Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-zrtmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-29T17:46:44.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST): the clinical implications of cellular signalling pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009

Daniela Katz
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical Oncology and Sarcoma Research Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Alexander Lazar
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Sarcoma Research Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Dina Lev*
Affiliation:
Department of Cancer Biology and Sarcoma Research Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Dina Lev,Department of Cancer Biology and Sarcoma Research Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1104, Houston, TX 77030,USA. Tel: +1 713 792 1637; Fax: +1 713 563 1185; E-mail:dlev@mdanderson.org

Abstract

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST) is a rare malignancy accounting for 3–10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Most MPNSTs arise in association with peripheral nerves or deep neurofibromas and may originate from neural crest cells, although the specific cell of origin is uncertain. Approximately half of MPNSTs occur in the setting of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), an autosomal dominant disorder with an incidence of approximately one in 3500 persons; the remainder of MPNSTs develop sporadically. In addition to a variety of clinical manifestations, approximately 8–13% of NF1 patients develop MPNSTs, which are the leading cause of NF1-related mortality. Surgical resection is the mainstay of MPNST clinical management. However, because of invasive growth, propensity to metastasise, and limited sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation, MPNST has a guarded to poor prognosis. Five-year survival rates of only 20–50% indicate an urgent need for improved therapeutic approaches. Recent work in this field has identified several altered intracellular signal transduction cascades and deregulated tyrosine kinase receptors, posing the possibility of personalised, targeted therapeutics. However, expanded knowledge of MPNST molecular pathobiology will be needed to meaningfully apply such approaches for the benefit of afflicted patients.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1Grobmyer,S.R. et al. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations.Journal of Surgical Oncology97,340-349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Cashen,D.V. et al. (2004)Survival data for patients with malignant schwannoma.Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research426,69-73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Anghileri,M. et al. (2006)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution.Cancer107,1065-1074Google Scholar
4Angelov,L. et al. (1998)Neurogenic sarcomas: experience at the University of Toronto.Neurosurgery43,56-64; discussion 64-55Google Scholar
5Evans,D.G. et al. (2002)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1.Journal of Medical Genetics39,311-314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ducatman,B.S. et al. (1986)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases.Cancer57,2006-2021Google Scholar
7Ferner,R.E. andGutmann,D.H. (2002)International consensus statement on malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis.Cancer Research62,1573-1577Google ScholarPubMed
8Tucker,T. et al. (2005)Association between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1.Neurology65,205-211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Friedman,J.M. (1999)Epidemiology of neurofibromatosis type 1.American Journal of Medical Genetics89,1-63.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Gutmann,D.H. et al. (1997)The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2.Journal of the American Medical Association278,51-57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Zadeh,G. et al. (2007)Radiation induced peripheral nerve tumors: case series and review of the literature.Journal of Neuro-Oncology83,205-212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Adamson,D.C.,Cummings,T.J. andFriedman,A.H. (2004)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the spine after radiation therapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma.Clinical Neuropathology23,245-255Google ScholarPubMed
13Gupta,G.,Mammis,A. andManiker,A. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Neurosurgery Clinics of North America19,533-543CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Vauthey,J.N.,Woodruff,J.M. andBrennan,M.F. (1995)Extremity malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (neurogenic sarcomas): a 10-year experience.Annals of Surgical Oncology2,126-131Google Scholar
15Van Herendael,B.H. et al. (2006)The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors.Skeletal Radiology35,745-753Google Scholar
16Cardona,S. et al. (2003)Evaluation of F18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to assess the nature of neurogenic tumours.European Journal of Surgical Oncology29,536-541Google Scholar
