 73–89. In: McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds), La Selva. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Heywood, V. H. (ed.) 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hosokawa, T. 1950. Epiphyte-quotient. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 63: 18–19.
Hietz-Seifert, U., Hietz, P. & Guevara, S. 1996. Epiphyte vegetation and diversity on remnant trees after forest clearance in southern Veracruz. Biol. Cons. 75: 103–111.
Ibisch, P. 1996. Neotropische Epiphytendiversität-das Beispiel Bolivien. Martina Galunder-Verlag, Wiehl.
Ibisch, P., Boegner, A., Nieder, J. & Barthlott, W. 1996. How diverse are neotropical epiphytes? An analysis based on the 'Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru'. Ecotropica 2: 13–28.
Johansson, D. 1974. Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forest. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 59: 1–136.
Johansson, D. R. 1989. Vascular epiphytism in Africa. Pp. 183–194. In: Lieth, H. & Werger, M. J. A. (eds), Tropical rain forest ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Kelly, D. L. 1985. Epiphytes and climbers of a Jamaican rain forest: vertical distribution, life forms and life histories. J. Biogeog. 12: 223–241.
Kelly, D. L., Tanner, E. V. J., Nic Lughada, E. & Kapos, V. 1994. Floristics and biogeography of a rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. J. Biogeog. 21: 421–440.
Kikuchi, T. 1992. Communities of epiphytic vascular plants on a Himalayan mountainside in far eastern Nepal. Ecol. Rev. 22: 121–128.
Kress, W. J. 1986. The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes: an update. Selbyana 9: 2–22.
Longman, H. A. 1917. The flora of a single tree. Proc. Royal Soc. Queensland 29: 64–69.
Lüttge, U. (ed.) 1989. Vascular plants as epiphytes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lüttge, U., Ball, E., Kluge, M. & Ong, B. L. 1986. Photosynthetic light requirements of various tropical vascular epiphytes. Physiol. Vég. 24: 315–331.
Martin, C. 1989. Die Regenwälder Westafrikas: Ökologie-Bedrohung-Schutz. Birkhäuser, Basel.
Michaloud, G. 1988. Aspects de la reproduction des figuiers monoï ques en forê t équatoriale africaine. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Montpellier II, Montpellier.
Michaloud, G. & Michaloud-Pelletier, S. 1987. Ficus hémiépiphytes (Moraceae) et arbres supports. Biotropica 19: 125–136.
Michaloud, G., Carriè re, S. & Kobbi, M. 1996. Exceptions to the one: one relationship between African fig trees and their fig wasp pollinators: possible evolutionary scenarios. J. Biogeog. 23: 513–520.
Mø ller Jø rgensen, P. & Leó n-Yánez, S. (eds). 1999. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri.
Nieder, J. & Zotz, G. 1998. Methods of analyzing the structure and dynamics of vascular epiphyte communities. Ecotropica 4: 33–39.
Nieder, J., Engwald, S., Klawun, M. & Barthlott, W. 2000. Spatial distribution of vascular epiphytes in a lowland Amazonian rain forest in southern Venezuela. Biotropica 32: 385–396.
Nowicki, C. 1998. Diversität epiphytischer und terrestrischer Pflanzen eines ecuadorianischen Bergnebelwaldes im Vergleich. Unpublished diploma thesis. Botanisches Institut, Universität Bonn. Bonn.
Papulin, F., Bianchi, E., Germani, M., Pedruzzi, D. & Wagner, A. 1995. Orchid diversity and distribution on a tree at Reserva Forestal de San Ramó n, Costa Rica. Brenesia 43–44: 47–54.
Prosperi, J. 1998. Biologie du développement des hémi-épiphytes ligneux. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Montpellier II, Montpellier.
Putz, F. E. 1983. Liana biomass and leaf area of a “Tierra Firme” forest in the Rio Negro basin, Venezuela. Biotropica 15: 185–189.
Putz, F. E. & Holbrook, N. M. 1986. Notes on the natural history of hemiepiphytes. Selbyana 9: 61–69.
Putz, F. E. & Holbrook, N. M. 1989. Strangler fig rooting habits and nutrient relations in the Llanos of Venezuela. Am. J. Botany 76: 781–788.
Rauer, G. 1995. Epiphytische Orchidaceae eines westandinen Bergregenwaldes in Ecuador. Unpublished diploma thesis. Botanisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn.
Richards, P.W. 1952. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rudolph, D. 1995. Vaskuläre Epiphyten eines westandinen Bergregenwaldes in Ecuador. Unpublished diploma thesis. Botanisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn.
Rudolph, D., Rauer, G., Nieder, J. & Barthlott, W. 1998. Distributional patterns of epiphytes in the canopy and phorophyte characteristics in a western Andean rain forest in Ecuador. Selbyana 19: 27–33.
Sanford, W. W. 1969. The distribution of epiphytic orchids in Nigeria in relation to each other and to geographic location and climate, type of vegetation and tree species. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 1: 247–285.
Schnell, R. 1952. Végétation et flore de la région montagneuse des Nimba. Mem. I.F.A.N. 22: 1–356.
Ter Steege, H. & Cornelissen, J. H. C. 1989. Distribution and ecology of vascular epiphytes in lowland rain forest of Guyana. Biotropica 21: 331–339.
Tewari, M., Upreti, N., Pandey, P. & Sing, S. P. 1985. Epiphytic succession on tree trunks in a mixed oak-cedar forest (Kumaun, Himalaya). Vegetatio 63: 105–112.
Todzia, C. 1986. Growth habits, host tree species, and density of hemiepiphytes on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 18: 22–27.
Van Oye, P. 1921. Influence des facteurs climatiques sur la répartition des épiphytes à la surface des troncs d'arbres à Java. Rev. Gén. Bot., 33: 161–176.
Watson, J. B., Kress, W. J. & Roesel, C. S. 1988. A bibliography of biological literature on vascular epiphytes. Selbyana 10: 1–23.
Williams-Linera & Lawton, R. O. 1995. The ecology of hemiepiphytes in forest canopies. Pp. 255–283. In: Lowman, M. D. & Nadkarni, N. M. (eds), Forest canopies. Academic Press, San Diego.
Zotz, G. 1995. How fast does an epiphyte grow? Selbyana 16: 150–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Botanisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115, Bonn, Germany
Jürgen Nieder
Laboratoire de Botanique, Université de Montpellier II, CNRS–ISEM–UMR 5554, 34090, Montpellier, France
Juliana Prosperí & Georges Michaloud
- Jürgen Nieder
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Juliana Prosperí
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Georges Michaloud
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nieder, J., Prosperí, J. & Michaloud, G. Epiphytes and their contribution to canopy diversity.Plant Ecology153, 51–63 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017517119305
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative