• Anderson, Stephen. 1976. 'On the Notion of Subject in Ergative Languages', in C. Li (ed.),Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Andrews, Avery D. 1982. 'Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic', in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun, and Dominique Sportiche. 1994. 'Agreement, Word Order, and Conjunction in Some Varieties of Arabic',Linguistic Inquiry25, 195–220.

  Google Scholar 

• Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, and Dominique Sportiche. 1981. 'Some Aspects of Wide Scope Quantification',Journal of Linguistic Research1, 69–95.

  Google Scholar 

• Aoun, Joseph and Audrey Li. 1993.The Syntax of Scope, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Bach, Emond. 1971. 'Questions',Linguistic Inquiry2, 153–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Belletti, Adriana. 1990.Generalized Verb Movement, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.

  Google Scholar 

• Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1996. 'Introduction', in A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (eds.),Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1992. 'Structural Conditions on Agreement', in K. Broderick (ed.),The Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 22, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, pp. 17–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale. 1996. 'Ergativity: Towards a Theory of a Heterogeneous Class',Linguistic Inquiry27, 531–604.

  Google Scholar 

• Bobaijik, Jonathan David. 1993. 'Nominal1y Absolutive Is Not Absolutely Nominative', in J. Mead (ed.),The Proceedings of the Eleventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 44–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Bobaijik, Jonathan David. 1995.Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• Bokarev, Evgenij A. 1959.Cezskie (didojskie) jazyki Dagestana, AN SSSR, Moscow.

  Google Scholar 

• Butt, Miriam. 1995.The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

  Google Scholar 

• Campana, Mark. 1992.A Movement Theory of Ergativity, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, McGill University, Quebec.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1973. 'Conditions on Transformations', in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 232–286.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1977.Essays on Form and Interpretation, North Holland, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1981.Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1986.Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1991. 'Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation', in R. Freidin (ed.),Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1993. 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.),The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–52.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1995.The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, Noam. 1998. 'Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework', unpublished manuscript, MIT.

• Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1993. 'The Theory of Principles and Parameters', in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and F. Vennemann (eds.),Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 506–569.

  Google Scholar 

• Chung, Sandra. 1998.The Design of Agreement, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon. 1998. 'The Typology ofWh-Movement:Wh-Questions in Malay',Syntax1, 221–258.

  Google Scholar 

• Comrie, Bernard. 2000. 'Valency Changing Derivations in Tsez', in R. M. W. Dixon and A. Aikhenvald (eds.),Changing Valency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 360–374.

  Google Scholar 

• Comrie, Bernard, Maria Polinsky, and Ramazan Rajabov. to appear. 'Tsezian Languages', in A. Harris and R. Smeets (eds.),Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3, University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh.

• Culicover, Peter. 1991. 'Topicalization, Inversion, and Complementizers in English', in D. Delfitto, M. Everaert, A. Evers, and F. Stuurman (eds.),Going Romance and Beyond, University of Utrecht, OTS Working Papers, Utrecht, pp. 48–62.

• Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991.Plains Cree Morphosyntax, Garland Publishing Company, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahlstrom, Amy. 1995. 'Morphology and Syntax of the Fox (Mesquakie) Language', unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.

• Davison, Alice. 1988. 'Constituent Structure and the Realization of Agreement Features', in D. Brentari, G. Larson, and L. MacLeod (eds.),The Proceedings of the 24th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 291–303.

  Google Scholar 

• Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. 'Scope Marking: In Defense of Indirect Dependency', in U. Lutz and G. Müller (eds.),Papers on Wh-Scope Marking: papers from the Workshop on the Syntax and Semantics of Wh-Scope Marking, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungbereichs 34. D 76, University of Stuttgart and University of Tübingen, Stuttgart, pp. 107–130.

  Google Scholar 

• Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. 'Ergativity',Language55, 59–138.

  Google Scholar 

• Doherty, Cathal. 1993.Clauses Without That:The Case for Bare Sentential Complementation in English, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  Google Scholar 

• Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1998.The Dynamics of Focus Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Ernst, Thomas. 1998. 'Case and Parameterization of Scope',Natural Language and Linguistic Theory16, 101–148.

  Google Scholar 

• van Gelderen, Elly. 1997.Verbal Agreement and the Grammar Behind Its Breakdown: Minimalist Feature Checking, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.

  Google Scholar 

• Givó n, Talmy (ed.). 1983.Topic Continuity in Discourse, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, Lynn. 1979. 'Raising in Bauan Fijian', paper presented at the 54th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.

• Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. 'Projection, Heads, and Optimality',Linguistic Inquiry28, 373–422.

  Google Scholar 

• Gundel, Jeanette. 1985. '“Shared Knowledge” and Topicality',Journal of Pragmatics9, 83–107.

  Google Scholar 

• Halliday, Michael. 1967. 'Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Part II',Journal of Linguistics3, 199–244.

  Google Scholar 

• Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. 'Complement Clauses', in A. E. Kibrik (ed.),Godoberi, LINCOM Europa, München, pp. 174–197.

  Google Scholar 

• Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. 'Long-Distance Agreement in Godoberi (Daghestanian) Complement Clauses',Folia Linguistica33, 131–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. 'On the Parametrisation of Functional Projections in CP', in A. Schafer (ed.),Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 23, Vol. 1, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, pp. 191–204.

  Google Scholar 

• Hornstein, Norbert. 1995.Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. 'Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar', unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• Huang, C.-T. James. 1995. 'Logical Form', in Gert Webelhuth (ed.),Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 125–176.

  Google Scholar 

• Imnajšvili, David. 1963.Didojskij jazyk v sravnenii s ginuxskim i xvaršijskim jazykami, Izd. AN Gruzinskoj SSR, Tbilisi.

  Google Scholar 

• Jackendoff, Ray. 1972.Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Jake, Janice and David Odden. 1979. 'Raising in Kipsigis',Studies in the Linguistic Sciences9, 131–155.

  Google Scholar 

• Joseph, Brian D. 1976. 'Raising in Modern Greek: A Copying Process?', in J. Hankamer and J. Aissen (eds.),Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 241–281.

  Google Scholar 

• Kibrik, Alexander E. 1987. 'Constructions with Clause Actants in Daghestanian Languages',Lingua71, 133–178.

  Google Scholar 

• Kiss, Katalin É. (ed.). 1995.Discourse Configurational Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1993. 'Object Agreement Phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis', inMIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers on Case and Agreement I, MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, pp. 99–148.

  Google Scholar 

• Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche. 1991. 'The Position of Subjects',Lingua85, 211–258.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuno, Susumu, Ken-ichi Takami and Yuru Wu. 1999. 'Quantifier Scope in English, Chinese, and Japanese',Language75, 63–111.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuroda, S.-Y. 1972. 'The Categorical and the Thetic Judgment. Evidence from Japanese Syntax',Foundations of Language9, 153–185.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuroda, S.-Y. 1988. 'Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese',Linguisticae Investigationes12, 1–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuroda, S.-Y. 1990. 'The Categorical and Thetic Judgment Reconsidered', in K. Milligan (ed.),Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 77–88.

  Google Scholar 

• Lambrecht, Knud. 1994.Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Lasnik, Howard. 1981. 'On Two Recent Treatments of Disjoint Reference',Journal of Linguistic Research1, 48–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito. 1991. 'On the Subject of Infinitives', inThe Proceedings of the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 324–343.

  Google Scholar 

• Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito. 1992.Move Alpha, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Mahajan, Anoop. 1989. 'Agreement and Agreement Phrases', in I. Laka and A. Mahajan (eds.),MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, pp. 217–252.

  Google Scholar 

• Massam, Diane. 1985.Case Theory and the Projection Principle, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

• May, Robert. 1977.The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• May, Robert. 1985.Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• McNally, Louise. 1998. 'On the Linguistic Encoding of Information Packaging Instructions', in P. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.),The Limits of Syntax. Syntax and Semantics 29, Academic Press, New York, pp. 161–184.

  Google Scholar 

• Moore, John. 1998. 'Turkish Copy-Raising and A-Chain Locality',Natural Language and Linguistic Theory16, 149–189.

  Google Scholar 

• Müller, Gereon and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1993. 'Improper Movement and Unambiguous Binding',Linguistic Inquiry24, 461–507.

  Google Scholar 

• Murasugi, Kumiko. 1992.NP-Movement and the Ergative Parameter, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• Oku, Satoshi. 1999. 'Notes on Quantifier/Wh Interaction',Linguistic Inquiry30, 143–147.

  Google Scholar 

• Partee, Barbara. 1991. 'Topic, Focus, and Quantification', in S. Moore and A. Wyner (eds.),Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics10, 159–187.

• Pesetsky, David. 1987. 'Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)Definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 98–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. 'Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP',Linguistic Inquiry20, 365–424.

  Google Scholar 

• Postal, Paul. 1974.On Raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Prince, Ellen. 1981. 'Towards a Taxonomy of Given-New Information', in P. Cole (ed.),Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–256.

  Google Scholar 

• Prince, Ellen. 1998. 'On the Limits of Syntax, With Reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization', in P. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.),The Limits of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics 29, Academic Press, New York, pp. 281–302.

  Google Scholar 

• Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. 'Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics', distributed by the University of Indiana Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

  Google Scholar 

• Richards, Norvin. 1997.What Moves Where When in Which Language, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• Rizzi, Luigi. 1990.Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. 'Residual Verb Second and theWh-Criterion',Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics 2, University of Geneva.

• Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. 'The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery', in L. Haegeman (ed.),Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Rochemont, Michael. 1998. 'Phonological Focus and Structural Focus', in P. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.),The Limits of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics 29, Academic Press, New York, pp. 337–363.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967.The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Ross, John Robert. 1967. 'Constraints on Variables in Syntax', unpublished Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

• Rooth, Mats. 1992. 'A Theory of Focus Interpretation',Natural Language Semantics1, 75–116.

  Google Scholar 

• Runner, Jeffrey. 1998.Noun Phrase Licensing and Interpretation, Garland Publishing Company, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. 'The Thetic/Categorical Distinction Revisited',Linguistics25, 511–580.

  Google Scholar 

• Seiter, William J. 1983. 'Subject-Direct Object Raising in Niuean', in D. Perlmutter (ed.),Studies in Relational Grammar I, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 317–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984.Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Spencer, Andrew. 1991.Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Testelec, Jakov. 1998. 'Word Order in Dagestanian Languages', in A. Siewerska (ed.),Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 257–280.

  Google Scholar 

• Vallduví, Enric. 1992.The Informational Component, Garland Publishing Company, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Vallduví, Enric and Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. 'The Linguistic Realization of Information Packaging',Linguistics34, 459–519.

  Google Scholar 

• Vallduví, Enric and Maria Vilkuna. 1998. 'On Rheme and Kontrast', in P. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.),The Limits of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics 29, Academic Press, New York, pp. 79–108.

  Google Scholar 

• van den Berg, Helma. 1995.A Grammar of Hunzib (With Texts and Lexicon), LINCOM Europa, München.

  Google Scholar 

• Wali, Kashi and Ashok Koul. 1994. 'Kashmiri Clitics: The Role of Case and CASE',Linguistics32, 969–994.

  Google Scholar 

Download references