17Woodruff,J.M. (1996)Pathology of the major peripheral nerve sheath neoplasms.Monographs in Pathology38,129-161Google ScholarPubMed
18Lin,B.T.,Weiss,L.M. andMedeiros,L.J. (1997)Neurofibroma and cellular neurofibroma with atypia: a report of 14 tumors.American Journal of Surgical Pathology21,1443-1449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Zou,C. et al. (2009)Clinical, pathological, and molecular variables predictive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor outcome.Annals of Surgery249,1014-1022Google Scholar
20De Raedt,T. et al. (2003)Elevated risk for MPNST in NF1 microdeletion patients.American Journal of Human Genetics72,1288-1292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Warbey,V.S. et al. (2009)[18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type-1.European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging36,751-757CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Furniss,D. et al. (2008)A 10-year review of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in a single center: clinical and radiographic features can help to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery121,529-533Google Scholar
23Hruban,R.H. et al. (1990)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the buttock and lower extremity.A study of 43 cases. Cancer66,1253-1265Google Scholar
24Kourea,H.P. et al. (1998)Subdiaphragmatic and intrathoracic paraspinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 25 patients and 26 tumors.Cancer82,2191-2203Google Scholar
25Wong,W.W. et al. (1998)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: analysis of treatment outcome.International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics42,351-360Google Scholar
26Sharif,S. et al. (2006)Second primary tumors in neurofibromatosis 1 patients treated for optic glioma: substantial risks after radiotherapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology24,2570-2575Google Scholar
27Sordillo,P.P. et al. (1981)Malignant schwannoma–clinical characteristics, survival, and response to therapy.Cancer47,2503-25093.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Carli,M. et al. (2005)Pediatric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the Italian and German soft tissue sarcoma cooperative group.Journal of Clinical Oncology23,8422-8430Google Scholar
29D'Agostino,A.N.,Soule,E.H. andMiller,R.H. (1963)Sarcomas of the Peripheral Nerves and Somatic Soft Tissues Associated with Multiple Neurofibromatosis (Von Recklinghausen's Disease).Cancer16,1015-1027Google Scholar
30Poyhonen,M.,Niemela,S. andHerva,R. (1997)Risk of malignancy and death in neurofibromatosis.Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine121,139-143Google ScholarPubMed
31Perry,A. et al. (2001)NF1 deletions in S-100 protein-positive and negative cells of sporadic and neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.American Journal of Pathology159,57-61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Bottillo,I. et al. (2009)Germline and somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic and NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours.Journal of Pathology217,693-701Google Scholar
33Holtkamp,N. et al. (2007)MMP-13 and p53 in the progression of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Neoplasia9,671-677Google Scholar
34Menon,A.G. et al. (1990)Chromosome 17p deletions and p53 gene mutations associated with the formation of malignant neurofibrosarcomas in von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America87,5435-5439Google Scholar
35Birindelli,S. et al. (2001)Rb and TP53 pathway alterations in sporadic and NF1-related malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Laboratory Investigation81,833-844Google Scholar
36Legius,E. et al. (1994)TP53 mutations are frequent in malignant NF1 tumors.Genes Chromosomes and Cancer10,250-255Google Scholar
37Johannessen,C.M. et al. (2005)The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102,8573-8578CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Ambrosini,G. et al. (2008)Sorafenib inhibits growth and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in malignant peripheral nerve sheath cells.Molecular Cancer Therapeutics7,890-896Google Scholar
39Perrone,F. et al. (2009)PDGFRA, PDGFRB, EGFR, and downstream signalling activation in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.Neuro-Oncology Feb 26; [Epub ahead of print]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Watson,M.A. et al. (2004)Gene expression profiling reveals unique molecular subtypes of Neurofibromatosis Type I-associated and sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Brain Pathology14,297-303Google Scholar
41Mahller,Y.Y. et al. (2006)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with high and low Ras-GTP are permissive for oncolytic herpes simplex virus mutants.Pediatric Blood and Cancer46,745-754Google Scholar
