Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-bmd9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-30T12:42:18.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura 1. Rudiments of sexual isolation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2009

Lee Ehrman
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller Institute, New York City 21, U.S.A.
Save PDF (0.45 mb)View PDF[Opens in a new window]
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Weak but statistically significant sexual isolation has been demonstrated among Vetukhiv's six experimental populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura, all originally descended from founders taken from cultures of the same hybrids from four geographic localities. These six populations were maintained separately for almost 4½ years and then tested for the existence of sexual isolation. The sexual isolation has arisen in the absence of any selection for isolation, evidently as a by-product of genetic divergence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Barker,J. S. F. (1962).The estimation of generation interval in experimental populations ofDrosophila.Genet. Res.3,388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky,Th. (1947).Adaptive changes induced by natural selection in wild populations ofDrosophila.Evolution,1,1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky,Th. (1958). Species after Darwin.In A Century of Darwin.Barnett,S. A. ed.,Heinemann,London, pp.19–55.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky,Th. &Pavlovsky,O. (1957).An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection.Evolution,11,311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky,Th. &Spassky,N. P. (1962).Genetic drift and natural selection in experimental populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. not. Acad. Sci.,Wash.,48,148–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrman,L. (1962).Hybrid sterility as an isolating mechanism in the GenusDrosophila.Quart. Rev. Biol.37,279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene,H. (1949).A new measure of sexual isolation.Evolution,3,315–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcfarquhar,A. M. &Robertson,F. W. (1963).The lack of evidence for co-adaptation in crosses between geographical races ofDrosophila subobscura Coll.Genet. Res.4,104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalker,H. D. (1942).Sexual isolation studies in the species complexDrosophila virilis.Genetics,27,238–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoday,J. M. &Gibson,J. B. (1952).Isolation by disruptive selection.Nature,Lond.,193,1164–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. (1953).Viability of hybrids between local populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. not. Acad. Sci.,Wash.,39,30–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetukhiv,M. (1954a).Integration of the genotype in local populations of three species ofDrosophila.Evolution,8,241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. (1954b).Heterosis and hybrid breakdown in hybrids between local populations of certain species ofDrosophila.Caryologia, Vol.6 suppl.,760–761.Google Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. (1956a).Fecundity of hybrids between geographic populationsof Drosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution,10,139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. (1956b).Heterosis in hybrids between local populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Suppl. Vol. ofCytologia,394–395.Google Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. (1956C).The longevity of hybrids between local populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Acta genet.6,252–254.Google ScholarPubMed
Vetukhiv,M. (1957).Longevity of hybrids between geographic populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution,11,348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetukhiv,M. &Beardmore,J. A. (1959).Effect of environment upon the manifestation of heterosis and homeostasis inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics,44,759–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace,B. &Vetukhiv,M. (1955).Adaptive integration of the gene pools ofDrosophila populations.Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.20,303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access