42Mattingly,R.R. et al. (2006)The mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitor PD184352 (CI-1040) selectively induces apoptosis in malignant schwannoma cell lines.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics316,456-465Google Scholar
43Tang,Y. et al. (1998)A role for Pak protein kinases in Schwann cell transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America95,5139-5144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Ingram,D.A. et al. (2001)Hyperactivation of p21(ras) and the hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPase, Rac2, cooperate to alter the proliferation of neurofibromin-deficient mast cells in vivo and in vitro.Journal of Experimental Medicine194,57-69Google Scholar
45Yang,F.C. et al. (2003)Neurofibromin-deficient Schwann cells secrete a potent migratory stimulus for Nf1 + /− mast cells.Journal of Clinical Investigation112,1851-1861Google ScholarPubMed
46Donovan,S. et al. (2002)Hyperactivation of protein kinase B and ERK have discrete effects on survival, proliferation, and cytokine expression in Nf1-deficient myeloid cells.Cancer Cell2,507-514Google Scholar
47Lau,N. et al. (2000)Loss of neurofibromin is associated with activation of RAS/MAPK and PI3-K/AKT signaling in a neurofibromatosis 1 astrocytoma.Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology59,759-767Google Scholar
48Zhang,Y.Y. et al. (1998)Nf1 regulates hematopoietic progenitor cell growth and ras signaling in response to multiple cytokines.Journal of Experimental Medicine187,1893-1902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Holtkamp,N. et al. (2008)EGFR and erbB2 in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and implications for targeted therapy.Neuro-Oncology10,946-957CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Mawrin,C. et al. (2002)Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of p53, RB, and PTEN in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Virchows Archiv440,610-615Google Scholar
51Schneider-Stock,R. et al. (1997)p53 gene mutations in soft-tissue sarcomas–correlations with p53 immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy.Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology123,211-218Google Scholar
52Kindblom,L.G. et al. (1995)Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of p53, MDM2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 in benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours.Virchows Archiv427,19-26Google Scholar
53Kourea,H.P. et al. (1999)Deletions of the INK4A gene occur in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors but not in neurofibromas.American Journal of Pathology155,1855-1860Google Scholar
54Nielsen,G.P. et al. (1999)Malignant transformation of neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1 is associated with CDKN2A/p16 inactivation.American Journal of Pathology155,1879-1884Google Scholar
55Kourea,H.P. et al. (1999)Expression of p27(kip) and other cell cycle regulators in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and neurofibromas: the emerging role of p27(kip) in malignant transformation of neurofibromas.American Journal of Pathology155,1885-1891CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Perry,A. et al. (2002)Differential NF1, p16, and EGFR patterns by interphase cytogenetics (FISH) in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and morphologically similar spindle cell neoplasms.Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology61,702-709Google Scholar
57Mantripragada,K.K. et al. (2008)High-resolution DNA copy number profiling of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors using targeted microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.Clinical Cancer Research14,1015-1024Google Scholar
58Theos,A. andKorf,B.R. (2006)Pathophysiology of neurofibromatosis type 1.Annals of Internal Medicine144,842-849Google Scholar
59Ballester,R. et al. (1990)The NF1 locus encodes a protein functionally related to mammalian GAP and yeast IRA proteins.Cell63,851-859Google Scholar
60Xu,G.F. et al. (1990)The catalytic domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product stimulates ras GTPase and complements ira mutants of S. cerevisiae.Cell63,835-841Google Scholar
61Daum,G. et al. (1994)The ins and outs of Raf kinases.Trends in Biochemical Sciences19,474-480CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Fu,H.W. andCasey,P.J. (1999)Enzymology and biology of CaaX protein prenylation.Recent Progress in Hormone Research54,315-342; discussion 342–313Google Scholar
63Rubio,I. et al. (1999)Farnesylation of Ras is important for the interaction with phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma.European Journal of Biochemistry266,70-82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Basso,A.D.,Kirschmeier,P. andBishop,W.R. (2006)Lipid posttranslational modifications. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors.Journal of Lipid Research47,15-31Google Scholar
65Roy,S. et al. (2005)Individual palmitoyl residues serve distinct roles in H-ras trafficking, microlocalization, and signaling.Molecular and Cellular Biology25,6722-6733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Wong,W.W. et al. (2002)HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the malignant cell: the statin family of drugs as triggers of tumor-specific apoptosis.Leukemia16,508-519Google Scholar
67Morgan,M.A.,Ganser,A. andReuter,C.W. (2003)Therapeutic efficacy of prenylation inhibitors in the treatment of myeloid leukemia.Leukemia17,1482-1498Google Scholar
68Mendola,C.E. andBacker,J.M. (1990)Lovastatin blocks N-ras oncogene-induced neuronal differentiation.Cell Growth and Differentiation1,499-502Google Scholar
69Sebti,S.M.,Tkalcevic,G.T. andJani,J.P. (1991)Lovastatin, a cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor, inhibits the growth of human H-ras oncogene transformed cells in nude mice.Cancer Communications3,141-147Google Scholar
70Wojtkowiak,J.W. et al. (2008)Induction of apoptosis in neurofibromatosis type 1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines by a combination of novel farnesyl transferase inhibitors and lovastatin.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics326,1-11Google Scholar
71Krab,L.C. et al. (2008)Effect of simvastatin on cognitive functioning in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of the American Medical Association300,287-294Google Scholar
72Sun,J. et al. (1998)Both farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors are required for inhibition of oncogenic K-Ras prenylation but each alone is sufficient to suppress human tumor growth in nude mouse xenografts.Oncogene16,1467-1473Google Scholar
73Rowell,C.A. et al. (1997)Direct demonstration of geranylgeranylation and farnesylation of Ki-Ras in vivo.Journal of Biological Chemistry272,14093-14097Google Scholar
74Yan,N. et al. (1995)Farnesyltransferase inhibitors block the neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) malignant phenotype.Cancer Research55,3569-3575Google ScholarPubMed
75Widemann,B.C. et al. (2006)Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in children with refractory solid tumors or neurofibromatosis type I and plexiform neurofibromas.Journal of Clinical Oncology24,507-516Google Scholar
76Chang,F. et al. (2003)Signal transduction mediated by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway from cytokine receptors to transcription factors: potential targeting for therapeutic intervention.Leukemia17,1263-1293Google Scholar
77Lavoie,J.N. et al. (1996)Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway.Journal of Biological Chemistry271,20608-20616Google Scholar
78Katz,M.E. andMcCormick,F. (1997)Signal transduction from multiple Ras effectors.Current Opinion in Genetics and Development7,75-79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79Rini,B.I. (2007)Sunitinib.Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy8,2359-2369Google Scholar
80Maki,R.G. et al. (2008)Sorafenib Sarcoma Study Group Updated results of a phase II study of oral multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib in sarcomas, CTEP study #7060.Journal of Clinical Oncology26 (May 20 Suppl: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings), Abstract 10531Google Scholar
81Diwakar,G. et al. (2008)Neurofibromin as a regulator of melanocyte development and differentiation.Journal of Cell Science121,167-177Google Scholar
82Dilworth,J.T. et al. (2006)Molecular targets for emerging anti-tumor therapies for neurofibromatosis type 1.Biochemical Pharmacology72,1485-1492Google Scholar
83Johansson,G. et al. (2008)Effective in vivo targeting of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Molecular Cancer Therapeutics7,1237-1245Google Scholar
84Guertin,D.A. andSabatini,D.M. (2005)An expanding role for mTOR in cancer.Trends in Molecular Medicine11,353-361Google Scholar
85LoPiccolo,J. et al. (2008)Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: effective combinations and clinical considerations.Drug Resistance Updates11,32-50Google Scholar
86Zou,C.Y. et al. (2009)Dual targeting of AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin: A potential therapeutic approach for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.Molecular Cancer Therapeutics May 5; [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
87Vezina,C.,Kudelski,A. andSehgal,S.N. (1975)Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. I. Taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle.Journal of Antibiotics28,721-726Google Scholar
88Sabatini,D.M. (2006)mTOR and cancer: insights into a complex relationship.Nature Reviews Cancer6,729-734Google Scholar
89Wan,X. andHelman,L.J. (2007)The biology behind mTOR inhibition in sarcoma.Oncologist12,1007-1018Google Scholar
90Guba,M. et al. (2002)Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor.Nature Medicine8,128-135Google Scholar
91Sun,S.Y. et al. (2005)Activation of Akt and eIF4E survival pathways by rapamycin-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition.Cancer Research65,7052-7058Google Scholar
92Wang,X. et al. (2007)Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin induces phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent and Mnk-mediated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E phosphorylation.Molecular and Cellular Biology27,7405-7413Google Scholar
93Mita,M.M. et al. (2008)Phase I trial of the novel mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor deforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies.Journal of Clinical Oncology26,361-367CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94Chawla,S.P. et al. (2007)Survival results of AP23573, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients with advanced soft tissue or bone sarcomas: update of a phase II trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology25 (June 20 Suppl: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings), Abstract 10076Google Scholar
95Fetterly,G.J. et al. (2008)Pharmacokinetics of oral deforolimus (AP23573, MK-8669).Journal of Clinical Oncology26 (May 20 Suppl: ASCO Annual Meetings Proceedings), Abstract 14555Google Scholar
96 [No authors listed] ClinicalTrials.gov. A pivotal trial to determine the efficacy and safety of AP23573 when administered as maintenance therapy to patients with metastatic soft-tissue or bone sarcomas.http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00538239Google Scholar
97Raynaud,F.I. et al. (2007)Pharmacologic characterization of a potent inhibitor of class I phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases.Cancer Research67,5840-5850Google Scholar
98Gschwind,A.,Fischer,O.M. andUllrich,A. (2004)The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy.Nature Reviews Cancer4,361-370Google Scholar
99Yarden,Y. (2001)The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer. signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.European Journal of Cancer37 (Suppl 4),S3-8Google Scholar
100DeClue,J.E. et al. (2000)Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in neurofibromatosis type 1-related tumors and NF1 animal models.Journal of Clinical Investigation105,1233-1241Google Scholar
101Tawbi,H. et al. (2008)Epidermal growth factor receptor expression and mutational analysis in synovial sarcomas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Oncologist13,459-466Google Scholar
102Albritton,K.H. et al. (2008)Phase II study of erlotinib in metastatic or unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).Journal of Clinical Oncology24 (June 20 Suppl: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings), Abstract 9518Google Scholar
103Li,H. et al. (2002)Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are associated with tumorigenesis in the Nf1:p53 mouse tumor model.Cancer Research62,4507-4513Google ScholarPubMed
104Ling,B.C. et al. (2005)Role for the epidermal growth factor receptor in neurofibromatosis-related peripheral nerve tumorigenesis.Cancer Cell7,65-75Google Scholar
105Holtkamp,N. et al. (2004)Subclassification of nerve sheath tumors by gene expression profiling.Brain Pathology14,258-264Google Scholar
106Keizman,D. et al. (2009)Expression and significance of EGFR in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.Journal of Neuro-Oncology94,383-388Google Scholar
107Raymond,E.,Faivre,S. andArmand,J.P. (2000)Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase as a target for anticancer therapy.Drugs60 (Suppl 1),15-23; discussion 41-12Google Scholar
108Su,W. et al. (2003)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell invasion is facilitated by Src and aberrant CD44 expression.Glia42,350-358Google Scholar
109Mahller,Y.Y. et al. (2007)Oncolytic HSV and erlotinib inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in a novel malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor xenograft model.Molecular Therapy15,279-286Google Scholar
110Herbst,R.S. et al. (2002)Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well-tolerated and has activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors: results of a phase I trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology20,3815-3825Google Scholar
111Benvenuti,S. et al. (2007)Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies.Cancer Research67,2643-2648Google Scholar
112van Zandwijk,N. et al. (2007)EGFR and KRAS mutations as criteria for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: retro- and prospective observations in non-small-cell lung cancer.Annals of Oncology18,99-103Google Scholar
113Perrone,F. et al. (2009)PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Annals of Oncology20,84-90Google Scholar
114Frattini,M. et al. (2007)PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.British Journal of Cancer97,1139-1145Google Scholar
115Geyer,C.E. et al. (2006)Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.New England Journal of Medicine355,2733-2743Google Scholar
116Heldin,C.H. andWestermark,B. (1984)Growth factors: mechanism of action and relation to oncogenes.Cell37,9-20Google Scholar
117Betsholtz,C.,Karlsson,L. andLindahl,P. (2001)Developmental roles of platelet-derived growth factors.Bioessays23,494-507Google Scholar
118Badache,A. andDe Vries,G.H. (1998)Neurofibrosarcoma-derived Schwann cells overexpress platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and are induced to proliferate by PDGF BB.Journal of Cellular Physiology177,334-342Google Scholar
119Holtkamp,N. et al. (2004)Differentially expressed genes in neurofibromatosis 1-associated neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Acta Neuropathologica107,159-168Google Scholar
120Holtkamp,N. et al. (2006)Mutation and expression of PDGFRA and KIT in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and its implications for imatinib sensitivity.Carcinogenesis27,664-671Google Scholar
121Dang,I. andDeVries,G.H. (2005)Schwann cell lines derived from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors respond abnormally to platelet-derived growth factor-BB.Journal of Neuroscience Research79,318-328Google Scholar
122Jones,S.M. andKazlauskas,A. (2000)Connecting signaling and cell cycle progression in growth factor-stimulated cells.Oncogene19,5558-5567Google Scholar
123Aoki,M. et al. (2007)Imatinib mesylate inhibits cell invasion of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor induced by platelet-derived growth factor-BB.Laboratory Investigation87,767-779Google Scholar
124Buchdunger,E. et al. (2000)Abl protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics295,139-145Google Scholar
125Badache,A.,Muja,N. andDe Vries,G.H. (1998)Expression of Kit in neurofibromin-deficient human Schwann cells: role in Schwann cell hyperplasia associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis.Oncogene17,795-800Google Scholar
126Reilly,K.M. andVan Dyke,T. (2008)It takes a (dysfunctional) village to raise a tumor.Cell135,408-410Google Scholar
127Zhu,Y. et al. (2002)Neurofibromas in NF1: Schwann cell origin and role of tumor environment.Science296,920-922Google Scholar
128DuBois,S. andDemetri,G. (2007)Markers of angiogenesis and clinical features in patients with sarcoma.Cancer109,813-819Google Scholar
129Hicklin,D.J. andEllis,L.M. (2005)Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis.Journal of Clinical Oncology23,1011-1027Google Scholar
130Harper,S.J. andBates,D.O. (2008)VEGF-A splicing: the key to anti-angiogenic therapeutics?Nature Reviews Cancer8,880-887Google Scholar
131Wasa,J. et al. (2008)Differential expression of angiogenic factors in peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Clinical and Experimental Metastasis25,819-825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
132Angelov,L. et al. (1999)Inhibition of angiogenesis by blocking activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 leads to decreased growth of neurogenic sarcomas.Cancer Research59,5536-5541Google ScholarPubMed
133D'Adamo,D.R. et al. (2005)Phase II study of doxorubicin and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.Journal of Clinical Oncology23,7135-7142Google Scholar
134Verschraegen,C.F. et al. (2008)Phase I/II study of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology25 (June 20 Suppl: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings), Abstract 10056Google Scholar
135Hensley,M.L. et al. (2002)Gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase II trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology20,2824-2831Google Scholar

Further reading, resources and contacts

Ongoing studies available for MPNST patients are provided as a service of the US National Institutes of Health:

Grobmyer,S.R. et al. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations.Journal of Surgical Oncology97,340-349Google Scholar
Gupta,G.,Mammis,A. andManiker,A. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Neurosurgery Clinics of North America19,533-543Google Scholar
Rubin,J.B. andGutmann,D.H. (2005)Neurofibromatosis type 1 – a model for nervous system tumour formation?Nature Reviews Cancer5,557-564Google Scholar
Gschwind,A.,Fischer,O.M. andUllrich,A. (2004)The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy.Nature Reviews Cancer4,361-370Google Scholar
Sebolt-Leopold,J.S. andHerrera,R. (2004)Targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to treat cancer.Nature Reviews Cancer4,937-947Google Scholar
Sabatini,D.M. (2006)mTOR and cancer: insights into a complex relationship.Nature Reviews Cancer6,729-734Google Scholar
Grobmyer,S.R. et al. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations.Journal of Surgical Oncology97,340-349Google Scholar
Gupta,G.,Mammis,A. andManiker,A. (2008)Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Neurosurgery Clinics of North America19,533-543Google Scholar
Rubin,J.B. andGutmann,D.H. (2005)Neurofibromatosis type 1 – a model for nervous system tumour formation?Nature Reviews Cancer5,557-564Google Scholar
Gschwind,A.,Fischer,O.M. andUllrich,A. (2004)The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy.Nature Reviews Cancer4,361-370Google Scholar
Sebolt-Leopold,J.S. andHerrera,R. (2004)Targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to treat cancer.Nature Reviews Cancer4,937-947Google Scholar
Sabatini,D.M. (2006)mTOR and cancer: insights into a complex relationship.Nature Reviews Cancer6,729-734Google Scholar